3,101 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Choosing and operating an HTTP API versioning strategy that doesn't break clients — Stripe's date-based pinned versions, the Deprecation/Sunset header pair (RFC 9745 + RFC 8594), URI vs header vs media-type approaches, and the version-transformer pattern. Grounded in Stripe's published architecture and IETF RFCs. NOT for GraphQL schema evolution, gRPC/Protobuf wire compatibility, database schema migrations, or library/SDK semver.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
API migration strategies, deprecation workflows, and header/URL/content versioning. Activate on: API versioning, backward compatibility, deprecation, breaking change, API migration, v1 v2, sunset header. NOT for: schema evolution in data (use schema-evolution-manager), gateway routing (use api-gateway-reverse-proxy-expert).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
API gateway and reverse proxy configuration with Kong, Nginx, Traefik, routing, and auth middleware. Activate on: API gateway, reverse proxy, Kong, Nginx, Traefik, load balancer, ingress, auth middleware. NOT for: rate limiting algorithms (use api-rate-limiting-throttling-expert), service mesh (use service-mesh-microservices-expert).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design performant animation systems with Framer Motion, GSAP, View Transitions API, and spring physics. Activate on: page transitions, micro-interactions, scroll animations, layout animations, spring physics. NOT for: CSS-only hover effects (use css-in-js-architect), video/canvas rendering (use creative-coding-expert).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for insight, reframing, contradiction, impasse, and anomaly-driven problem solving when execution effort no longer helps. NOT for routine optimization, error correction, or well-specified tasks with known solution paths.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply cognitive task analysis to expert work that depends on perceptual cues, branching judgment, and recurring monitoring loops. Use when decomposing expert capability into agent structure, simulation design, or validation interviews. NOT for ordinary step-by-step SOP capture or simple pipelines with no tacit cue layer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement WCAG 2.2 AA/AAA compliance with automated testing, keyboard navigation, screen reader support, and focus management. Activate on: accessibility audit, WCAG compliance, keyboard navigation, screen reader, aria attributes, axe-core, focus trap. NOT for: design-level accessibility review (use design-accessibility-auditor), color contrast only (use css-in-js-architect).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert-level idiomatic Rust API design — the patterns that make illegal states unrepresentable and abstractions zero-cost. Type-state programming (PhantomData state machines), newtype + sealed + extension traits, typestate builders, RAII guards & Drop ordering, the interior-mutability decision tree (Cell/RefCell/Mutex/RwLock/Atomic/OnceLock), enum-driven state machines, error architecture (thiserror vs anyhow), dyn vs generic dispatch & object safety, the impl Trait / GAT / RPITIT toolbox, and Deref-for-smart-pointers (and its abuse). Use when designing a Rust library's public API, encoding invariants in the type system, choosing a dispatch or error strategy, or reviewing Rust for idiom. NOT for borrow-checker firefighting / toolchain / test-runner workflow (use rust-development-workflow), NOT for pd-console GPUI rendering/layout/panes (use gpui-rust-console), NOT for app packaging/notarization (use rust-app-distribution).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a compliance-ladder design (C0-C6) and transcript-fidelity ladder (T0-T5) plus their adapter conformance fixtures — Codex, Claude Code, Cloudflare, Ollama/LM Studio, custom stdio/HTTP agents — for the two failure modes that make a C-badge or T-fidelity label a lie: the ladder disagreeing with itself across doc/schema/ui/probe surfaces, and a level being reachable by self-report because no daemon-witnessed negative probe actually tries to forge it. Use when designing or freezing a compliance ladder, wiring an adapter conformance probe suite, deciding whether a numeric C-badge or T-label is safe to ship, or investigating a self-attestation or observed-to-controlled bypass risk. NOT for auditing a cryptographic protocol or whitepaper for adversarial soundness (`redteam-review`), writing TLA+/formal invariants for a daemon monitor (`runtime-verification-for-agents`), or agent identity, successor linkage, and reputation across restarts (`agent-identity-continuity-reputation`).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Declare an agentic application's interaction disclosure, state, context, capabilities, and effect-control boundaries. Use for a reviewable design specification and static consistency audit before implementation. NOT for proving that controls are deployed or enforced, exposing private chain-of-thought, selecting a model/router, or designing a multi-agent protocol.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and audits deterministic, authority-filtered partitions of trust-typed context for already admitted bodies or abstract continuation slots. Use when causal context, obligations, disclosure boundaries, vector-space identity, capacity, and omission proofs must survive partitioning. NOT for spawning or admitting agents, choosing worker count, retrieving arbitrary knowledge, writing successor prompts, or granting tools, leases, identity, or effect authority.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and audits closed, ordered, replay-safe message protocols between already admitted agent bodies. Use when a multi-agent exchange needs explicit epochs, audiences, per-sender sequencing, gathers, terminal fences, acknowledgements, and deterministic replay. NOT for selecting or spawning agents, granting identity or authority, choosing a runtime topology, general human facilitation, wire transport implementation, or deciding whether evidence is true.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply crisis decision-making research to agent routing, uncertainty triage, and coordination failure analysis in time-pressured systems. Use when diagnosing handoff failures, analytical paralysis, or expert judgment under incomplete information. NOT for routine coding, simple CRUD design, or static single-agent tasks with complete information.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs digital experiences for ADHD brains using neuroscience research and UX principles. Expert in reducing cognitive load, time blindness solutions, dopamine-driven engagement, and compassionate design patterns. Activate on 'ADHD design', 'cognitive load', 'accessibility', 'neurodivergent UX', 'time blindness', 'dopamine-driven', 'executive function'. NOT for general accessibility (WCAG only), neurotypical UX design, or simple UI styling without ADHD context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and audit a pricing function for variable-cost agent labor. Choose among per-seat, metered, credits, hybrid, and outcome pricing; name buyer value and cost metrics separately; calculate a reproducible cost floor; require pre-commitment guardrails; and stress-test declared personas. Use for offline pricing-design evidence, not billing implementation or runtime control. NOT for production billing, payment collection, or runtime spend enforcement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architecture and systems design for agents that retain bounded state across sessions. Covers durable event history, owned state, derived memory, retrieval indexes, framework evaluation, recovery, deletion, and rebuild behavior. Uses constructed implementation examples and workload calibration rather than universal vendor, latency, similarity, retention, or cost claims. Activate on: "always-on agent", "persistent agent architecture", "episodic memory system", "agent memory design", "long-running agent", "stateful agent", "agent that remembers", "MemGPT architecture", "Letta deployment", "/always-on-agent-architecture". NOT for: choosing what data to feed the agent (use always-on-agent-inputs), brainstorming applications (use always-on-agent-applications), safety and privacy concerns (use always-on-agent-safety), general agentic patterns (use agentic-patterns).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Introduce people to AI, agentic AI, and AI skills with appropriate pedagogy for any audience. Covers LLM analogies, progressive complexity paths, aha-moment demos, audience-tailored explanations, workshop design, and overcoming emotional barriers to AI adoption. Activate on 'explain AI', 'introduce AI', 'AI workshop', 'AI demo', 'teach AI', 'AI literacy', 'onboard to AI', 'AI evangelism', 'explain agentic', 'explain skills to', 'AI training session', 'AI onboarding'. NOT for teaching ML engineering (use ai-engineer), not for building AI features (use ai-engineer), not for prompt engineering (use prompt-engineer), not for building training data pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and scaffold new skills, subagents, and MCP surfaces. Use when choosing which primitive to create. NOT for invoking existing agents, generic coding help, or deployment work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design discovery, directories, and guilds for agent swarms at scale. Use when agents need to find each other on a shared surface: capability indices, yellow-pages directories, whois/phonebook routing, reputation-aware discovery, and guild structures that scope trust. Covers the canonical prior art (FIPA Directory Facilitator, Contract Net, Chord/DHT, DNS-SD/Consul, EigenTrust, Greif's merchant guilds) and the failure modes (read-poverty, Sybil reset, Goodhart on rank, directory staleness, cold-start). Triggers: "agents can't find each other", "who owns this file/skill", "route a question to the right agent", "capability registry", "agent reputation", "guild / federation of fleets". NOT for issuing identities, granting authority, or automatically assigning work from a directory entry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design or audit an agent identity, credential, session, continuity, and reputation plan. Use when attributed outcomes must survive key rotation, restart, recovery, or review; when choosing Elo, TrueSkill, a contextual bandit, or an LLM judge; and when making Sybil, newcomer, calibration, collusion, and evidence limits explicit. Produces a supplied-plan consistency audit, never proof of observed delivery, cryptographic identity, or live enforcement. NOT for proving personhood, global Sybil resistance, or an unobserved delivery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Data structures and serialization formats for agent-to-agent communication. Covers message envelopes, structured output schemas, capability declarations, task handoff payloads, error/retry signaling, and context windows as data structures. Compares the version-pinned A2A, MCP, and JSON-RPC role boundaries covered by this bundle; OpenAI and LangChain-specific APIs require their own current sources. Teaches when to use rigid schemas versus free-form content with validation, typed versus untyped boundaries, and streaming versus batch. Activate on: "agent message format", "agent communication schema", "agent-to-agent protocol", "A2A protocol", "MCP message format", "structured output for agents", "agent interop", "interchange format", "agent serialization", "task handoff format", "capability declaration". NOT for: what agents say to each other (use agent-conversation-protocols), orchestration topology (use multi-agent-coordination), building agent infrastructure (use agentic-infrastructure-2026).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in 3D computer vision labeling tools, workflows, and AI-assisted annotation for LiDAR, point clouds, and sensor fusion. Covers SAM4D/Point-SAM, human-in-the-loop architectures, and vertical-specific training strategies. Activate on '3D labeling', 'point cloud annotation', 'LiDAR labeling', 'SAM 3D', 'SAM4D', 'sensor fusion annotation', '3D bounding box', 'semantic segmentation point cloud'. NOT for 2D image labeling (use clip-aware-embeddings), general ML training (use ml-engineer), video annotation without 3D (use computer-vision-pipeline), or VLM prompt engineering (use prompt-engineer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discipline an AI agent needs to work an issue/task tracker (Jira, Linear, GitHub Issues) as the shared source of truth: pull the right next item instead of inventing work, search before creating to avoid duplicates, write actionable items with checkable acceptance criteria, keep status transitions honest, and link work to items via branches/PRs/commits so progress is legible. Use when an agent picks up tracker work, files a new issue, updates status, or closes an item. NOT for authoring the PR itself (use agent-pr-authoring), roadmap-level planning and prioritization (use legible-roadmap-with-sidequests), or the mechanics of multiple agents coordinating on the same codebase (use multi-agent-coordination).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Author a pull request an AI coding agent can actually get merged: a scoped, coherent diff; a Summary and Test Plan backed by real evidence; correct triage of required-and-blocking CI gates versus external/advisory checks (e.g. a Cloudflare Pages preview build); draft-while-WIP discipline; named fixup commits for real review findings; and a clean landing through a merge queue without force-pushing or bypassing branch protection. Use when opening, updating, triaging red CI on, or landing an agent-authored GitHub PR. NOT for this repo's internal release ceremony, actor embodiments, or contributor mirror-sync mechanics (use port-daddy-internal-dev), tracking backlog/issue lifecycle across a board (use agent-issue-tracker-workflow), or deciding what to build next / sequencing a roadmap (use legible-roadmap-with-sidequests).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。