「bounded」の検索結果

Orchestrate approved, bounded work through a same-directory Codex App fork: create and name the execution task, ask it to run spec-executor, route decisions through Codex Task Messenger, validate the returned receipt, and archive a completed child. The source may come from any planning workflow. Requires Codex App task tools and codex-task-messenger.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute approved, bounded work in an isolated implementation conversation and return a structured evidence receipt. Use with inherited history or an explicitly identified source; no particular planning, testing, or review skill is required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Goal-driven E2E testing where a browser agent (Playwright MCP / computer-use) reads a natural-language goal and explores the app via the accessibility tree to assert outcomes — no pre-written script. Covers when intent-driven beats scripted, making agent runs deterministic (pinned model, temperature 0, seeded data, bounded steps, explicit success assertion, snapshot-not-pixel), cost/latency control, the accessibility-tree-first interaction model, CI gating, and graduating a stable run into a scripted Playwright test. Use when: "agentic browser test," "goal-driven browser test," "let an agent explore the app," "natural-language E2E," "browser agent smoke test," "Playwright MCP test." Not for: Writing/maintaining deterministic scripted Playwright tests — that is playwright-automation. Testing your product's OWN LLM features — that is ai-system-testing. Related: playwright-automation, ai-system-testing, exploratory-testing, test-reliability, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose and run ACU-only, adaptive PPU in-kernel timeline, or optional bounded joint analysis for a PPU kernel. Use for device-level bottleneck diagnosis, kernel-internal critical-path questions, or evidence that genuinely needs both; do not require all three modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Model domains and bounded contexts for complex systems. Use when a senior developer needs domain-driven design guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate an unexplained defect or unexpected behavior without changing application code. Use for root-cause diagnosis and an evidence-backed handoff, including a bounded unresolved result. Not for implementing a known fix, new features, or explanation-only questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The checkpoint coordinator for /feature. Routed to by /feature once a writing-plans plan exists. Uses authored HTML checkpoints or bounded legacy batches, delegates each scope to subagent-driven-development (fresh author agent per task, full review chain, fresh verification), then stops for a human checkpoint before the next batch. The checkpointed counterpart to /sprint's autonomous run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate an unexplained defect or unexpected behavior without changing application code. Use for root-cause diagnosis and an evidence-backed handoff, including a bounded unresolved result. Not for implementing a known fix, new features, or explanation-only questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has audio or video and wants a timestamped transcript (SRT) in the source language. Routes by source language — Chinese defaults to Volcano (豆包) ASR; other languages (Spanish, English, Portuguese, French, Italian, Japanese, Korean, etc.) use OpenAI Whisper API with word-level timestamps and self-assembled cues. Outputs SRT with punctuation-bounded cues capped for on-screen reading. Triggers — "转写", "转成字幕", "做 SRT", "transcribe", "make subtitles", "speech to text", "出字幕".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has an SRT (or transcript text) in one language and wants it translated to another, with punctuation-bounded re-segmentation so cues end at real sentence breaks. Simplified Chinese (zh-CN) and English (en) are first-class targets; other targets follow the same rules. Outputs a target-language SRT or bilingual SRT — no audio, no burn-in. Triggers — "翻译字幕", "翻成中文", "translate this SRT", "中英双语字幕", "把这个 SRT 翻译成 X", "bilingual subtitles".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Domain-Driven Design architecture for claude-flow v3. Implements modular, bounded context architecture with clean separation of concerns and microkernel pattern.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Status-first routing, bounded evidence collection, and safety guidance for issue-graph.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned prospecting and qualification discipline. Use when defining an ICP, sourcing and enriching a bounded lead list, finding early adopters or design partners, scoring account fit, or documenting disqualification evidence. NOT FOR: sending outreach (use suede-cold-email), changing CRM routing (use suede-revops), or profiling competitors instead of prospects (use suede-competitor-profiling).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned retention discipline for voluntary and involuntary churn: cancel flows, pause paths, evidence-based save offers, failed-payment recovery, proactive signals, and win-back design. Use when diagnosing subscriber loss or designing a bounded retention intervention. NOT FOR: lifecycle-email production (use suede-emails), pricing architecture (use suede-pricing), paywall design (use suede-paywalls), or event instrumentation (use suede-analytics).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned B2B cold-email discipline for evidence-based personalization, subject lines, opening lines, concise bodies, one clear CTA, and bounded follow-up sequences. Use when writing or repairing outbound email to qualified prospects. NOT FOR: building or qualifying the prospect list (use suede-prospecting), lifecycle or nurture email (use suede-emails), or broader sales collateral (use suede-sales-enablement).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-affiliated marketing deliberation that applies documented public frameworks through clearly labeled simulated advisors, surfaces disagreements, and synthesizes a decision. Use when the user wants multiple expert lenses on one bounded marketing question. NOT FOR: factual claims about a living person's private views, primary research (use suede-customer-research), or executing the selected tactic (route to the relevant public Suede skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you design or change an endpoint's errors, status codes, pagination, idempotency or concurrency behaviour — one error shape, the status-code table, bounded lists, safe retries

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start or resume a requested Guardrails implementation or PR takeover in the selected linked worktree with bounded scope and verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose bounded implementation scope and existing owning modules before Guardrails runtime, configuration, client, resource, streaming, Agents, or SDK compatibility changes and feedback fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lark/Feishu real-time event listening / subscribing / consuming: stream events as NDJSON via `lark-cli event consume <EventKey>` (covers IM message receive, reactions, chat member changes, etc.). Use for Lark bots, real-time message processing, long-running subscribers, streaming webhook/push handlers. Supports `--max-events` / `--timeout` bounded runs and a stderr ready-marker contract — designed for AI agents running as subprocesses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes a detailed, executable implementation plan from an approved design or multi-step requirement, including exact files, interfaces, tests, commands, checkpoints, and rollback considerations. Use before touching code for a substantial feature, migration, refactor, or cross-cutting change. Not for a one-file bounded fix or for executing a plan that already exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate HitKeep safely in isolated Git worktrees. Use when inspecting workspace state, resolving ports or URLs, starting or stopping development services, coordinating concurrent agents or QA runs, reusing active runs, reading bounded logs, or preparing a secret-free handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keep coding work complete, readable, and proportionate to the task. Use when planning, implementing, debugging, testing, reviewing, or maintaining code, including bounded changes in larger repositories. Avoid unnecessary design and verification overhead. Does not apply to non-code conversation or writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for every task that plans, writes, edits, debugs, tests, refactors, reviews, or maintains code. Apply to professional repositories, scripts, apps, services, prototypes, beginner work, vibe coding, and bounded code changes inside large systems. Choose the fewest clear lines, files, paths, states, and abstractions that correctly implement the requested behavior. Do not invent fallbacks, compatibility paths, defensive layers, or future scale without evidence. Do not use for ordinary conversation, emotional support, prose, translation, summarization, social-media content, or general research or technical discussion that is not part of planning, changing, or reviewing code. Never weaken real security, integrity, concurrency, compatibility, privacy, accessibility, legal, or regulatory requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。