1,052 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Internal prototype QA helper. Use only after a Product Design prototype, URL-to-code build, or image-to-code build has a source visual target and a rendered implementation to compare before handoff. Do not use for broad UX critique, design critique, product audits, or flow reviews; route those user-facing requests to audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare KPI readouts, scorecards, WBR/MBR/QBR updates, and executive summaries from quantitative business or product metrics; use when the task is to report status, compare against targets, explain validated drivers, and state operating implications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare bounded Sentry windows and releases to identify new issues, regressions, frequency changes, and user-impact changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a website or digital experience against its supplied source references for originality and plagiarism risk. Use when Codex must compare current or historical site output with reference pages, capture packs, screenshots, copy, brands, numbers, images, assets, videos, layouts, motion, or code; raise evidence-backed red flags; distinguish common visual grammar from distinctive copying; and propose concrete fixes without making unsupported legal claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply a prompt-agnostic execution and verification loop to any substantial task while preserving the original request. Use when the user asks to fan out work, use subagents or independent reviewers, loop until done, benchmark against references, apply a harsh critic, compare candidates blind, improve an existing prompt with verification, or continue until explicit quality gates pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Wallet profiler — balance, PnL, labels, transactions, counterparties, related wallets, batch, trace, compare. Use when analysing a specific wallet address or comparing wallets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use DeepChat's bundled CLI control plane for model inference, image/video/speech generation, transcription, OCR, artifact inspection, public configuration, Skills, and MCP operations. Activate when a user asks to invoke DeepChat capabilities that are not already exposed as a more specific tool, compare models, run a benchmark, inspect DeepChat runtime state, or manage DeepChat through the CLI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare official Anthropic docs baseline vs current snapshot (no network — instant)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare different approaches to solve the same problem
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill helps users extract structured product listings from Amazon, including titles, ASINs, prices, ratings, and specifications. Use this skill when users want to search for products on Amazon, find the best selling brand products, track price changes for items, get a list of categories with high ratings, compare different brand products on Amazon, extract Amazon product data for market research, look for products in a specific language or marketplace, analyze competitor pricing for keywords, find featured products for search terms, get technical specifications like material or color for product lists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scrapes Amazon product data from ASINs using browseract.com automation API and performs surgical competitive analysis. Compares specifications, pricing, review quality, and visual strategies to identify competitor moats and vulnerabilities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract complete product information from any e-commerce product page. Returns name, price, currency, brand, images, description, SKU/ASIN/EAN/UPC/GTIN/MPN identifiers, stock availability, rating, review count, variants, and seller. Works on Shopify, Amazon, WooCommerce, eBay, Walmart, Etsy, AliExpress, Alibaba, Target, Best Buy, Rakuten, Magento, BigCommerce, PrestaShop, and any public e-commerce site. Accepts product URL, keyword, or product identifier (SKU/ASIN/EAN/UPC). Use when: scrape product page, get product details, extract price and availability, product info extraction, check product data, product detail scraping, get product from URL, keyword product search, ASIN lookup, EAN search, UPC lookup, price check, product research, compare products, monitor product price, get product images, product brand and description, ecommerce data extraction, product catalog scraping, product page scraper, get item price, fetch product info.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill helps users analyze Amazon competitor listings by ASIN and produce structured competitive intelligence plus strategic opportunity points for their own go-to-market. The Agent should proactively apply this skill when users want to analyze a competitor Amazon listing by ASIN, understand what a top-ranked product does right in content keywords or visuals, find market gaps and unmet buyer needs, turn competitor research into opportunity maps for their brand, identify keyword placement patterns on rival listings, extract SEO insights from Amazon product pages, reverse-engineer competitor bullet and title strategies, mine competitor reviews for buyer psychology, compare seller and A plus content patterns, run gap analysis before launching a new SKU, research why a listing wins conversion signals, synthesize whitespace you can own versus the diagnosed listing, or say just look at this ASIN with a competitive or optimization angle.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill helps users extract basic product details other sellers prices and seller ratings from Amazon via ASIN automatically using the BrowserAct API. Agent should proactively apply this skill when users express needs like query Amazon buy box information, monitor Amazon product prices, extract Amazon product details by ASIN, check other sellers prices on Amazon, get Amazon seller ratings and feedback count, monitor buy box ownership for a specific ASIN, track Amazon fulfillment methods for competitors, compare Amazon product prices across different sellers, retrieve Amazon buy box availability status, analyze Amazon seller profile details.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user wants to "run an evaluation", "evaluate my agent", "evaluate my ADK agent", "write an eval dataset", "analyze eval failures", "compare eval results", "optimize agent", or needs guidance on the Gemini platform eval methodology and the Quality Flywheel. Covers eval metrics, dataset schema, LLM-as-judge scoring, and common failure causes. Applies to any agents-cli project, whatever framework the agent is written in. Do NOT use for agent API code patterns (ADK: use google-agents-cli-adk-code), deployment (use google-agents-cli-deploy), or project scaffolding (use google-agents-cli-scaffold).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answer a quantitative business question by writing a SQL query against the data warehouse, validating it, and presenting the result. Use when the user asks "how many...", "what's the trend of...", "compare X vs Y over...", "what's our top N...", or anything that resolves to a query against tabular data. Produces a small result table plus the underlying query.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze experimental results", "run strict statistical analysis", "compare model performance", "generate scientific figures", "check significance", "do ablation analysis", or mentions interpreting experiment data with rigorous statistics and visualization. It focuses on strict analysis bundles, not Results-section prose.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compares two or more dotnet new templates side by side to help users choose between them based on parameters, feature support, frameworks, and classifications. USE FOR: deciding between similar templates (webapi vs webapp, blazor vs blazorwasm, console vs worker), producing a side-by-side comparison of parameters and feature support, understanding how templates differ before creating a project. DO NOT USE FOR: creating a project from a template (use template-instantiation), authoring or validating custom templates (use template-authoring and template-validation), general single-template discovery (use template-discovery).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Helps find, inspect, and compare (at a high level) .NET project templates. Resolves natural-language project descriptions to ranked template matches with pre-filled parameters. USE FOR: finding the right dotnet new template for a task, inspecting a template's parameters and constraints, understanding what a template produces before creating a project, resolving intent like "web API with auth" to concrete template + parameters. DO NOT USE FOR: actually creating projects (use template-instantiation), authoring custom templates (use template-authoring), producing a detailed side-by-side comparison (use template-comparison), choosing cross-parameter defaults during creation (use template-smart-defaults), MSBuild or build issues (use dotnet-msbuild plugin), NuGet package management unrelated to template packages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classifies existing tests by standard traits and reports their distribution. USE FOR: tagging all tests with category attributes, categorizing/tagging/ labeling each test, compare happy vs error paths, audit the test mix, describe coverage shape by test type, or tag then verify the project builds. Read bodies when names mislead. Apply canonical attributes; otherwise report only. DO NOT USE FOR: requests owned by test-anti-patterns, coverage-analysis, crap-score, test-gap-analysis, code-testing, or migration skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare options with weighted scoring, pros and cons, pre-mortems, opportunity costs, and ICE prioritization. Use when a user wants to reason through a choice, expose assumptions, or rank alternatives.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add or extend account, managed-site or check-in integrations, improve native editors or compare their UX, or decide site-type boundaries. Uses scoped capability and workflow checks; not isolated bug fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate multiple radically different interface designs for a module using parallel sub-agents. Use when user wants to design an API, explore interface options, compare module shapes, or mentions "design it twice".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recommend the right TRES Finance report for any user question. Trigger this skill whenever a user asks which report to use, what report contains certain data, how to get specific information out of TRES, or compares two reports. Also trigger when the user describes a goal (e.g. "month-end close", "auditor needs proof", "tax filing", "reconciliation") without naming a specific report. Trigger phrases include "which report", "what report", "how do I export", "where can I find", "I need a report for", "what's the difference between", "best report for", "auditor asked for", or any question about getting data out of TRES Finance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。