「fix」の検索結果

Generate an /insights-style HTML report across MANY of your agent coding sessions (Claude Code and OpenAI Codex): what you work on, how you use the agent, your wins, your friction points, and concrete fixes to become more effective — precise goal-setting, not trusting output blindly, scoping, context hygiene, right-sizing models. Reads local session history and writes one self-contained report.html. Use when the user asks to "разбери мои сессии", "оцени как я работаю с агентом", "мой insights", "session insights report", "review how I work", "на что обратить внимание", or runs "/mentor", "/mentor claude", "/mentor codex", "/mentor both". Do NOT use for reviewing the CODE produced (that's code-review) or building the agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Craft Cloud — Pixel & Tonic's serverless hosting platform for Craft CMS. Covers craft-cloud.yaml configuration, the Build → Migrate → Release deploy pipeline, the craftcms/cloud extension package, edge image transforms via Cloudflare, edge static caching with cache.rules + ESI, Cloud-managed S3 filesystem, MySQL 8 / Postgres 15 databases (no MariaDB, no tablePrefix), Console-based command runner and scheduled cron (once-per-hour minimum), auto-handled queue jobs, custom domains and SSL, preview environments per branch, Cloud limitations (ephemeral filesystem, no SSH, no .htaccess, no built-in mail), plugin development requirements for Cloud compatibility, and self-hosted → Cloud migration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, critique, and refine academic posters from a paper, LaTeX project, reference draft image, HTML/CSS source, PPT/PDF outputs, or local figure assets. Use when Codex is asked to create or improve a research poster, convert a poster design to HTML/PDF/PPTX, fix poster layout/typography/overflow/blank-space issues, or preserve paper figures and result semantics in a poster.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit an implementation against its plan with a hostile peer agent, debate findings to consensus, and drive fix waves until the auditor runs dry. Use when a done-claim needs verification the implementer cannot game ("hostile review", "adversarial audit", "is this PR faithful", "find the escape hatches") — the loop that beats the laziness bias with its own game theory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an autonomous overnight campaign to find, prove, fix, and document CI flakes. Use when the user asks to stabilize CI through repeated full-pipeline runs and leave an evidence-backed draft PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test kolu's remote-host features (multi-host / padi-remote) in a real browser against a real remote box — the ONLY full end-to-end harness for this surface (real ssh provision, no mock). Covers the isolated nix-run invocation (or just dev, which bakes the same agent source), ssh- provisioning a real remote box without touching production or another user's box, the chrome-devtools drive sequence for host-switch / split / code-browser / per-host-canvas, PID-exact teardown, and the reproduce- first rule for any bug the feature surfaces. Triggers on "test remote hosts", "test multi-host", "test padi-remote", "verify the host switch", "browser-test a remote host change", or before claiming a remote-host fix works.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

确认漏洞后产出正式 SRC/0day 提交稿 DOCX 报告的收口 skill。仅在漏洞已确认、准备成稿时使用——负责查重、过分层验证门、按固定 DOCX 骨架生成报告（Heading 2 章节 + Step 式 PoC + 内嵌真实截图）、语义化命名、放对目录、处理驳回追加。不负责挖掘/验证漏洞本身。TRIGGER：用户说"写报告/出报告/成稿/提交稿/生成漏洞报告"，或漏洞已验证到位准备交付时；或 /report。EN: Turns confirmed vulnerabilities into submission-ready DOCX reports for SRC/0day platforms (verification gates, fixed layout, step-style PoC, mandatory real screenshots). Trigger on "write report" or /report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rewrite AI-generated developer text to sound human — fix inflated language, filler, tautological docs, and robotic tone. Use after review-ai-writing identifies issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Confirms or rejects findings from review-llm-artifacts before deletes or risky refactors. Loads review-verification-protocol-style checks per finding. Use after a review run, when the user wants to reduce false positives, before fix-llm-artifacts on dead code, or when validating a full-project scan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Respond to review comments on a PR after evaluation and fixes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dependency vulnerability remediation workflow for this repository. Use when fixing CVE, BDSA, GHSA, OSV, npm, PyPI, Dependabot, Black Duck, Snyk, or other package vulnerability findings, especially when the user asks for minimal package-only updates, validation, commits, branches, or pull requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ADB-based RIPDPI device/emulator debugging: build/install/launch, logcat filtering, fixture port-forwarding, instrumented tests, crash/ANR triage. Use when debugging on a real device or emulator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Red-green-refactor-lint workflow for RIPDPI plus test-double, FaultQueue, and golden-bless conventions. Use when building a feature or fixing a bug test-first. Not for Kotlin test syntax (use kotlin-test-patterns).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kotlin/Compose/Hilt/coroutine test code patterns: fakes, MainDispatcherRule, Turbine, Roborazzi, golden-contract calls. Use when writing or fixing Kotlin test code. Not for the TDD workflow (use tdd).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit project health across 7 dimensions (documentation, test coverage, security, code quality, dependencies, database, build/deploy) producing a scored report with prioritized fixes. Use for periodic checkups, before releases, or when the user runs /project-health-check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic debugging method: 5-step root-cause analysis (capture, isolate, hypothesize, investigate, fix & verify) plus common bug-pattern reference. Use when errors, exceptions, test failures, or unexpected behavior appear. Loaded automatically by the debugger agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or implementing Spring Data JPA on Spring Boot 4 — repository boundaries, projections, query patterns, custom repositories, CQRS read models, entity relationships, or persistence performance fixes. Not for generic SQL help, database admin work, or project-wide migration (see the springboot-migration skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review, triage, and resolve PR review comments. Use when user asks to check PR comments, address review feedback, fix issues raised in review, reply to reviewers, or resolve review threads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a change with an optional workflow contract using deterministic scope, adaptive cross-model reviewers, verified findings, fixes, and a gate. Use standalone or from wf-impl.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Malý task bez kontraktu — 1–3 akceptační kritéria v chatu, TDD v aktuální session, risk-based review, vždy branch + draft PR a explain dokument. Použij pro drobné fixy a malé featury; větší nebo rizikové tasky eskaluje na /wf.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A complete fiction-writing studio, run as a team of named specialist agents, that guides an author from a bare idea to a polished prose manuscript. Use this skill whenever the user wants to write, plan, or revise fiction — a novel, novella, short story, or series. Trigger on requests like "help me write a novel", "I have an idea for a story", "develop my characters", "build a world for my fantasy", "outline my plot", "fix this scene", "my dialogue feels flat", "give me beta-reader feedback", or any time the user is doing creative storytelling and would benefit from structured, craft-aware guidance. Also trigger when the user names a studio member (Homer, Aristotle, Fyodor, Tolkien, Scheherazade, Oscar, Max, Virginia, Borges, Bloom) or asks to switch creative roles / bring in a specialist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and run manual tests of the project's running app. Runs a session in one of five modes: exploratory, verification, smoke, assessment (UX, localization, accessibility, improvement review), or AI probe. Also writes a manual test plan that holds only what automated tests cannot judge. Use whenever the user asks, in any language, for something to be tested by hand or for a manual test plan — "manual test", "exploratory test", "bug hunt", "verify the bug fix", "smoke test", "QA this screen", "review this screen's UX", "what would you improve", "check the localized copy", "test the AI agent's answers", "write manual test cases", "kịch bản test manual" — or assigns a test design, test plan or test-case IDs to execute by hand. Not for writing automated tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose problems before solving them: turn "X is broken and we don't know why" into a precise problem statement, verified root causes, solutions traced to those causes, and a rollout plan. Use whenever the user reports something failing, breaking, slowing, or recurring without a known cause: "sales dropped and we don't know why", "this keeps happening", "why does X keep failing", "find the root cause", "run a post-mortem", "5 whys"; Vietnamese "sao cứ bị vậy hoài", "tìm nguyên nhân gốc", "X đang hỏng mà không rõ vì sao". Trigger even when the user asks for solutions directly: "give me ideas to fix falling sales" is a diagnosis request. Not for open-ended ideation when nothing is broken (brainstorm-coach), understanding user needs (design-thinking), or company-level strategic bets (strategy-board).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Emergency fund analyzer. Calculates the right emergency fund size based on job stability, family structure, fixed expenses, dependents, and employee vs. business-owner status. Recommends where to keep it (HYSA, money market, T-bills, I-Bonds), how fast to build it, what counts as a true emergency, and how to replenish after use. Produces FINANCE-EMERGENCY.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。