747 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
MUST be used first for tunnel / proxy-path connectivity failures or slow throughput (网络故障 / 连不上 / 代理或隧道下超时). Diagnoses Tailscale, proxy, TUN, DNS and SSH-tunnel problems on macOS and Windows/WSL, e.g. Tailscale ping works but SSH fails, curl works but browser gets 503, Git/Docker fails behind the proxy, or downloads crawl despite a reachable proxy. Not for application-layer bugs (use debugging-network-issues).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain what a piece of code does in plain English, at the depth the reader needs. Use when asked to explain code, walk through a function, understand an unfamiliar snippet, or onboard to a file. Produces a one-line summary, a step-by-step walkthrough, the non-obvious parts called out, and any bugs or smells spotted along the way.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Simplify code that works — remove speculative abstraction, dead flexibility, and needless indirection while keeping behaviour identical and verified. Use when a feature has just landed ('now simplify it'), when AI-generated code arrives over-engineered, when a file has grown hard to follow, or as the cleanup pass before review. Produces a smaller, flatter version with identical behaviour, plus a ledger of what was removed and why it was safe. For finding bugs use code-review-checklist / ai-code-review — this skill assumes it works and makes it simple.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review AI-authored code for its characteristic failure modes — plausible-but-wrong logic, hallucinated APIs, over-engineering, dead scaffolding, and silent security shortcuts. Use when reviewing an AI-generated or heavily AI-assisted PR, when AI-written code keeps shipping subtle bugs, or when setting review standards for a team using coding agents. Produces a focused review with AI-specific findings, verification steps per risk class, and a team checklist for AI-authored changes. For general PR review use code-review-checklist — this skill covers what that one assumes a human wouldn't do.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
**UTILITY SKILL** - Explain code snippets, functions, and algorithms in plain language. USE FOR: explain code, what does this code do, break down this function, help me understand this, walk through this algorithm, clarify this logic, explain this snippet, describe what happens here. DO NOT USE FOR: writing new code (use code generation), fixing bugs (use debugging), refactoring (use refactoring skills), code review with action items. INVOKES: file reading tools to access code, language detection for tailored explanations. FOR SINGLE OPERATIONS: If the user just needs to see file contents, use file reading tools directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze KiCad projects and PDF schematics: schematics, PCB layouts, Gerbers, footprints, symbols, netlists, and design rules. Reviews designs for bugs, traces nets, cross-references schematic to PCB, extracts BOM data, checks DRC/ERC, DFM, power trees, and regulator circuits. Every finding carries a confidence label and evidence source with trust_summary rollup. Analyzes PDF schematics from dev boards, reference designs, eval kits, and datasheets. Supports KiCad 5–10. Use whenever the user mentions .kicad_sch, .kicad_pcb, .kicad_pro, PCB design review, schematic analysis, PDF schematics, reference designs, Gerber files, DRC/ERC, netlist issues, BOM extraction, signal tracing, power budget, DFM, or wants to understand, debug, compare, or review any hardware design. Also for "check my board", "review before fab", "what's wrong with my schematic", "is this ready to order", "check my power supply", "verify this circuit", OSHWA certification readiness, or any electronics/PCB design question.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use to review a generated HTML deck or single-page artifact for visual quality and structural correctness. Especially good at catching CSS specificity bugs where slide-modifier classes (.divider, .center, .q, .flow etc.) accidentally override the base .slide{display:none} and cause one slide to stack on top of every other. Also catches missing keyboard navigation, bullet-dump / wall-of-text failure modes, broken self-containment (external link/script/img). Patches the file in place; never changes the original content (slide text, numbers, named entities are the author's work, not yours).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect missing authentication and broken function-level authorization vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (map endpoints and the role/permission system), batched verify (check auth/authz in parallel subagents, 3 endpoints each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Covers unauthenticated access and vertical privilege escalation (e.g., regular user accessing admin-only functions). Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/missingauth-results.md. Use when asked to find missing auth, broken access control, or privilege escalation bugs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find dangerous execution sinks), batched verify (trace user input to sinks in parallel subagents, 3 sinks each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Covers OS command injection, eval-like sinks, and unsafe deserialization. Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/rce-results.md. Use when asked to find RCE, command injection, or unsafe deserialization bugs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find outbound call sites), batched verify (trace user input to destinations in parallel subagents, 3 sites each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/ssrf-results.md. Use when asked to find SSRF or server-side request forgery bugs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect insecure JWT (JSON Web Token) implementations in a codebase using a two-phase approach: first map all JWT issuance and verification sites to understand the token lifecycle and signing configuration, then check each verification site for exploitable weaknesses such as algorithm confusion, missing signature verification, weak secrets, header injection, and missing claim validation. Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/jwt-results.md. If no JWT usage is found in Phase 1, Phase 2 is skipped. Use when asked to find JWT, token forgery, or authentication bypass bugs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find template rendering sites that use dynamic strings), batched verify (trace user input to those sites in parallel subagents, 3 candidates each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/ssti-results.md. Use when asked to find SSTI or template injection bugs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect SQL injection vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find unsafe SQL construction sites), batched verify (trace user input to those sites in parallel subagents, 3 sites each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Covers string concat, f-strings, unsafe ORM methods, and dynamic identifiers. Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/sqli-results.md. Use when asked to find SQLi or database injection bugs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find HTML/JS/DOM sink sites), batched verify (trace user input to sinks in parallel subagents, 3 sink sites each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/xss-results.md. Use when asked to find XSS or cross-site scripting bugs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect GraphQL injection vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (confirm GraphQL usage and find unsafe operation document assembly sites), batched verify (trace user input to those sites in parallel subagents, up to 3 candidate sites each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/graphql-results.md. If no GraphQL technology is found in Phase 1, later phases are skipped. Use when asked to find GraphQL injection, unsafe GraphQL document construction, or operation string injection bugs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find candidates), batched verify (check authorization in parallel subagents, 3 candidates each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Checks endpoints for missing ownership or authorization checks on user-supplied identifiers. Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/idor-results.md. Use when asked to find IDOR or authorization bypass bugs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find XML parsing sites without external-entity hardening), batched verify (trace user input to each site in parallel subagents, 3 sites each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/xxe-results.md. Use when asked to find XXE or XML injection bugs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect path traversal vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find file-loading sinks with dynamic paths), batched verify (trace user input and mitigations in parallel subagents, 3 sinks each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/pathtraversal-results.md. Use when asked to find path traversal, directory traversal, or file disclosure bugs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect business logic vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: threat modeling (domain analysis and attack scenarios), batched verify (check exploitable gaps in parallel subagents, 3 scenarios each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Covers price manipulation, workflow bypass, limit violations, race conditions, reward abuse, etc. Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/businesslogic-results.md. Use when asked to find business logic, logic flaws, or abuse-of-function bugs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect insecure file upload vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: discovery (find all upload sites), batched verify (check extension bypass and related issues in parallel subagents, 3 sites each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/fileupload-results.md. Use when asked to find file upload, unrestricted upload, or extension bypass bugs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates a new CLI command following the Commander.js pattern in src/commands/. Handles command registration in src/cli.ts, telemetry tracking via tracked() wrapper, and option parsing. Use when user says add command, new CLI command, create subcommand, or adds files to src/commands/. Do NOT use for modifying existing commands or fixing bugs in existing commands.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adds a new LLM provider implementing LLMProvider interface with call() and stream() methods. Integrates with provider factory in src/llm/index.ts, config detection in src/llm/config.ts, and error handling via tracking and recovery. Use when adding a new model backend, integrating a third-party LLM API, or extending LLM platform support. Do NOT use for fixing bugs in existing providers, modifying existing provider behavior, or changing the LLMProvider interface.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze KiCad projects and PDF schematics: schematics, PCB layouts, Gerbers, footprints, symbols, netlists, and design rules. Reviews designs for bugs, traces nets, cross-references schematic to PCB, extracts BOM data, checks DRC/ERC, DFM, power trees, and regulator circuits. Every finding carries a confidence label and evidence source with trust_summary rollup. Analyzes PDF schematics from dev boards, reference designs, eval kits, and datasheets. Supports KiCad 5–10. Use whenever the user mentions .kicad_sch, .kicad_pcb, .kicad_pro, PCB design review, schematic analysis, PDF schematics, reference designs, Gerber files, DRC/ERC, netlist issues, BOM extraction, signal tracing, power budget, DFM, or wants to understand, debug, compare, or review any hardware design. Also for "check my board", "review before fab", "what's wrong with my schematic", "is this ready to order", "check my power supply", "verify this circuit", OSHWA certification readiness, or any electronics/PCB design question.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find out why the tests pass but the app is broken. Catches false greens: a green suite over a feature that does not work, a mocked API standing in for a real one, an assertion that holds no matter what the app does, a click handler wired to nothing. Use when the suite is green and the user says it is broken, when a test never fails, when coverage looks fine but bugs still ship, or before trusting a passing run you did not watch.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。