1,280 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Analyze an insurance claims processing system for lifecycle completeness, straight-through processing automation, fraud detection coverage, reserve estimation methodology, subrogation recovery workflows, and regulatory compliance with state prompt payment laws..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate Claude Ads contracts, scoring inputs, run bundles, capabilities, source freshness, safety, installation, uninstall, or release readiness. Use for ads validate, ads status, ads next, stale claims with missing tool access, maturity checks, ownership-manifest uninstall, preserving unrelated ads-* skills, checksum verification, preflight, QA, or release audits. Missing access must demote stale evidence for the run and block dependent release-current claims before recovery guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn an academic paper (PDF, LaTeX, pasted text, thesis chapter or technical disclosure) into a Chinese invention patent application draft — 说明书摘要、摘要附图、权利要求书、说明书、说明书附图 — delivered as DOCX/PDF with black-and-white patent drawings, plus a separate drafting-notes file covering novelty/disclosure risk, claim layout and claim-to-paper support. Use whenever the user wants to 论文转专利, 写专利/专利申请书/专利交底书, draft or review 权利要求书, write a 说明书, make 专利附图, or check a patent draft against its source paper, even if they only say "帮我把这篇论文写成专利".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when recording, tallying, or triaging stochastic review findings — the append-only JSONL ledger where Tier 2 (advisory, unevidenced) reviewer output goes instead of blocking language. Triggers on "log this finding", "ledger add", "tally the findings", "triage findings", "is this finding recurring", "retire this noise", or whenever a reviewer produces an unevidenced concern that should be measured for recurrence rather than chased. For the review itself see code-review-and-quality or skill-library-review; for verifying formal claims with deterministic evidence see adversarial-claims-reviewer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prove — or honestly fail to prove — a specific technical claim: "the fix works", "it's deployed", "the service is running", "the site is done", "there are no vulnerabilities". Atomizes the claim, picks the shortest decisive signal on the evidence ladder, and returns a verdict from a fixed vocabulary (pass / partial / fail / skip) with an explicit coverage boundary. NOT code review, NOT a fix, NOT orchestration — only "what is proven, and what we merely hope". Triggers — "prove it works", "is it really done?", "are you sure?", "we deployed — is it live?", "verify that", "did we actually check?".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts adverse possession complaints and quiet title pleadings. Structures jurisdictional foundations, legal property descriptions, and element-by-element proof of actual, open, continuous, exclusive, and hostile possession. Use when filing adverse possession claims, quiet title actions, or prescriptive ownership pleadings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Task claiming and file-ownership tracking for parallel execution: agents claim tasks from a shared queue with ownership enforced. Use during parallel phases with multiple simultaneous agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects fabricated content, false citations, and unverifiable claims in agent outputs. Uses source verification and consistency checking. Activate on 'detect hallucination', 'fact check', 'verify claims', 'check accuracy', 'find fabrications'. NOT for validation (use dag-output-validator) or confidence scoring (use dag-confidence-scorer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Capstone/orchestration skill — build an M-Agent + N-Human cooperative IDE in Rust gpui (the Harbor): many agents and humans co-editing the same files as co-equal CRDT replicas, governed by claims/guard/salvage, across LAN/shared/remote harbors. The INDEX that dispatches into the sibling rust skills. Use when building the collaborative editor, the agent-fleet console, multiplayer editing with agents-as-peers, or any slice of the Harbor. Trigger on: cooperative IDE, collaborative editor, multiplayer editor, agents and humans co-editing, gpui IDE, Loro CRDT editor, harbor editor, claims/salvage, "build the cooperative IDE". NOT for: a single non-collaborative gpui screen (compose the siblings directly), web editors, or non-editor apps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI-powered calendar management and agent-based scheduling coordination. Covers calendar APIs (Google Calendar, CalDAV/iCal), AI scheduling assistants (Reclaim, Clockwise, Motion, Cal.com), building custom calendar agents with MCP, multi-calendar merging, timezone management, focus block protection, meeting fatigue detection, and agent-to-agent meeting negotiation protocols. Activate on: "calendar agent", "AI scheduling", "calendar coordination", "meeting scheduling", "calendar API", "focus time protection", "calendar optimization", "Google Calendar MCP", "Reclaim", "Clockwise", "Motion", "Cal.com", "smart scheduling", "calendar-aware agent", "timezone scheduling", "agent negotiation meetings". NOT for: manual calendar UI component design (use form-validation-architect), project management scheduling or Gantt charts (use project-management-guru-adhd), general time-tracking or pomodoro apps (use adhd-daily-planner for time-awareness), building the agent itself from scratch (use agent-creator).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Treats a ctDNA assay as a molecule-counting experiment at the Poisson edge and builds its analytical-validation case the measurement-science way. Covers the genome-equivalent currency (~330 haploid copies/ng), the lambda = input_GE x VAF sampling ceiling (lambda>=3 for ~95% detection), the error-suppression ladder (raw NGS ~1e-3 -> single-strand UMI ~1e-4/1e-5 -> duplex <1e-7), the CLSI EP17 LoB/LoD/LoD95/LoQ framework, the per-locus-vs-panel-integrated LoD distinction that lets bespoke MRD reach ppm, contrived/SEQC2 reference standards, and honest LoD reporting conditioned on input mass + consensus depth + replicate detection rate. Use when stating or trusting a sensitivity claim, designing a dilution-series validation, deciding how many genome equivalents are needed at a target VAF, choosing a single-locus vs panel-integrated LoD, or auditing a "detects 0.1% VAF" claim.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Forces every code-related claim to include file:line citations. No citation means the claim must be verified or removed. Use when building documentation, writing code reviews, or any output that others will rely on.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds the "Report Sources" child page for a finished Weekly Community Signal report — an evidence-backed defense of WHY every item landed in the column/section/rank it did. The agent argues each placement like a lawyer (claim → evidence → rule → rebuttal) but is under oath: it CANNOT invent, spin, or overstate — every claim ties to a verifiable fact (issue #, label, PR type, quoted comment, npm output, the front-door test). Not CYA — it's so Nathan can defend the report with facts and see the exact reasoning behind each call. Runs after the report (invoked by weekly-report, last steps) and on "report sources", "defend the report", "why is this here".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when claiming 'done', suggesting a commit, push, or PR — runs the evidence gate so completion claims come from fresh output in this message, not memory or earlier runs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cite-or-Block 架构的基石原子 skill。把报告里的 citation 锚点 (例如 [guideline:CSCO-2024-NSCLC:§5.5.2] / [pmid:12345678:abstract]) 解析为源文件片段,并核对事实声明里的关键词是否在引用源原文里出现。 Foundation atomic skill for the Cite-or-Block architecture. Resolves citation anchors (e.g. [guideline:CSCO-2024-NSCLC:§5.5.2] / [pmid:12345678:abstract]) to raw source text fragments, and verifies whether claim keywords actually appear in the cited source. 使用场景 / Use when: 1. 报告生成后要做 fact-check (resolve_citation + verify_claim_against_source) 2. content-verification-layer 要扫全报告锚点 (parse_citations_in_text) 3. drug-citation-verifier / 任何 cross-check skill 需要"锚点 → 源原文" P0 守护:本 skill **绝不维护任何已知字典**。源里没有 = verified=False, 无例外、无 fallback、无"已知答案兜底"。 P0 guard: this skill **never maintains any built-in dictionary**. Not in source = verified=False. No fallback, no built-in answers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when work produces a deliverable, factual claim, dataset, code change, decision, publication, deployment, automation, or irreversible action whose failure would matter; when the user asks for a quality gate, acceptance criteria, QA, completeness, validation, audit, evidence, preflight, release readiness, or a definition of done; or before claiming completion on medium- or high-risk work. Automatically decide whether a formal gate is warranted, derive task-specific pass/fail criteria, gather evidence, and block unsupported completion. Make sure to use this skill even when the user does not say "quality gate" if consequential work needs acceptance criteria or completion evidence. Skip formal gating for trivial, reversible, low-impact requests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 4 Turn 1 of disease-market-sizing-orchestration. Generates report HTML with mandatory citation anchors per fact claim. Reads contract + staging + sources/. Every drug/treatment/stat/recommendation MUST carry [pmid:.../guideline:.../nct:...] anchor that resolves to an actual file in sources/. NEVER hardcode drug names or numerical claims. Use AFTER evidence recall (phase 3), BEFORE content-verification-layer (Turn 2).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing; run verification and read the output before any success claim.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。