「building」の検索結果

Specialized software engineering prompt methodology for Claude. Use when building prompts for system design, code review, incident response, security analysis, API design, architecture decisions, RFCs, ADRs, runbooks, or technical leadership. Trigger on: "build a prompt for code review," "system design prompt," "SRE prompt," "security review prompt," "incident response prompt," "API design prompt," "architecture decision prompt," "RFC prompt," "runbook prompt." Provides 11 tested approaches across identity, reasoning, and output for engineering analysis. Do NOT use for general coding help, writing code, or debugging — this builds prompts that shape engineering analysis, not code itself. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized research and analysis prompt methodology for Claude. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output) for data analysis, policy research, systematic evidence review, investigative research, and research-specific deliverables. Use when building prompts for quantitative data interpretation, evidence-based policy recommendations, literature reviews, causal analysis, hypothesis-driven investigation, or briefing documents. Trigger on: "prompt for data analysis," "research prompt," "policy brief prompt," "literature review prompt," "prompt for investigating," "systematic review prompt," "build a prompt for evidence synthesis," "causal analysis prompt," "briefing document prompt." Also use when user describes a research or analytical task and needs a structured Claude prompt for it. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or auditing Claude Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tested output format specifications for Claude prompts. Use when the user wants a specific deliverable structure — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or building output formatting. Trigger on: "give me the Executive Brief format," "show me the output template for," "I need the Decision Matrix structure," "show me available output formats," "build a custom output format for." Provides 10 ready-to-use structures (executive briefs, technical designs, research summaries, implementation plans, decision matrices, competitive analyses, post-mortems, stakeholder updates, strategic memos, process documentation) plus a custom template, with per-section length guidance and format constraints tested against Claude formatting defaults. If unsure which format fits, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or choosing reasoning/identity approaches (use rootnode-block-selection if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits Claude Code repositories. Two-phase workflow — Phase 1 sweeps 14 hygiene categories (permissions, hooks, CLAUDE.md bloat, Skills hygiene, process-abstraction, plus structural) and an optional 7-layer leak check. Phase 2 executes [APPROVED] markers from the report file. Use for repo cleanup, pre-distribution sanity, post-feature hygiene, environment audit, process-abstraction discovery. Trigger on "audit my CC repo," "sweep my repository for hygiene," "check this CC environment," "find process abstraction candidates," "review my CLAUDE.md," "clean up my .claude directory," "pre-distribution hygiene check," "find layer leaks in my CC setup." Routes structural findings to rootnode-cc-design REMEDIATE. Composes with rootnode-critic-gate. CC-only — does not scan Claude Projects. Do NOT use for building a Skill (use rootnode-skill-builder), compiling a prompt (use rootnode-prompt-compilation), scoring a single prompt (use rootnode-prompt-validation), or auditing a Project (use rootnode-project-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds, validates, packages, tests, and optimizes deployment-ready Skill files (SKILL.md + references/ + scripts/ + agents/) from design specifications. Three pre-build gates + 9-dimension quality gate (with D9a/b/c empirical evidence tiers) + behavioral iteration loop + automated description optimizer + blind version comparator. Use for building, reviewing, revising, testing, or optimizing Skills. Trigger on: "build this Skill," "review this Skill," "test my Skill," "optimize the description," "compare these Skill versions," "should this be a hook instead," "build a template first." Also: "my Skill doesn't activate," "my description truncates," "my SKILL.md is too long," "my Skill is overtriggering." Do NOT use when designing Skill methodology — that's design work, not packaging. Do NOT use for prompt compilation, project auditing, or prompt scoring (use rootnode-prompt-compilation, rootnode-project-audit, or rootnode-prompt-validation if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized business strategy prompt methodology for Claude. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output formats) for consulting, M&A, corporate strategy, and strategic planning tasks. Use when building prompts for deal evaluation, due diligence, portfolio strategy, business model analysis, board narratives, investment cases, market entry plans, or strategic options assessments. Trigger on: "build a prompt for M&A analysis," "due diligence prompt," "board narrative," "investment case," "market entry strategy," "strategic options," "portfolio strategy prompt," "business model analysis prompt," "consulting-style analysis." Do NOT use for evaluating or scoring existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or for auditing Claude Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds complete, optimized Claude prompts and Project scaffolds from task descriptions. Use when building, designing, creating, or structuring a Claude prompt or system prompt. Trigger on: "build me a prompt," "compile a prompt for," "create a system prompt," "write a Claude prompt," "design a prompt for," "help me write a prompt," "scaffold a Claude Project," "design a Project for." Uses a four-stage methodology (Parse, Select, Construct, Validate) and a tested 5-layer architecture (Identity, Objective, Context, Reasoning, Output + Quality Control). In Project Mode, the Compiler is global-layer-aware — checks User Preferences, installed Skills, and MCP Connectors to avoid redundancy and flag gaps. Do NOT use for auditing existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or diagnosing existing Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when searching codebases (text, structural/AST, files by name, PDFs/archives, code stats) or building context before a task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to get found in Google or AI engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews) — keyword and content strategy, technical or content SEO audits, schema markup, link building, topical clustering, E-E-A-T, AI citation (AEO), or deciding whether SEO is even the right channel for their startup. Calibrated for early-stage, low-authority sites. Not for paid acquisition or channel-mix/CAC analysis (use channel-expert), or writing the page copy itself (use copywriter-skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user needs to find, prioritize, or engage B2B prospects — defining an ICP, tiering accounts, building or enriching lists, reading buying signals, designing multi-channel cadences, cold calling, LinkedIn outreach, routing inbound leads, or diagnosing weak pipeline generation. Also for live prospecting coaching. Not for closing (use sales-skill), copy (use copywriter-skill), or CAC analysis (use channel-expert).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user is working a B2B SaaS deal from qualified opportunity to closed-won — preparing discovery calls, structuring demos or POCs, handling a specific objection, qualifying with MEDDIC/MEDDPICC/SPICED, building mutual action plans, navigating negotiation or procurement, or reviewing pipeline health, forecast accuracy, and deal velocity. Not for finding or prospecting new leads (use prospecting) or upstream positioning (use product-position).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a rough ask into a clear work order. Use when the ask is rough, unspoken, or double-readable — before planning or building.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing bytecode dispatch loops, choosing stack or register VM shapes, adding inline caches, or building a first JIT with mmap. Not for a language toolchain: use compiler-frontend.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building or evaluating a Hare program: hare build, run, or test, tagged-union error handling, or calling C through bodyless fn declarations and -l. Not for Zig or C: use zig-cinterop or gcc.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when studying Intel VT-x or AMD-V internals: VMCS and VMCB, EPT and NPT, VM exit handling, APIC virtualization, or building a minimal type-1 hypervisor. Not for running VMs: use qemu-kvm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building Linux servers with liburing, batching SQEs, multi-shot operations, provided buffer rings, registered files and buffers, or zero-copy send. Not for packet I/O: use af-xdp.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when explaining or building on Linux container primitives: namespaces, cgroups v2, overlayfs, runc and the OCI spec, seccomp-bpf, capabilities, or escapes. Not for VM isolation: use qemu-kvm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building static archives with ar, stripping or converting binaries, mapping crash addresses with addr2line, or demangling C++ symbols. Not for ELF analysis: use elf-inspection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building a lexer, Pratt or recursive-descent parser, AST, symbol table, type checker, or LLVM IR emitter for a language or DSL. Not for optimizing IR: use llvm-passes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when directing, building, or auditing React/Next.js Tailwind UI: visual direction, responsive/dark-mode retrofits, UX audits. Not for typography or motion: use typography-audit or ui-animation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to audit typography across a codebase. Produces a file:line report with concrete fixes ordered by impact and flags unverifiable rules. Not for building a type system or token scale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an answer is wanted from one named seat only: breaking, business, career, codebase, human, impact, innovation, moat, rent-seeking, skeptic, or stability. Not for multi-lens synthesis: use prism. Not for rebuilding from primitives: use from-first-principle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing a multi-file change, building a feature from a breakdown, or writing a large amount of code. Not for a single settled ticket: use work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when replacing a greenfield attempt with a clean pad of verified requirements. Not for rebuilding from primitives: use from-first-principle. Requires a committed, VCS-recoverable attempt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。