「analyze」の検索結果

Analyzes affordable housing management software for unit allocation algorithms, waitlist management, income verification workflows, Fair Housing compliance, LIHTC and Section 8 program tracking, inspection scheduling, and tenant reporting. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You are reviewing housing management software or tenant management systems - Someone asks about Section 8, LIHTC, or public housing program compliance - You need to audit unit allocation algorithms for fairness or bias - A project involves waitlist management, income verification, or rent calculations - You are evaluating HUD compliance (50058, EIV, PIC submissions) - Someone mentions Fair Housing, reasonable accommodation, or protected class handling - You need to review HQS/NSPIRE inspection tracking or abatement workflows - A codebase handles tenant eligibility, subsidy calculations, or housing vouchers TRIGGER PHRASES: "affordable housing", "Section 8", "LIHTC", "public housing", "waitlist management", "income verification", "Fair Housing", "HUD compliance", "rent calculation", "housing voucher", "tenant management", "HQS inspection", "unit allocation", "housing authority"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze, plan, and execute Adobe SDK upgrades — including the critical JWT-to-OAuth migration, PDF Services SDK v3-to-v4, and Photoshop API endpoint changes (cutout v1 to remove-background v2). Trigger with phrases like "upgrade adobe", "adobe migration", "adobe breaking changes", "update adobe SDK", "jwt to oauth".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Android Accessibility Service security analysis and pentesting. Use this skill whenever the user mentions Android security testing, accessibility service abuse, RAT detection, malware analysis, ClayRat, PlayPraetor, overlay phishing, credential harvesting, or any Android app security assessment involving AccessibilityService APIs. This skill helps detect malicious accessibility services, analyze abuse patterns, and harden apps against accessibility-based attacks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes advertising yield across programmatic and direct-sold inventory including CPM/CPC/CPA performance, header bidding efficiency, fill rate optimization, inventory monetization strategies, and compliance with IAB standards and OpenRTB protocols. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You need to audit ad revenue performance or diagnose yield drops - Someone asks about header bidding configuration or Prebid.js optimization - You are analyzing fill rates, eCPM trends, or ad unit performance - A project involves programmatic advertising, SSP integration, or ad serving - You need to verify ads.txt, sellers.json, or supply chain compliance - Someone mentions CPM floors, bid density, or auction dynamics - You are evaluating ad quality controls, viewability, or ad-related UX impact - A codebase integrates Google Ad Manager, AdMob, Prebid, or any SSP TRIGGER PHRASES: "ad yield", "eCPM", "fill rate", "header bidding", "Prebid", "programmatic ads", "ad monetization", "CPM optimization", "ad revenue", "ads.txt", "ad serving", "SSP", "ad unit performance", "viewability"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive backlink analysis using DataForSEO API. Analyze backlink profiles, find link building opportunities, detect toxic links, compare with competitors, and identify link gaps. Use when user says "backlinks", "link building", "referring domains", "link profile", "toxic links", "link gap", "competitor links", or "domain authority".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical research methodology with YAGNI/KISS/DRY principles. Phases: scope definition, information gathering, analysis, synthesis, recommendation. Capabilities: technology evaluation, architecture analysis, best practices research, trade-off assessment, solution design. Actions: research, analyze, evaluate, compare, recommend technical solutions. Keywords: research, technology evaluation, best practices, architecture analysis, trade-offs, scalability, security, maintainability, YAGNI, KISS, DRY, technical analysis, solution design, competitive analysis, feasibility study. Use when: researching technologies, evaluating architectures, analyzing best practices, comparing solutions, assessing technical trade-offs, planning scalable/secure systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create an implementation plan and a GitHub Issue based on the task description provided as an argument. Use this when the user supplies a natural-language task description (not an issue number) and wants a new implementation-ready Issue. If the input is an existing issue number, use create-issue-from-issue-number (re-analyze) or update-issue (reflect comments) instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Re-analyze an existing GitHub Issue using its current title and body, refresh the implementation plan against the latest code state, and update the Issue in place. Use when the user provides an Issue number (numeric, `#`-prefixed, or Issue URL) and wants to regenerate the code analysis via the explore-agent subagent. For reflecting comment-driven updates, use update-issue. For creating a brand-new Issue from a natural-language task description, use create-issue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds an interactive HTML dashboard visualizing the Agent Skills ecosystem by fetching live data from github.com/agentskills/agentskills. Use this skill whenever the user wants to explore, research, or visualize Skills architecture, the SKILL.md spec, ecosystem adoption, repo stats, or any Skills intelligence dashboard. Trigger when the user mentions "skills dashboard", "skills ecosystem", "skills architecture overview", "agentskills repo", or wants to analyze how different tools implement Agent Skills. Optimized for Perplexity Computer — Computer fetches all data live, no static files required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze spatial cell-cell interactions, neighborhoods, and niches in IMC/MIBI data with squidpy and imcRtools, covering neighborhood-enrichment permutation nulls, the abundance-vs-density confound, inhomogeneous Ripley's K, cellular-neighborhood discovery, graph-construction (contact vs proximity), and edge effects. Use when testing whether cell types co-locate, choosing a spatial null, building a neighbor graph, discovering tissue niches, or deciding whether a spatial pattern is real or a density/segmentation artifact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes time-series and longitudinal RNA-seq for differential expression and trajectory structure. Covers DESeq2 LRT with reduced models, time as factor vs continuous vs natural splines, maSigPro (Nueda 2014 for RNA-seq), ImpulseDE2 with explicit impulse-model failure modes, DREAM for repeated measures via linear mixed models, pseudoreplication avoidance, conditional vs marginal modeling, and trajectory clustering with DPGP, Mfuzz (with Schwämmle 2010 fuzzifier estimation), and splines+k-means. Use when modeling time-course or longitudinal expression, choosing factor vs spline, handling repeated measures from the same subject, avoiding pseudoreplication, clustering temporal trajectories, or selecting between dedicated time-course tools and pairwise+LRT.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes species-environment relationships with constrained ordination (CCA, RDA, db-RDA), variance partitioning, indicator species (indicspecies IndVal.g group-equalized), PERMANOVA paired MANDATORILY with PERMDISP (Anderson & Walsh 2013; dispersion confounds centroid tests), Joint Species Distribution Models (HMSC, sjSDM, gjam) with explicit rejection of "residual covariance equals biotic interaction", phylogenetic community ecology (SES_MPD/MNTD), trait-environment via RLQ + fourth-corner with corrected modeltype=6 (Dray 2014), bipartite network metrics (NODF, modularity) with curveball null (Strona 2014), and Mantel-test replacements (dbRDA, GDM) for spatial data. Use when testing how environmental gradients structure communities, identifying habitat indicator taxa, partitioning variance among predictors, deciding whether PERMANOVA significance is location vs dispersion, picking among HMSC/sjSDM/gjam, or replacing Mantel tests for landscape data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and analyzes combinatorial CRISPR screens covering paired-Cas9 (Big Papi, Najm 2018), enhanced AsCas12a multiplex (enCas12a, DeWeirdt 2021), in4mer 4-guide-array Cas12a (Esmaeili Anvar N et al 2024 Nat Commun 15:3577) and the Inzolia paralog-pair library, paralog-buffering detection (Dede 2020 Genome Biol; Thompson 2021 Cell Reports 36:109597), genetic-interaction (GI) scoring as observed_double_LFC minus expected_additive_double_LFC, synthetic-lethal and synthetic-rescue interaction interpretation, the half-of-essentiality buffered by paralogs phenomenon, multiplex screen statistical analysis with MAGeCK MLE interaction terms, and the relationship to single-cell combinatorial Perturb-seq. Use when designing a paralog or pathway-pair screen, choosing between paired-Cas9 (Big Papi) and Cas12a multiplex (Inzolia), interpreting genetic interaction scores, identifying synthetic-lethal targets for drug development, or scaling beyond single-gene CRISPR screens.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes CRISPR drug-modifier (chemogenomic) screens with drugZ (Li & Hart 2019 Genome Med), a bidirectional Z-score method that identifies synthetic-lethal sensitizing genes and resistance-conferring suppressor genes from vehicle vs drug comparisons. Covers vehicle-anchored design (not Day-0), the bidirectional Z math giving 2-3x sensitivity over MAGeCK / STARS / edgeR / RIGER on drug screens, per-gene sumZ and normZ, synth (sensitizer) vs supp (suppressor) FDR, multi-dose handling, integration with control sgRNAs, and comparison with MAGeCK MLE with dose covariate. Use when running a drug-modifier CRISPR screen, identifying sensitizing or resistance genes for a drug candidate, choosing drugZ vs MAGeCK MLE for chemogenomic analysis, troubleshooting low-effect drug screens where MAGeCK lacks sensitivity, or designing a drug-screen layout (vehicle vs drug arms).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and analyzes in vivo CRISPR screens in animal tumor models, organoids, and immune-cell adoptive transfers. Covers bottleneck math (250x cells/sgRNA requires ~25M cells implanted; impossible for most syngeneic models, forcing focused libraries), focused library design (Manguso 2017 Nature 547:413 immune screen; Chen 2015 tumor screens), CRISPR-StAR intrinsic-control screening (Uijttewaal 2025 Nat Biotechnol 43:1848), clonal-dynamics-limited detection, tumor-explant DNA recovery, syngeneic vs xenograft vs PDX considerations, and the relationship to downstream MAGeCK / drugZ analysis. Use when designing in vivo CRISPR screens for tumor / immune / metastasis biology, choosing focused vs genome-wide for animal models, addressing bottleneck-induced clonal collapse, picking the syngeneic / xenograft / PDX model, integrating in vivo with in vitro results, or applying CRISPR-StAR for animal experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes pooled CRISPR screens with MAGeCK (Li et al 2014), covering count generation (mageck count), the RRA two-condition workflow (mageck test using alpha-RRA over per-sgRNA negative-binomial p-values), the MLE multi-condition workflow (mageck mle with explicit design matrix and beta-score output), normalization choice (median vs total vs control-sgRNA vs spike-in), sgRNA efficiency injection, paired-sample testing, time-course design, drug-screen versus dropout-screen design matrices, MAGeCKFlute and MAGeCK-VISPR downstream visualization, and decision logic for when to use MAGeCK vs JACKS / BAGEL2 / drugZ / Chronos. Use when running a fresh CRISPR screen analysis, picking RRA vs MLE for the experimental design, choosing a normalization method from QC signatures, debugging MLE convergence failure or NaN beta scores, comparing MAGeCK output across tools, or building a batch-aware multi-cell-line / multi-condition MLE design matrix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes single-cell pooled CRISPR screens (Perturb-seq, CROP-seq, Perturb-CITE-seq, ECCITE-seq, multiome) where each cell carries an sgRNA and a scRNA-seq / surface-protein / chromatin readout. Covers experimental design (direct-capture Perturb-seq Dixit 2016 vs CROP-seq 3'UTR-barcoded Datlinger 2017 vs ECCITE-seq vs Multiome), MOI for sgRNA assignment, escaper-cell filtering (Mixscape, Papalexi 2021), SCEPTRE NB GLM + permutation for low-MOI (Barry 2024 Genome Biol 25:124), the Pertpy framework, factor decomposition, genome-scale Perturb-seq (Replogle 2022 Cell, 2.5M cells), and per-perturbation single-cell DE. Use when running a single-cell CRISPR screen, choosing direct-capture vs CROP-seq architecture, filtering escaper cells, performing single-cell DE, integrating Perturb-seq with pathway analysis, scaling to GW CRISPRi via Replogle protocol, or analyzing multi-omics screens.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and analyzes pooled prime-editor (PE) screens for installing precise genetic variants without bystander confounding. Covers pegRNA design with PRIDICT and PRIDICT2 (Mathis 2023/2024) for predicting per-pegRNA editing efficiency, pegRNA architecture (spacer + scaffold + PBS + RTT), PE2 / PE3 / PE3b / PEmax / PEAR variants, MOSAIC in situ saturation mutagenesis (Hsu JY et al 2024 bioRxiv), the PRIME pooled-screen methodology (Erwood/Doman 2023 Nat Biotechnol 41:885; ~3,699 ClinVar variant screens), chromatin context as a primary determinant of PE efficiency, scaffold-incorporation and indel byproduct quantification with CRISPResso2, and the cross-modal validation strategy of PE + base-editor screens for variant function. Use when designing a pegRNA library for variant installation, choosing between BE and PE for a specific edit, predicting pegRNA efficiency before library synthesis, analyzing PE screen output, distinguishing intended-edit from scaffold-incorporation, or scaling PE screens to thousands of variants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes base-editing screens for variant function. Covers library design (Sanson 2020 GRACE, Hanna 2021 BRCA1/2 SNV scanning, Cuella-Martin 2021), CBE vs ABE chemistry choice (BE3/BE4 vs ABE7.10/ABE8.20/ABE8e), editing-window math (positions 4-8 from PAM-distal end, wider for ABE8e), bystander-edit quantification and the variant-call ambiguity it creates, sgRNA-efficiency filtering before hit calling, indel byproduct interpretation, the substitution-vs-indel diagnostic, variant annotation against ClinVar / COSMIC, and the Broad be-validation-pipeline. Use when designing a BE variant screen, choosing CBE vs ABE for a specific edit, interpreting bystander-confounded hits, distinguishing functional signal from indel artifact, integrating CRISPResso2 output with screen scoring, or deciding BE vs PE for SNV installation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and analyze pangenomes for prokaryotes (Panaroo, PPanGGOLiN, PEPPAN, GET_HOMOLOGUES, anvi'o pangenomics) and eukaryotes (Minigraph-Cactus, PGGB, vg pangenome graphs). Implement Tettelin core/accessory/cloud genome decomposition (Tettelin 2005), Heap's law open/closed pangenome modeling, gene presence/absence GWAS (Scoary, pyseer), pangenome graph variant calling (vg, PanGenie), and structural-variation graph indexing. Use when assembling species- or genus-level pan-gene catalogs, separating core from accessory/shell/cloud genes, testing gene-content associations with phenotypes, building pangenome graphs from haplotype-resolved assemblies, calling SVs from pangenome graphs, or selecting between bacterial-pangenome and eukaryotic-pangenome workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes CUT&RUN (Skene Henikoff 2017) and CUT&Tag (Kaya-Okur 2019) chromatin profiling data. Handles SEACR vs MACS2 peak calling (with the btaf375 2025 benchmark guidance), pA-MNase vs pA-Tn5 vs pAG-Tn5 chimera differences, E. coli spike-in carryover normalization, IgG-only control logic (no input), characteristic fragment-size signatures (25-75 bp for CUT&Tag), and lower depth requirements (5M reads typical vs 25M for ChIP). Use when calling peaks from CUT&RUN/CUT&Tag, scaling by E. coli spike-in carryover, choosing SEACR norm mode, or comparing CUT&RUN/Tag results to traditional ChIP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes chemical libraries by scaffold using Bemis-Murcko scaffolds, generic frameworks, cyclic skeletons, matched molecular pair (MMP) analysis via mmpdb, R-group decomposition, Free-Wilson analysis, scaffold hopping, and chemotype-aware ML train/test splits. Use when identifying chemotype clusters in a library, deriving SAR transformation rules, decomposing series into R-groups, performing scaffold-balanced QSAR splits, or planning analog campaigns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze TF motif accessibility variability across samples or single cells using chromVAR. Use when identifying TF motifs whose accessibility correlates with conditions, computing per-sample motif z-scores after matched background correction, comparing to ArchR / Signac equivalents, or distinguishing motif-accessibility signal from per-site footprinting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes alternative splicing from PacBio Iso-Seq (HiFi, Kinnex/MAS-Iso-seq) and Oxford Nanopore (direct cDNA, direct RNA, R10.4.1+) long-read RNA-seq with full-isoform resolution. Tools include FLAIR (correct/collapse/quantify/diffSplice for PacBio + ONT), IsoQuant (de-novo or annotation-guided isoform discovery 2024 SOTA), Bambu (annotation-aware Bayesian discovery + quantification with Novel Discovery Rate), SQANTI3/SQANTI-LR (isoform classification: FSM/ISM/NIC/NNC + artifact flags), rMATS-long (event calling on long-read isoforms), and minimap2 (-ax splice:hq for HiFi; -ax splice -k14 for ONT cDNA; add -uf only for direct RNA or stranded cDNA preps). Solves microexon detection, recursive splicing, complex multi-exon isoforms, and DTU without transcript-quantification uncertainty. Use when short-read AS limitations (anchor length, complex isoforms, microexons, recursive splicing, transcript ambiguity) demand full-isoform resolution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。