「plugin」の検索結果

Audit and maintain the learnings in `docs/solutions/` against the current codebase — fix drifted paths and links, merge overlapping docs, replace guidance the code no longer supports, delete obsolete docs, reconcile the `CONCEPTS.md` glossary, then report and commit. Also bootstraps `CONCEPTS.md` on request and, when asked, culls docs whose reasoning the code already explains. Use for "refresh the learnings", "audit docs/solutions", "are our solution docs still accurate", "clean up / prune the learnings", "create a CONCEPTS.md", or after a refactor, rename, migration, or dependency upgrade that likely invalidated documented solutions. Not for capturing a new learning — use `learn-with-docs`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply these opinionated React conventions when writing React 18+ or 19 components: hooks patterns, Server Components, Suspense boundaries, state management, performance memoization, React 19 features (use, form actions).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolve CodeRabbit review feedback on a GitHub pull request. Collects every open CodeRabbit finding (inline threads, plus the nitpick and outside-diff findings packed into review bodies), judges and fixes each one against the real code with subagents, unifies fixes that share a pattern, commits locally, asks before pushing, then shows every reply draft linked to its finding and posts only on approval. Runs only on top-tier models. Use on "resolve the CodeRabbit feedback", "address coderabbit comments", "answer the rabbit", "fix what CodeRabbit flagged on

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply these opinionated Next.js conventions whenever writing or reviewing App Router code (14+): Server Components by default, where the 'use client' boundary belongs, the caching defaults that changed in Next 15, tag-based revalidation, treating Server Actions as public endpoints, the Metadata API, and next/image and next/font.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use after drafting to make copy sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's "Signs of AI writing" guide.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply these opinionated TypeScript conventions whenever writing or reviewing TypeScript: branded types for domain modeling, discriminated unions for state, `satisfies` over `as`, const objects instead of enums, type-only imports, and the strict tsconfig baseline beyond `strict: true`. Also use for monorepo project references and incremental build setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply these opinionated JavaScript conventions whenever writing or reviewing JS or Node: ESM-first packaging, choosing between Promise combinators, error handling that doesn't swallow failures, AbortController for cancellation, keeping the event loop unblocked, and reaching for platform APIs before dependencies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS invoke for any task involving docstrings, JSDoc/TSDoc, or REST API documentation — even when the request seems handleable without it. Enforces Microsoft contract-first conventions and a bare-minimum rule that Claude won't apply by default: never restate the signature, drop @param/@returns that only echo names and types, always document @throws, and document data shapes as WHAT not WHY. Covers Python docstring styles (Google/NumPy/Sphinx), TSDoc tags and @inheritDoc, and API doc patterns for NestJS/Express/FastAPI/Django. Trigger on: adding or auditing docstrings, redundant or missing tags, deleting comment rot, or producing a documentation-health report. Do not skip for documentation tasks — consistent conventions are the whole point.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft the QA scope and plain-language Given/When/Then test scenarios for a Jira ticket, built from the full ticket, the decisions made in its comments, and the actual code change read commit by commit (open PR, the ticket's merged PR, the branch against its base, or a named commit range). Saves a Markdown draft under docs/, iterates with the user, then posts it to the ticket as a new Jira comment only after explicit approval. Use on "QA scope for PROJ-123", "what should QA test", "write test scenarios for QA", "hand this ticket to QA", "prep the QA handoff", "gherkin scenarios for this ticket", or when a branch is ready for manual testing — even when the user only names the ticket or says "this branch".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture a solved, verified problem as a durable learning in `docs/solutions/` so the next agent or engineer does not repeat the mistake or redo the investigation, and keep the `CONCEPTS.md` glossary in step. Use after a fix, debugging session, or design decision whose reasoning is not readable from the final code, tests, or existing docs — "document this", "write up what we learned", "capture this learning", "add it to solutions", "that worked, save it for next time". Writes nothing for routine fixes the code already explains. For auditing or cleaning up existing learnings, use `learn-with-docs-refresh`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Opinionated house conventions for NestJS backends — module boundaries and layering, provider wiring and injection scopes, guards/interceptors/pipes/filters, DTOs and validation, domain exceptions, config, and the Nest 11 / Express 5 behaviour that compiles cleanly and fails at runtime. Use whenever the code is NestJS (`@nestjs/*` in package.json, or `@Module`/`@Injectable`/`@Controller`/`@Cron` in the file), including when the question sounds like plain TypeScript, an OOP refactor, a code review, or an ops problem — the Nest-specific answer differs from the generic one. Typical asks: scaffolding a module, adding a controller, provider, or endpoint, wiring an enhancer, a boot-time DI or circular-import failure, a response leaking entity fields despite `@Exclude()`, a cron job firing on every replica, upgrading NestJS, or reviewing a Nest diff. Not for plain Express or Fastify, Angular, frontend, SQL, or CI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply these opinionated .NET 8 architecture conventions whenever structuring or reviewing a backend service: clean architecture layering and which direction dependencies point, when CQRS with MediatR is worth it, cross-cutting concerns as pipeline behaviours, minimal APIs grouped by feature, keeping DbContext in Infrastructure, health checks and structured logging, WebApplicationFactory integration tests, and when AOT pays off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Appwrite Go SDK skill. Use when building server-side Go applications with Appwrite. Covers user management, database/table CRUD, file storage, and functions via API keys. Uses per-service packages and functional options pattern.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Appwrite .NET SDK skill. Use when building server-side C# or .NET applications with Appwrite, including ASP.NET and Blazor integrations. Covers user management, database/table CRUD, file storage, and functions via API keys.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Appwrite Dart SDK skill. Use when building Flutter apps (mobile, web, desktop) or server-side Dart applications with Appwrite. Covers client-side auth (email, OAuth), database queries, file uploads with native file handling, real-time subscriptions, and server-side admin via API keys for user management, database administration, storage, and functions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Appwrite Rust SDK skill. Use when building server-side Rust applications with Appwrite. Covers async client setup with API keys, user management, TablesDB database/table/row operations, file storage, function executions, permissions, queries, and error handling. Uses the crates.io `appwrite` package and Tokio.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Appwrite Swift SDK skill. Use when building native iOS, macOS, watchOS, or tvOS apps, or server-side Swift applications with Appwrite. Covers client-side auth (email, OAuth), database queries, file uploads, real-time subscriptions with async/await, and server-side admin via API keys for user management, database administration, storage, and functions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Appwrite TypeScript SDK skill. Use when building browser-based JavaScript/TypeScript apps, React Native mobile apps, or server-side Node.js/Deno backends with Appwrite. Covers client-side auth (email, OAuth, anonymous), database queries, file uploads, real-time subscriptions, and server-side admin via API keys for user management, database administration, storage, and functions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Appwrite Ruby SDK skill. Use when building server-side Ruby applications with Appwrite, including Rails and Sinatra integrations. Covers user management, database/table CRUD, file storage, and functions via API keys.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Appwrite Kotlin SDK skill. Use when building native Android apps or server-side Kotlin/JVM backends with Appwrite. Covers client-side auth (email, OAuth with Activity integration), database queries, file uploads, real-time subscriptions with coroutine support, and server-side admin via API keys for user management, database administration, storage, and functions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Appwrite Python SDK skill. Use when building server-side Python applications with Appwrite, including Django, Flask, and FastAPI integrations. Covers user management, database/table CRUD, file storage, and functions via API keys.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Appwrite CLI skill. Use when managing Appwrite projects from the command line. Covers installation, login, project initialization, multi-file project configuration, deploying functions/sites/tables/buckets/teams/webhooks/topics, flag-based list queries, non-interactive CI/CD mode, and generating type-safe SDKs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Appwrite PHP SDK skill. Use when building server-side PHP applications with Appwrite, including Laravel and Symfony integrations. Covers user management, database/table CRUD, file storage, and functions via API keys.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep behavioral security audit for AI agent skills and MCP tools. Performs deterministic static analysis (AST + Semgrep + 15 specialized scanners), cryptographic lockfile generation, and optional LLM-powered intent analysis. Use when installing, reviewing, or approving any skill, tool, plugin, or MCP server — especially before first use. Replaces basic safety summaries with full CWE-mapped, OWASP-tagged, line-referenced security reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。