3,361 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Write an evergreen teaching longform for non-technical readers built from your own real material (systems you run, dated failures, numbers), structured as a stitched lesson that can live as a blog post, a GitHub guide hub and a newsletter issue. Use when turning lived engineering experience into a durable how-to. Triggers: /guide, make a guide, build a lesson, evergreen guide.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Наполнение пула ИНЖЕНЕРОВ-ТЕСТЕРОВ под миссию №2 из живых issue вендорских и агентных репо (не из крипто-базы leads.db). Триггеры: «/engineer-pool», «/ep», «где брать инженеров», «пул инженеров», «кому давать демо», «инженеров в выборке ноль», «наполни пул тестеров», «engineer pool», а также САМ, когда отчёт очереди touchbase печатает «инженеров из LLM-лабораторий в выборке: 0»
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
After shipping a repo, release or feature, find who on GitHub actually needs it: search issues, discussions and catalogs for the symptom, rank live threads and draft one precise reply per consumer. Use right after any artifact goes public. Triggers: /consumer-hunt, /ch, find consumers, where to submit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
- КРЕДИТ АВТОРУ ИДЕИ: совет из комментария (TG @ClawRus / @ClawInga, комменты под постами Антона в FB, треды и issue на… Триггеры: “/alpha-credit“, “/credit“, “кто нам это посоветовал“, “запиши совет“, “поблагодари советчиков“, “кому мы должны спасибо“, “кредит автору“, “чей это был совет“, “credit the author“
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research any open-source repository end to end and answer the core question — SHOULD YOU contribute to it? — with a GO / NO-GO / GO-IF verdict backed by evidence: snapshot, momentum, contribution landscape (PR acceptance rates, outside-contributor merge rates, first-timer outcomes), issue health, governance, community sentiment, and a final go/no-go recommendation. Use when the user asks 'should I contribute to X', wants a before-I-contribute due-diligence check on a project, asks whether a project accepts outside PRs, wants contribution-health numbers like PR merge rates or stale-PR counts, or asks for a deep dive on an open-source codebase's health and dynamics before investing time in it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit, grade, rewrite, and issue funny evidence-backed tickets for generic AI-slop patterns in prose, social posts, UI/design, and code. Use when asked to de-slop writing, humanize AI copy, grade a draft, review a landing page or generated interface, remove vague claims and repetitive rhetoric, inspect AI-written code for generic abstractions and happy-path-only logic, or ticket someone for a specific quality offense. Do not use to determine whether AI authored something.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operational guide for the ArtCraft MCP integration — the community Python rebuild (C:\Users\rasta\artcraft-mcp-py\artcraft_mcp_server.py) that replaces the broken upstream artcraft-mcp.exe, the live api.storyteller.ai/v1 API map (required headers, cookie auth, endpoint schemas), the upstream bug/PR trail (issues #1/#3, PR #2), the reverse-engineering playbook (browser capture, cookie injection, schema fishing via validation errors, handshake replay, Windows MITM kit), and the generic MCP-protocol debugging playbook (snake_case servers, the shim pattern, 'missing field protocolVersion' diagnosis). Use when working on ArtCraft MCP tools, debugging an artcraft server connection, extending the Python rebuild, or diagnosing any third-party MCP handshake failure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
**MANDATORY for ALL MCP server work** - mcp-use framework best practices and patterns. **READ THIS FIRST** before any MCP server work, including: - Creating new MCP servers - Modifying existing MCP servers (adding/updating tools, resources, prompts, widgets) - Debugging MCP server issues or errors - Reviewing MCP server code for quality, security, or performance - Answering questions about MCP development or mcp-use patterns - Making ANY changes to server.tool(), server.resource(), server.prompt(), or widgets This skill contains critical architecture decisions, security patterns, and common pitfalls. Always consult the relevant reference files BEFORE implementing MCP features.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when diagnosing CopilotKit issues -- runtime connectivity failures, agent not responding, streaming errors, tool execution problems, transcription failures, version mismatches, and AG-UI event tracing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building custom agent backends, implementing the AG-UI protocol, debugging streaming issues, or understanding how agents communicate with frontends. Covers event types, SSE transport, AbstractAgent/HttpAgent patterns, state synchronization, tool calls, and human-in-the-loop flows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sentryのイシューを調査して修正する。リンク・ID・検索でイシューを 特定し、スタックトレース・ブレッドクラム・トレース・ログの全コンテキストを 取得し、根本原因を特定して修正・解決する。
Operational guide for the three recurring NV oOS maintenance tracks: (1) Docs & Release Catch-Up — plan-first per-version docs, changelog, and version-bump passes; (2) Model Catalog & Config Updates — the monthly model-config refresh across the catalog and its derived files; (3) PR Deferred-Item Sweep — review merged/closed PRs for deferred work and file GitHub issues for what is still incomplete. Use when asked to 'catch up docs', 'update the model configs', or 'review the week's PRs for deferred work'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Per-toolkit hardening audit loop for NV oOS Pro tools. Systematically scans each addons/pro/includes/tools/<toolkit> (and its plugins/nvoos-content-graph-pro mirror) for the four recurring production failure classes — unguarded shell calls that fatal on exec-disabled hosts, calls to nonexistent client methods, string-assuming parsing of provider responses that may be arrays, and provider enum/service mismatches — then fixes, tests (Docker PHPUnit), and validates (phpcs both standards) before moving to the next toolkit. Use when asked to audit a toolkit, review the X tools for similar issues, do the same for the other toolkits, or continue the toolkit audit loop. The first case study (document-generation) found 3 fatal bugs + 1 broken regex.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep security audit for WordPress plugin/theme PHP code, covering issues beyond the basic sanitize/escape/nonce checklist — PHP object injection (unserialize), SSRF in remote requests, CSRF on state-changing GET handlers, mass assignment via $_POST loops, insecure file include / template injection, mail header injection, ZipSlip in archive extraction, type-juggling in auth comparisons, and TOCTOU race patterns in option/meta locks. Use after or alongside wp-security-audit when reviewing complex plugins, REST APIs, integrations that fetch remote URLs, file processors, or any code that handles uploads, archives, or self-rolled auth tokens.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits WordPress plugin/theme code for secret-handling and credential issues — hardcoded API keys, DB credentials, or signing secrets in source; weak randomness (rand, mt_rand, uniqid) used for security tokens, password reset links, nonces, or session IDs; password storage with md5/sha1/crypt instead of password_hash; insecure cookie flags (missing Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite) on sensitive cookies; secrets logged via error_log / var_dump in production code paths. Use before plugin release, when reviewing auth/registration/login features, when integrating third-party APIs, or when the user mentions "API key", "token", "session", "password reset".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits WordPress plugin or theme PHP code for internationalization (i18n) correctness — text-domain consistency, use of escaped translation helpers (esc_html__, esc_attr__, esc_html_e), correct placeholder helpers (sprintf with translator comments, _n for plurals, _x for context), no variable text-domains, no concatenation inside __() calls, presence of load_plugin_textdomain or load_theme_textdomain, and matching declared Text Domain in the plugin/theme header. Use before plugin/theme release, when reviewing contributor PRs, when adding new strings, when migrating to a new text domain, or when a translator reports issues with the .pot file.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage the NV oOS Pro Toolkit CRM — leads, deals, companies, contacts, customers, activities, and support tickets. Covers the complete sales pipeline from lead capture through qualification, deal management, and post-conversion customer tracking with BANT/MEDDIC scoring, activity logging, and workflow automation. Use when working with CRM records, managing pipeline stages, qualifying leads, creating company profiles, logging calls/emails/meetings, or troubleshooting CRM data issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete operational guide for the NV oOS (Open Operator System) WordPress plugin in Docker/WSL2 — setup, assistant creation, credential tokens, MCP tool calling, API key auto-detection, env var bridging, common fixes, and IGCSE study configuration. Use when setting up the plugin for the first time, creating assistants programmatically, generating MCP bridge tokens, troubleshooting Docker path issues, bridging API keys, or calling tools via JSON-RPC over HTTP.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code for quality, simplicity, and maintainability. Identifies unnecessary abstractions, duplicated logic, oversized functions, missing error handling, and naming issues — then fixes them automatically before presenting the result.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and implement typography systems for web and brand projects. Covers font pairing, type scales, variable fonts, web font loading strategies (font-display, subsetting), CSS typography best practices, and WordPress theme typography integration. Use when selecting fonts, building type scales, loading web fonts, configuring theme.json typography, or fixing font performance issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a live page for accessibility issues, locate each WCAG violation precisely, and return a selector-grounded fix worklist without editing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to address review or issue comments on an open GitHub Pull Request using the gh CLI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a coding task should be driven end-to-end from issue intake through implementation, review, deployment, and acceptance verification with minimal human re-intervention.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find and fix WCAG 2.2 accessibility issues. Two modes — report (sweep a codebase or page, produce a prioritized written report, no edits) and fix (audit→edit→verify loop on a target). Prefers di
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。