「compile」の検索結果

Verify Elixir/Phoenix changes — compile, format, and test in one loop. Use after implementation, before PRs, or after fixing bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reduce mix output noise (5-15% token savings) by installing rtk filters that compress mix test/credo/dialyzer/compile output before it reaches Claude. Use when long mix output floods context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit Hex deps for supply-chain security risk — bidi chars, compile-time exec, maintainer changes, typosquats, CVEs. Use after mix deps.update, when checking if a package upgrade is safe, or reviewing mix.lock PR diffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find the root cause of Elixir/Phoenix bugs — crashes, exceptions, stack traces, compile errors, LiveView that won't update, silent failures. Use when something is broken or misbehaves. --parallel for 4 tracks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

对中文毕业论文进行编译、warning 分级、模板模式检查、数据与引用复查，并把问题回写成可继续迭代的 review checklist。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to use the Roslynk MCP tools (mcp__roslynk__*) effectively for .NET work. Use this whenever a Roslynk server is connected and the task touches *.cs, *.cshtml or *.razor files in a solution — checking for compile errors or warnings, finding a symbol's definition, references, callers, or implementations, renaming symbols, applying code fixes or refactorings, finding dead code, or editing those files — even if the user never says "Roslynk". Consult it before reaching for grep, file reads, hand-written edits, or `dotnet build` on such files: Roslynk's semantic tools are faster and more correct for all of those jobs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and debug Avalonia 11/12 .NET applications with XAML, compiled bindings, MVVM, custom controls, desktop lifetimes, and platform publishing. USE FOR: Avalonia projects, bindings, commands, themes, UI dispatch, trimming, or Native AOT. DO NOT USE FOR: WPF, WinUI, MAUI, Uno, or Avalonia XPF compatibility work. INVOKES: inspect installed versions, implement, and validate on the actual target platforms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route C# and .NET requests to the exact installed specialist or smallest dotnet/skills marketplace plugin. USE FOR: "which specialist should own this" or "how do I add the skill" requests involving ASP.NET Core endpoints, Blazor, MAUI binding, Windows Forms specialist selection or installation, EF Core queries, test or framework migration, runtime CPU/allocation evidence, file-based C#, editor/compiler defects, a surviving MSBuild `.binlog`, or a plugin missing from `/skills`; also use for C# semantics when no narrower specialist exists. DO NOT USE FOR: requests that already name the exact installed specialist to invoke, or work unrelated to C# or .NET.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DO NOT INVOKE when the primary request explicitly asks to convert, migrate, modernize, or rewrite a legacy/old-style project to SDK style; use msbuild-modernization. Migration prompts often mention ToolsVersion, explicit Compile/Reference entries, packages.config, or Microsoft.CSharp.targets, but merely reviewing or auditing a file that contains those patterns remains in scope here. USE FOR broad review, audit, lint, or maintainability/correctness checks of project/build files, including custom targets; prioritized cross-cutting findings; discrete anti-patterns; F# ordering/FS0039; cross-platform paths; and focused Import safety verdicts. Review/audit is analysis-only unless fixes are requested. For concrete property/item defects use property-patterns/item-management; use target-authoring for implementation and extension-points for NuGet auto-import/layout discovery. Exclude non-MSBuild systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for modernizing and migrating MSBuild project files to SDK-style format. USE FOR: converting legacy .csproj/.vbproj with verbose XML to SDK-style, migrating packages.config to PackageReference, removing Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs in favor of auto-generation, eliminating explicit Compile Include lists via implicit globbing, consolidating shared settings into Directory.Build.props. Indicators of legacy projects: ToolsVersion attribute, an Import of Microsoft.CSharp.targets via $(MSBuildToolsPath), .csproj files over 50 lines for simple projects. DO NOT USE FOR: projects already in SDK-style format, non-.NET build systems (npm, Maven, CMake), .NET Framework projects that cannot move to SDK-style.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use F# Interactive (`dotnet fsi`) for .NET exploration, scriptable experiments, package-backed .fsx workflows, quick data transforms, and reproducible command-line probes. USE FOR: .fsx scripts, F# REPL work, #r nuget references, #load composition, interactive type exploration, and small strongly typed experiments before moving code into a project. DO NOT USE FOR: production application code that needs compiled project structure; C# scripting; long-lived automation better expressed as a normal CLI, test, or build target. INVOKES: run dotnet fsi, edit .fsx scripts, load project or source files, and validate snippets against the target SDK.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate a .NET 10 project or solution to .NET 11 and resolve all breaking changes. This is a MIGRATION skill — use it when upgrading from .NET 10 to .NET 11, NOT for writing new programs. USE FOR: upgrading TargetFramework from net10.0 to net11.0, fixing build errors after updating the .NET 11 SDK, resolving source-breaking and behavioral changes in .NET 11 runtime, C# 15 compiler, and EF Core 11, adapting to updated minimum hardware requirements (x86-64-v2, Arm64 LSE), and updating CI/CD pipelines and Dockerfiles for .NET 11. DO NOT USE FOR: .NET Framework migrations, upgrading from .NET 9 or earlier, greenfield .NET 11 projects, or cosmetic modernization unrelated to the upgrade. NOTE: .NET 11 is in preview. Covers breaking changes through Preview 3.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate a .NET 8 project to .NET 9 and resolve all breaking changes. USE FOR: upgrading TargetFramework from net8.0 to net9.0, fixing build errors after updating the .NET 9 SDK, resolving behavioral changes in .NET 9 / C# 13 / ASP.NET Core 9 / EF Core 9, replacing BinaryFormatter (now always throws), resolving SYSLIB0054-SYSLIB0057, adapting to params span overload resolution, fixing C# 13 compiler changes, updating HttpClientFactory for SocketsHttpHandler, and resolving EF Core 9 migration/Cosmos DB changes. DO NOT USE FOR: .NET Framework migrations, upgrading from .NET 7 or earlier, greenfield .NET 9 projects, or cosmetic modernization unrelated to the upgrade.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Neutral, framework-agnostic decision tree for project kickoff: "which agent / RAG / LLM framework should I reach for?" Synthesizes the ecosystem sections of 7 landmark-project SOPs (LangGraph, LlamaIndex, DSPy, CrewAI, vLLM, Aider, Dify) into one layered rubric. Core stance: frameworks are LAYERS, not competitors — a real project usually combines DSPy (compile) + LlamaIndex (retrieve) + LangGraph (orchestrate) + vLLM (serve), and you choose ONE per layer, not one to rule all. Use when starting any LLM/agent/RAG project, or whenever the "which framework?" question is asked. Deliberately neutral — unlike vendor docs and the LangChain-biased `framework-selection` on skill.sh, this skill has no horse in the race.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The compile-readiness gate for prompt auto-optimization. Decide whether you have earned the right to run an optimizer (DSPy MIPROv2 / GEPA / BootstrapFewShot) before spending compute. Two preconditions only — a real metric, and enough examples for the optimizer you picked. Garbage metric in, garbage prompt out. Pick the optimizer by data scale; GEPA inverts the scale assumption (~10 examples + textual feedback).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision rubric for promoting a prose prompt into a typed DSPy Signature. This is an ENHANCE overlay on top of the [[dspy]] library skill: it does NOT teach DSPy syntax — it answers the coder-agent decision "when do I stop hand-writing a prompt string and declare it as a `dspy.Signature`, and how do I name/describe its fields so the optimizer and the calling code both get a clean contract." Activate when: a prompt string grows past ~50 lines; the LM output is consumed by code (parsed, branched on, stored) rather than read by a human; the same prompt is reused across >1 call site; or a teammate asks "should this be a Signature?". Do NOT activate for one-shot throwaway prompts, or for HOW-TO questions about DSPy modules /optimizers/compile — defer those to the [[dspy]] skill and the [[agentsop-dspy]] workflow skill. Search keywords: typed prompt, structured prompt, DSPy Signature, prompt as a function, prompt contract, when to formalize a prompt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decomposed, multi-criteria metric design for LLM pipelines. The metric IS the model — change the metric and the optimizer changes behavior. Decompose by default; bool during compile, float during eval; calibrate against human; mitigate judge bias. Search keywords: LLM-as-judge, llm as judge, eval metric, evaluation score, scoring function, rubric, RAGAS, G-Eval, judge bias, verbosity bias, how to evaluate LLM output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when analyzing binary structure, disassembling code, or decompiling functions. Deep static analysis via radare2 (r2) and Ghidra headless - function enumeration, cross-references (xrefs), decompilation, control flow graphs. Keywords - "disassemble", "decompile", "what does this function do", "find functions", "analyze code", "r2", "ghidra", "pdg", "afl"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when ready to document findings, generate a report, or summarize binary analysis results. Compiles analysis findings into structured reports - correlates facts from triage/static/dynamic phases, validates hypotheses, generates documentation with evidence chains. Keywords - "summarize findings", "generate report", "document analysis", "what did we find", "write up results", "export findings"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reverse engineering tools are missing, not working, or need configuration. Installation guides for radare2 (r2), Ghidra, GDB, QEMU, Frida, binutils, and cross-compilation toolchains. Keywords - "install radare2", "setup ghidra", "r2 not found", "qemu missing", "tool not installed", "configure gdb", "cross-compiler"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when analyzing binaries, executables, or bytecode to understand what they do or how they work. Triggers on "binary", "executable", "ELF", "what does this do", "reverse engineer", "disassemble", "decompile", "pyc file", "python bytecode", "analyze binary", "figure out", "marshal". Routes to sub-skills for triage, static analysis, dynamic analysis, synthesis, or tool setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Best practices for creating ISPC lit tests. Use when writing regression tests, verifying code generation, or checking compiler diagnostics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to visually verify or drive this Tauri app's running UI — taking screenshots, reading the live DOM, clicking real buttons, or calling real backend commands against real data. Covers launching the dev build with the MCP bridge compiled in, connecting the driver session, and shutting down cleanly. Not suitable for unit-test-only changes, or when the user only wants the code read.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master TypeScript's advanced type system including generics, conditional types, mapped types, template literals, and utility types for building type-safe applications. Use when implementing complex type logic, creating reusable type utilities, or ensuring compile-time type safety in TypeScript projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。