「experiment」の検索結果

AI-PLC Registry ビューア（ブラウザ）の起動・停止。experimental/registry-viewer を手でコピーしたときだけ使える。

Autonomous fixed-budget ML experiment loop — setup, iterative hypothesis testing, git-based keep/discard tracking, and indefinite autonomous execution. Implements the karpathy/autoresearch protocol.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate the full PaperOrchestra (Song et al., 2026, arXiv:2604.05018) five-agent pipeline to turn unstructured research materials (idea, experimental log, LaTeX template, conference guidelines, optional figures) into a submission-ready LaTeX manuscript and compiled PDF. TRIGGER when the user asks to "write a paper from my experiments", "turn this idea and these results into a paper", "generate a conference submission", "run paper-orchestra on X", or otherwise wants the end-to-end paper-writing pipeline. Coordinates the outline-agent, plotting-agent, literature-review-agent, section-writing-agent, and content-refinement-agent skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Step 2 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Execute the visualization plan from outline.json — render plots and conceptual diagrams from experimental_log.md and idea.md, optionally refine via VLM critique loop, and produce context-aware captions. Runs in parallel with the literature-review-agent. TRIGGER when the orchestrator delegates Step 2 or when the user asks to "generate the figures for my paper" or "render the plots from this experiment log".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generalised autonomous optimisation loop — soft RLVR for any artifact a user can measure. Web runtime package: uses memory in this order: connector-backed, project-pack, none. Never assumes subprocess access or unrestricted local files. Use this skill whenever a user wants to iteratively improve an artifact — code, prompts, documents, configs, designs, content — by running structured experiments, evaluating results against a multi-dimensional rubric, and learning from each attempt. Triggers include: "optimise this", "keep improving until it's good", "run experiments on", "autoresearch", "iterate on this overnight", "try different approaches and pick the best", or any request implying repeated evaluate-and-improve cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generalised autonomous optimisation loop — soft RLVR for any artifact a user can measure. Use this skill whenever a user wants to iteratively improve an artifact — code, prompts, documents, configs, designs, content — by running structured experiments, evaluating results against a multi-dimensional rubric, and learning from each attempt. Triggers include: "optimise this", "keep improving until it's good", "run experiments on", "autoresearch", "iterate on this overnight", "try different approaches and pick the best", or any request implying repeated evaluate-and-improve cycles. Also use when the user wants to improve a system prompt, a data pipeline, a writing style, or any artifact where quality can be decomposed into measurable tracks. For inference optimisation tasks (model latency, throughput, quantization, GPU deployment), a* delegates the low-level tuning to AITune while maintaining quality tracking and learning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement and execute approved research Experiment, Tuning, or Design Cards with reproducible logs, metrics, environment, and artifacts. Use for bounded coding, debugging, and runs; not for changing claims, priorities, budgets, or the Research Spine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Direct a claim-driven research experiment project from post-Idea intake through method realization, prioritized evidence collection, Human Gates, and Evidence Freeze. Use for scientific planning, state transitions, queues, budgets, or recovery; not for running code or independently auditing results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit recent high-relevance papers from a target venue to identify claim-relevant experimental evidence gaps after core P0 results exist. Use for venue completeness and reviewer-risk analysis; not for redefining the research question or running experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and execute chaos engineering experiments using Litmus or Chaos Mesh. Test system resilience through controlled fault injection, validate hypothesis-driven tests, and improve failure recovery. Use before major product launches, after architecture changes to validate resilience, during GameDays or disaster recovery drills, to validate assumptions about failure modes, or as part of an SRE maturity program.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post material interim assignment updates, then commit and submit a terminal experiment result through the typed Senpai GitHub tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operator-side guide for generating a target-specific training curve chart for a legacy experiment PR. Use when auditing or presenting historical runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review one terminal experiment and choose the next step: merge a reproducible winner, close a useful negative or dead end, or request missing evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operator-side inventory of experiment PRs for auditing a Senpai research track. It outputs merged winners, a compact results table, and full details for deep dives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SWE-bench pipeline for A/B testing Grafema with Claude Code. Use when: (1) running SWE-bench experiments, (2) comparing baseline vs grafema conditions, (3) evaluating results, (4) debugging container issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The Arbor research-coordinator protocol: the OBSERVE -> IDEATE -> SELECT -> DISPATCH -> DECIDE cycle over a durable Idea Tree. Preloaded automatically on /auto-research sessions. The coordinator never edits code or runs commands — executors do that in isolated worktrees; the coordinator steers the tree with idea_tree / dispatch_experiments / merge_experiment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EXPERIMENT MODE: Timeboxed, throwaway code for rapid validation. Bypasses TDD requirements. Code must be quarantined and cannot be merged to main.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a feature launch needs experiment design, test sequencing, rollout guardrails, and measurement logic before exposure to users.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Research Pilot project needs an experiment proposal from a weak or bounded project claim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Design and analyze factorial experiments to identify significant process factors and optimize settings. Use this skill when the user needs to systematically test factor effects, optimize a manufacturing process, or determine which variables matter most — even if they say 'which factors affect quality', 'optimize process settings', or 'design an experiment'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when exploring, continuing, or accepting a deep-learning or computer-science research idea. Converts claims into pilot-first experiment matrices covering diagnostics, failure analysis, authorized execution, evaluation, and paper-story viability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, analyze, and document A/B tests for conversion, onboarding, pricing, lifecycle, and product experiments. Use when the user asks for `/ab-test-setup`, experiment design, sample size, statistical significance, A/B test analysis, ICE-scored test backlogs, or avoiding common testing mistakes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design rigorous experiments — hypotheses, controls, randomization, power analysis, and preregistration. Use when planning any study where you need trustworthy causal conclusions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designing psychology experiments — variables, controls, randomization, counterbalancing, and preregistration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。