gauge
無料Auditing SKILL.md normalization and compliance: scans the 21-item checklist, classifies violations, produces fix snippets. Use when auditing SKILL.md compliance or ecosystem health.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
4,619 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Auditing SKILL.md normalization and compliance: scans the 21-item checklist, classifies violations, produces fix snippets. Use when auditing SKILL.md compliance or ecosystem health.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assessing standards, regulatory controls, and legal-document coverage with cited evidence and proposed wording. Use for OWASP/WCAG/SOC2/PCI/HIPAA or ToS/privacy/DPA reviews; not legal advice or code fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviewing code via multi-engine orchestration (Claude + Codex) on three axes — secure, correct, and lean — shipping only findings worth fixing. Use for PR review or pre-commit. Complements Zen.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When something breaks in production: triage the severity, gather evidence, identify root cause, deploy a fix or mitigation, and write a post-mortem. Provides a calm, structured process for high-stress moments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose and fix mini-program failures through reproducible, evidence-driven root-cause analysis across source, state, asynchronous timing, caches, mock data, build versions, platform behavior, devices, cloud calls, and external services. Use when users report white screens, crashes, stale or jumping values, missing data, intermittent behavior, permission failures, performance stalls, device-only defects, API or cloud-function errors, source-versus-build mismatches, or regressions whose cause is not yet established. Freezes the observation environment, ranks competing hypotheses, runs discriminating checks, creates a failing regression test before repair, covers analogous states, and never hides a known failure with longer waits, swallowed errors, forced success, or cosmetic patches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify mini-program implementations and fixes with risk-calibrated evidence across static checks, unit tests, integration tests, state matrices, simulators, real devices, cloud environments, and release artifacts. Use when users ask to test, validate, accept, regression-check, quality-check, confirm readiness, or determine whether a mini-program feature is actually complete. Binds results to a source and build fingerprint, records commands and observable evidence, separates passed, failed, blocked, and not-run layers, prioritizes the next highest-information check, and never converts local success into device, cloud, release, or formal acceptance claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designer's eye QA: finds visual inconsistency, spacing issues, hierarchy problems, AI slop patterns, and slow interactions — then fixes them. (gstack)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write or fix a profile.yml — pick the right resource kind for each file, bind operating references, and verify the install layout before publishing. Use when creating a ForgeCat profile, adding a skill/agent/rule/hook to one, or when `forgecat validate` or `plan` reports something unexpected.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Whole-repo audit for over-engineering. Like ponytail-review, but scans the entire codebase instead of a diff: a ranked list of what to delete, simplify, or replace with stdlib/native equivalents. Use when the user says "audit this codebase", "audit for over-engineering", "what can I delete from this repo", "find bloat", "ponytail-audit", or "/ponytail-audit". One-shot report, does not apply fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured code review for bugs, regressions, tests, and standards. Use before PRs or when asked for review; interactive mode can fix locally, while mode:agent reports only for pipeline callers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to add, fix, or optimize schema markup and structured data on their site. Also use when the user mentions "schema markup," "structured data," "JSON-LD," "rich snippets," "schema.org," "FAQ schema," "product schema," "review schema," "breadcrumb schema," "Google rich results," "knowledge panel," "star ratings in search," or "add structured data." Use this whenever someone wants their pages to show enhanced results in Google. For broader SEO issues, see seo-audit. For AI search optimization, see ai-seo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Resolve PR review feedback. Use when addressing review comments, resolving review threads, or fixing code-review feedback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides systematic root-cause debugging. Use when tests fail, builds break, something that worked yesterday broke, behavior doesn't match expectations, or you encounter any unexpected error. Use when you need to figure out what broke and why — a systematic approach to finding and fixing the root cause rather than guessing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimizes application performance across frontend, backend, queries, and databases. Use when performance requirements exist, when you suspect performance regressions, when Core Web Vitals or load times need improvement, when N+1 query patterns need fixing, or when profiling reveals bottlenecks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drives development with tests using the red-green-refactor loop. Use when implementing any logic, fixing any bug, or changing any behavior. Use when you need to prove that code works, when a bug report arrives, or when you're about to modify existing functionality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns implementation work into working code, reviewed and verified. Use when the user delegates a feature, story, bug fix, or meaningful change; a bare story or issue link counts. Skip obvious, low-risk mechanical maintenance such as small ignore-file, typo-only, formatting-only, or configuration-hygiene edits. Explicit BMAD requests always qualify. Do not volunteer for user-directed interactive edits or version-control operations that only record existing work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use test-driven development for behavior-changing feature or fix work, and whenever the user mentions TDD, test-first, red-green-refactor, tracer bullets, integration tests, or public-interface behavior tests. Skip for docs-only, path-only rename, formatting-only, or purely mechanical chores unless explicitly requested.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits and optimizes websites for search engine visibility (SEO) and AI search citation (GEO), covering technical health, E-E-A-T content scoring, domain authority, structured data, rich results, and entity signals. Use when running SEO audits, diagnosing traffic drops or ranking losses, generating Schema.org JSON-LD, checking Core Web Vitals, crawlability, robots.txt, sitemaps, hreflang, backlinks, planning content strategy or site migrations, fixing indexing issues, or optimizing for AI Overviews, ChatGPT, and Perplexity. NOT for paid ads (PPC/SEM), social media strategy, email marketing, or general web development unrelated to search.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous project bootstrapper. Generates complete project from a description — structure, code, tests, docs, config. Orchestrates ba → plan → design → fix → test → docs → git in one pipeline. The "0 to production-ready" skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code quality review — patterns, security, performance, correctness. Finds bugs, suggests improvements, triggers fix for issues found. Escalates to opus for security-critical code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when receiving external input that needs structured intake before action — PR review feedback, code review comments, OR issue tracker items (bug reports, feature requests). PR Review Mode (default) verifies suggestions before implementing. Issue Triage Mode classifies issues into a state machine (ready-for-agent / ready-for-human / needs-info / wontfix) and emits AGENT-BRIEFs for AFK execution. Prevents blind implementation, enforces verification-first discipline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performance regression gate. Detects N+1 queries, sync-in-async, missing indexes, memory leaks, and bundle bloat before they reach production. Ranks findings by Cost Impact Hierarchy (architecture > data transfer > compute > DB > caching) so fix priority maps to actual unit-cost reduction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify AI-generated imports, API calls, and packages actually exist. Use when finishing AI-generated code that introduces new imports or external API calls — auto-fires after fix/cook to catch phantom functions, non-existent packages, and slopsquatting attacks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Feature implementation orchestrator. ALWAYS use this skill for ANY code change — implement, build, add feature, create, fix bug, or any task that modifies source code. This is the default route for 70% of all requests. Runs full TDD cycle: understand → plan → test → implement → quality → verify → commit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。