「then」の検索結果

Discover prospect companies from a structured OpenClaw search brief, including public search and user-authorized data sources, then output a conservative candidate list ready for lead screening.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find the first batch of foreign-trade prospect companies from public web, LinkedIn, and user-authorized data sources such as customs exports, trade show lists, association directories, CRM/Excel files, or historical customer data, then output a conservative, structured candidate list ready for lead screening.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add Wasp's built-in features to your app: auth, email, jobs, and more. These are full-stack, batteries-included features that Wasp handles for you. Use when the user wants to add meta tags, authentication (email, social auth providers), email sending, database setup, styling (tailwind, shadcn), or other Wasp-powered functionality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pure API reference for reddapi.dev - authentication, all endpoints (vector search, semantic search, trends, subreddit lookup), request parameters, response schemas, and error codes, with no research-workflow framing. Use when the user wants raw endpoint documentation, is debugging a reddapi.dev integration, needs exact request/response field names, or asks for 'reddapi API reference', 'reddapi.dev endpoints', or 'reddapi error codes'. For guided research workflows and query playbooks, see reddit-research. For B2B lead scoring, see reddit-leads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review application and infrastructure changes for exploitable security risks by tracing assets, trust boundaries, attacker-controlled input, authorization, sensitive data, and dangerous sinks. Use for security reviews, threat-focused PR reviews, authentication or authorization changes, input handling, secrets, dependencies, and infrastructure permissions; do not use to exploit live systems or modify code unless separately requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Learns a user's personal writing and speaking style through interactive writing prompts, then generates a reusable voice profile. Use when the user says "learn my writing style," "write like me," "capture my voice," "voice calibration," "mimic my tone," "my writing style," or wants AI to match their personal communication style. Also activates when a .voice-profile.md file exists and the user asks you to write something in their voice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a vague "what should we do about X" into a scored decision - explicit actions, an explicit unknown, an explicit prior, and one utility scale - then picks by maximum expected utility and checks the result for framing effects. Use when facing a choice between options under uncertainty, when a decision has stalled in circular debate, when someone asks "should we do A or B", or before writing any decision record, strategy memo, or roadmap commitment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review changed code for YAGNI, removable over-complexity, reuse, code quality, and efficiency, then apply worthwhile simplifications. Use when the user asks to simplify, clean up, tighten, de-hack recent changes, identify logic that can be dropped, or review whether added safeguards and edge-case handling are actually needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review local git changes before opening a PR or merging. First review all local tracked and untracked files; if none exist, review the current branch against a requested base branch or the Git Town parent branch. Use zero to three review subagents only when risk, diff size, language specificity, or uncertainty justifies the token cost, then report high-confidence bugs, regressions, risky assumptions, and missing tests. Use when the user asks for code review, local review, branch sanity check, pre-PR review, or review of work-in-progress changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Push the current branch and all tags to origin, then create a GitHub release using the latest tag and its CHANGELOG.md entry. Use after tag-version to complete a release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当对方先提大要求被拒后立刻换成小要求，用户感到"占了便宜"或"谈成了好交易"时激活。用于识别拒绝-后撤策略的操控并制定防御。 不适用于: 正常的讨价还价、双方诚意的逐步让步、纯信息查询。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep enrichment for community-sourced enterprise PROSPECTS (the 🎯 Prospective enterprise customers subsection). For each prospect, resolve their LinkedIn from their GitHub self-linked accounts FIRST (search only if none is self-linked), verify the employer matches, capture their full name, then list the company website + company size (ARR / latest funding round / employee count). Runs as a general-purpose subagent (many web searches) so the orchestrator's context stays small. Invoked by weekly-report (enterprise section) and the enterprise skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate the ≤10-minute Loom walkthrough script for a completed Weekly Community Signal report — a plain spoken briefing that dives straight into what the team needs to know, walking the report top to bottom (CopilotKit page first, then AG-UI in the same order). Straightforward and factual, NOT a radio show or a performance; no hype opener, no blame framing. Runs after every report (invoked by weekly-report) and on "loom script", "walkthrough script", "record the loom", "narrate the report".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

After a weekly report is built, diff it against the PRIOR report to find items that appear in BOTH weeks, then print the Owner (and prospect "Passed to") value recorded last week so it can be carried forward. Print-only — never edits the owner fields; Nathan verifies and re-tags in Notion. Invoked by weekly-report near the end, and standalone on "carry forward owners", "who owned this last week", "owner continuity".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate beautiful, on-brand HTML artifacts — reports, diagrams, diff reviews, slide decks, plans, recaps, dashboards. Loads on creation intents ("create a plan", "make me an implementation plan", "generate a diagram", "build a slide deck", "draft a recap", "visualize this", "render this as HTML", "make me a status update") and exploration intents ("show me three layouts", "explore document shapes", "compare visual treatments", "explore a new design system", "compare replacement brand directions") and iteration intents ("make this beautiful", "polish this report", "make this less generic", "design this", "theme this", "use my brand", "iterate on this design", "review this artifact", "make this bolder", "make this quieter", "simplify this design", "animate this", "improve the look of", "give this a refresh"). Captures brand from the user's codebase, asking, or live site, then applies it to every artifact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Access Frigate NVR cameras with session-based authentication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stack an existing or new git branch on top of another branch, restacking it in a git worktree when needed, then align the GitHub PR bases and stack metadata with `gh stack`. Use when invoked as `$git-stack` or when the user asks to stack or restack a branch or PR onto another branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, switch to, or delete a git worktree under ~/.worktrees/<path-key>/<branch>, then rebase the agent session onto that directory. Use when asked to make, enter, or remove a worktree for a branch, when work needs an isolated checkout, or when invoked as /git:worktree.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate and fix failing CI. Takes a PR reference, one or more CI run/job URLs, or freeform text describing where the failures are, then enumerates failing workflows/jobs/steps, determines the root cause (often one shared cause behind several red checks), proposes a fix plan, applies code changes, commits, pushes, watches the new runs, and repeats until checks pass. Use when the user says "fix CI", "CI is red", "checks are failing", "the build is broken on my PR", "fix the failing jobs", or pastes a failing CI run URL. Do NOT use for authoring new workflows, or for read-only diagnosis with no fix intent — use gha-log-reader for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a written plan or design doc through a designer's lens before implementation - seven passes over information architecture, interaction states, emotional arc, AI-slop risk, design-system alignment, responsive and accessibility coverage, and unresolved decisions. Each dimension is rated 0-10 with an explicit statement of what would make it a 10, then the plan is edited to get there. Use when a plan has a UI surface and you want the design gaps closed before code is written. Not for auditing a live site.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conception pipeline for Codex. Equivalent to the repository's Claude skill: detect epic/task/bug mode, then delegate to the existing repo agents and workflows. Usage: /analyse [<issue#>] [<description>]

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics. Use when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications, or when any design skill requires project context. Call with 'craft' to run the full shape-then-build flow, or 'teach' for design context setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan the UX and UI for a feature before writing code. Runs a structured discovery interview, then produces a design brief that guides implementation. Use during the planning phase to establish design direction, constraints, and strategy before any code is written.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。