「iste」の検索結果

Auto-activates when synthesizing outputs from multiple parallel sub-agents to create cohesive, integrated design with consistency checking and conflict resolution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Forensic scan for npm/PyPI supply-chain compromise (Shai-Hulud/TeamPCP campaigns) — checks persistence, hook injection, compromised packages, IOC strings, C2, dead-man switches. Use when auditing a machine or repo for malicious dependencies. Trigger on "supply chain audit", "check for compromised packages", "Shai-Hulud", "scan for malicious deps".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query, update, and audit the registry of all Claude Code components (skills, agents, rules, hooks, plugins) with PDCA lifecycle tracking. Use when listing/inspecting components, finding stale ones, or registering new ones. Trigger on "list skills", "component registry", "what skills exist", "stale skills", "/registry".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert a working prototype or ad-hoc solution into a permanent, tested, registered skill. Run after something works and you want it to stick.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze an existing codebase in parallel via 7 specialized mapper subagents. Outputs structured findings to docs/codebase/ for persistent cross-session context. Use when onboarding to a brownfield project or when reactive on-demand file reading is too slow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mergt één pull request of een reeks achter elkaar op main, met bijwerken zonder handtekeningverlies, wachten op de juiste checks, en controleren dat de uitrol geslaagd is. Gebruik dit bij "merge PR N", "laat de trein rijden" of het wegwerken van een stapel mergebare PR's.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and audits a concept-ontology for a regelrecht corpus to decide and verify reference types — cross-law source-binding vs intra-law source-binding vs open-norm leaf vs external-fact leaf — and to catch concept conflation across laws. Core principle: a value's reference type is fixed by WHO derives it, and a binding is sound only when producer and consumer denote the SAME concept; the lexical surface (the word in the text) is not the concept. Detects false friends (one term, different concepts — e.g. a register-based vs a factual "naar de omstandigheden"-based residence/ingezetene concept), orphan plain-params (a value a regulation actually derives, modeled as a brute input), negation/complement re-entry (¬X modeled as an independent leaf next to X), and duplication (one concept re-entered as several independent leafs, losing the single-source-of-truth invariant). Produces a law-level glossary and a stelsel-level concept map with sound same-concept binding edges and flagged lexical-match-but-concept-mismatch edges. Use when deciding whether a value should be cross-law/intra-law/leaf, when the same term means different things across laws, or when a binding might silently conflate concepts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Voegt een proof-of-concept toe aan het poc-portaal op poc.regelrecht.rijks.app — register-entry, map-indeling, de subpad-aanpassingen die een losse app nodig heeft om onder /<slug>/ te draaien, en de bedrading in de deploy. Gebruik dit bij "voeg poc X toe", het verhuizen van een losse PoC-repo naar de monorepo, of het aanpassen van status en voorbehoud van een bestaande poc.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a Go design spec before implementation begins - dispatch a subagent that checks a design doc for completeness, consistency, and idiomatic Go (simplicity, small consumer-defined interfaces, explicit wrapped errors, context propagation). Use when a user has a Go spec to review, asks "is this spec ready?", or is about to implement from a written design. Distilled from spf13/go-skills and adapted to this repo's conventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft or restructure research-paper sections, refine local prose, and audit manuscript-wide consistency. Use for evidence-grounded academic writing and revision, not independent acceptance-risk review or official rebuttal management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit data quality across six DAMA DMBOK dimensions — Completeness, Accuracy, Consistency, Timeliness, Validity, Uniqueness. Produces a scored data quality report with issue log and remediation plan. Use when profiling datasets, onboarding new data sources, or building data quality gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review REST and GraphQL API designs for consistency, usability, and best practices. Covers naming conventions, versioning strategy, error format, pagination, authentication patterns, and breaking change detection. Use when reviewing API specs, designing new APIs, or auditing existing endpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Publish HTML frontend projects to the PushWebly publishing platform, list published projects, obtain shareable project URLs, change a published app's public/private visibility, and package published HTML projects into Android APKs. Use when Codex needs to publish a local zip project, publish and build an APK, build an APK for an existing published project, toggle an app between public and private, list a user's published projects, or log in/register for this publishing platform. Codex should use HTTP APIs with curl when remote MCP tools are not mounted.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Publish HTML frontend projects to the PushWebly publishing platform, list published projects, obtain shareable project URLs, change a published app's public/private visibility, and package published HTML projects into Android APKs. Use when Codex needs to publish a local zip project, publish and build an APK, build an APK for an existing published project, toggle an app between public and private, list a user's published projects, or log in/register for this publishing platform. Codex should use HTTP APIs with curl when remote MCP tools are not mounted.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authorized exploit development and vulnerability research skill for lab environments, CTFs, owned software, crash analysis, memory corruption, exploitability assessment, fuzzing results, proof-of-concept design, and remediation. Use for defensive validation and education; avoid real-world weaponization, stealth, persistence, evasion, or unauthorized targets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assembly programming and low-level debugging skill for reading, writing, explaining, optimizing, and reviewing assembly across x86, x86-64, ARM, AArch64, RISC-V, calling conventions, ABI boundaries, inline assembly, disassembly, stack frames, registers, and binary-level behavior. Use for .s/.asm files, compiler output, reverse-engineering snippets, low-level performance, and crash analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multilingual communication, translation, localization, and language quality skill for translating, rewriting, localizing, summarizing, tone-matching, and reviewing content across languages. Use for multi-language prompts, UI strings, documentation, cultural adaptation, terminology consistency, bilingual output, language detection, and Indonesian/English or other cross-language workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure, diagnose, or optimize the persistent OpenClaw fleet, native CLI routing, skill loading, run evidence, and context recovery. Use for orchestration operations; product implementation uses its own relevant skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate and review GO-CAM (Gene Ontology Causal Activity Model) activities / annotons — molecular-function typing, has-input, causal relations, complexes, evidence — and check their consistency with gene annotation reviews. Use when reviewing cached GO-CAMs under gocams/, filling a GoCamReview YAML (gocams/<id>/<id>-review.yaml), or grounding a module in GO-CAM models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Health-check a persistent markdown wiki. Use this when the user wants to find orphan notes, dangling links, missing pages, graph gaps, contradictions to review, or general wiki maintenance opportunities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and maintain a persistent, interlinked markdown wiki (second brain / research notebook / personal knowledge base) from raw sources. Use this skill when the user wants to ingest an article / paper / note / URL / PDF into their wiki, ask a question against their wiki, lint/health-check their wiki, or set up a new wiki from a folder. Triggers include phrases like "add this to my wiki", "ingest this", "file this article", "update my notes with this", "what does my wiki say about X", "health-check my wiki", "find stale/orphan pages", or any workflow involving a `raw/` source folder, `wiki/` markdown folder, `index.md`, or `log.md`. Compatible with Obsidian vaults.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ingest one new source into an existing persistent markdown wiki or established vault workflow. Use this when the user asks to add an article, PDF, note, URL, transcript, or other source into their wiki and wants the source filed, linked, indexed, and logged. If the wiki workflow does not exist yet, use $wiki-bootstrap first. This skill is for the ingest operation only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bootstrap a markdown workspace into a durable wiki structure. Use this when the user wants to initialize a wiki from an empty folder or convert an existing pile of notes into a more structured persistent wiki.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer questions against a persistent markdown wiki and optionally file the answer back into the wiki. Use this when the user asks what their wiki says about a topic, wants a comparison across notes, or wants citations grounded in the wiki.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。