4,998 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Tools are how AI agents interact with the world. A well-designed tool is the difference between an agent that works and one that hallucinates, fails silently, or costs 10x more tokens than necessary. This skill covers tool design from schema to error handling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze and optimize tweets for maximum reach using Twitter's open-source algorithm insights. Rewrite and edit user tweets to improve engagement and visibility based on how the recommendation system ranks content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs deep architectural analysis of a specified module, directory, or feature area by examining structural coupling, data flow, concurrency patterns, risk, and SOLID alignment. Use when the user wants to assess, evaluate, or review the architecture, design quality, dependency structure, coupling, cohesion, or technical debt of an existing part of the codebase. Not for investigating specific bugs, runtime errors, or failures — use investigate. Not for test planning — use automated-test-planning. Not for file-level code review — use code-review. Not for researching open-ended options, prior art, or how something works — use research. Not for designing a new interface or contract — use design-an-api. Not for planning the change its findings imply — use plan-a-change. Not for discovering bounded contexts, ubiquitous language, or where code boundaries diverge from domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis. Not for writing documentation or architectural decision records.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a feature implementation plan from an existing feature specification (or equivalent context) through a facilitated team conversation. Use when the user wants to plan how to implement, build, deliver, or ship a feature that has already been specified. Does not specify what the feature should do — use plan-a-feature first. Does not design the contract for an interface — use design-an-api. Does not refine or stress-test an already-written plan — use iterative-plan-review. Runs its resolution rounds to completion and holds its questions until after they finish; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces a human-readable, progressive-disclosure overview of unfamiliar code or a pull request's changes — why it exists (the real problem it solves or goal it serves for the business or a user), and from there what it does, how it flows, and where to start — so you can get up to speed before working on or reviewing it. Use when you want to understand, get oriented in, make sense of, explain, or get up to speed on a chunk of code, a file, a directory, a symbol, or a PR's changes. Writes the overview to a scratch file and changes no code. Does not review code quality or raise findings — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting them. Does not produce durable feature or system documentation — use project-documentation. Does not assess architecture or structural risk — use architectural-analysis. Does not diagnose bugs or root-cause failures — use investigate. Does not pace a person through the code one step at a time in conversation — use code-walkthrough.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates and maintains project documentation for features, systems, and components. Use when documenting how a feature, system, or component works — including writing, updating, or organizing docs. Does not scan or detect the project's technology stack — use project-discovery for repository analysis and config detection. Does not create architectural decision records — use architectural-decision-record for ADRs. Does not create or update coding standards — use coding-standard instead. Does not generate PR descriptions — use update-pr-description for that. Does not produce runbooks for operational scenarios — use runbook for that. Does not rewrite existing prose for readability — use edit-for-readability for that. Does not produce an ephemeral, understand-now overview of code or a PR — use code-overview for that.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evidence-based investigation of issues, bugs, API calls, integrations, and other aspects of software development that need a deep dive to find the root cause and solutions. Use when you need to debug, troubleshoot, diagnose, or figure out why something is broken. Does not review code for quality or style — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting review feedback to GitHub. Does not assess architectural health or structural risk — use architectural-analysis for architectural concerns. Does not research open-ended options, prior art, or how something works when nothing is broken — use research for that. Does not plan the structural change a root cause calls for — use plan-a-change. Does not map bounded contexts or domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback for that.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Educator peer review management for Canvas LMS. Tracks completion rates, analyzes comment quality, flags problematic reviews, sends targeted reminders, and generates instructor-ready reports. Trigger phrases include "peer review status", "how are peer reviews going", "who hasn't reviewed", "review quality", or any peer review follow-up task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Student weekly assignment planner for Canvas LMS. Shows all due dates, submission status, grades, and peer reviews across all courses. Use when a student says "what's due", "plan my week", "weekly check", or wants to organize their coursework.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Legacy v1 (voiceover-led, GSAP + HyperFrames). Use when making, directing or rescuing a product launch video, promo, teaser, demo reel, sizzle, feature-announcement film or animated product explainer built from code — and when an existing one looks basic, reads as a slideshow, has reveals that miss the voiceover, an invisible cursor, an inaudible sound effect, a clipped or too-quiet mix, or every video coming out looking the same. Covers SaaS, apps, hardware, e-commerce, dev tools, services. Keywords include motion design, storyboard, voiceover sync, kinetic typography, GSAP, HyperFrames, Remotion, film grain, LUFS, ffmpeg.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interact with Hacker News (news.ycombinator.com) — browse top, new, and best stories, read item details and comment threads, look up user profiles, and search posts via Algolia. Use this skill whenever the user mentions Hacker News, HN, YCombinator news, ycombinator.com, news.ycombinator.com, wants to browse tech news, read HN discussions, search HN posts, or look up HN users. Also trigger when the user pastes an HN URL (e.g. news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12345). Keywords: Hacker News, HN, YC, ycombinator, tech news, Show HN, Ask HN, HN front page.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create original short videos using the 炫技预期反转｜高调费力铺垫、安静难动作与社交重排 Creative DNA for MiniMax H3 or Seedance 2.0. Use when the user wants this causal, camera, motion, rhythm, or payoff structure with new subjects and surfaces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit, design, categorize, distribute, and measure agent skills using lessons from Anthropic's Lessons from building Claude Code: How we use skills. Use when reviewing an existing skill, deciding whether a workflow deserves a skill, planning a skill library, turning team knowledge into skills, choosing skill categories, writing trigger descriptions, designing progressive disclosure, or planning skill marketplace and usage measurement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evidence-driven architecture research for understanding real systems and making technical decisions. Use when doing architecture landscape studies, source-backed system archaeology, build-vs-buy or adopt/adapt/build decisions, open-source and commercial comparisons, revisiting an earlier architecture choice, or handling requests such as 架构调研, 架构选型, 竞品架构, 技术尽调, 同类方案, 开源替代, how is X built, and what should we learn from X. Do not use for small mechanical changes, market-only discovery, or detailed design after the technology direction is already fixed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies the reasoning, principles, and frameworks of Andrew Ng (machine learning pioneer, co-founder of Coursera and DeepLearning.AI, Stanford University, and former Google Brain lead). Use this skill whenever the user is navigating AI application development, agentic workflows, automation strategy, AI-native software engineering, or rapid prototyping. Trigger this skill when discussing career advice in the AI era, evaluating AI regulations, structuring machine learning projects, or deciding how to integrate AI into a business. It emphasizes task-based automation, data-centric ML, and driving the cost of proof-of-concepts to zero.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies the reasoning of David Silver, lead researcher on AlphaGo and AlphaZero at DeepMind, to problems of AI design, reinforcement learning, and open-ended discovery. Use this skill whenever you are designing AI systems, evaluating learning algorithms, balancing exploration vs. exploitation, choosing research problems, or discussing how to break past human performance ceilings. Reach for this whenever the user asks about self-play, Monte-Carlo Tree Search, tabula rasa learning, AGI, or moving from human-curated data to autonomous experience. It helps shift the focus from hardcoding human knowledge to building systems that learn for themselves.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Processes Drafts Pro captures from the Inbox folder. Classifies by intent, shows preview for approval, routes to Ready as tasks. Use when triaging captures, processing mobile notes, or as part of daily review. Triggers on "triage captures", "process captures", "check my captures".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define go-to-market strategy including launch plan, messaging, channels, and timing during PRD v0.9 Go-to-Market. Triggers on requests to plan launch, define GTM strategy, or when user asks "how do we launch?", "go-to-market", "launch plan", "marketing strategy", "messaging", "launch channels", "GTM". Outputs GTM- entries with launch plan components.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research-first content creation optimized for both human readers and AI search engines (Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini). Creates authentic, authoritative content that becomes the go-to citation source for AI models answering user questions. Use this skill when: - Creating content that should appear in AI search results (Perplexity, ChatGPT, Claude) - Building topical authority to become THE source AI cites for a topic - Launching a new product and need compelling, citable content - Creating blog posts, articles, social media, or press releases - Need content that references real trends, people, and recent events - Want AI-assisted content that doesn't sound AI-generated - Creating thought leadership content in any industry Triggers: "create content for", "write about", "research and write", "find experts for", "content for launch", "blog post about", "article on", "press release for", "AI search", "show up in AI", "Perplexity", "be cited by AI"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze web page content, structure, and layout to understand what a page contains and how it is organized. Trigger when the user asks to: analyze a page, understand page structure, inspect a website, summarize page content, examine page layout, review a web page, or describe what is on a page.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write or update the CLI `--help` text and README section for a new or changed rezolus feature (a subcommand, flag, mode, or behavior change), then prove the help is usable by dispatching a fresh subagent that has never seen the code. Use this whenever you add or change how rezolus is invoked — new `rezolus <subcommand>`, new flags/args on an existing mode, renamed options, or changed defaults — and any time the user says the help/README is thin, stale, confusing, or "an agent couldn't figure this out." Treats help text as an interface under test, not prose.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Native Rust browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites — navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, sharing a live browser view, narrating browser actions, extracting structured data, running assertions, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "show me the browser", "share the screen", "pause the browser", "step through this", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", "visual regression test", "check for prompt injection", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Native Rust browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, navigate pages, fill forms, click buttons, take screenshots, share a live browser view, narrate browser actions, extract structured data, run assertions, test web apps, mock network requests, or automate any browser task. Triggers include "open a website", "fill out a form", "take a screenshot", "show me the browser", "share the screen", "pause the browser", "step through this", "scrape data", "test this web app", "login to a site", "visual regression test", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。