「report」の検索結果

Collaborative purple-team operations — threat-informed adversary emulation planning (ATT&CK, CTID, Atomic Red Team, CALDERA), the detect-tune-validate loop, detection coverage measurement (DeTT&CT/Navigator), safe execution and deconfliction, and MTTD/coverage reporting

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cyber threat intelligence production — the intelligence cycle, IOC extraction/normalization/enrichment, STIX/TAXII and MISP, structured analytic models (Diamond, Kill Chain, ATT&CK), source scoring, actor/campaign tracking, and finished intelligence reporting

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authorized red team engagement planning, C2 architecture design, attack methodology, lateral movement strategy, OPSEC, and professional reporting

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SOC alert triage, incident playbook automation, escalation workflows, shift reporting, and SOC KPI tracking

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OWASP Top 10 testing, injection vulnerability detection, API security assessment, authentication testing, and web vulnerability reporting for authorized assessments

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

IR playbook execution, evidence collection, forensic timeline analysis, memory forensics, and post-incident reporting following NIST SP 800-61 and SANS PICERL methodology

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dependency auditing, CVE detection, configuration security review, CVSS scoring, and prioritized vulnerability reporting

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build compelling data-driven narratives. Use when presenting analysis results, creating stakeholder reports, or transforming a set of findings into a story that drives a specific decision or action.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trace and resolve discrepancies when the same metric shows different values in two or more sources. Use before reporting, after pipeline changes, or when stakeholders question a number.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize code performance through iterative improvements (max 2 rounds). Benchmark execution time and memory usage, compare against baseline implementations, and generate detailed optimization reports. Supports C++, Python, Java, Rust, and other languages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent self-evolution system. Collects signals from user feedback, stores execution trajectories (golden + correction pairs), analyzes patterns, proposes mutations to workspace files, and generates HTML reports. Trigger with "/evolve" or when the user asks to improve agent behavior. Also use when the user says "remember this pattern", "don't do X again", or "that was a good approach, save it".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when kernel threads block on driver synchronization or Verifier reports a lock-order violation; build an owner/waiter graph. Not for treating every watchdog stop as a deadlock or listing every lock type with !locks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use with every WinDbg plugin investigation to apply evidence-first reasoning, confidence calibration, contrarian review, structured reporting, and deterministic validation. Not a bug-family-specific triage skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a kernel dump reports a Windows bugcheck; decode parameters and recover exception or trap context before investigating your driver. Not for user-mode process crashes or blaming a module from its name alone.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks for "deep research", "research team", "comprehensive analysis", "research report", "investigate thoroughly", "compare X vs Y in depth", or needs synthesis across multiple sources with verification. It spawns a coordinated team of researcher agents across multiple rounds, with the lead triaging findings and creating targeted follow-up tasks. Scales from Focused (2 researchers, 1-2 rounds) to Comprehensive (4 researchers, 3-4 rounds with cross-verification). Do NOT use for simple lookups, debugging, or questions answerable with 1-2 searches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user wants to create, read, edit, or manipulate Word documents (.docx files) or Word templates (.dotx files). Triggers include: any mention of 'Word doc', 'word document', '.docx', '.dotx', or requests to produce professional documents with formatting like tables of contents, headings, page numbers, or letterheads. Also use when extracting or reorganizing content from .docx or .dotx files, inserting or replacing images in documents, performing find-and-replace in Word files, working with tracked changes or comments, or converting content into a polished Word document. If the user asks for a 'report', 'memo', 'letter', 'template', or similar deliverable as a Word or .docx file, use this skill. Do NOT use for PDFs, spreadsheets, Google Docs, or general coding tasks unrelated to document generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Direct and produce Chinese-first cinematic motion videos with HyperFrames. Use this skill when the user wants a rendered promo film, article-to-video piece, product launch film, website-to-video piece, keynote reveal, kinetic typography sequence, text/icon transition promo, music-synced motion graphic, HTML/CSS/SVG/GSAP video, short-form vertical video, or a landing page/product story turned into motion. Default to Simplified Chinese, vertical 9:16, and 1080x1920 unless the user or platform clearly requires another format. The skill enforces a two-phase workflow: brief first, confirmation second, then assets, composition, validation, snapshots, render, and review report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive SEO/GEO/AEO analysis toolkit for optimizing content visibility across traditional search engines (Google, Bing), AI platforms (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grokipedia), answer engines (Google AI Overviews, Bing Copilot, featured snippets), voice assistants (Google Assistant, Siri, Alexa), and social media (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Instagram). Analyzes HTML/Markdown/JSX files for metadata completeness, schema markup, keyword optimization, entity extraction, and generates multi-format audit reports with platform-specific recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that may support intermediary services, hosting services, online platforms, marketplaces, content moderation, recommender systems, advertising delivery, complaint workflows, transparency reporting, or systemic-risk evidence under the EU Digital Services Act. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java online platform for DSA controls; Design notice-and-action or appeal workflows; Add recommender, ad transparency, moderation, audit, researcher access, or privacy-safe observability evidence; Assess online-platform transparency controls before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems and need a structured, repeatable ISO/IEC 25010:2023 quality-attribute review covering Functional Suitability, Performance Efficiency, Compatibility, Interaction Capability, Reliability, Security, Maintainability, Flexibility, and Safety, producing an engineering review report rather than an interactive ADR discovery. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that may support EU Market Abuse Regulation concerns, market surveillance, suspicious order and transaction reports, insider dealing controls, unlawful disclosure controls, market manipulation detection, inside information disclosure workflows, insider-list evidence, PDMR transaction notifications, alert explainability, model or rule provenance, reviewer decisions, or compliance escalation. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java trading surveillance system for MAR controls; Design suspicious order and transaction monitoring evidence; Add alert explainability and reviewer-decision audit trails; Assess AI-assisted market-abuse detection before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to verify Java performance optimizations by comparing profiling results before and after refactoring — including baseline validation, post-refactoring report generation, quantitative before/after metrics comparison, side-by-side flamegraph analysis, regression detection, or creating profiling-comparison-analysis and profiling-final-results documentation. This should trigger for requests such as Verify performance fix; Verify the performance; Verify the memory; Verify the threading; Compare before and after profiling results; Check for performance regressions after refactoring. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to set up Gatling performance testing for a Java Maven project — including adding Gatling dependencies and the Gatling Maven plugin, creating Java simulations, running gatling:test, configuring a simulation class, and reviewing generated reports. This should trigger for requests such as Add Gatling performance testing; Apply Gatling performance testing; Create a Gatling simulation; Add Gatling support; Review Gatling performance test assertions and feeders. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Change or repair code, config or services without weakening tests; report what ran and what did not. Use when: implementing a change or fixing a defect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。