3,616 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Skill for building with the Astro web framework. Helps create Astro components and pages, configure SSR adapters, set up content collections, deploy static sites, and manage project structure and CLI commands. Use when the user needs to work with Astro, mentions .astro files, asks about static site generation (SSG), islands architecture, content collections, or deploying an Astro project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
学术论文图表生成与设计。输入是实验数据（CSV/表格）、图表草稿、论文方法描述、中文图/表说明、想生成的图形摘要（GA）、或想画流程图时使用。功能包括：matplotlib 绘图（plot）、图表类型推荐（recommend）、英文图/表标题生成（caption）、论文架构图 prompt 生成（architecture）、图形摘要 prompt 生成（abstract）、流程图 prompt 生成（flowchart）、图表规范检查（polish）、概念图/示意图设计（design）。架构图模板覆盖 6 类场景，流程图覆盖 6 类（线性 / 分支 / 并行 / 循环 / 嵌套 / 泳道），图形摘要覆盖 5 类。内置 prompt 工程词汇表与参数化语法。不适用于：正文段落润色（用 academic-writing）、参考文献格式（用 academic-citation）。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
发布后文档更新。读取所有项目文档，与 diff 交叉对照， 更新 README/ARCHITECTURE/CONTRIBUTING/CLAUDE.md 使之匹配已发布内容， 润色 CHANGELOG 语气，清理 TODOS，可选地更新 VERSION。 触发方式：用户说"更新文档"、"文档同步"、"forge-doc-release"，或 forge-ship 之后、PR 合并之前由 forge-dev --full 调度。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architect systems like Fable 5 — deep understanding before design, modular thinking, iterative refinement. Use this skill when starting a new project, designing system architecture, planning a major refactor, or making technology decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a deep architectural analysis or security review requiring extended reasoning. Use for complex architecture decisions, security audits, or when standard analysis is not finding the root cause.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) document for a technical decision. Use when documenting a technical choice, architectural decision, or design decision.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research the codebase to answer a question without making any changes. Use when exploring code, understanding architecture, or investigating how something works.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for any question about a codebase, its architecture, file relationships, or project content — especially when graphify-out/ exists, where the question should be treated as a graphify query first. Turns any input (code, docs, papers, images, videos) into a persistent knowledge graph with god nodes, community detection, and query/path/explain tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a written plan or design doc through a designer's lens before implementation - seven passes over information architecture, interaction states, emotional arc, AI-slop risk, design-system alignment, responsive and accessibility coverage, and unresolved decisions. Each dimension is rated 0-10 with an explicit statement of what would make it a 10, then the plan is edited to get there. Use when a plan has a UI surface and you want the design gaps closed before code is written. Not for auditing a live site.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Frontend UI design, critique, audit, polish. Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, automated anti-pattern detection, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements any user intent, requirement, story, bug fix or change request by producing clean working code artifacts that follow the project's existing architecture, patterns and conventions. Use when the user wants to build, fix, tweak, refactor, add or modify any code, component or feature.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct technical research on technologies and architecture. Use when the user says they would like to do or produce a technical research report
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate PRD, UX, Architecture and Epics specs are complete. Use when the user says "check implementation readiness".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks how code works, wants to understand architecture, trace execution flows, or explore unfamiliar parts of the codebase. Examples: "How does X work?", "What calls this function?", "Show me the auth flow"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
React composition patterns that scale. Use when refactoring components with boolean prop proliferation, building flexible component libraries, or designing reusable APIs. Triggers on tasks involving compound components, render props, context providers, or component architecture. Includes React 19 API changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decompose systems into microservices and apply canonical distributed-systems patterns. Use this skill whenever the user wants to split a monolith into services, design service boundaries, choose between microservices and a modular monolith, implement sagas or the outbox pattern, set up CQRS or event sourcing, configure an API gateway or BFF, add resilience (circuit breakers, retries, timeouts), or implement distributed tracing with OpenTelemetry. Also trigger for distributed transactions, service discovery, event-driven architecture, contract testing with Pact, canary releases, and idempotent consumers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enforce traceability from natural-language intent to machine predicates, final observables, evidence, and owner-readable acceptance. Use when conducting any audit, review, QA pass, parity or compliance check, security assessment, code or architecture review, visual or behavioral comparison, data validation, system verification, completion gate, or claim that an implementation satisfies a human request.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check proposed stack, data flows, cloud choices, and delivery controls against declared enterprise policies, compliance frameworks, and security controls. Trigger at R2/R3 risk classification, before locking architecture decisions, or when the operating profile names a governance pointer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
LLM and cloud cost awareness — model tiering, token budgets, right-sizing, and when a cheaper model suffices. Trigger before finalising any architecture that calls LLMs, before scaling a workload, or when a cost estimate is needed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
JP's signature red-team pass — "how would I break this?" Argue against your own approach before proceeding. Trigger on any high-stakes decision, architecture choice, or before marking work complete.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architecture decisions, trade-off analysis, and ADR authoring. Trigger when a significant technical decision needs to be made, documented, and owned — not when an implementation detail needs a choice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explore open-source GitHub repository source trees via web browsing to analyze and compare feature implementations at the code level. Supports two modes: cross-project comparison and single-project deep dive. Use when evaluating how OSS projects implement a specific feature, choosing architecture patterns, or benchmarking implementation strategies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。