「decisions」の検索結果

Capture decisions and commitments after a meeting and draft a concise follow-up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses GKE nodes reporting NotReady or Unknown status by inspecting node conditions, events, kubelet/containerd logs, and node metrics, then proposing safe remediations. Use when nodes show NotReady, when the kubelet stops posting node status, or when workloads are evicted or stuck Pending due to node health. Don't use for pod-level application failures (use gke-workload-troubleshooting), autoscaler scale-up/scale-down decisions (use gke-cluster-autoscaler), or non-GKE compute.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Apache ShardingSphere or user-authorized downstream pull requests and PR discussions from public or authorized repository evidence. Use for code-correctness or mergeability decisions, CI-focused review, root-cause and regression analysis, complete consolidated findings, copy-ready committer feedback, challenged findings, multi-round review, and formal review of local implementation candidates in the repository completion loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

P10 CTO mode — define strategic direction, design org topology, manage P9 teams. Use when user says 'CTO模式', 'P10', '战略规划', '架构委员会', or when facing cross-team architectural decisions. Produces: strategic input templates + org design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Owns the Ideal State Artifact — the primitive holding a project or task's articulated ideal state; scaffolds, interviews, grills a half-formed idea into shape via checkpointed discovery, scores completeness, reconciles feature excerpts to master, seeds from a repo, and appends decisions/changelog/verification across a locked seventeen-section order. USE WHEN ISA, ISC, ideal state, ideal state criteria, project specification, hill-climb, articulating done, fog, not yet specified, grill me, discovery interview. NOT FOR creating new skills (use CreateSkill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when long-running agent sessions need context compression, structured summarization, compaction, token-per-task optimization, or durable handoff summaries that preserve decisions, files, risks, and next actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used for the tool-interface layer of an agent system specifically: writing tool descriptions agents can route on, designing tool schemas and response formats, naming conventions, actionable error recovery messages, MCP server design, tool-set consolidation, and deciding when to add or remove an individual tool. Use this when the unit of work is a single tool or a set of tools. Route project-shape, pipeline architecture, and task-model-fit decisions to project-development; route deciding whether to introduce sub-agents to multi-agent-patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used to explain or reason about the foundational concepts of context engineering: what context is, the anatomy of a context window, how attention mechanics work, the U-shaped attention curve, why context quality matters more than quantity, and the mental models needed to interpret every other context-engineering decision. Use this for conceptual explanation, onboarding, and background reading. Route operational work to the specialized skills: debugging attention failures goes to context-degradation, token-efficiency work goes to context-optimization, conversation summarization goes to context-compression, and project-shape decisions go to project-development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used for project-level decisions about LLM-powered systems: whether an LLM is the right primitive for the task at hand, the shape of a multi-stage batch or agent pipeline, token and cost estimation, choosing between single-agent and multi-agent at the project level, structured output design for downstream parsing, and structuring agent-assisted iteration. Use this when the unit of work is a whole project or a multi-stage pipeline. Route individual tool design to tool-design and individual skill-loading or context-budget tactics to context-optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user wants to create, write, name, place, or organize an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) in a software project — e.g. "write an ADR for choosing a database", "document this architecture decision", "set up an adr/ or decisions/ directory", "which ADR template should I use", "supersede an old ADR". Covers picking a template, naming the file, filling in context/decision/consequences, and deciding whether a decision even needs an ADR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent-native memory for OpenClaw that structures memory from agent trace, execution history, decisions, tool calls, and conversations into durable long-term memory primitives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ambient Memori long-term memory for Claude Code via local Bash. MUST TRIGGER on essentially every non-trivial user turn: run recall before drafting any substantive response, whether or not the user mentioned memory, a prior session, or past work. The default is to check memory first; do not wait to be asked. Always fire before external lookups (WebSearch/WebFetch) and before answering any question about preferences, prior decisions, constraints, project history, status, past work, or any non-trivial coding/research task. Skip only for trivial acknowledgements/closings, purely self-contained turns where prior context cannot possibly help, or when the user explicitly opts out. Use Advanced Augmentation after drafting the final response for every non-trivial turn, as the last memory step. Use recall.summary only for broad session summaries/orientation, compaction after context loss, feedback for memory quality, quota for limits, and signup only when explicitly requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn meeting transcripts or rough notes into crisp summaries with decisions, risks, and owner-tagged action items; use for Zoom/Meet/Teams transcripts, call notes, or long meeting chats to generate share-ready outputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a GitHub pull request by summarizing its diff and key design decisions. Use when the user wants to review a PR, understand changes in a branch, or get a code review summary. Trigger keywords - review PR, review pull request, summarize PR, summarize diff, code review, review branch, PR summary, diff summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill encodes Emil Kowalski's philosophy on UI polish, component design, animation decisions, and the invisible details that make software feel great.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an animation from scratch, making the decisions in the order that determines whether it feels right — should it animate at all, what purpose, which tool, which properties, which curve and duration, how it interrupts, how it exits. Writes the implementation. Use when asked to animate something, add motion, make a component feel alive, or build a transition. For critiquing existing motion use review-animations; for auditing a whole codebase use improve-animations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the Fable-derived 10-stage OBSERVE, OBSERVE, LISTEN, THINK, CONNECT, CONNECT, FEEL, ACCEPT, CREATE, GROW loop to consequential or ambiguous reasoning and decisions. Use for think this through, deep think, architecture review, postmortem, tradeoff analysis, or challenges to assumptions. This is a reasoning review, not a deterministic vault health check or repair workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Walk the user through design or implementation decisions one at a time, or review completed code one change at a time. Use when the user says "walk me through each decision", "let's decide together", "help me work through these choices", "walk me through what you did", or "QA step by step". Present concise context, mutually exclusive options, log each answer, and finish with a summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Records research provenance as a post-task epilogue, scanning conversation history at the end of a coding or research session to extract decisions, experiments, dead ends, claims, heuristics, and pivots, and writing them into the ara/ directory with user-vs-AI provenance tags. Use as a session epilogue — never during execution — to maintain a faithful, auditable trace of how a research project actually evolved.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when challenging ideas, plans, decisions, or proposals using structured critical reasoning. Invoke to play devil's advocate, run a pre-mortem, red team, or audit evidence and assumptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing new high-level system architecture, reviewing existing designs, or making architectural decisions. Invoke to create architecture diagrams, write Architecture Decision Records (ADRs), evaluate technology trade-offs, design component interactions, and plan for scalability. Use for system design, architecture review, microservices structuring, ADR authoring, scalability planning, and infrastructure pattern selection — distinct from code-level design patterns or database-only design tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds security-focused full-stack web applications by implementing integrated frontend and backend components with layered security at every level. Covers the complete stack from database to UI, enforcing auth, input validation, output encoding, and parameterized queries across all layers. Use when implementing features across frontend and backend, building REST APIs with corresponding UI, connecting frontend components to backend endpoints, creating end-to-end data flows from database to UI, or implementing CRUD operations with UI forms. Distinct from frontend-only, backend-only, or API-only skills in that it simultaneously addresses all three perspectives—Frontend, Backend, and Security—within a single implementation workflow. Invoke for full-stack feature work, web app development, authenticated API routes with views, microservices, real-time features, monorepo architecture, or technology selection decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn raw notes or a transcript into a clean summary with decisions and action items.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain a free-form scratchpad of decisions, extracted values, and open questions so context pruning doesn't lose anything you still need.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。