4,059 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Generate Rocaille-style domain warping shaders, mouse-reactive liquid logo effects, depth-map parallax heroes (Astryx-style hover-reactive statues), and stable fluid simulations over live DOM. Four modes — rocaille, liquid-logo, astryx-statue, fluid-dom. Triggers on shader art, depth parallax, hover-reactive depth map, statue hero, fluid sim, liquid logo, WebGL visualization, procedural background, pointer-reactive fluid.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate SEO and LLM-readability claims against live HTML, local fixtures, and generated artifacts. Use this skill when the user asks to prove whether title, meta description, canonical, hreflang, JSON-LD, NewsArticle.image, OpenGraph, Twitter cards, RSS autodiscovery, robots.txt, llms.txt, sitemap, news-sitemap, crawler access, or performance evidence is actually present, and when subjective audits must become timestamped pass/fail reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review public site content for editorial quality, source support, prompt residue, duplicate blocks, translation drift, hidden filler, and human usefulness before SEO or LLM-friendly publication. Use this skill when the user asks to quality-gate news briefs, longform explainers, blog posts, topic pages, project pages, translated content, or generated article drafts without changing the live publishing pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Specialized research and analysis prompt methodology for Claude. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output) for data analysis, policy research, systematic evidence review, investigative research, and research-specific deliverables. Use when building prompts for quantitative data interpretation, evidence-based policy recommendations, literature reviews, causal analysis, hypothesis-driven investigation, or briefing documents. Trigger on: "prompt for data analysis," "research prompt," "policy brief prompt," "literature review prompt," "prompt for investigating," "systematic review prompt," "build a prompt for evidence synthesis," "causal analysis prompt," "briefing document prompt." Also use when user describes a research or analytical task and needs a structured Claude prompt for it. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or auditing Claude Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tested output format specifications for Claude prompts. Use when the user wants a specific deliverable structure — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or building output formatting. Trigger on: "give me the Executive Brief format," "show me the output template for," "I need the Decision Matrix structure," "show me available output formats," "build a custom output format for." Provides 10 ready-to-use structures (executive briefs, technical designs, research summaries, implementation plans, decision matrices, competitive analyses, post-mortems, stakeholder updates, strategic memos, process documentation) plus a custom template, with per-section length guidance and format constraints tested against Claude formatting defaults. If unsure which format fits, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or choosing reasoning/identity approaches (use rootnode-block-selection if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Selects the active profile from triggering context. Evaluates a rule set against inputs (current time, calendar state, geofence, manual command, custom signals) and returns the profile name that consuming Skills (handoff-trigger-check, critic-gate, future Skills) should apply. Configuration-driven; rule set lives in a router config file conforming to the included schema. Deterministic precedence — manual override beats calendar beats time-window beats default. Required default profile guarantees a routing decision always exists. Use when an orchestrator needs to pick a profile automatically rather than having the caller specify one, when wiring calendar/time/Telegram triggers to gate behavior, or when a Skill's behavior should change with availability mode. Trigger on: "what profile should I use," "route to a profile," "which mode am I in," "auto-select profile," "active mode," "current profile." Do NOT use to evaluate work readiness or review proposed changes. Always returns a profile name.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose tbh-meter problems — reader not attaching, AV/blocked state, slow calibration, missing or invalid runs. Use when debugging meter behavior or reading meter.log / live.json / raw run records / logs records (or the legacy runs.jsonl).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pressure-test and freeze a tiny iOS MVP in seven minutes using one persona, one explicit devil's-advocate round, scope cuts, and a three-screen flow. Use when an audience supplies an app idea, when requirements must be settled live, or when a concept needs a fast implementation-risk check before Claude Design or Claude Code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a visible, evidence-backed privacy and security report for a local iOS app by scanning permission declarations, network code, dependencies, persistence, and risky APIs, while complementing the official Claude Code security-guidance plugin. Use after implementation, in a live security lane, or before claiming that an app is offline and account-free.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a truthful Japanese App Store metadata pack and app-name shortlist in twelve minutes without a multi-agent research round. Use for a live launch sprint, fallback ASO copy, app naming under a hard deadline, or when local product evidence is available but market research is intentionally deferred.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a polished local launch page in twelve minutes from a frozen app brief and design handoff, including a playable micro-demo, responsive copy, privacy proof, and zero remote dependencies. Use for the parallel marketing lane of a live iOS build, a fallback landing page, or a fast product teaser that must run offline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route a 50-minute live iOS launch sprint across the lightweight requirements, Claude Design handoff, SwiftUI implementation, landing page, ASO, Simulator screenshot, promo-video, and privacy-scan skills bundled in this plugin. Use as the main entry point when the whole talk workflow should be planned or executed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Timebox and coordinate a live three-lane iOS launch sprint from audience idea to tested SwiftUI app, landing page, ASO copy, screenshots, promo video, and privacy report. Use for a 50-minute talk, demo rehearsal, fallback drill, or any request to finish a tiny local iOS product under a hard deadline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the deliverable is spoken words to be performed on camera or into a mic: video and podcast scripts, hooks, and CTAs for short-form (TikTok, Reels, Shorts), YouTube long-form, or podcast episodes. Triggers: "write me a reel about X", "I need a hook for my video", "script a 60-second video", "draft a podcast episode", "turn this idea into a script". For motion/timing/shot specs rather than the words, use motion-picture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user needs to find, prioritize, or engage B2B prospects — defining an ICP, tiering accounts, building or enriching lists, reading buying signals, designing multi-channel cadences, cold calling, LinkedIn outreach, routing inbound leads, or diagnosing weak pipeline generation. Also for live prospecting coaching. Not for closing (use sales-skill), copy (use copywriter-skill), or CAC analysis (use channel-expert).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Monitor, cap, and recover from context accumulation in agentic systems. Covers per-cycle cost tracking, context window auditing, budget caps with enforcement policies, emergency pruning when approaching limits, and progressive disclosure integration to minimize token spend on routing. Use when running long-lived agent loops (heartbeats, polling, autonomous workflows), when context windows are growing unpredictably between cycles, when API costs spike beyond expected baselines, when designing new agentic workflows that need cost guardrails from the start, or when post-mortem analysis reveals a cost incident caused by context accumulation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement GitOps continuous delivery using Argo CD or Flux with app-of-apps pattern, automated sync policies, drift detection, and multi-environment promotion. Manage Kubernetes deployments declaratively from Git with automated reconciliation. Use when implementing declarative infrastructure management, migrating from imperative kubectl commands to Git-driven deployments, setting up multi-environment promotion workflows, enforcing code review gates for production, or meeting audit and compliance requirements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design serialization schemas using JSON Schema, Protocol Buffer definitions, or Apache Avro. Covers schema versioning, backwards compatibility, validation rules, and evolution strategies for long-lived data formats. Use when defining a new API contract or data interchange format, adding fields to an existing schema without breaking consumers, migrating between schema versions, choosing between schema systems, or documenting data validation rules for automated enforcement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a GxP training programme covering training needs analysis by role, curriculum design (regulatory awareness, system-specific, data integrity), competency assessment criteria, training record retention, and retraining triggers for SOP revisions and incidents. Use when a new validated system requires user training before go-live, an audit finding cites inadequate training, organisational changes introduce new roles, a periodic programme review is due, or inspection preparation requires demonstrating training adequacy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Capture outbound HTTP and telemetry from a CLI harness at runtime. Covers capture-channel selection (transcript file vs verbose-fetch stderr vs outbound proxy vs on-disk state), hook-driven per-event capture vs long-running session capture, JSONL output format for diff-friendly artifacts, and the observability table that maps each target to the cheapest channel that captures it. Use when a static finding needs runtime confirmation, when a payload shape is needed for a client re-implementation, or when dark-vs-live disambiguation requires watching what the binary actually sends.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Thoroughness and diligence in execution — systematic checking, completeness verification, follow-through on commitments, and the discipline of finishing well. Maps the personality trait of conscientiousness to AI task execution: not cutting corners, verifying results, and ensuring that what was promised is what was delivered. Use before marking a task as complete, when a response feels "good enough" but deserves better, after a complex multi-step operation where steps may have drifted, or when self-monitoring detects a pattern of cutting corners or rushing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate a system's current structural form, identify transformation pressure, and classify transformation readiness. Covers structural inventory, pressure mapping, rigidity assessment, change capacity estimation, and readiness classification for architectural metamorphosis. Use before any significant architectural change to understand the starting point, when a system feels stuck without clear reasons, when external pressure from growth or tech debt is mounting, or as periodic health checks for long-lived systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Universal SDLC pipeline orchestrator with stack provider auto-discovery. Reads stack.md profiles from installed plugins, picks the highest-priority match, executes a 5-phase pipeline (BA → Dev → QA → Sec → Docs) plus stack-defined extra phases. Use when: - User invokes /sdlc:start "<feature>" - User asks to "run the SDLC pipeline" or "go through the full pipeline" - You need to coordinate specialist agents to deliver a complete feature Do NOT use for: - Trivial single-file edits (just edit directly) - Read-only questions about the codebase - Casual conversation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Modern C# idioms for any .NET project (C# 10+, .NET 6+): nullable reference types, records, readonly structs, primary constructors, pattern matching, async/await with CancellationToken, IDisposable/IAsyncDisposable, file-scoped namespaces, var usage, naming conventions (PascalCase members, _camelCase fields, I-prefixed interfaces), and class design rules. Apply whenever the project is a .NET 6+ project. Stack-agnostic — referenced by every .NET plugin in the marketplace. Use this skill to: - Write self-documenting immutable value types with records and readonly structs. - Handle nullable reference types explicitly to eliminate NullReferenceException at compile time. - Implement async/await correctly with CancellationToken propagation and ConfigureAwait(false) in libraries. - Dispose unmanaged resources correctly via IDisposable / IAsyncDisposable and using statements. - Apply C# pattern matching (switch expressions, property patterns, list patterns) for cleaner branching logic. Do NOT use this skill for: - Framework-specific idioms (ASP.NET Core controllers, minimal APIs, EF Core — those live in aspnet-core-plugin skills). - Build tooling (dotnet CLI, NuGet, csproj) — see csharp-foundation:dotnet-tooling. - Testing patterns — see csharp-foundation:dotnet-testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。