5,167 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Give the owner one page when they come back from sleep, a meeting or a long run: what got done, what is stuck, what waits for their answer, and what it cost in quota. Use when the owner asks what happened while they were away, wants a status page, or when you finish a long stretch of work and must report it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide to interpreting BUSCO completeness statuses: why Duplicated BUSCOs count as complete, parsing output files, computing/comparing completeness across proteomes/genomes, common counting mistakes. Use when running BUSCO QC, comparing assemblies, or reporting completeness. See also: prokka-genome-annotation for annotation workflows feeding BUSCO.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ENA REST API for sequences, reads, assemblies, and annotations. Portal API search, Browser API retrieval (XML/FASTA/EMBL), file reports for FASTQ/BAM URLs, taxonomy, cross-refs. For multi-DB Python use bioservices; for NCBI-only use pubmed-database or Biopython Entrez.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluating scientific evidence and claims. Covers study design hierarchy (RCT to expert opinion), effect sizes (OR, RR, NNT, Cohen's d), confounding, p-value vs clinical significance, GRADE quality assessment, reproducibility, and bias types (selection, information, confounding, reporting). Use when reading a paper or assessing claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scientific manuscript writing: IMRAD, citation styles (APA/AMA/Vancouver/IEEE), figures/tables, reporting guidelines (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA/ARRIVE), writing principles (clarity/conciseness/accuracy), venue-specific style. For LaTeX see companion assets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide to KEGG pathway enrichment for DEG results. Covers ORA vs GSEA, mandatory directionality splitting, KEGG organism codes, API failure handling with offline fallbacks, cross-condition comparisons, and answer-first reporting. Consult when running enrichment with clusterProfiler or gseapy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guidelines for clinical decision support (CDS) documents: biomarker-stratified cohort analyses and GRADE-graded treatment reports. Covers structure, executive summaries, evidence grading (1A–2C), stats (HR, CI, survival), and biomarker integration. Use for pharma research docs, clinical guidelines, regulatory submissions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured peer review of manuscripts and grants. 7-stage evaluation: initial assessment, section review, statistical rigor, reproducibility, figure integrity, ethics, writing. Covers CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA and report structure. For evidence quality see scientific-critical-thinking; scoring see scholar-evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Methodology for exploratory data analysis on scientific files. Decision frameworks by data type (tabular, sequence, image, spectral, structural, omics), quality assessment, report generation, format detection across 200+ formats. Use when given a data file for initial exploration or to pick an analysis before a pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
NEB-IRC activation energy pipeline for reaction barriers using GFN2-xTB and pysisyphus. Optimize reactant and product geometries, run CI-NEB path search, optimize the transition state with a Hessian, verify with IRC (one imaginary mode, endpoints matching reactant/product, single NEB maximum), and report the electronic and Gibbs barriers. Use when you need a transition state, reaction barrier, activation energy, minimum energy path, or intrinsic reaction coordinate. Covers reactant/product atom-ordering pitfalls, feasibility sizing for single-core runs, and thermochemistry corrections. Renders an IRC energy-profile plot and an animated TS imaginary-mode HTML viewer. For 2D reaction scheme drawing use rdkit-chemdraw-cdxml.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conducting systematic, scoping, and narrative literature reviews. Covers PRISMA/PRISMA-ScR protocols, search strategy (Boolean, MeSH), database selection (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase), screening, data extraction, evidence synthesis (narrative, meta-analysis, thematic), and reporting. Use when planning or executing a formal literature review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guided statistical analysis: test choice, assumption checks, effect sizes, power, APA reporting. Pick tests, verify assumptions, or format results for publication. Covers frequentist (t-test, ANOVA, chi-square, regression, correlation, survival, count, reliability) and Bayesian. Use statsmodels or pymc-bayesian-modeling to fit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze PMCC (Poor Man's Covered Call / diagonal spread) positions from IB portfolio. For each diagonal spread, reports short leg risk (delta, IV, assignment probability), daily P&L projections, top-3 roll candidates, and a side-by-side comparison table. Requires TWS or IB Gateway running locally.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate tactical collar strategy reports for protecting PMCC positions through earnings or high-risk events. Requires TWS or IB Gateway running locally.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert a markdown file to PDF using mistune + reportlab. Use when the user wants to convert a .md file to PDF, or when another skill needs to produce a PDF from markdown output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fetch trade executions from Interactive Brokers filtered by account, date range, or symbol. Supports live API (~7 days history) and FlexReport (full history). Use when user asks about their trades, executions, or transaction history. Requires TWS or IB Gateway running locally.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Get upcoming earnings dates with timing (before/after market) and EPS estimates. Use when user asks about earnings dates, earnings calendar, when a company reports, or upcoming earnings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze C++ build performance using vcperf.exe and ETL traces. Use this skill when the user wants to profile a build, understand compile bottlenecks, identify expensive headers or templates, generate JSON analysis reports, or interpret vcperf output. Covers tracing workflows, the /jsonAnalysis flag, reading the resulting JSON schema, and actionable remediation strategies for each bottleneck category.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when evaluating a newly adapted model's accuracy/eval score. Runs evalscope eval (or the test/srt/run_eval.py fallback) against an OpenAI-compatible endpoint on datasets like gsm8k / aime, producing per-dataset reports and a score. Accuracy only — throughput/latency benchmarks belong to model-speed-benchmark. Triggers on accuracy, eval, evalscope, gsm8k, aime, run_eval — not throughput.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enables interaction with Google NotebookLM for advanced RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) capabilities via the notebooklm-mcp-cli tool. Use when querying project documentation stored in NotebookLM, managing research notebooks and sources, retrieving AI-synthesized information, generating audio podcasts or reports from notebooks, or performing contextual queries against curated knowledge bases. Triggers on "notebooklm", "nlm", "notebook query", "research notebook", "query documentation in notebooklm".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides comprehensive memory file management capabilities including auditing, quality assessment, and targeted improvements for files such as CLAUDE.md. Use when user asks to check, audit, update, improve, fix, maintain, or validate project memory files. Also triggers for "project memory optimization", "CLAUDE.md quality check", "documentation review", or when a project memory file needs to be created from scratch. This skill scans memory files, evaluates quality against standardized criteria, outputs detailed quality reports with scores and recommendations, then makes targeted updates with user approval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate WooAIAssistant against a structured scenario suite with hard invariants + LLM-as-judge rubric scoring. Runs live against the demo store + gpt-5.1 via the woo-mobile-ai backend wrapper, writes a JSONL run record, compares against stored baselines, and surfaces regressions. Always delegated to a subagent so the main context only sees the markdown report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when about to claim a result, effect, significance, or that an analysis reproduces, before reporting or writing it up - requires running the analysis fresh and reading the actual output first; evidence before claims always
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use after completing an analysis or before reporting a finding, to have a skeptical reviewer attack the conclusion before you believe it
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。