「decision」の検索結果

Use for Six Thinking Hats or de Bono's parallel thinking, or when a decision or idea needs facts, gut feel, risks, benefits and new options kept apart: "look at this from all sides", "full perspective check". Skip for plain factual questions or single-angle hot takes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the domain language in CONTEXT.md and the decisions in docs/adr/. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more testable and AI-navigable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze NFT projects for investment decisions — evaluate fundamentals, identify red flags, assess risk, and provide buy/hold/avoid recommendations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grounds every implementation decision in official documentation. Use when you want authoritative, source-cited code free from outdated patterns. Use when building with any framework or library where correctness matters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high (production, security-sensitive logic, irreversible operations), or any time a confident output would be cheaper to verify now than to debug later.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous agents are AI systems that can independently decompose goals, plan actions, execute tools, and self-correct without constant human guidance. The challenge isn't making them capable - it's making them reliable. Every extra decision multiplies failure probability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

API design principles and decision-making. REST vs GraphQL vs tRPC selection, response formats, versioning, pagination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Marc Andreessen-mode decision and productivity skill. A blunt, market-first operator that pressure-tests ideas, ventures, features, and career bets through Andreessen's actual frameworks — market dominates team and product; the only milestone that matters is product/market fit; bias to build over deliberate. Use when the user says 'andreessen', 'pmarca mode', 'should I build this', 'is there a market', 'are we at product/market fit', 'pmf check', 'pressure-test this idea', 'be brutal about this venture', 'market-first take', or wants a no-disclaimers, no-hedging, confidence-leveled verdict on whether something is worth pursuing. Also provides the 3x5-card + Anti-Todo personal productivity routine. Runs on a fixed anti-sycophancy operating prompt: leads with the strongest counterargument, never validates premises, uses explicit confidence levels, never apologizes for disagreeing. Not for polite brainstorming — this skill exists to tell you the market is dead when it is.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A hybrid memory system that provides persistent, searchable knowledge management for AI agents (Architecture, Patterns, Decisions).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, reviewing, refactoring, or enforcing Angular application architecture with isolated lazy features, eager core/layout, reusable ui/pattern architecture building blocks, one-way dependency graphs, eslint-plugin-boundaries rules, or folder placement decisions. This skill takes precedence over angular-developer when architecture rules conflict with general Angular advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning or upgrading an internal skill/workflow for business operations, especially when turning a messy idea into a structured skill plan, migration plan, acceptance checklist, or packaging decision. Particularly useful for Obsidian knowledge base consolidation, workspace migration, content library cleanup, and integrating multiple workbenches into one operating system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build bilingual, evidence-backed, SIEGER v2 customer intelligence reports for foreign-trade leads. Use when OpenClaw or a sales operator needs claim-level citations, decision gates, an industry-specific analysis lens, a non-fabricated verdict card, and sales angles that require approval before downstream outreach drafting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenClaw-native SIEGER-aligned customer intelligence. Use a structured evidence bundle to produce a bilingual report with claim-level evidence, decision gates, industry-specific analysis, and proposed sales angles that require explicit approval before email drafting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户需要做重大决策、团队存在群体思维、或想将决策权下放到一线时触发此技能。帮助建立知情指挥决策模型，让最有信息的人做最终决定。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当管理者犹豫是否留用"还行但不够出色"的员工、想知道何时该让人离开、或团队中有人离开反而让人松了口气时触发。提供基于"留任测试"的决策框架和体面离职流程。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate trained models and analytical claims against their intended decision, independent evidence, and human-reviewed ground truth. Use when reviewing model performance, analysis conclusions, launch claims, or evaluation reports; use failure diagnosis instead when the main task is locating a known defect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think like Fable 5 — natural, flowing, purposeful reasoning distilled from 4,665 real chain-of-thought traces with mathematical precision. Use this skill EVERY TIME before writing code, making decisions, or taking action.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architect systems like Fable 5 — deep understanding before design, modular thinking, iterative refinement. Use this skill when starting a new project, designing system architecture, planning a major refactor, or making technology decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recall project knowledge, past decisions, failures, and preferences when they can help a coding task. Capture changed files before responding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Models what a competitor will do next and what happens if you respond - best response, equilibrium, and the difference between a rival who optimises perfectly and one who does not. Use before a price change or price war, when a competitor launches something, when deciding whether to match a rival's move, when analysing a market with few players, or when someone asks "what will they do if we do this".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decides how far ahead to plan, what to discount future payoffs by, and which backlog items can be dropped without analysis - using receding-horizon planning, an explicit discount factor, and branch-and-bound pruning against the incumbent. Use when building a roadmap, prioritising a backlog, arguing about short-term versus long-term, setting quarterly or annual plans, or when planning has become an end in itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Separates signal from noise in metrics you cannot observe directly, updating a belief from evidence instead of reacting to the latest reading - Bayesian updates over competing explanations, and a filter that says whether this week's move is real. Use when a metric moves and someone wants to act, when diagnosing why traffic or revenue changed, when a dashboard number contradicts intuition, or when deciding whether a trend is real yet.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Splits scarce time, budget or traffic across competing products, channels, campaigns or variants by treating them as a multi-armed bandit - Thompson sampling over beta posteriors, with optimism for anything not yet tried enough to judge. Use when deciding what to work on next, how to divide a marketing budget, which product to prioritise, whether to kill something that is underperforming, or when picking a winner among test variants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。