「gate」の検索結果

Update Pulp's pinned Skia, Dawn, and optional V8 prebuilts as one milestone-matched render-toolchain release. Use for requests such as "update Skia/Dawn", "move to chrome/mNNN", "find the matching V8", "update the GPU toolchain", or "use the Skia/Dawn/V8 tuple that goes together". Distinguishes milestone-matched V8 releases from v8-builder's newer weekly LKGR releases, verifies exact upstream provenance and asset hashes, updates every Pulp mirror, and runs the provider-identity/ODR gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide whether several finished branches ship as ONE PR or stay separate. Use when holding 2+ green branches before `shipyard pr`. Trades CI cost against revert granularity, urgency, and the diff-coverage gate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Embed security into DevOps — pipeline security gates, guardrails, and culture that ships fast and safe.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Domain-Driven Design: bounded contexts, ubiquitous language, aggregates, and tactical patterns. Use when modeling complex domains or structuring domain logic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master orchestrator for B2B SaaS content creation and the editorial production system behind it. Use this skill to produce blog articles, whitepapers, case studies, video scripts, newsletters and ghostwritten thought leadership, to develop content strategy, and to run the publishing line itself — content briefs, editorial calendars and production capacity, review and approval workflow, subject-matter-expert access, the style guide, an AI-drafting policy, and a content inventory with owners. Also triggers on: blog, article, case study, whitepaper, newsletter, video script, ghostwriting, content calendar, editorial, thought leadership, content strategy, content brief, content operations, content ops, editorial workflow, managing editor, who reviews this, our content pipeline is stuck, content is stuck in review, content audit, content inventory, content governance, style guide, house style, SME interview, expert interview, freelance writers, AI content policy, how much content can we actually produce. Also owns the customer academy and customer education: online courses, onboarding curriculum, tutorials, certification programs, digital credentials and badges, exam and pass-mark design, course freshness when the product UI changes, and whether the academy should sit behind a login. Triggers on: customer academy, customer education, online course, course library, learning path, curriculum, tutorial, certification program, certified users, digital badge, Open Badges, recertification, exam, pass mark, LMS, Skilljar, our tutorial shows the old UI, our course is out of date, should the academy be gated, do certified customers renew better.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fresh verification gate before claiming done, fixed, passing, ready, or before commit/PR. Evidence before claims, always.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate the QA team through a full testing cycle. Coordinates qa-lead (strategy + test plan) and qa-tester (test case writing + bug reporting) to produce a complete QA package for a sprint or feature. Covers: test plan generation, test case writing, smoke check gate, manual QA execution, and sign-off report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect non-deterministic (flaky) tests by reading CI run logs or test result history. Aggregates pass rates per test, identifies intermittent failures, recommends quarantine or fix, and maintains a flaky test registry. Best run during Polish phase or after multiple CI runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the critical path smoke test gate before QA hand-off. Executes the automated test suite, verifies core functionality, and produces a PASS/FAIL report. Run after a sprint's stories are implemented and before manual QA begins. A failed smoke check means the build is not ready for QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map test coverage to GDD critical paths, identify fixed bugs without regression tests, flag coverage drift from new features, and maintain tests/regression-suite.md. Run after implementing a bug fix or before a release gate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided, section-by-section Art Bible authoring. Creates the visual identity specification that gates all asset production. Run after /brainstorm is approved and before /map-systems or any GDD authoring begins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When a GDD is revised, scans all ADRs and the traceability index to identify which architectural decisions are now potentially stale. Produces a change impact report and guides the user through resolution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unity 6 C# scripting guide. Use when writing MonoBehaviour scripts, handling lifecycle events (Awake, Start, Update, FixedUpdate), using coroutines or async/await (Awaitable), working with ScriptableObjects, events, delegates, or core APIs like Vector3, Quaternion, Time, Debug. Based on Unity 6.3 LTS documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

用于规划或审查前端测试策略，按风险选择正确测试层级，将覆盖映射到静态检查、单元测试、组件测试、集成测试、E2E、Storybook/视觉回归、a11y、安全、性能或 CI gates。不要用于编写单个组件/E2E 测试或只是运行现有验证命令；中文触发词包括 测试策略、测试分层、测试计划、覆盖矩阵。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning or reviewing a frontend testing strategy, selecting the right test layer by risk, mapping coverage across static checks, unit tests, component tests, integration tests, E2E, Storybook/visual regression, a11y, security, performance, or CI gates. Do not use to write individual component/E2E tests or merely run existing validation commands; Chinese triggers include test strategy, test layering, test plan, coverage matrix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks for general frontend code review, PR review, merge-readiness assessment, architecture maintainability, type-safety, rendering/state risks, style consistency, testability gaps, or a cross-cutting review summary. Delegate deep security, accessibility, E2E, or performance investigations to their specialized skills; Chinese triggers include code review, code review, review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffolds a structured investigation in scratch/ for empirical research and documentation. Use when the user says "start an investigation" or wants to: trace code paths or data flow ("trace from X to Y", "what touches X", "follow the wiring"), document system architecture comprehensively ("document how the system works", "archeology"), investigate bugs ("figure out why X happens"), explore technical feasibility ("can we do X?"), or explore design options ("explore the API", "gather context", "design alternatives"). Creates dated folder with README. NOT for simple code questions or single-file searches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use OpenClaw Manager (OCM) safely and correctly for OpenClaw environment lifecycle work, runtime installation/builds, release-shaped local builds, upgrades, migration/adoption, cloning existing user state, service supervision, gateway logs, dev worktrees, plugin testing, model/provider smoke tests, TUI/dashboard checks, cleanup, and concise reporting. Use whenever Codex is asked to use OCM, manage OpenClaw envs/runtimes/services, test OpenClaw with OCM, reproduce existing-user or new-user flows, or avoid breaking user state while working with OpenClaw.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Economist — estimating a demand elasticity or causal treatment effect from observational or experimental data, building a cost-benefit or welfare analysis for a policy or pricing decision, forecasting a macro or market aggregate under stated assumptions, or stress-testing whether a "the data shows X" claim survives a confounding-variable check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an executive administrative assistant — triaging a stacked calendar against competing priorities, deciding what reaches an executive versus what gets redirected, reconciling a multi-city travel itinerary or expense report, drafting on an executive's behalf within a delegated-authority boundary, or handling a scheduling conflict across time zones.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Engineering Teacher, Postsecondary — diagnosing a spike in a gatekeeper course's D/F/W rate, running a capstone design course with an industry sponsor, closing the loop on an ABET student-outcome assessment, or building a tenure/promotion teaching-effectiveness case beyond raw student evaluation scores.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Data Engineer — designing an idempotent pipeline operation so retries and backfills don't corrupt data, choosing event-time over processing-time partitioning for time-series aggregation, enforcing schema compatibility rules before an upstream change propagates downstream, adding automated data quality checks to a pipeline, or deciding between batch and streaming architecture for a specific freshness requirement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Business Intelligence Analyst — reconciling a metric discrepancy between reports, designing a dimensional model or semantic layer for self-service dashboards, setting a data freshness/latency SLA, or diagnosing why a dashboard's aggregate number is misleading.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Bridge and Lock Tender — deciding whether to open a movable span for a vessel signal during a restricted-hours window, sequencing a lock chamber's fill/empty and valve staging, verifying an interlock/gate cycle before commanding span movement, resolving a marine-traffic-vs-vehicle-traffic conflict, or coordinating a vessel passage over VHF.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。