「agent-skills」の検索結果

Ask Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini a question and capture the full trace behind the answer (the search queries each engine ran, the pages it retrieved, and the sources it cited, span by span). Use when asked to "trace an AI answer", "see what AI engines cite", "check AI citations", "which sources does ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini use", "why does the AI recommend X", or for any GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) measurement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One-shot GEO visibility check for a brand using Xpoz. Runs the buyer questions that matter through Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini, and reports where the brand appears, who wins instead, and which surfaces the answers are assembled from. Use when asked to "check my AI visibility", "does ChatGPT recommend us", "GEO audit", "where do we show up in AI answers", or "who wins our category in AI answers".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discovers and invokes agent skills. Use when starting a session or when you need to discover which skill applies to the current task. This is the meta-skill that governs how all other skills are discovered and invoked.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a LiveAvatar integration end-to-end — assesses the user's existing stack, recommends the optimal path, and guides implementation. Use when: (1) Building a new LiveAvatar integration, (2) Adding a real-time avatar to an app or site, (3) Connecting LiveAvatar to an existing AI pipeline, (4) User mentions LiveAvatar, real-time avatar, interactive avatar, conversational avatar, or lip-sync avatar, (5) Deciding between Embed, FULL Mode, and LITE Mode, (6) Migrating from HeyGen Interactive Avatar to LiveAvatar.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Troubleshoot and debug LiveAvatar integration issues. Use when the user's LiveAvatar integration isn't working, the avatar is silent, audio is garbled, sessions fail to start, events aren't received, or they're getting API errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collect and submit developer feedback to the LiveAvatar team. Use when: (1) A LiveAvatar integration is done, working, finished, or complete, (2) The user says "it works", "we're done", "that's it", "ship it", (3) The user is frustrated, stuck, or giving up — "this is broken", "this doesn't work", "I'm stuck", "I give up", "this is frustrating", "I want to report an issue", (4) The user explicitly asks to give feedback, report a bug, file an issue, or share a suggestion about LiveAvatar, (5) You've seen 3+ failed attempts at the same integration step, (6) You just finished writing or generating LiveAvatar integration code for the user.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spin up a working LiveAvatar demo from a curated catalog — clones the reference repo, installs dependencies, provisions the LiveAvatar account, and fills the env file, then hands off the parts only a human can do. Use when: (1) User wants to try, test, see, or demo LiveAvatar, (2) User asks what LiveAvatar demos or examples exist, (3) User wants a sales agent / lead-qualification avatar, (4) User wants a LiveKit agent driving a LiveAvatar avatar, (5) User wants an avatar joining their own LiveKit room, (6) User wants a speech-to-speech avatar, a GPT-Live demo, a language-learning or tutor avatar, a customer-support avatar, a poker coach / game-style avatar, or an avatar with on-screen visuals/overlays, (7) User says "run the LiveAvatar demo", "show me LiveAvatar", "get me started with LiveAvatar", or "clone the LiveAvatar example", (8) User is evaluating LiveAvatar and wants something running before writing their own integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Observe the user's screen via screenpipe, detect repeated research workflows, match them against existing scientific-agent-skills, and draft new skills (or composition recipes that chain existing ones) for the patterns not yet covered. Use when the user asks to analyze their recent work and propose skills based on what they actually do. Requires the screenpipe daemon (https://github.com/screenpipe/screenpipe) running locally on port 3030 — the skill has no other data source and will refuse to run if screenpipe is unreachable. All detection runs locally; only redacted cluster summaries reach the LLM.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for critical thinking, or when the user wants a claim, plan or decision checked for weak spots: "is this right?", "what am I missing?", "poke holes", "sanity check", "devil's advocate", "red team this". Skip for execution-only tasks and wording edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for strategic thinking, or when the user must choose a direction under constraints: "where should we focus?", "how do we win?", "roadmap for next year", "what should we not do?". Ends in explicit bets and risks. Skip for step-by-step implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user describes a problem, decision or stuck situation but names no method: "how should I approach this?", "help me think this through", "we can't decide", "where do I start?". Picks the best-fit thinking method and runs it. Skip for plain execution tasks or when a method is named.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for Six Thinking Hats or de Bono's parallel thinking, or when a decision or idea needs facts, gut feel, risks, benefits and new options kept apart: "look at this from all sides", "full perspective check". Skip for plain factual questions or single-angle hot takes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for lateral thinking, or when ideas feel stuck or incremental: "we've tried everything", "need a surprising angle", "break the pattern", "give me a wild idea that could work". Uses provocations and reframes. Skip for rule lookups or strict logical proofs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for SWOT analysis, or when the user wants to assess where a team, product or company stands: "strengths and weaknesses", "should we enter this market?", "review our position", "competitor comparison". Turns findings into actions. Skip for detailed planning or pure market sizing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for design thinking, or when a product or service problem needs user understanding before solutions: "what do users really need?", "how might we...", "plan a discovery sprint", "validate this concept". Skip when the spec is frozen or the task is code maintenance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for creative thinking, or when the user wants many fresh options before choosing: "give me ideas", "brainstorm names", "other ways to do this", "think outside the box". Diverges first, then picks. Skip when one answer is wanted or the task is pure execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for Fermi estimation, or when a rough number is needed fast: "roughly how many...", "ballpark the cost", "estimate capacity or market size", "is this even feasible?". Decomposes, uses ranges and sanity-checks. Skip when exact data is available or a precise calculation is wanted.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for systems thinking, or when a change may ripple beyond its target: "what are the side effects?", "why does this keep coming back?", "how do these teams or services affect each other?". Maps loops, delays and leverage points. Skip for single-step fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for first principles thinking, or when the user questions an inherited default: "why do we do it this way?", "is this cost really necessary?", "should we copy what competitors do?". Strips analogies and rebuilds from fundamentals. Skip for convention-following checklists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for analytical thinking, or when a question needs breaking down and evidence: "why did metric X drop?", "what drives this?", "break this down", "what data do we need?". Builds a tree, hypotheses and evidence, ends with an answer and key uncertainty. Skip for quick verdicts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for a pre-mortem, or before committing to a plan, launch or migration: "what could go wrong?", "stress test this plan", "how might this fail?", "risks before we ship". Assumes failure, lists causes, ranks them and sets mitigations. Skip for explaining a failure that already happened.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for tradeoff analysis, or when the user must pick between concrete options: "A or B?", "which library should we use?", "build vs buy", "compare these approaches". Scores options on weighted criteria, tests sensitivity and reversibility. Skip for open ideation or single-option reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for ethical thinking, or when a plan could harm or unfairly burden people: "should we do this?", "is this fair?", "privacy or bias risk", "who gets hurt?". Maps stakeholders, harms, power and consent. Skip for legal advice, neutral fact lookups and implementation-only work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for the 5 Whys, or when the user wants the root cause of a failure: "why did this happen?", "this keeps breaking", "write the postmortem", "find the real cause". Asks why repeatedly with evidence at each step, then sets countermeasures. Skip for one-off typos or when the cause is already proven.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。