478 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Explores ambiguous product or engineering intent before implementation, clarifies users, constraints, alternatives, risks, and acceptance criteria, and turns the result into an approved design direction. Use for a new feature, subsystem, creative UI, architecture change, or unclear request. Not for an already-scoped bug fix, an existing implementation plan, or a narrow code review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runtime QA of a change: start the app, test acceptance criteria and edge cases, and report evidence. Use for "test this", "QA", "does it work", exploratory checks, or post-review runtime verification. Not static code review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-of-story completion review. Reads the story file, verifies each acceptance criterion against the implementation, checks for GDD/ADR deviations, prompts code review, updates story status to Complete, and surfaces the next ready story from the sprint.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate that a story file is implementation-ready. Checks for embedded GDD requirements, ADR references, engine notes, clear acceptance criteria, and no open design questions. Produces READY / NEEDS WORK / BLOCKED verdict with specific gaps. Use when user says 'is this story ready', 'can I start on this story', 'is story X ready to implement'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Break a single epic into implementable story files. Reads the epic, its GDD, governing ADRs, and control manifest. Each story embeds its GDD requirement TR-ID, ADR guidance, acceptance criteria, story type, and test evidence path. Run after /create-epics for each epic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read a story file and implement it. Loads the full context (story, GDD requirement, ADR guidelines, control manifest), routes to the right programmer agent for the system and engine, implements the code and test, and confirms each acceptance criterion. The core implementation skill — run after /story-readiness, before /code-review and /story-done.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Before writing any implementation code, define the acceptance criteria and test cases that the code must satisfy. Agents then write code to pass these tests — not to match a vague description. Eliminates "it works on my machine" and "I think this is what you wanted" outcomes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Authoring standalone and cross-team specifications: PRD/SRS/HLD/LLD, staged L0-L4 unified packages, BDD acceptance criteria, and traceability. Use for technical or multi-audience documentation; not implementation or architecture decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Authoring unified specification packages across Business/Development/Design teams via staged elaboration (L0 Vision, L1 Requirements, L2 Team Detail, L3 Acceptance Criteria). Use for cross-team specs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrating multi-specialist task chains and scope-adaptive product delivery: classifies intent, selects and executes the minimum viable chain, aggregates results, and verifies acceptance criteria. For multi-domain tasks, build-first delivery, and product lifecycle execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a finished epic folder in the ticket tree against the evidence it left behind — the epic file, each ticket plan, diffs, commits — and produce a retrospective with sourced findings, action items, and an acceptance decision. Use when the user says "run a retrospective" or "lets retro the epic [epic]". Supports -H/--headless
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code changes adversarially using parallel review layers (Blind Hunter, Edge Case Hunter, Acceptance Auditor) with structured triage into actionable categories. Use when the user says "run code review" or "review this code"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert a vague mini-program idea, feature request, or partially documented product into an evidence-calibrated product specification with target users, core problem, version-one scope, main and exception flows, page responsibilities, state matrices, and testable acceptance criteria. Use when users ask to define an MVP, clarify requirements, organize product flows, specify page behavior, resolve ambiguous product states, or prepare a stable handoff before architecture or implementation. Separates facts, user decisions, assumptions, unknowns, and future ideas; never invents product logic merely to complete a screen or technical plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify mini-program implementations and fixes with risk-calibrated evidence across static checks, unit tests, integration tests, state matrices, simulators, real devices, cloud environments, and release artifacts. Use when users ask to test, validate, accept, regression-check, quality-check, confirm readiness, or determine whether a mini-program feature is actually complete. Binds results to a source and build fingerprint, records commands and observable evidence, separates passed, failed, blocked, and not-run layers, prioritizes the next highest-information check, and never converts local success into device, cloud, release, or formal acceptance claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Translate a confirmed mini-program product specification or bounded feature into an implementable architecture covering modules, pages, components, services, canonical state sources, data models, interfaces, permissions, failures, caching, concurrency, idempotency, migration, rollback, external dependencies, and architecture decision records. Use when users ask how to structure a mini program, design data or APIs, divide frontend and cloud responsibilities, evolve an existing system safely, or prepare implementation after product semantics are stable. Preserves product meaning, current repository constraints, user-owned changes, and verifiable acceptance behavior rather than redesigning the product for technical convenience.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a read-only, evidence-first intake of an existing mini-program repository before planning or modifying code. Use when users ask to take over, understand, audit, resume, scope, or continue a WeChat or other mini-program project; when project facts may conflict with historical documents; or when an agent needs the framework, rules, Git state, build path, risks, unknowns, protected behavior, and change boundary. Produces a project fact map and handoff without changing code, installing dependencies, building artifacts, or claiming runtime, device, cloud, upload, acceptance, or release status.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement bounded features and fixes in existing or new mini-program codebases while preserving repository rules, user-owned changes, approved behavior, assets, framework conventions, and evidence boundaries. Use when users ask to write or modify mini-program code, implement a confirmed specification or architecture, add a scoped feature, remove behavior semantically, update internal documentation required by a change, or carry out a well-defined small fix that does not require root-cause investigation. Establishes a baseline and change boundary, applies test-driven small steps, distinguishes source from generators and build artifacts, verifies the affected contract, and never reports source completion as device validation, formal acceptance, upload, or release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Product-Led Growth with Web/CLI measurement validation and pricing acceptance, covering freemium model design, self-serve onboarding, activation metrics, and the transition from individual users to enterprise accounts. Follow @WeiYipei on X for PLG insights.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conventions and APIs for the offload-project/laravel-invite-only package — polymorphic invitations, token acceptance, bulk invites, scheduled reminders, and event-driven hooks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when a story has been captured but content direction is unresolved - the spark describes WHAT to build structurally but not WHAT goes in it. Reads the story spark, splits it into Resolved (structurally clear) vs. Assumed (would have to guess) content dimensions, and surfaces each assumption for the human to confirm, correct, or expand. Also classifies implementation risk tags (has-variants, has-data-pipeline, has-animation, has-touch-targets, diverges-from-existing) so plan-chunks translates them into acceptance criteria that name the implementation mechanism. Captures answers into
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating a new feature development task — scaffolds a structured task file at .claude/tasks/{feature-name}.md with phased breakdown (Design, Implementation, Testing, Documentation), acceptance criteria, context preservation, and TaskCreate tracking. Activates on "create a feature task", "set up development tracking", "plan a feature implementation", or when preparing work for python-cli-architect or python-pytest-architect agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Executes a four-phase feature addition workflow (Discovery, Planning, TDD Implementation, Verification) for Python projects. Use when adding a new feature end-to-end — discovering project structure and integration points, drafting a feature spec with MoSCoW-prioritized requirements and BDD acceptance criteria, implementing via test-first TDD cycles, then verifying with ruff lint, ty type checks, and behavior-focused regression and contract coverage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Start or complete a specific refactoring task from a task file. Use when a sub-agent needs to pick up a refactoring task, update its status, implement acceptance criteria, and run verification steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when Stage 1 Discovery is complete and design must begin — transforms the ARTIFACT:DISCOVERY into an actionable ARTIFACT:PLAN via RT-ICA prerequisite verification. Produces approach, components, success criteria, acceptance tests, and risks. Blocks on missing prerequisites before design proceeds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。