本文へ移動
cccskills

「coverage」の検索結果

1,321 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

Design a test strategy around product risk, business invariants, failure modes, and existing controls, deciding what deserves testing and at which boundary rather than maximising coverage. Use whenever the user asks how to test something, wants a test plan or strategy, is deciding between unit/integration/contract/E2E/property/concurrency testing, or wants to know whether existing tests actually protect what matters. Prefer this over writing tests immediately. Part of the audit suite; inherits the shared constitution while its own job is proving risk coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

playbookTV/Ironclad72026年8月1日 更新

Guides test implementation following the test pyramid (75% unit, 20% integration, 5% E2E), Arrange-Act-Assert pattern, and project coverage thresholds (branches 70%, functions 80%, lines 80%, statements 80%). Covers test naming conventions, test independence, mock and stub patterns, test data management with fixtures and builders, and CI integration. Use when writing tests, reviewing test code, or setting up test infrastructure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

feel-flow/ai-spec-driven-development72026年9月14日 更新

Execute code-quality gates for a completed phase including tests, coverage, lint, types, build, CI/CD, staging, migrations, and spec coverage

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RepairYourTech/cfsa-antigravity62026年8月16日 更新

Smart Kotlin unit testing with auto-detection, coverage analysis, and AI edge cases. Use when generating tests for biz/ layer classes, analyzing test coverage gaps, or discovering edge cases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dantech0xff/dreams62026年9月21日 更新

Use when working with Codeclimate — code Climate quality management. Covers maintainability analysis, test coverage tracking, issue detection, GPA scoring, and repository configuration. Use when managing Code Climate projects, reviewing maintainability ratings, tracking test coverage trends, or configuring analysis engines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cloudthinker-ai/CloudSkills62026年4月5日 更新

unit-vitest

無料日本語概要

Use this skill when writing unit tests, mocking dependencies, testing pure functions, or measuring coverage with Vitest. Trigger words: ユニットテスト, 単体テスト, Vitest, モック, テストを書く, カバレッジ, describe, it, expect, vi.mock.

Akira-Papa/claude-code-nextjs-mongo-template-162026年5月24日 更新

Integrate AFL++ coverage-guided fuzz testing into CI/CD pipelines to discover memory corruption, input handling, and logic vulnerabilities in C/C++ and compiled applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MustafaKemal0146/fetih52026年10月11日 更新

Map advanced persistent threat (APT) group tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) to the MITRE ATT&CK framework using the ATT&CK Navigator and attackcti Python library. The analyst queries STIX/TAXII data for group-technique associations, generates Navigator layer files for visualization, and compares defensive coverage against adversary profiles. Activates for requests involving APT TTP mapping, ATT&CK Navigator layers, threat actor profiling, or MITRE technique coverage analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

micsapp/micstec-skills42026年3月20日 更新

vitest

無料日本語概要

Vitest (Vite ネイティブテストフレームワーク) リファレンス。 test, describe, it, expect, vi.fn, vi.mock, vi.spyOn、 beforeEach / afterEach / beforeAll / afterAll、coverage (v8 / istanbul)、snapshot、 vitest.config.ts、ワークスペース、ブラウザモード、UI モード、bench。

Fandhe-AI/agent-reference-skills42026年10月13日 更新

Profiles a genome from raw reads BEFORE assembly with a k-mer spectrum (KMC or Jellyfish histogram), then models it with GenomeScope2 to estimate genome size, heterozygosity, repeat content, and ploidy, and Smudgeplot to infer ploidy from heterozygous k-mer pairs (diploid AB vs triploid AAB vs tetraploid AABB). Covers choosing k via Merqury best_k.sh, the k-mer-coverage vs sequencing-coverage confusion, reading het/repeat/contamination/organelle peaks, why noisy ONT must not be used for counting, and how the estimate becomes the NG50 denominator, the Flye -g value, the hifiasm --hom-cov/purge setting, and the 1.5-2x-too-big haplotig sanity check. Use when starting any de novo assembly, deciding whether short reads can work, estimating genome size for an unknown organism, diagnosing ploidy, or sanity-checking an assembly's size against expectation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

peacezha/TRACE32026年10月13日 更新

Reads, queries, and writes bigWig indexed binary signal tracks (coverage, fold-change, conservation, methylation-rate) with pyBigWig (Python) and the UCSC Kent tools (bedGraphToBigWig, bigWigToBedGraph, bigWigInfo, bigWigSummary, bigWigAverageOverBed) and deepTools (multiBigwigSummary, computeMatrix, bigwigCompare). Covers the central trap that a wide query returns a precomputed zoom-level summary (by default the mean, which annihilates narrow peaks) not per-base data, when exact=True/values() is mandatory, the NaN-not-zero gap-handling fork, choosing mean vs max vs sum vs coverage by biological question, and the sorted-bedGraph plus chrom.sizes build requirement. Use when extracting signal at regions, computing mean signal per gene/peak, building a browser track from bedGraph, comparing tracks, or building TSS/gene-body metaprofiles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

peacezha/TRACE32026年10月13日 更新

Assembles microbial-community sequencing into metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) with metaFlye (ONT), metaSPAdes/MEGAHIT (Illumina), and hifiasm-meta/metaMDBG (PacBio HiFi), then recovers genomes via multi-binner consolidation (MetaBAT2, MaxBin2, CONCOCT, SemiBin2, VAMB -> DAS_Tool) and QCs them against MIMAG with CheckM2, GUNC, and GTDB-Tk. Covers why a metagenome is not a genome (uneven coverage, micro-diversity, strain collapse to consensus), differential-coverage binning, co-assembly vs per-sample, the rRNA-operon collapse that fails short-read MAGs, and strain resolution with inStrain. Use when reconstructing genomes from a microbiome, soil, ocean, or gut community, recovering MAGs, or resolving strain-level variation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

peacezha/TRACE32026年10月13日 更新

Quantifies alternative splicing as PSI (percent spliced in) from RNA-seq using rMATS-turbo (BAM-based event), SUPPA2 (TPM-based event), MAJIQ V3 (LSV-based Bayesian), leafcutter (annotation-free intron clusters), VAST-TOOLS (cross-species with microexon support), Shiba (junction-imbalance-corrected, 2025 SOTA at low coverage), or IRFinder-S (intron retention coverage-aware). Distinguishes the five canonical event classes (SE, A5SS, A3SS, MXE, RI), special classes (microexons, exitrons, AFE/ALE), intron retention subtypes (canonical RI vs detained introns), and applies effective-length normalization. Use when measuring splice-site usage or isoform inclusion ratios from short-read RNA-seq.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

peacezha/TRACE32026年10月13日 更新

Generate alignment statistics using samtools flagstat, stats, depth, coverage, and mosdepth. Use when assessing alignment quality, calculating coverage, or generating QC reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

peacezha/TRACE32026年10月13日 更新

Analyze product risk and propose traceable QA coverage, priorities, environments, data, and explicit coverage gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace32026年9月28日 更新

Apply the Red-Green-Refactor cycle to software development. Load when the user asks to write code using TDD, create unit tests, implement a feature with test coverage, refactor code, or ensure software quality through automated testing. Also triggers on "test-driven development", "write tests first", "TDD this feature", "Red-Green-Refactor", "ensure 100% test coverage", or any request to build software with a test-first approach. Supports unit, integration, and end-to-end testing strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dvy1987/agent-loom32026年8月8日 更新

Assembles microbial-community sequencing into metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) with metaFlye (ONT), metaSPAdes/MEGAHIT (Illumina), and hifiasm-meta/metaMDBG (PacBio HiFi), then recovers genomes via multi-binner consolidation (MetaBAT2, MaxBin2, CONCOCT, SemiBin2, VAMB -> DAS_Tool) and QCs them against MIMAG with CheckM2, GUNC, and GTDB-Tk. Covers why a metagenome is not a genome (uneven coverage, micro-diversity, strain collapse to consensus), differential-coverage binning, co-assembly vs per-sample, the rRNA-operon collapse that fails short-read MAGs, and strain resolution with inStrain. Use when reconstructing genomes from a microbiome, soil, ocean, or gut community, recovering MAGs, or resolving strain-level variation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

peacezha/HPClaw32026年10月11日 更新

Reads, queries, and writes bigWig indexed binary signal tracks (coverage, fold-change, conservation, methylation-rate) with pyBigWig (Python) and the UCSC Kent tools (bedGraphToBigWig, bigWigToBedGraph, bigWigInfo, bigWigSummary, bigWigAverageOverBed) and deepTools (multiBigwigSummary, computeMatrix, bigwigCompare). Covers the central trap that a wide query returns a precomputed zoom-level summary (by default the mean, which annihilates narrow peaks) not per-base data, when exact=True/values() is mandatory, the NaN-not-zero gap-handling fork, choosing mean vs max vs sum vs coverage by biological question, and the sorted-bedGraph plus chrom.sizes build requirement. Use when extracting signal at regions, computing mean signal per gene/peak, building a browser track from bedGraph, comparing tracks, or building TSS/gene-body metaprofiles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

peacezha/HPClaw32026年10月11日 更新

Profiles a genome from raw reads BEFORE assembly with a k-mer spectrum (KMC or Jellyfish histogram), then models it with GenomeScope2 to estimate genome size, heterozygosity, repeat content, and ploidy, and Smudgeplot to infer ploidy from heterozygous k-mer pairs (diploid AB vs triploid AAB vs tetraploid AABB). Covers choosing k via Merqury best_k.sh, the k-mer-coverage vs sequencing-coverage confusion, reading het/repeat/contamination/organelle peaks, why noisy ONT must not be used for counting, and how the estimate becomes the NG50 denominator, the Flye -g value, the hifiasm --hom-cov/purge setting, and the 1.5-2x-too-big haplotig sanity check. Use when starting any de novo assembly, deciding whether short reads can work, estimating genome size for an unknown organism, diagnosing ploidy, or sanity-checking an assembly's size against expectation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

peacezha/HPClaw32026年10月11日 更新

Quantifies alternative splicing as PSI (percent spliced in) from RNA-seq using rMATS-turbo (BAM-based event), SUPPA2 (TPM-based event), MAJIQ V3 (LSV-based Bayesian), leafcutter (annotation-free intron clusters), VAST-TOOLS (cross-species with microexon support), Shiba (junction-imbalance-corrected, 2025 SOTA at low coverage), or IRFinder-S (intron retention coverage-aware). Distinguishes the five canonical event classes (SE, A5SS, A3SS, MXE, RI), special classes (microexons, exitrons, AFE/ALE), intron retention subtypes (canonical RI vs detained introns), and applies effective-length normalization. Use when measuring splice-site usage or isoform inclusion ratios from short-read RNA-seq.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

peacezha/HPClaw32026年10月11日 更新

Generate alignment statistics using samtools flagstat, stats, depth, coverage, and mosdepth. Use when assessing alignment quality, calculating coverage, or generating QC reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

peacezha/HPClaw32026年10月11日 更新

Analyzes PHP codebase for test coverage gaps. Detects untested classes, methods, branches, exception paths, and edge cases. Provides actionable recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MikeCheng1208/BattleTree22026年7月22日 更新

Create comprehensive academic research notes with deep literature coverage. Auto-detects language (EN prompt→EN output, TR prompt→TR output). Supports Obsidian markdown and PDF. Performs 8-15 iterative search cycles with 25-50+ sources for comprehensive coverage. Uses footnote citations and visual overviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MikeCheng1208/BattleTree22026年7月22日 更新

Use when GitHub may have shipped a GraphQL schema update affecting timeline event unions (PullRequestTimelineItems / IssueTimelineItems), when the gh-timeline dispatcher fallback is hitting more than expected, before a gh-timeline release, or when the user requests phrases like "verify timeline coverage", "audit gh-timeline schema", "check for new timeline events", "GitHub schema changed". Walks through schema diff → patch → test update → live verification → optional fixture refresh, marking each spot where a human decision is required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

sushichan044/gh-timeline22026年5月25日 更新