「executing」の検索結果

Produce a traceable risk-based QA strategy without executing tests or expanding authorization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an approved plan needs executing task by task in this session, with a fresh implementer per task and review between tasks

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - creates isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks. Dispatches fresh delegate_task per task with two-stage review (spec compliance then code quality).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a detailed, phased implementation plan with documentation discovery. Use when asked to plan a feature, task, or multi-step implementation — especially before executing with do.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - creates isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when working with scientific research tools and workflows across bioinformatics, cheminformatics, genomics, structural biology, proteomics, and drug discovery. This skill provides access to 600+ scientific tools including machine learning models, datasets, APIs, and analysis packages. Use when searching for scientific tools, executing computational biology workflows, composing multi-step research pipelines, accessing databases like OpenTargets/PubChem/UniProt/PDB/ChEMBL, performing tool discovery for research tasks, or integrating scientific computational resources into LLM workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Red team engagement planning is the foundational phase that defines scope, objectives, rules of engagement (ROE), threat model selection, and operational timelines before any offensive testing begins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes authorized attack simulations against Active Directory environments to identify misconfigurations, weak credentials, dangerous privilege paths, and exploitable trust relationships that could lead to domain compromise. The tester uses BloodHound for attack path analysis, Mimikatz for credential extraction, and Impacket for protocol-level attacks including Kerberoasting, AS-REP Roasting, and delegation abuse. Activates for requests involving Active Directory pentest, AD attack simulation, domain compromise testing, or Kerberos attack assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes comprehensive red team exercises that simulate real-world adversary operations against an organization's people, processes, and technology. The red team operates with stealth as a primary objective, employing the full attack lifecycle from initial reconnaissance through objective completion while testing the organization's detection and response capabilities. This differs from penetration testing by focusing on adversary emulation rather than vulnerability identification. Activates for requests involving red team exercise, adversary simulation, adversary emulation, or full-scope offensive security assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes authorized phishing simulation campaigns to assess an organization's susceptibility to email-based social engineering attacks. The tester designs realistic phishing scenarios, builds credential harvesting infrastructure, sends targeted phishing emails, and tracks open rates, click-through rates, and credential submission rates to measure human security awareness. Activates for requests involving phishing simulation, social engineering assessment, email security testing, or security awareness measurement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Responds to malware infections across enterprise endpoints by identifying the malware family, determining infection vectors, assessing spread, and executing eradication procedures. Covers the full lifecycle from detection through containment, analysis, removal, and recovery. Activates for requests involving malware response, malware eradication, trojan removal, worm containment, malware triage, or infected endpoint remediation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive red team operations methodology covering full engagement lifecycle from planning through reporting. Addresses engagement scoping and rules of engagement negotiation, multi-tier C2 infrastructure design with redirectors and domain fronting, malleable traffic profiles and beacon tradecraft, OPSEC discipline including attribution avoidance and indicator management, EDR and AMSI evasion techniques using direct syscalls and unhooking, data collection with chain-of-custody controls, and structured reporting with purple team debrief workflows. Covers assumed-breach, external-to-internal, insider threat, and hybrid physical-cyber engagement scenarios with MITRE ATT&CK mapping throughout. Targets operators planning or executing adversary simulation engagements against mature defenders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dense methodology covering DNS exfiltration (dnscat2, iodine, dns2tcp), HTTPS tunneling (domain fronting, CDN abuse, legitimate service channels), ICMP tunneling (icmpsh, ptunnel-ng), cloud storage dead drops (S3 presigned URLs, Azure Blob SAS tokens, GCS signed URLs), email-based exfil (SMTP, EWS, draft method), steganography (image, audio, document metadata), encoding/encryption (base64 chunking, XOR, AES), covert channels (custom protocol tunneling, HTTP header encoding, timing channels), and data staging (compression, splitting, encryption). Tools: dnscat2, iodine, dns2tcp, PacketWhisper, chisel, stunnel, icmpsh, ptunnel-ng, steghide, zsteg, OpenStego. MITRE ATT&CK: T1048 (Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol), T1041 (Exfiltration Over C2 Channel), T1567 (Exfiltration Over Web Service), T1029 (Scheduled Transfer), T1030 (Data Transfer Size Limits), T1132 (Data Encoding), T1001 (Data Obfuscation). Use when planning or executing data exfiltration during authorized red team engagements or post-exploita...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete Open WebUI API integration for managing LLM models, chat completions, Ollama proxy operations, file uploads, knowledge bases (RAG), image generation, audio processing, and pipelines. Use this skill when interacting with Open WebUI instances via REST API - listing models, chatting with LLMs, uploading files for RAG, managing knowledge collections, or executing Ollama commands through the Open WebUI proxy. Requires OPENWEBUI_URL and OPENWEBUI_TOKEN environment variables or explicit parameters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan database migrations before executing them: risk assessment, dependency mapping, multi-service sequencing, rollback budgets, and stakeholder communication plans. Use when deciding HOW to migrate, not when writing the actual DDL. NOT for: writing migration SQL (use database-migration-manager), data ETL pipelines (use data-migration-specialist), query optimization, or ORM configuration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates agent outputs against schemas and quality criteria, scores confidence, detects hallucinations, monitors convergence, decides when to iterate, and synthesizes actionable feedback. Use when checking if a node's output is acceptable, scoring confidence, detecting fabricated content, deciding whether to re-execute, or generating improvement feedback. Activate on "validate output", "check quality", "confidence score", "hallucination check", "should we iterate", "improvement feedback". NOT for executing DAGs (use dag-runtime), planning DAGs (use dag-planner), or matching skills (use dag-skills-matcher).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decides HOW to mutate a DAG when a node fails, quality is below threshold, or new information changes the plan. Selects from mutation strategies (add node, replace agent, fork paths, loop back, downgrade model) based on failure type, cost budget, and execution history. Activate on "DAG failed how to fix", "mutation strategy", "replan on failure", "adaptive DAG", "recovery strategy", "what to do when node fails". NOT for detecting failures (use dag-quality), executing mutations (use dag-planner), or runtime execution (use dag-runtime).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Propose and safely admit immutable DAG revisions after failures, requirements, resource changes, or unresolved effects. NOT for mutating an executing graph in place or retrying an effect with unknown commit state.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates typed DAG dependency declarations, returns Kahn linear extensions or generations and residual cycle witnesses, and identifies changed consumers for revalidation. NOT for constructing graphs, scheduling resource capacity, granting effects, or executing nodes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and validate versioned DAGs with typed dependencies, gates, and evidence-bound readiness. NOT for executing a DAG, granting work authority, or treating an unverified gate as cleared.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。