「completion」の検索結果

Extracts durable insights from temp/ files to SoT during EPIC Phase E. Triggers at EPIC completion or explicit `/ghm-harvest` invocation. Outputs new SoT entries and archive manifest.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterative task completion loop with Definition of Done verification. Combines the Ralph Wiggum technique (prompt re-injection via Stop hook) with DoD-based independent verification. Claude proposes DoD criteria, user confirms, then Claude works autonomously. Stop hook re-injects the original prompt and blocks exit until all DoD items are independently verified. "/ralph", "ralph loop", "ralph 루프", "반복 작업", "DoD 루프", "완료 검증 루프", "task loop", "keep going until done"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer questions about the AI SDK and help build AI-powered features. Use when developers: (1) Ask about AI SDK functions like generateText, streamText, ToolLoopAgent, embed, or tools, (2) Want to build AI agents, chatbots, RAG systems, or text generation features, (3) Have questions about AI providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, etc.), streaming, tool calling, structured output, or embeddings, (4) Use React hooks like useChat or useCompletion. Triggers on: "AI SDK", "Vercel AI SDK", "generateText", "streamText", "add AI to my app", "build an agent", "tool calling", "structured output", "useChat".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cerebras Inference is a hosted LLM API that runs open models on Cerebras wafer-scale chips at thousands of tokens per second, through an OpenAI-compatible endpoint. Use when a user wants the lowest-latency chat, code completion or agent loop, asks how to call the Cerebras API or SDK, needs streaming, tool calling, strict JSON schema output or reasoning control, or hits a "model not found" error from a retired Cerebras model ID.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master the AI tools that supercharge software development. From code completion to full application generation, write better code faster and automate the tedious parts. Use when "AI coding, code assistant, Copilot, Cursor, code generation, AI developer tools, development, coding, ai-assistant, productivity, code-generation" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic code cleanup and refactoring agent that identifies and fixes code quality issues without changing functionality. Focuses on: - Dead code removal - Import organization - Type improvements - Consistent patterns - File organization Use when "User asks to "clean up" code, User mentions "dead code" or "unused", User wants to "organize imports", User asks about "code quality", User wants to "refactor" without changing behavior, Code review identifies cleanup items, After major feature completion, cleanup, refactoring, code-quality, maintenance, organization" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive patterns for building AI-powered code generation tools, code assistants, automated refactoring, code review, and structured output generation using LLMs with function calling and tool use. Use when "code generation, AI code assistant, function calling, structured output, code review AI, automated refactoring, tool use, code completion, agent code, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Land a PR by monitoring conflicts, resolving them, waiting for checks, and squash-merging when green; use when asked to land, merge, or shepherd a PR to completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SPARC (Specification, Pseudocode, Architecture, Refinement, Completion) comprehensive development methodology with multi-agent orchestration

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Watch a PR's CI to completion — diagnose on red, notify and offer the merge on green. Never auto-merges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design forms that minimize friction, prevent errors, and guide users to successful completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SPARC (Specification, Pseudocode, Architecture, Refinement, Completion) comprehensive development methodology with multi-agent orchestration

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned operations-architecture discipline that fixes the shape of a system before anyone builds it: entity schema first, exactly one write path per entity, every unit of work routed to a deterministic automation, an AI agent, or a human decision, every existing tool marked absorb, keep, or kill, and the build sequenced into phases whose completion is proved by a command. Use when scoping an automation or agent build, deciding whether a workflow needs a model at all, consolidating a sprawling tool stack, designing the data model under a workflow, choosing a migration path off an old system, or ordering a build so nothing lands on a moving foundation. NOT FOR: executing a planned multi-file repo change (use suede-graph-flo-xr); coordinating parallel builders with file ownership (use suede-agent-teams); lead lifecycle, scoring, and CRM routing rules (use suede-revops); proving agent output quality against an eval set (use suede-ai-eval); reviewing the finished diff (use suede-code-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify before claiming completion. No claims without fresh verification evidence. Use before marking work done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically notify the user when long-running terminal commands finish (npm test, docker build, git push, etc.). The agent monitors command execution and sends a desktop notification on completion if the command ran longer than threshold (default 10s). Use when user asks to "notify me when done", "desktop notification when command finishes", "alert when done", or "tell me when this completes". Do NOT use for interactive commands (vim, nano, less, htop), commands that always complete in <5s, or streaming commands (tail -f).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence rules for completion claims. Use before ticking an acceptance criterion, ending an implementation run, or writing anything that says something works, passes or is fixed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Superloopy's lightweight strict-evidence loop for Codex tasks that need durable progress, criteria, and artifact-backed completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automated iterative agent runner for spec-based development in Kiro. Wraps kiro-cli in a self-correcting bash loop that picks up tasks from a Kiro spec, implements them one at a time, verifies against exit criteria, and accumulates corrections and codebase patterns across iterations. Use this skill when the user mentions "ralph loop", "ralph", "spec loop", "iterative spec runner", "run my spec tasks automatically", "kiro spec automation", "self-correcting agent loop", "implement spec tasks in a loop", "run kiro-cli in a loop", "automated task implementation", or wants to drive a Kiro spec to completion through repeated agent iterations. Also use when the user wants to set up, configure, troubleshoot, or understand the Ralph Loop workflow — including progress tracking, corrections, codebase patterns, timing logs, and the summary dashboard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-of-story completion review. Reads the story file, verifies each acceptance criterion against the implementation, checks for GDD/ADR deviations, prompts code review, updates story status to Complete, and surfaces the next ready story from the sprint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automating browsers via Playwright and Chrome DevTools for data collection, form interaction, screenshot capture, and network monitoring. Task completion focus (vs Voyager for E2E testing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SPARC (Specification, Pseudocode, Architecture, Refinement, Completion) comprehensive development methodology with multi-agent orchestration

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit milestone completion against original intent before archiving

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement bounded features and fixes in existing or new mini-program codebases while preserving repository rules, user-owned changes, approved behavior, assets, framework conventions, and evidence boundaries. Use when users ask to write or modify mini-program code, implement a confirmed specification or architecture, add a scoped feature, remove behavior semantically, update internal documentation required by a change, or carry out a well-defined small fix that does not require root-cause investigation. Establishes a baseline and change boundary, applies test-driven small steps, distinguishes source from generators and build artifacts, verifies the affected contract, and never reports source completion as device validation, formal acceptance, upload, or release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。