「facts」の検索結果

Verify implementation matches change artifacts. Use when the user wants to validate that implementation is complete, correct, and coherent before archiving.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fast-forward through OpenSpec artifact creation. Use when the user wants to quickly create all artifacts needed for implementation without stepping through each one individually.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning and synthesizing product/user research as a method-and-repository discipline — selecting the right method for the goal (generative interviews vs usability test vs concept test vs validation), computing method-based saturation/sample size with an explicit confidence level, or synthesizing coded observations into insights while flagging single-source anecdotes. Never fabricates user insight; an insight requires recurrence across independent participants. Distinct from product-team/ux-researcher-designer (persona/journey artifacts), product-discovery (discovery-sprint planning), and experiment-designer (live A/B) — this is the research-ops method + insight-repository layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help the user define a concrete, measurable goal before starting work, especially when they ask to use the goal tool, create a goal, set an objective, clarify success criteria, or turn a fuzzy intention into a quantitative outcome. Use this skill for goal creation and goal refinement only; it does not manage durable snapshots, decision logs, or long-running execution artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when pinning or unpinning the CLI version the Kilo JetBrains plugin uses, or fresh-regenerating the local repo CLI. Cleans all leftover CLI binaries and build artifacts in the current worktree so every operation starts from a fresh, artifact-free state.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The durable documentation set that makes an AI-built (vibe-coded) app reviewable before shipping. A small core every app needs — architecture, user/permission flows, permissions, variables/secrets, and a test-coverage map — plus conditional docs added only when they apply: emails, scheduled work, SEO, and embedded agents/automation. Defines what each doc must capture and how a reviewer or auditor uses it. Use when documenting a codebase for handoff, mapping user journeys and trust-boundary crossings, planning test coverage, or preparing for a security or performance audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brownfield audit — do existing artifacts actually work? Numbered migration plan. Unlike /project-stage-detect, checks compliance not existence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ready to advance between development phases? PASS/CONCERNS/NOT ASSESSED/FAIL with blockers and required artifacts. 'Can we move to production?'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Document a solved problem as a durable repo learning. Use when verified work produced non-obvious reasoning absent from its final code, tests, or existing docs; avoid routine fixes whose artifacts already explain the lesson.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screenshots, recording, and presentation artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clean and finalize authorized natural-language text intended for readers by auditing suspicious invisible Unicode and rewriting prose while preserving facts, meaning, and the writer's voice. Use when the user asks to clean, humanize, polish, or finalize articles, manuscripts, reports, documentation, emails, product copy, UI text, Markdown, or HTML prose, or when a project rule or instruction file explicitly requires this workflow. Don't use for code-only tasks or undisclosed authorship evasion; leave code, commands, identifiers, paths, APIs, formulas, citations, required disclosures, and verbatim quotations unchanged.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classify one failed NemoClaw GitHub Actions job using bounded, redacted logs and optional retained artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recover facts and relevant examples from work history to support a requested piece of writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare an evidence-backed handoff with current state, relevant artifacts, blockers, and next actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply Apache ShardingSphere's written coding standards when explicitly requested, or when code-implementation routes task-changed production, test, script, build, generated, or Maven POM artifacts through repository standards. Also perform a standalone read-only compliance audit of a user-specified scope. Use CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, applicable AGENTS.md rules, Checkstyle, Spotless, and other repository-defined standards, including naming and evidence-based defensive-code rules. Do not invoke independently for an ordinary implementation already governed by code-implementation, and do not independently audit architecture, runtime ownership, caches, or lifecycle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

URDF robot description authoring and validation. Use when creating, editing, inspecting, validating, or debugging `.urdf` files, robot links, joints, limits, inertials, visual/collision geometry, mesh references, frame conventions, or robot-description artifacts. Use the SRDF skill for MoveIt2 semantic groups and IK/path-planning semantics; use the CAD skill for STEP/STL/3MF/DXF/GLB outputs. Open and visually review existing URDF files in CAD Viewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage Office files, formats and versions; use Writer, Calc or Impress for content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate and edit images, vector artwork, photos, audio and video; inspect results and deliver finished artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate FrontendExtension (FE) resources in frontend-forge: create, update, rebuild, inspect package artifacts, download packages, publish, unpublish, delete, and debug package/publish controller behavior. Use this skill whenever the user mentions FE operations, FrontendExtension lifecycle, extension package/download/publish/unpublish, artifact ConfigMaps, package Jobs, publisher Jobs, publish target ConfigMaps or Secrets, rebuild-token, package-state/publish-state labels, or troubleshooting FE status in a Kubernetes cluster.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manually dispatch and iterate on the Release Canary workflow that smoke-tests published OpenShell artifacts (install.sh on macOS/Ubuntu/Fedora, Helm chart on kind) after each Release Dev publish. Use when changing `.github/workflows/release-canary.yml`, validating a release before tagging, debugging a canary failure, or reproducing a canary job locally. Trigger keywords - release canary, release-canary, canary failed, canary dispatch, test release canary, post-release smoke, install.sh canary, helm chart canary, kind canary, dispatch canary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs the Autoware autonomous-driving stack against CARLA on UE 5.8 over CARLA's native ROS 2 interface — no bridge process. Reports the DDS contract (rt/vehicle/status/* out, rt/control/command/* in), the Autoware-only sensor blueprints, generates the lanelet2 + point-cloud map artifacts Autoware needs instead of an .xodr, and drives the two shipped modes (classical NDT stack, or the camera-only VAD end-to-end model). Use when the user asks to "run Autoware on CARLA", "connect an AV stack", "drive the ego from Autoware", "generate a lanelet2 map", or asks which topics CARLA exchanges with Autoware.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explores a CARLA map's road network through the Map/Waypoint API — a natural-language rundown of the whole map ("give me the topology"), drawing the topology to confirm the modelled map matches the visible one, enumerating junctions to resolve phrases like "the 4-way junction in the middle", nearest-waypoint lane facts, and next/previous lane navigation. Use when the user asks about the map's layout, lanes, junctions, topology, or to locate/navigate specific map elements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compiles any research input — PDF papers, GitHub repositories, experiment logs, code directories, or raw notes — into a complete Agent-Native Research Artifact (ARA) with cognitive layer (claims, concepts, heuristics), physical layer (configs, code stubs), exploration graph, and grounded evidence. Use when ingesting a paper or codebase into a structured, machine-executable knowledge package, building an ARA from scratch, or converting research outputs into a falsifiable, agent-traversable form.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs ARA Seal Level 2 semantic epistemic review on Agent-Native Research Artifacts, scoring six dimensions (evidence relevance, falsifiability, scope calibration, argument coherence, exploration integrity, methodological rigor) and producing a constructive, severity-ranked report with a Strong Accept-to-Reject recommendation. Use after Level 1 structural validation passes, when an ARA needs an objective epistemic critique before publication or release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。