「evaluation」の検索結果

Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in designing effective prompts for LLM-powered applications. Masters prompt structure, context management, output formatting, and prompt evaluation. Use when: prompt engineering, system prompt, few-shot, chain of thought, prompt design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates code generation models across HumanEval, MBPP, MultiPL-E, and 15+ benchmarks with pass@k metrics. Use when benchmarking code models, comparing coding abilities, testing multi-language support, or measuring code generation quality. Industry standard from BigCode Project used by HuggingFace leaderboards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Medical device risk management specialist implementing ISO 14971 throughout product lifecycle. Provides risk analysis, risk evaluation, risk control, and post-production information analysis. Use when user mentions risk management, ISO 14971, risk analysis, FMEA, fault tree analysis, hazard identification, risk control, risk matrix, benefit-risk analysis, residual risk, risk acceptability, or post-market risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns marketing prompts into tested, versioned production assets: A/B prompt evaluation against structured test cases, immutable prompt version history with diffs, ready-to-use marketing prompt templates (ad copy, email campaigns, social posts, landing pages, SEO meta), and an LLM-governance playbook for marketing teams (claim discipline, disclosure rules, human-review gates). Use when a marketing team relies on AI-generated content and needs prompt quality to be measurable and safe — or when the user mentions 'prompt engineering,' 'improve my prompts,' 'prompt templates,' 'prompt versioning,' 'AI content workflow,' or 'AI governance for marketing.'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to build a free tool for marketing — lead generation, SEO value, or brand awareness. Use when they mention 'engineering as marketing,' 'free tool,' 'calculator,' 'generator,' 'checker,' 'grader,' 'marketing tool,' 'lead gen tool,' 'build something for traffic,' 'interactive tool,' or 'free resource.' Covers idea evaluation, tool design, and launch strategy. For pure SEO content strategy (no tool), use seo-audit or content-strategy instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

World-class senior data scientist skill specialising in statistical modeling, experiment design, causal inference, and predictive analytics. Covers A/B testing (sample sizing, two-proportion z-tests, Bonferroni correction), difference-in-differences, feature engineering pipelines (Scikit-learn, XGBoost), cross-validated model evaluation (AUC-ROC, AUC-PR, SHAP), and MLflow experiment tracking — using Python (NumPy, Pandas, Scikit-learn), R, and SQL. Use when designing or analysing controlled experiments, building and evaluating classification or regression models, performing causal analysis on observational data, engineering features for structured tabular datasets, or translating statistical findings into data-driven business decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technology stack evaluation and comparison with TCO analysis, security assessment, and ecosystem health scoring. Use when comparing frameworks, evaluating technology stacks, calculating total cost of ownership, assessing migration paths, or analyzing ecosystem viability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "design system architecture", "evaluate microservices vs monolith", "create architecture diagrams", "analyze dependencies", "choose a database", "plan for scalability", "make technical decisions", or "review system design". Use for architecture decision records (ADRs), tech stack evaluation, system design reviews, dependency analysis, and generating architecture diagrams in Mermaid, PlantUML, or ASCII format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical leadership guidance for engineering teams, architecture decisions, and technology strategy. Use when assessing technical debt, scaling engineering teams, evaluating technologies, making architecture decisions, establishing engineering metrics, or when user mentions CTO, tech debt, technical debt, team scaling, architecture decisions, technology evaluation, engineering metrics, DORA metrics, or technology strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automates the end-to-end detection engineering workflow in Google SecOps using MCP tools. Use when fetching threat intelligence from blogs, generating Threat Detection Opportunities (TDOs), simulating attacker behavior with synthetic UDM events, evaluating rule coverage, and deploying gap-closing rules. Don't use for standalone YARA-L 2.0 rule authoring/tuning (use secops-detection-engineering), threat hunting, or SOC investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures GKE observability, including Cloud Logging, Cloud Monitoring, and managed Prometheus. Use when configuring GKE monitoring, setting up GKE logging, or configuring Prometheus metrics collection, and to troubleshoot Managed Service for Prometheus (GMP) issues such as missing metrics, unhealthy scrape targets, PodMonitoring misconfiguration, rule/alert evaluation failures, and monitoring permission errors. Don't use to configure local application logging frameworks or external APMs outside GKE.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy open models or custom weights from Model Garden to Agent Platform endpoints, check the status of an in-progress deployment operation, or clean up resources by undeploying models and deleting endpoints. Use when asked to actively deploy a model, list the Model Garden CATALOG of available models, check if a specific model is deployable (`gcloud ai model-garden models list-deployment-config`), query deployment cost, troubleshoot deployment errors (like quota limits), or undeploy/clean up endpoints. Also use when copying and deploying a 1P Tuned Model. Don't use for pure listing/discovery questions of the form "is X deployed?", "list my endpoints", or "which regions have models running?" — for those use `agent-platform-endpoint-management`. Don't use for running model evaluations (use `agent-platform-eval-flywheel` skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connects to and performs inference with Google Cloud Agent Platform GenAI models, including First-Party Gemini models and Third-Party OpenMaaS models (Llama, DeepSeek, Qwen, etc.). Use when asked to perform inference, ask a model a question, run a test prompt, execute chat completions, or generate code for calling Gemini or OpenMaaS models, authenticate with GenAI SDK, OpenAI SDK, or legacy Agent Platform SDK, configure base URLs and global/regional endpoints, or troubleshoot 429 Resource Exhausted (DSQ), 400 User Validation, or 404 Not Found errors. Don't use for deploying models to endpoints or for running model evaluations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages Agent Platform serving endpoints. Use when you need to create, list, describe, update, or delete serving endpoints for model deployment on Agent Platform. Also use when troubleshooting endpoint permission, quota, or resource busy errors. Don't use for deploying models to endpoints or for running model evaluations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measures and improves the quality of AI models and agents on Google Cloud using the Eval Quality Flywheel methodology. Use when generating synthetic user scenarios, evaluating an agent or model, building an eval dataset, picking or writing evaluation metrics, analyzing failures, comparing results before and after a fix, or when guidance is needed on Agent Platform eval methodology — including dataset schema, LLM-as-judge scoring, and common failure causes. For fine-tuning, use agent-platform-tuning. For general production deployment, use agent-platform-deploy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DeepEval evaluation workflow for AI agents and LLM applications. TRIGGER when the user wants to evaluate or improve an AI agent, tool-using workflow, multi-turn chatbot, RAG pipeline, or LLM app; add evals; generate datasets or goldens; use deepeval generate; use deepeval test run; send results to Confident AI; monitor production; run online evals; inspect traces; or iterate on prompts, tools, retrieval, or agent behavior from eval failures. AI agents are the primary use case. Covers Python SDK, pytest eval suites, CLI generation, traced evals, Confident AI reporting, and agent-driven improvement loops. DO NOT TRIGGER for unrelated generic pytest, non-AI test setup, or non-DeepEval observability work unless the user asks to compare or migrate to DeepEval; for instrumenting an app with DeepEval tracing, @observe, or framework integrations (use the `deepeval-tracing` skill); or for raw OpenTelemetry / OTLP export without the deepeval package (use the `deepeval-otel` skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert knowledge for AI deep research — methodology, source evaluation, search optimization, cross-referencing, synthesis, and citation formats

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prompt engineering expert for chain-of-thought, few-shot learning, evaluation, and LLM optimization

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Machine learning engineer expert for PyTorch, scikit-learn, model evaluation, and MLOps

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when designing autonomous agent harnesses: research loops, evaluation scaffolds, locked and editable surfaces, durable logs, novelty gates, pruning, rollback, PR preparation, and human approval boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used for book-to-SFT pipelines: ePub extraction, literary segmentation, author-voice dataset construction, style-transfer training, LoRA workflows, and model evaluation for voice replication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a refined research proposal or method idea into a detailed, claim-driven experiment roadmap. Use after `research-refine`, or when the user asks for a detailed experiment plan, ablation matrix, evaluation protocol, run order, compute budget, or paper-ready validation that supports the core problem, novelty, simplicity, and any LLM / VLM / Diffusion / RL-based contribution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates code generation models across HumanEval, MBPP, MultiPL-E, and 15+ benchmarks with pass@k metrics. Use when benchmarking code models, comparing coding abilities, testing multi-language support, or measuring code generation quality. Industry standard from BigCode Project used by HuggingFace leaderboards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。