「context」の検索結果

Designs, builds, and deploys AI agents or multi-agent systems on Google Cloud. Provides an interactive workflow to gather requirements, recommend a tailored architecture, and generate deployment instructions. Use when designing or implementing agentic systems on Google Cloud. Don't use for general Google Cloud solution architecture (use google-cloud-solution-architecture instead) or for narrow tasks targeting a single product without agent context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages GKE storage, including PVCs, PersistentVolumes, Filestore, and GCS FUSE. Use when configuring GKE storage, creating PVCs, or setting up GCS FUSE on GKE. For diagnosing storage failures (volume attach/mount errors, disk performance/node storage pressure, or Cloud Storage FUSE OOM), use the gke-storage-troubleshooting skill instead. Don't use for database administration or replication strategies outside volume provisioning context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discovers golden base images for creating GKE custom node images based on technical specifications or context clues. Use when finding the golden base image for custom GKE node creation, mapping cluster configuration parameters (GKE version, OS, architecture, accelerators, gVisor, cgroups) to image names, or querying GKE base image maps. Don't use for general GKE cluster creation (use gke-cluster-creation) or standard node pool management (use gke-basics).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages clusters, instances, and backups for AlloyDB for PostgreSQL, and integrates with AlloyDB Model Context Protocol (MCP) tools for automated database operations. Use when creating, configuring, or administering AlloyDB databases. Do NOT use for general PostgreSQL instances (e.g. Cloud SQL) or other GCP databases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Processes GCP infrastructure design and deployment workflows within Application Design Center (ADC). Use when: - Designing GCP infrastructure with Terraform. - Validating local HCL. - Performing best-practice plan scans. - Importing templates to Application Design Center (ADC). - Deploying templates. - Troubleshooting deployment failures. Boundaries: - Only use for GCP-specific cloud infrastructure. - Only use for Terraform coding within the ADC context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full SRS workflow: Brainstorm → Spec → Plan (per-section files) → User Review → SRS Generation → Validation → Improvement Report → Context Save. Use when user provides a project topic and wants a complete requirements pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full SRS workflow: Brainstorm → Spec → Plan (per-section files) → User Review → SRS Generation → Validation → Improvement Report → Context Save. Use when user provides a project topic and wants a complete requirements pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or reviewing Agentforce topic (renamed subagent in April 2026) structure, including topic boundaries, instruction quality, handoff rules, out-of-scope behavior, and topic-selector strategy. Triggers: 'agentforce subagents (formerly topics)', 'topic design', 'topic selector', 'agent scope boundary', 'handoff conditions'. NOT for restricting what the agent may do or say (topic Scope, action filters, abuse prevention) — use agentforce/agentforce-guardrails. NOT for the mechanics of transferring a live conversation out — Omni-Channel routing and the context package — use agentforce/agentforce-agent-handoff-patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design Invocable Apex actions that return deterministic, agent-friendly errors instead of surfacing raw exceptions to the LLM. NOT for authoring the action itself — @InvocableMethod schema, labels, security context — use agentforce/custom-agent-actions-apex. NOT for the Apex tests that force each error branch — use agentforce/agent-action-unit-tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design Agentforce conversations that span multiple turns without losing context: session variable scoping, conversation memory, clarifying-question patterns, topic-to-topic (now subagent) handoff, and the right abstractions for accumulating state across turns. NOT for deciding the topic boundaries themselves or out-of-scope behavior — use agentforce/agent-topic-design. NOT for single-turn agent actions and their input/output contracts — use agentforce/agent-actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrating Classic email templates (Text, HTML with Letterhead, Custom HTML, Visualforce email) to Lightning Email Templates (LET) and the Email Template Builder. Covers merge-field translation, Letterhead-to-Enhanced-Letterhead conversion, Visualforce email retention strategy, folder reorganization, sender-context (OrgWideEmailAddress) preservation, and downstream Email Alert / Process Builder / Flow rewiring. NOT for transactional Apex email sending (use apex/apex-outbound-email-patterns) or marketing email broadcasts (use Marketing Cloud / Account Engagement).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects permission requests triggered at app launch or before meaningful user interaction, which violates Guideline 5.1.1(ii) requiring permissions to be requested only at the moment of need with contextual explanation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React composition patterns that scale. Use when refactoring components with boolean prop proliferation, building flexible component libraries, or designing reusable APIs. Triggers on tasks involving compound components, render props, context providers, or component architecture. Includes React 19 API changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI เชฟครัวร้านอาหาร — menu development, kitchen brigade, mise en place, food cost, seasonal menu, HACCP, Thai culinary context

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a HyperFrames video composition from a brief/script autonomously. Uses separated builder and critic subagents — builders never review their own work. Quality decisions are grounded in project context (identity, audience, goals) and established visual/motion design principles. Measurable criteria (text size, contrast, overflow) are verified with tooling, not visual judgment. Use when the user says "make this video", "implement this brief", "build this composition", or provides a video script/brief to implement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate work as a cyclic directed graph of subagent-executed nodes with transition criteria on edges, budgeted cycles, and per-node gates (runtime verification, metric, or artifact). Use when the user says "workgraph", "run this as a graph", "graph this work", or when a goal has parallel branches, feedback loops, or mixed gate types that a linear loop cannot express. Every node is sized to a 64k context budget, so small goals run as a two-node do/verify graph and large goals scale out without caps. For clock-driven or metric-driven single loops, timeboxed-iterating and autoresearch remain lighter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to use the coding agents installed on this machine (claude, codex, droid, grok, vktr, hermes, opencode, copilot, pi) as plain sub-agents in orchestrated workflows: one headless invocation, one prompt in, one result out. Deliberately ignores each CLI's own orchestration features (droid --mission, codex multi_agent, hermes delegation/moa/kanban, grok --agents, opencode personas). The orchestrator is whatever session is running the skill; the CLIs are interchangeable workers. Use when the user asks "which agent should run this", "fan out workers", "run X headless", or when a lifeos skill (overnight, timeboxed-iterating, workgraph, gauntlet, bughunt, dark-factory) needs to launch an agent CLI, or when a worker needs company context it should ask Viktor for (vktr).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a task iteratively over a user-specified duration by dispatching subagents. The orchestrator stays strictly linear and time-checked, but each iteration fans out MULTIPLE subagents in parallel over independent units (and those subagents may fan out further). Shared state — a compact progress digest and a growing environment cheatsheet — lives on disk and is passed to every subagent BY REFERENCE, killing the per-subagent rediscovery tax. Every subagent first reads an initialiser preamble that points it at that shared state and makes it write findings back, so the cheatsheet populates itself; role prompts are produced ONCE on the filesystem by a single scaffold command and dispatched by path, never re-typed per dispatch. Subagents persist their results to disk and return only a tiny status, so the orchestrator's context stays small and lasts. The orchestrator classifies the goal as FINITE or OPEN-ENDED: finite lists may finish early; open-ended goals use the full duration, never idle, never manufacture busywork. Use when the user gives a task and a duration and wants it ground out iteratively by subagents over that time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Personal financial planner for Thailand-based users. Use this skill when the user asks for help with budgeting, tax planning involving Thai-specific products (SSF, RMF, Thai ESG, Thai ESGX, Easy E-Receipt), debt strategy at Thai bank rates, retirement planning involving ประกันสังคม (มาตรา 33/39/40), กบข., PVD (provident fund), or any personal-money question framed in baht and Thai life events. Strong activation phrases include "ช่วยวางแผนการเงิน", "วางแผนภาษี", "ปลดหนี้บัตรเครดิต", "ลดหย่อน RMF", "Help me with my Thai finances", "How much should I save in Thailand", "ม.33 vs ม.39", "เกษียณต้องเก็บเงินเท่าไหร่". Do NOT use for non-Thai financial contexts (US 401(k), Canadian RRSP, UK ISA, etc.) — different skills exist for those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose failures in SKMTC sessions — no output, wrong output, error messages, failed bundle builds, parseIssues, "Registered definition mismatch", ref cycles, "Module not found" in generated code, or any other broken behavior. Applies across both CLI usage and generator authoring contexts. Use this skill when the user asks "why isn't my generator working", "no output for X", "wrong output", "what does this error mean", "manifest says X", "bundle failed", "INVALID_SCHEMA", "INVALID_DEPENDENCY_REF", "Registered definition mismatch", "Module not found" (in generated code), "ConfigValidationError", or reports any other SKMTC failure. This skill encodes a **verify-first epistemic stance** — read the manifest, check parseIssues, reproduce the failure before proposing fixes. Distinct from `skmtc-cli` and `skmtc-generator` which guide *doing*; this skill guides *diagnosing*.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the Skmtc CLI to scaffold projects, install or clone generators from JSR, configure schema sources and enrichments, and produce code artifacts from an OpenAPI v3 or GraphQL SDL schema. Teaches the workspace mental model (`<root>/.skmtc/<project>/`, client.json, bundle, manifest) and the agent contract (strict text / strict JSON modes, exit codes, recipe errors, `agent-context` + `doctor`); the command surface itself is discovered from the binary — `skmtc --help`, `skmtc <cmd> -h` — rather than carried in this skill. Use this skill when the user asks to "run skmtc", "generate code from an OpenAPI schema", "install a skmtc generator", "scaffold a skmtc project", "watch a skmtc project", "configure enrichments", "publish a stack", "deploy to skmtc-hub" (the command is `publish`; there is no `deploy`), "skmtc in CI", or invokes any CLI subcommand. For *authoring* a generator package (Projections, Snippets, transform functions), defer to `skmtc-generator`. When something is broken (no output, wrong output, error messages, a failed bundle build), verify before proposing a fix: read the manifest and the parse issues, and reproduce the failure first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a customer support email reply based on ticket context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Process a refund request by gathering context and preparing the refund workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。