「eval」の検索結果

Designs Claude Code prompts and CC environments. Produces CLAUDE.md drafts, agent topologies, scope-authorization frameworks, halt triggers, Skills/hooks/MCP plans, chat-to-CC handoff specs, and EXECUTION_PLAN.md remediation plans. Five modes: DESIGN (new CC deployments), EVOLVE (updates from friction), RESEARCH (evaluate a CC tool/pattern), TEMPLATE (reusable artifacts), REMEDIATE (consume hygiene findings → produce + execute plan). Do NOT use REMEDIATE for direct cleanup (Cat 1–10 — use rootnode-repo-hygiene Phase 2). Do NOT use for hygiene scanning (rootnode-repo-hygiene), chat prompts (rootnode-prompt-validation), or chat Projects (rootnode-project-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Eight tested identity approaches for Claude prompts, each shaping depth, vocabulary, reasoning style, and what Claude treats as obvious vs. requiring explanation. Use when the user wants a specific identity template — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or building a role definition. Trigger on: "give me the Strategic Advisor identity," "show me the identity template for," "I need a Technical Architect role," "build a custom role for," "show me all available identities." Also use when reviewing a prompt's identity layer or when output lacks domain-appropriate depth. Provides 8 tested approaches across strategy, technical, research, communications, and operations domains plus a template for building custom identities. If the user is unsure which identity fits their task, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating complete prompts — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available. Do NOT use for full prompt assembly — use rootnode-prompt-compilation if available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tested output format specifications for Claude prompts. Use when the user wants a specific deliverable structure — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or building output formatting. Trigger on: "give me the Executive Brief format," "show me the output template for," "I need the Decision Matrix structure," "show me available output formats," "build a custom output format for." Provides 10 ready-to-use structures (executive briefs, technical designs, research summaries, implementation plans, decision matrices, competitive analyses, post-mortems, stakeholder updates, strategic memos, process documentation) plus a custom template, with per-section length guidance and format constraints tested against Claude formatting defaults. If unsure which format fits, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or choosing reasoning/identity approaches (use rootnode-block-selection if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized research and analysis prompt methodology for Claude. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output) for data analysis, policy research, systematic evidence review, investigative research, and research-specific deliverables. Use when building prompts for quantitative data interpretation, evidence-based policy recommendations, literature reviews, causal analysis, hypothesis-driven investigation, or briefing documents. Trigger on: "prompt for data analysis," "research prompt," "policy brief prompt," "literature review prompt," "prompt for investigating," "systematic review prompt," "build a prompt for evidence synthesis," "causal analysis prompt," "briefing document prompt." Also use when user describes a research or analytical task and needs a structured Claude prompt for it. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or auditing Claude Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides selection of identity, reasoning, and output approaches for Claude prompts based on task characteristics. Trigger on: "help me choose an approach," "which approach fits this task," "recommend a prompt pattern," "compare reasoning methods," "map this task to the right approach," "what combination of approaches," "which identity fits," "which reasoning method." Also trigger on symptom-phrased: "my prompt feels generic," "I don't know which approach to use," "my output lacks domain depth." Covers decision-tree logic across 8 identity approaches, 18 reasoning variants, and 10 output formats. After selection, use the relevant catalog skill if available to retrieve full templates. Activate whenever approach-selection across multiple categories is the primary decision. Do NOT use when the user already names a specific approach to retrieve (use the relevant catalog skill directly if available) or for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tested reasoning approaches for Claude prompts — 18 variants across 6 categories (Analytical, Strategic, Creative, Technical, Research, Comparative). Use when the user wants a specific reasoning template — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or combining reasoning instructions for a prompt. Trigger on: "give me the Root Cause Diagnosis approach," "show me the reasoning template for," "I need the Evidence Synthesis method," "show me analytical reasoning options," "combine reasoning approaches for," "show me all reasoning variants." Also use when a prompt produces shallow output and the fix is a reasoning upgrade. Provides 18 tested approaches for analytical, strategic, creative, technical, research, and comparison tasks. If the user is unsure which reasoning method fits, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available. Do NOT use for project-level audits — use rootnode-project-audit if available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rebalances context across Memory, Custom Instructions, knowledge files, and User Preferences in Claude Projects. Audits Memory for redundancy, staleness, and misplacement; prescribes optimization including Codification of stable Memory patterns into explicit User Preferences or Project CI rules. Use when user says "optimize my memory," "what should be in my memory," "trim my knowledge files," "reduce my context usage," "rebalance my project," "what should be in my preferences vs memory," or asks whether something belongs in Memory, a knowledge file, or User Preferences. Also trigger on symptom-phrased: "my project feels bloated," "Claude keeps forgetting things," "my context window keeps hitting limits." Activate whenever Memory-layer balance is the primary concern. Do NOT use for full Project audits (use rootnode-project-audit if available), single-prompt evaluation (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available), or global-layer audits that don't touch Project Memory (use rootnode-global-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independent re-derivation gate for proposed changes during autonomous execution. Evaluates a change (code diff, config edit, engine evolution, schema change) against the work's authority matrix and a 4-check protocol: invariant compliance, scope authorization, detection narrowness, and regression risk. Returns structured JSON with pass/fail per check, an overall verdict (APPROVE / REQUEST_CHANGES / REJECT), and blockers. Profile-driven thresholds (strict for unattended runs, lenient for desk supervision). Use when an autonomous agent proposes an engine change, when reviewing a Claude Code-authored modification before merge, or when an unattended profile requires independent re-derivation. Trigger on: "review/approve this proposed change," "critic-gate this," "is this change safe," "is this safe to merge," "should I let this land," "run the critic." Do NOT use for handoff-readiness checks (use rootnode-handoff-trigger-check), general code review, or design-time correctness. Authority matrix required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Therapeutics Data Commons through the PyTDC Python package for registry discovery, approved dataset access, task-aware splits (scaffold, cold-start, temporal, combination), evaluator metrics, benchmark groups, and bounded molecular-oracle workflows. Use this skill to find which TDC datasets exist for a therapeutic task, load them with a split that does not leak, score predictions with the task's own official metric rather than a generic one, and run benchmark groups reproducibly. Also trigger on PyTDC, Therapeutics Data Commons, tdc.single_pred, tdc.multi_pred, ADMET Benchmark Group, scaffold split, get_split, or molecular oracles such as GSK3B, JNK3 and DRD2.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query the ChEMBL database web services for measured bioactivity data, compound records and calculated properties, targets, assays, mechanisms of action, drug indications and warnings. Use this skill to build curated SAR or QSAR datasets for a target, look compounds up by SMILES, InChIKey, name, or ChEMBL id, run similarity and substructure searches, and check what chemistry is already known against a protein. Also trigger when a query mentions ChEMBL ids (CHEMBL...), pChEMBL values, IC50/Ki/Kd/EC50 retrieval, assay confidence scores, or ebi.ac.uk/chembl.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to use the Adaptyv Bio Foundry API and Python SDK for protein experiment design, submission, and results retrieval. Use this skill whenever the user mentions Adaptyv, Foundry API, protein binding assays, protein screening experiments, BLI/SPR assays, thermostability assays, or wants to submit protein sequences for experimental characterization. Also trigger when code imports `adaptyv`, `adaptyv_sdk`, or `FoundryClient`, or references `foundry-api-public.adaptyvbio.com`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit, classify, and selectively forget stored memories. Covers memory enumeration and classification by type/age/access frequency, staleness detection for outdated references, fidelity checks using external anchors, a decision tree for selective withdrawal, tombstoned deaccession so removed content stays recoverable, counter-memory inoculation for failed strategies that would otherwise be re-derived, preemptive filtering rules for what should never become memories, and an audit trail so forgetting itself is reviewable. Use when memory has grown large and uncurated, when project state has shifted significantly since memories were written, when retrieval quality has degraded, or as periodic maintenance alongside manage-memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Qualify a vendor or supplier of GxP-relevant software or services. Covers vendor risk classification, assessment questionnaire design, desk and on-site audit approaches, quality agreement evaluation, SLA review, and ongoing monitoring cadence definition. Use when selecting a new vendor for a GxP-critical system, onboarding a cloud provider for regulated data, performing a periodic re-qualification, when a vendor audit finding requires re-assessment, or when EU Annex 11 or ICH Q10 requires supplier qualification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Observe and assess a garden using a structured sensory protocol adapted from Coordinate Remote Viewing. Covers pre-entry clearing (meditate checkpoint), Stage I gestalt impression, Stage II sensory layer (leaf, stem, root, soil), Stage III pattern recognition with AOL management, and garden health triage matrix (heal checkpoint). Use before any intervention, when plants show stress symptoms, at seasonal transitions, when evaluating a new garden site, during regular health monitoring, or after extreme weather events such as frost or heat waves.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a Computer Systems Validation (CSV) assessment following GAMP 5 methodology. Covers user requirements, risk assessment, IQ/OQ/PQ planning, traceability matrix creation, and validation summary reporting. Use when a new computerized system is being introduced in a GxP environment, when an existing validated system is undergoing significant change, when periodic revalidation is required, or when a regulatory inspection demands a validation gap analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI systematic knowledge acquisition from unfamiliar territory — deliberate model-building with feedback loops. Maps spaced repetition principles to AI reasoning: survey the territory, hypothesize structure, explore with probes, integrate findings, verify understanding, and consolidate for future retrieval. Use when encountering an unfamiliar codebase or domain, when a user asks about a topic requiring genuine investigation rather than recall, when multiple conflicting sources require building a coherent model, or when preparing to teach a topic and deep understanding is required first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically interpret Raman spectra to identify molecular vibrations, assess polarizability-driven selection rules, compare with complementary IR data, and evaluate depolarization ratios for symmetry assignment. Covers Raman-active mode identification, fluorescence interference mitigation, and reference spectrum matching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically interpret mass spectra to determine molecular formula, identify fragmentation pathways, and propose molecular structures. Covers ionization method assessment, molecular ion identification, isotope pattern analysis, common fragmentation losses, and purity evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evolve SKILL.md files from agent execution traces using a three-stage pipeline: trajectory collection from observed runs, parallel multi-agent patch proposal for error and success analysis, and conflict-free consolidation of overlapping edits via prevalence-weighting. Based on the Trace2Skill methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develop a high-performance liquid chromatography method: define separation goals, select column chemistry and mobile phase, optimize gradient and flow conditions, choose the appropriate detector, and evaluate initial method performance for target analytes in solution or complex matrices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI unconstrained creative exploration — deliberately dropping structure to let associations form freely. The one skill that inverts the standard procedure format: instead of inputs, steps, and validation, dream opens space for emergence without evaluation. Use before design work, before naming things, before choosing between approaches, or anywhere that premature structure kills the best option.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compose or analyze sacred music in Hildegard von Bingen's distinctive modal style. Covers modal selection, melodic contour (wide-range melodies), text-setting (syllabic and melismatic), neumatic notation, and liturgical context for antiphons, sequences, and responsories. Use when composing a new piece in Hildegardian style, analyzing an existing chant for structure and mode, researching medieval modal music, preparing to perform or teach Hildegard's music, or setting Latin sacred texts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reference Hildegard von Bingen's Physica natural history knowledge. Covers classification of plants, stones, animals, fish, birds, elements, and trees with their medicinal, symbolic, and practical properties. Enables cross- referencing between categories and application guidance. Use when exploring a specific plant, stone, or animal from Hildegard's perspective, researching medieval natural history and cosmology, cross-referencing properties across categories, or integrating Physica knowledge into health, spiritual, or creative practice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。