4,439 件 ・ 関連度順
Analyze contracts for risks, check completeness, and provide actionable recommendations. Use when a user asks to review a contract, check an agreement for red flags, analyze contract terms, find risky clauses, review an NDA, evaluate a service agreement, or audit employment contract terms. Supports employment contracts, NDAs, service agreements, and vendor contracts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cohere API for enterprise NLP — embeddings, reranking, RAG, and text generation. Use when building RAG pipelines, semantic search, document reranking, or enterprise NLP applications. Command R+ excels at tool use and retrieval-augmented generation; Embed v3 and Rerank 3 are best-in-class for search quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Understand essential business finance — profit margins, unit economics, cash flow, LTV/CAC, and the 4 methods to increase revenue. Use when: analyzing business profitability, making pricing decisions, evaluating SaaS unit economics, financial planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Screen job applications against requirements and score candidates objectively. Use when a user asks to review applications, evaluate candidates, screen resumes, rank applicants, assess qualifications against a job description, shortlist candidates, or build a hiring scorecard.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code architecture for maintainability, catch structural issues before they become debtUse when "Reviewing pull requests with structural changes, Planning refactoring work, Evaluating new feature architecture, Assessing technical debt, Before major releases, When code feels "hard to change", architecture, code-review, refactoring, design-patterns, technical-debt, dependencies, maintainability" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Flagship intra-paper self-consistency forensics: does the paper contradict ITSELF across abstract/intro/tables/body/appendix, and does the method DESCRIBED match the method EVALUATED? Needs no external ground truth — works PDF-only (L0). Runs a deterministic arithmetic pass + a fresh cross-model semantic pass, every finding span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json), reviewer≠adjudicator. Emits consistency-audit.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. Triggers: "consistency audit", "check the paper against itself", "self-consistency", "内部自洽".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end substantive-integrity forensic sweep of a research paper (especially autoresearch / AI-Scientist-style output). Orchestrates the whole pipeline: ingest (arxiv-id | pdf | dir → working dir + pdftotext for L0) → /evidence-ledger (artifact manifest + observability level L0/L1/L2 + span-anchored claims.json) → fan out the integrity auditor skills (consistency, citation, baseline, experiment, presentation, proof-derivation, eval-design — each reads the ledger, emits span-anchored findings) + the zero-verdict-weight AIS writing-style track → advisory memos (/adversarial-case-builder + /novelty-duplication-advisory, no verdict weight) → deterministic tools/adjudicate_findings.py (--ledger REQUIRED) → reviewer-ready Integrity Forensics Report. Cross-model (fresh codex per dimension) and reviewer≠adjudicator: the model proposes findings, the deterministic adjudicator decides the verdict. Observability-aware, detect-only, never an opaque AI-text classifier (a separate zero-weight AIS section lists AI writing-style impressions, never moving the verdict). Triggers: "anti-autoresearch", "integrity audit this paper", "forensic review", "audit a submission", "审一篇投稿的诚信".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architecture Decision Framework workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
antigravity-skill-orchestrator workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs A meta-skill that understands task requirements, dynamically selects appropriate skills, tracks successful skill combinations using agent-memory-mcp, and prevents skill overuse for simple tasks and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
antigravity-skill-orchestrator workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs A meta-skill that understands task requirements, dynamically selects appropriate skills, tracks successful skill combinations using agent-memory-mcp, and prevents skill overuse for simple tasks and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
产品设计 / UX 设计 (产品设计 / UX 设计 (Product Design / UX Design) — 数字产品的用户体验设计：从用户研究 → 信息架构 → 交互设计 → 视觉/UI → 可用性测试 → 设计系统的认知操作系统，面向 UX designer / product designer / interaction designer / UX researcher / design systems engineer / design lead，以及想入行、转岗、服务这行(设计外包、设计工具厂商、研究平台)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **用户中心/研究驱动 (user-centered, 'you are not the user', research before pixels, observe behavior not opinions) ⇄ 商业目标/约束/交付 (business goals, north-star metrics, ship it, designer 服务于产品成功不是个人作品集)**; **设计直觉/品味/craft (taste, aesthetics, 'attractive things work better' — Norman 情感化设计) ⇄ 数据/实验/A-B 测试 (data-driven, metrics, experimentation, 'opinions are not data')**; **用户说的 (stated preference, 访谈里说喜欢) ⇄ 用户做的 (revealed behavior, 行为观察 > 自陈, usability test 看人真实卡在哪)**; **一致性/设计系统/规范 (consistency, design system, Jakob's law 用户带着别处的习惯来, 复用组件) ⇄ 创新/打破模式 (innovation, 该不该破规范)**; **减法/简化 (simplicity, Krug 'Don't Make Me Think', less but better — Dieter Rams) ⇄ 功能丰富/利益相关者塞需求 (feature creep, stakeholder pressure)**; **UX(体验/流程/研究) ⇄ UI(视觉/像素/组件)** 的职责之争, **designer 该不该写代码 (design engineer / 'should designers code')**; (b) 核心工作流 / pipeline (最标准、最易蒸高质量+CLI 化) — Double Diamond (发现 discover → 定义 define → 开发 develop → 交付 deliver) / Design Thinking (共情 empathize → 定义 → 构思 ideate → 原型 prototype → 测试 test) / Design Sprint (Jake Knapp 5 天冲刺); 完整链: 用户研究 (访谈/问卷/可用性测试/卡片分类) → persona / journey map / JTBD → 信息架构 IA + 用户流 user flow → 线框 wireframe (低保真) → 交互/原型 prototype (高保真) → 视觉 UI / 设计系统落地 → 可用性测试 usability testing → handoff 给开发 → 度量迭代 (北极星 / HEART 框架); (c) 工具栈 — 设计/原型 (Figma 绝对主导 / Sketch 衰退 / Adobe XD 已停更 / Framer 高保真+建站 / Penpot 开源 / Principle / ProtoPie 微交互); 协作白板 (FigJam / Miro / Mural); 用户研究 (Maze / UserTesting / Lookback / Dovetail 研究库 / Optimal Workshop 卡片分类树测试 / Hotjar / Microsoft Clarity 热图); 设计系统/交付 (Storybook / 蓝湖(中) / Zeplin / design tokens / Tokens Studio); 度量 (Amplitude / Mixpanel / 北极星指标); AI 新兴 (Figma AI / v0 by Vercel / Galileo AI / Uizard / Cursor 给 design engineer); (d) 知识正典 — Don Norman《The Design of Everyday Things》(affordance/signifier/mapping 圣经)、Steve Krug《Don't Make Me Think》(可用性入门)、Alan Cooper《About Face》《The Inmates Are Running the Asylum》(交互设计/persona 起源)、Jakob Nielsen 10 Usability Heuristics + NN/g 文章库、Jake Knapp《Sprint》、Jeff Gothelf《Lean UX》、Teresa Torres《Continuous Discovery Habits》、Erika Hall《Just Enough Research》、Julie Zhuo《The Making of a Manager》、《Refactoring UI》(Adam Wathan/Steve Schoger)、《Universal Principles of Design》、Laws of UX (Jon Yablonski)、《100 Things Every Designer Needs to Know About People》(Susan Weinschenk)、IDEO/Stanford d.school 设计思维材料; (e) figures/流派 — 认知心理/人因派 (Don Norman 认知科学奠基、Susan Weinschenk 行为心理、Kathryn Whitenton); 可用性工程派 (Jakob Nielsen 启发式/折扣可用性、Steve Krug、Jared Spool UIE); 交互设计/目标导向派 (Alan Cooper goal-directed/persona、Kim Goodwin); 设计思维派 (IDEO Tim Brown、David Kelley d.school); 精益/持续探索派 (Jeff Gothelf Lean UX、Teresa Torres continuous discovery、Marty Cagan《Inspired》产品发现); 设计系统/系统化派 (Brad Frost Atomic Design、Nathan Curtis design tokens、Alla Kholmatova); 视觉/UI craft 派 (Adam Wathan & Steve Schoger Refactoring UI、Dieter Rams 'less but better' 工业设计遗产); 设计领导/职业派 (Julie Zhuo、Aarron Walter 情感化设计、John Maeda); 移动优先 (Luke Wroblewski 'Mobile First'); (f) 行业话术/黑话 — affordance 可供性 / signifier 意符 / mental model 心智模型 / IA 信息架构 / heuristic evaluation 启发式评估 / usability 可用性 / a11y accessibility 无障碍 / WCAG / persona 用户画像 / journey map 用户旅程 / JTBD jobs-to-be-done / north-star metric 北极星 / HEART 框架 / wireframe 线框 / mockup / prototype 原型 / fidelity 保真度 (lo-fi/hi-fi) / design system 设计系统 / design token 设计令牌 / atomic design 原子设计 / component library 组件库 / handoff 交付 / red routes 关键路径 / dark pattern 暗黑模式 / Fitts's law / Hick's law / Jakob's law / Miller 7±2 / progressive disclosure 渐进披露 / above the fold / hamburger menu / skeuomorphism vs flat / micro-interaction / empty state / edge case / happy path / design debt 设计债 / dogfooding / dot voting / affinity mapping 亲和图 / card sorting 卡片分类 / tree testing / A/B test / NPS / SUS (System Usability Scale); (
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess a system for growth bottlenecks. Use when a senior developer needs to evaluate scaling limits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Finds, evaluates, fills, submits, and tracks a candidate's own job applications using a verified resume, evidence-based targeting, secure local profile storage, and browser automation. Use for onboarding or migrating a job-search profile, searching active roles, assessing a posting, applying to an authorized URL or batch, recording outcomes, or reviewing application effectiveness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate proposed repository harness changes with pinned Darwin tools and explicit evidence limits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Exhaustive problem space exploration using the MIT Synthetic Neurobiology "tiling tree" method. Partitions a problem into MECE (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive) subsets recursively via parallel subagents, then evaluates leaf ideas against specified criteria. Use when users say "tiling tree", "tile the solution space", "exhaustively explore approaches to", "what are all the ways to", or request a MECE breakdown of a problem. Requires orchestrating-chat-agents skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assign items to a CLOSED label vocabulary that is too large to put in a prompt — product taxonomies, category hierarchies, tag vocabularies, routing tables, ICD/SIC-style code lists. A cheap model writes the label it thinks the vocabulary would use, and an embedder snaps that writing onto the nearest legal value, so the schema is never transmitted and the output is always in-vocabulary. Use for "classify these into our taxonomy", "tag these against the existing tag list", "map these queries to categories", "the enum is too big to send", or a Literal/enum that hits a provider cap. NOT for a vocabulary that fits in a prompt — structured output measured 0.701 acc@1 there against this pattern's 0.564. NOT for open-ended labelling with no fixed vocabulary, and not for ranked retrieval over documents (bm25).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user explicitly asks to use the informed-patient skill to prepare for a medical appointment, organize symptoms before seeing a doctor, or evaluate the evidence behind a diagnosis or treatment. Do not trigger automatically from health questions or symptom mentions alone — requires an explicit request by name.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decide which model, effort level, and cascade shape each subagent gets, and how to keep improvement loops safe (evaluator-as-selector, stop on regression). Routes on measured cost-per-completed-task rather than per-token price, because a tier's token count varies more by task shape than price varies across tiers. Covers per-model effort semantics, the concision lever, cascade preconditions, context handoff, and watching a subagent fan-out live. Use when choosing a subagent's model or effort, when choosing how to escalate a failed attempt, or when asked which model or effort a task should get. Grounded in a 2026-07 calibration, a 2026-08 coding-cost study, a 2026-09 seeded-bug repair battery, a 2026-10 Haiku 5.5 ladder priced per spawn, and a 2026-10 retry-versus-escalation ladder on 295 SWE-bench Verified tasks; Managed Agents API specifics are operational, not calibrated.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a portable, embedding-free knowledgebase from a set of files and delivers it as a self-contained `.skill` bundle (BM25 index + bundled searcher + query protocol). Use when a user wants to turn uploaded files, a folder, or a corpus into a searchable knowledgebase they can hand to any agent — phrased as "make a knowledgebase", "build a KB skill", "package these docs for retrieval", "create a searchable bundle", or references to a `.skill` KB. The output runs anywhere with Node or Python — no model, no install, no network. Distinct from `bm25` (ephemeral in-session search) and `building-github-index` (markdown project-knowledge index).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement semantic vector search with AgentDB for intelligent document retrieval, similarity matching, and context-aware querying. Use when building RAG systems, semantic search engines, or intelligent knowledge bases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct deep OSINT research on individuals. Build full digital footprint, psychoprofile (MBTI/Big Five), career history, social graph with confidence scores. Recursive self-evaluation until completeness threshold is met. Includes internal intelligence (Telegram history, email, vault contacts) before going external. Use when: "osint", "досье", "research person", "find everything about", "пробей", "разведка", "due diligence", "background check", "digital footprint", "найди всё про", "собери информацию", "кто это", "профиль человека". NOT for: company/product research without a named person, competitive analysis, market research, content generation, or general web scraping tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify, evaluate, and prioritize design opportunities using impact-effort frameworks and strategic criteria.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to plan, evaluate, or build a free tool for marketing purposes — lead generation, SEO value, or brand awareness. Also use when the user mentions "engineering as marketing," "free tool," "marketing tool," "calculator," "generator," "interactive tool," "lead gen tool," "build a tool for leads," "free resource," "ROI calculator," "grader tool," "audit tool," "should I build a free tool," or "tools for lead gen." Use this whenever someone wants to build something useful and give it away to attract leads or earn links. For downloadable content lead magnets (ebooks, checklists, templates), see lead-magnets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits any landing or service page across 48 checks in 10 categories for LLM/AI discoverability, GEO readiness, content clarity, schema markup, internal linking, freshness signals, and technical crawlability. Produces an overall score out of 100, a per-category score out of 100, pass/warn/fail/ manual counts, and a prioritised fix list — all rendered as a standalone HTML report saved to disk. Use when a user provides a URL and asks to audit it, score it, check its GEO readiness, test its AI discoverability, run a landing page audit, or evaluate it for LLM citation potential. Also trigger on phrases like "audit this page", "score this URL", "check GEO for", "is this page AI-ready", "run a GEO audit", "LLM page check", "how would AI read this page", or "landing page score".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。