「changes」の検索結果

[Testing] Use when generating, updating, or maintaining E2E tests from recordings, specs, or code changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stage and commit changes using Conventional Commits

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic testing methodology for exhaustive branch coverage, edge case identification, and production bug prevention. Use when PR review reveals incomplete test coverage, when tests pass but users report bugs, when code changes break existing features, when verifying all branches and edge cases before merge, when analyzing "it works on my machine" issues, when planning test strategy for new features, or when debugging flaky tests and race conditions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing a .NET pull request for breaking changes that may affect other microservice repositories. Detects cross-repo API, DTO, endpoint, EF entity, and NuGet-package breaks, and checks whether a compatible downstream PR already exists. Keywords: cross-repo impact, breaking change, microservice compatibility, downstream break, compatible PR, blast radius review, api compatibility, contract break, dto shape change, endpoint break.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sync reusable frontend decisions into persistent project documentation after UI work. Use when frontend changes introduce or modify component APIs, variants, design-system tokens, styling conventions, layout behavior, accessibility rules, interaction patterns, responsive behavior, or agent operating instructions; when the user asks to reflect decisions in components.md, design system docs, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, or similar project memory files; or before finalizing frontend work where future consistency depends on decisions made during implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Re-audit code changes to identify side effects, regression risks, and unhandled edge cases before merging or deploying. Use after a change is complete and before merging to a shared branch, before deploying a hotfix, after complex multi-module refactoring, or when a previous review may have missed side effects in async, state-mutating, or security-sensitive code paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finalize code changes for production readiness by removing duplicate logic, auditing hardcoded values, verifying branch/worktree intent, verifying build integrity, structuring clean commits with Conventional Commits format, and forcing a post-publish branch/worktree cleanup decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finalize documentation changes for production readiness by discovering existing conventions, verifying code-doc alignment, reviewing format/terminology/tone consistency, verifying branch/worktree intent, and structuring clean commits with a post-publish branch/worktree cleanup decision. Counterpart of finalize-and-commit for documentation projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate architecture and design documents for implemented code changes with risk-based depth selection. Automatically evaluates risk signals, layer spread, and change magnitude to choose documentation level (A/B/C). Use after completing a feature, before merging a PR that touches multiple layers or sensitive areas (auth, infra, migrations, payments), or when an implemented change needs a design record or ADR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a diff may lack tests — missing assertions, uncovered branches, over-mocking, no regression test for a bug fix — dispatched by /review-changes, /do-and-judge, /judge, even without 'tests'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a diff may introduce security risk — authZ, injection, secrets, unsafe deserialization, SSRF, XSS, mass assignment — dispatched by /review-changes, /do-and-judge, /judge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When scoring a roadmap, PR review, ADR, or ticket for completeness — risk, tests, migration, maintainability. Dispatched by /refine-ticket, /adr-create, /review-changes; never auto-gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a diff needs correctness review — null-safety, edge cases, off-by-one, races, error handling — dispatched by /review-changes, /do-and-judge, /judge, even without 'judge'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a diff needs a readability review — naming, single-responsibility, DRY, dead code, mismatch with codebase conventions — dispatched by /review-changes, /do-and-judge, /judge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a diff needs a requirement review — does it satisfy every stated acceptance criterion — dispatched by /review-changes, /do-and-judge, /judge. Never infers criteria from the diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a release review needs machine-derived evidence from git history — hotspot risk and change-coupling analyzers. Triggers on 'hotspot', 'what changes together', 'release forensics'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a diff may break system boundaries, dependency direction, or cross-service contracts — fifth judge dispatched by /review-changes alongside the four standard judges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user says "review this", "check my code", or wants feedback on changes. Reviews for correctness, quality, security, and coding standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing authorization end-to-end — route → gate → policy → query scope → response filter — before changes to permissions, tenants, ownership, or admin flows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Boss delegates tasks to workers, reviews their output, and approves or requests changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check any artifact against an explicit specification and report adherence using the add-comments workspace format. Use when validating plans, scripts, docs, or code changes against a source-of-truth spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this Canvas-owned clean-room skill for creating, reading, editing, reviewing, redlining, commenting, or repairing Word `.docx` documents. Trigger for Word documents, DOCX files, memos, reports, letters, templates, tracked changes, comments, table of contents, headers, footers, page numbers, and Google Docs-targeted documents that should be authored as DOCX first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load this skill immediately whenever a project contains an ACCESSIBILITY.md file, or whenever you are contributing to the mgifford/ACCESSIBILITY.md repository. Absolutely always read ACCESSIBILITY.md before proposing or writing any changes. Under no circumstances skip this skill when an ACCESSIBILITY.md file is present. This skill governs when and how all other accessibility topic skills must be loaded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chooses ecosystem-native release and changelog tooling (Changesets, Melos, release-plz) plus binary distribution (GitHub Release tarballs, install.sh) when the product is an executable. Use for release CI, install.sh, versioning, CHANGELOGs, shipping MCP/CLI without clone, or meta repos that only ship skills via npx skills—not domain app tutorials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。