「confidence」の検索結果

Evaluates insider purchase patterns with cluster buying identification, historical signal analysis, and conviction scoring. Use when analyzing insider buying, assessing management confidence signals, or tracking insider activity patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independent LLM judge evaluates task completion separately from the executing agent, catching false success claims by reviewing task goal, actions taken, final state, and evidence. Produces PASS/FAIL with confidence score and reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prevent AI hallucination and ensure evidence-based responses when analyzing code or making suggestions. Use when: analyzing code, making recommendations, providing options, or when user asks about confidence/certainty. Keywords: certainty, assumption, inference, evidence, source, 確定性, 推測, 假設, 來源, 證據.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, structure, or improve form interfaces for clarity, completion rates, and user confidence. Use when the user asks to build a form, redesign a form flow, improve form conversion, add multi-step forms, fix form UX, or structure field layouts and validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create standout, technically ambitious interfaces that feel extraordinary through cinematic transitions, advanced motion, heavy rendering, or other high-ambition implementation work. Use when the user wants to wow, impress, go all-out, or push a feature beyond conventional UI polish—not when simple visual confidence or routine cleanup is enough.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or improve a UI testing strategy covering visual regression, interaction testing, and accessibility assertions. Use when the user asks to add tests, set up testing, fix flaky tests, improve test coverage, validate UI behavior, catch visual bugs, or establish confidence in shipping frontend changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exposes Claude's reasoning chain as an auditable, decomposable artifact. Quick mode (default) gives assumption inventory + weakest-link in 2 stages. Full mode (--full) adds decision branching, confidence decomposition, and falsification conditions. Triggers on "왜 그렇게 생각해", "reasoning", "근거", "show your work", "어떻게 그 결론이", "trace", "판단 근거", "why do you think that".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Local speech-to-text on Apple Silicon with two cross-checking MLX engines: NVIDIA Parakeet TDT v2 (parakeet-mlx) and Qwen3-ASR 1.7B (mlx-audio, hotword biasing). Batch JSONL with word timestamps, confidence, provenance, and an agreement verdict. No NeMo or PyTorch. Use when transcribing audio files, identifying game or legacy voice clips by content, telling speech from SFX, serving an OpenAI-compatible STT endpoint, or dictating. For push-to-talk into any text field, use the Handy app.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate datasets and resolve entities using OpenPlanter methodology — cross-reference heterogeneous sources, build Admiralty/ACH confidence-tiered evidence chains, and apply OSINT tradecraft. Triggers on entity resolution, cross-reference datasets, evidence chain, OSINT investigation, structured investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep, iterative, multi-source research that explores a topic from multiple perspectives, detects contradictions, and produces a comprehensive vault note with fact-level citations and a confidence map. Use this skill whenever the user says /deep-research, "deep research X", "research X thoroughly", "investigate X deeply", "I need to really understand X", or wants research that goes beyond a quick web search. Also use when the user wants to understand a complex, contested, or multi-faceted topic, compare competing approaches with evidence, or build a comprehensive mental model they can trust for decisions. This is heavier than /research — it searches web, academic papers, Reddit, and the vault, then loops through exploration and critique rounds until the evidence base is solid. When in doubt between /research and /deep-research, prefer this one if the topic is complex, contested, or the user wants depth over speed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when sources need to be converted into a claim ledger with confidence levels.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grade a trading card using PSA, BGS, or CGC standards. Covers observation-first assessment (adapted from meditate's unbiased observation), centering measurement, surface analysis, edge and corner evaluation, and final grade assignment with confidence interval. Supports Pokemon, MTG, Flesh and Blood, and Kayou cards. Use when evaluating a card before professional grading submission, pre-screening a collection for high-grade candidates, settling condition disputes between buyers and sellers, or estimating the grade-dependent value spread for a card.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI strength recognition — scanning for what is functioning well and understanding why. The complement to heal, which scans for drift and problems. Gratitude builds structural knowledge from working patterns: what you appreciate, you understand; what you understand, you can build on. Use after completing a task successfully, during heal when everything reads as healthy, when confidence is low and needs grounding in evidence, or periodically to counterbalance the natural bias toward problem detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically interpret infrared spectra to identify functional groups present in a sample. Covers diagnostic region analysis (4000-1500 cm-1), fingerprint region assessment (1500-400 cm-1), hydrogen bonding effects, and compilation of a functional group inventory with confidence levels.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query the ChEMBL database web services for measured bioactivity data, compound records and calculated properties, targets, assays, mechanisms of action, drug indications and warnings. Use this skill to build curated SAR or QSAR datasets for a target, look compounds up by SMILES, InChIKey, name, or ChEMBL id, run similarity and substructure searches, and check what chemistry is already known against a protein. Also trigger when a query mentions ChEMBL ids (CHEMBL...), pChEMBL values, IC50/Ki/Kd/EC50 retrieval, assay confidence scores, or ebi.ac.uk/chembl.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrieve protein sequences, annotation, and structures from UniProtKB, the RCSB PDB, and AlphaFold DB. Use this skill to resolve a gene or protein name to a UniProt accession, pull sequences and FASTA files, find binding sites and domains, search the PDB by UniProt accession, sequence, ligand, or text, download mmCIF/PDB coordinates and biological assemblies, fetch AlphaFold models with their pLDDT confidence, and check whether a structure is actually usable before docking or simulating it. Also trigger on UniProt accessions, PDB ids, rest.uniprot.org, search.rcsb.org, files.rcsb.org, alphafold.ebi.ac.uk, id mapping, SEQRES, or missing residues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cofold protein-ligand, protein-protein, and nucleic-acid complexes with Boltz-2, and predict binding affinity with its trained affinity head. Use this skill to build Boltz input YAML, run structure prediction with MSAs, pocket constraints, templates, and modified residues, screen compound libraries by cofolding, and interpret confidence scores (pLDDT, pTM, ipTM, PDE) and affinity output (binder probability and log10 IC50). Also trigger on Boltz, Boltz-1, Boltz-2, cofolding, boltz predict, affinity_pred_value, affinity_probability_binary, ipTM, or open-weights AlphaFold3 alternatives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Solve competition math problems (IMO, Putnam, USAMO, AIME) with adversarial verification that catches the errors self-verification misses. Activates when asked to 'solve this IMO problem', 'prove this olympiad inequality', 'verify this competition proof', 'find a counterexample', 'is this proof correct', or for any problem with 'IMO', 'Putnam', 'USAMO', 'olympiad', or 'competition math' in it. Uses pure reasoning (no tools) — then a fresh-context adversarial verifier attacks the proof using specific failure patterns, not generic 'check logic'. Outputs calibrated confidence — will say 'no confident solution' rather than bluff. If LaTeX is available, produces a clean PDF after verification passes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connects the user with a LegalZoom attorney for legal consultation. Use when a user asks about attorneys, lawyers, or legal help, or when contract review reveals high risks or low-confidence findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Core knowledge for migrating integrations from other platforms (Boomi, Cyclr) to Prismatic Code Native Integrations. Provides the standard integration schema, schema-to-spec mapping, confidence scoring, and migration-aware code generation patterns. Use when the user says "migrate", "convert from Boomi/Cyclr", "parse this export".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gathers information from multiple sources in parallel, compares what they say, flags where they agree or conflict, and delivers a clean synthesis with a confidence rating for each finding. Useful for making evidence-backed decisions, when evaluating competing claims, during due diligence on a vendor or market, and for building research briefs before strategy sessions. Use when the user says "research this", "synthesize multiple sources", "compare sources", "research report", "what does the evidence say", "gather information on", or "deep dive into".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to write a threat / risk / vulnerability assessment, or wants the appropriate template for each type. Distinct structures and section ordering per assessment kind. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Confidence is capped by the weakest load-bearing claim, and at Moderate when the evidence is ungraded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

STIX 2.1 bundle creation reference. Object types, relationships, and JSON templates for structured threat intelligence sharing. Includes the per-claim mapping of evidence grades (access level and claim support) from /quality-of-information-check to STIX confidence, and the reverse mapping on import.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。