「research」の検索結果

Use medical cv resume builder for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use conference poster pitch for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate structured SOAP notes from clinical narratives, transcripts, or existing notes; use when the user needs de-identified clinical documentation organized into Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan sections, with clear assumptions and review points.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use meeting minutes for other workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit medical device technical files against EU MDR 2017/745 regulations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use medication adherence message gen for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert physician verbal dictation into structured SOAP notes. Trigger.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs a translational blueprint for moving a biomedical finding toward diagnosis, prognosis, treatment response prediction, patient stratification, or therapeutic development, with explicit translational milestones, validation thresholds, and feasibility-sensitive route framing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design evidence-discovery and validation workflows for drug repurposing studies by integrating disease mechanisms, drug-target logic, expression reversal, real-world evidence, and validation routes into a closed-loop study blueprint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs a structured real-world evidence study using EHR, claims, or registry data, with explicit handling of time zero, eligibility windows, exposure definitions, outcome windows, censoring, confounding control, and target-trial-emulation logic. Use this skill when the user needs study-type design and protocol framing for an observational clinical study based on routine-care data. Do not invent database fields, follow-up completeness, linkage, coding validity, or causal identifiability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use anki-card-creator for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries for study-card generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs a realistic, execution-aware biomedical study version under explicit constraints of samples, time, budget, data access, lab capacity, team skill, and validation resources. Always use this skill when the user has a real study idea, a candidate route, or a partially framed project but cannot assume ideal conditions. If critical feasibility inputs are missing, first clarify what resources are currently available, what resources may be obtainable, and what resources are realistically unavailable. Do not invent access, capabilities, collaborations, or validation resources. Focus first on feasibility-constrained study framing, route narrowing, dependency control, and minimum viable study design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Precision editing tool that reduces abstract word count through intelligent compression techniques, maintaining scientific rigor while meeting strict journal and conference requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans sample size estimation logic, power assumptions, feasibility checks, and fallback enrollment strategies for clinical and translational study protocols.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs QTL colocalization studies that connect eQTL, pQTL, sQTL, or related molecular QTL signals with GWAS loci. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to plan, scope, or structure a locus-level study asking whether a GWAS association and a molecular QTL association may reflect the same underlying causal signal. Covers locus definition, QTL/GWAS source architecture, ancestry and LD alignment, single-locus vs multi-locus strategy, candidate-gene prioritization, optional fine-mapping, linked MR/SMR follow-up, and functional annotation. Always output four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, method rationale, evidence hierarchy, figure plan, minimal executable version, and strictly verified literature guidance with no fabricated references. Never equate colocalization with causality proof, mediation proof, or automatic target validation. Always include the mandatory Dataset Disclaimer immediately before any workflow section that mentions datasets, repositories, consortia, or public resources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform lengthy academic papers into concise, structured 250-word abstracts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refines long medical academic texts into SCI-style unstructured Chinese and English abstracts; use when you need to condense drafts/reports/summaries into bilingual abstracts and generate Summary_Report.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a structured case-control study framework with explicit source population logic, control selection rules, matching decisions, exposure measurement planning, and bias-control checkpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate interactive anatomy quizzes for medical education with multiple.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extends a mechanistic or association-level biomedical finding into a staged validation pathway that moves from descriptive evidence toward stronger functional support, mechanistic specificity, and clinical relevance. Use this skill when a user has a pathway, biomarker, cell-state, target, mechanism, or association finding and needs to decide what should be validated next, in what order, and which evidence layers are necessary versus optional. Do not default to maximal validation stacks. Build a structured validation ladder with a primary route, stronger upgrade route, and optional extensions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans confounder control, variable adjustment logic, and bias mitigation strategies at the protocol stage for clinical, epidemiologic, translational, observational, and biomarker studies. Always use this skill when a user needs to identify major confounders, decide which variables should or should not be adjusted for, compare matching/stratification/weighting approaches, anticipate selection or measurement bias, or pressure-test a study design before execution. Focus on bias sensing, causal structure awareness, variable-role classification, and critical design review rather than generic statistical advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates complete Mendelian randomization study designs from a user-provided exposure and outcome direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a Mendelian randomization study — even if phrased as "help me write a paper on X", "design an MR study for Y", or "I want to test whether A causally affects B using GWAS". Covers core two-sample MR design, optional bidirectional follow-up, optional multivariable MR, IV selection logic, ancestry alignment, harmonization, IVW as the default primary estimator, weighted median / MR-Egger / MR-PRESSO / leave-one-out sensitivity analyses, Steiger directionality, heterogeneity / pleiotropy checks, and explicit claim-boundary control. Always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, method rationale, validation ladder, figure plan, minimal executable version, and strictly verified literature guidance with no fabricated references.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates CIOMS I-compliant ICSR narratives from adverse event case data for FDA and EMA regulatory submission. Includes temporal analysis, MedDRA coding, causality assessment using WHO-UMC or Naranjo criteria, and multi-format output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs cell-based and animal-based validation plans that translate computational, omics, biomarker, genetic, or clinical findings into experimentally testable validation routes. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to move from an in silico, statistical, or clinical association finding toward wet-lab validation using cell systems, organoid-like systems, xenograft or genetically relevant animal models. It should define the exact claim to test, separate mechanism-testing from association-support and translational-support goals, choose the best-fit model family, specify perturbation strategy, readouts, controls, sequencing of experiments, and four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with one recommended primary plan. Never fabricate model availability, reagent availability, species relevance, assay feasibility, phenotype penetrance, expected effect sizes, validation success, or literature references.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。