1,574 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Build, modify, debug, migrate, review, or verify TypeScript MCP servers and MCP Apps with mcp-use. Use for tools, resources, prompts, middleware, Views, authentication, Skills over MCP, scaffolding, and advanced features.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build, modify, debug, migrate, review, or verify TypeScript MCP servers and MCP Apps with mcp-use. Use for tools, resources, prompts, middleware, Views, authentication, Skills over MCP, scaffolding, and advanced features.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build, modify, debug, migrate, review, or verify TypeScript MCP servers and MCP Apps with mcp-use. Use for tools, resources, prompts, middleware, Views, authentication, Skills over MCP, scaffolding, and advanced features.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate built features through conversational UAT
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive guide for writing Apache Cassandra in-JVM distributed tests (dtests). Use when creating tests that simulate multi-node Cassandra clusters within a single JVM for faster integration testing. Covers cluster creation (single-node, multi-node, multi-datacenter), configuration (all cassandra.yaml parameters, features, network topology), instance lifecycle (startup/shutdown/restart), query execution, message filtering for failure scenarios, running code on instances, ClusterUtils utilities, and debugging classloader-related issues (serialization failures, same-class-different-classloader problems).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits Convex performance for reads, subscriptions, write contention, and function limits. Use for slow features, insights findings, OCC conflicts, or read amplification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
单页 SaaS 落地页, 含 hero/features/social-proof/pricing/CTA
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write, update, and review Mintlify MDX documentation for Bifrost features. Explores the full codebase (UI, Go backend, config schema), validates config.json examples, places screenshot placeholders, and presents outlines for approval before writing. Invoked with /docs-writer <feature-name>, /docs-writer update <doc-path>, or /docs-writer review <doc-path>.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sets and reviews how text renders in your product, from the type scale and spacing to font features, wrapping, truncation and punctuation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-layer workflow for creating complete panel features by analyzing existing patterns and generating coordinated server routes, services, UI components, registration, and styling files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Single cohesive workflow for creating complete dashboard panel features in vanilla TypeScript — covers project-structure exploration, server dispatch pattern detection and wiring (Express or manual http.createServer), Panel base class component authoring with CircuitBreaker resilience and localStorage persistence, panel registration in index.ts, and safe file writing (including emoji workarounds).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Unified dashboard panel pattern combining circuit breaker resilience with enhanced UI features like retry logic, state persistence, and detailed error handling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create visually rich, robust TypeScript UI components with panel architecture, combining enhanced features like retry logic, state persistence, and dynamic styling with a systematic workflow for visual enhancements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-layer workflow for creating complete panel features by analyzing existing patterns and generating coordinated server routes, services, UI components, registration, styling files, AND explicitly wiring new handlers into the server's dispatch table (supports both Express middleware and manual http.createServer switch/case patterns).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add visual features (thumbnails, badges, dynamic styling) to TypeScript components by coordinating TypeScript logic changes with CSS updates
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides through Trail of Bits' 5-step secure development workflow. Runs Slither scans, checks special features (upgradeability/ERC conformance/token integration), generates visual security diagrams, helps document security properties for fuzzing/verification, and reviews manual security areas. Use when securing a smart contract end to end rather than hunting one bug, checking a project on every check-in or before deployment, triaging a Slither report, or asking where to start on smart contract security.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill whenever the user asks about NetExec (nxc) — a network exploitation and post-exploitation tool for Active Directory environments. Triggers include: any mention of 'nxc', 'netexec', 'crackmapexec' successor questions, AD enumeration, SMB/LDAP/WinRM/MSSQL/SSH/RDP/VNC/WMI/FTP/NFS protocol attacks, password spraying, credential dumping (SAM, NTDS, LSASS, DPAPI), Kerberoasting, ASREPRoasting, lateral movement, BloodHound collection, module usage, or any pentest workflow involving Windows domain environments. This skill covers ALL protocols, ALL modules, and ALL core features of NetExec. Always provide full command examples with correct flags and options.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Finds root cause before any fix. Use when something errors, crashes, regresses, or used to work. Not for code review or new features.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate code using Nx generators — scaffold projects, libraries, features, or run workspace-specific generators with proper discovery, validation, and verification. Use when user says "create a new library", "scaffold a component", "generate code with Nx", "run a generator", "nx generate", or any code scaffolding task in a monorepo. Prefers local workspace-plugin generators over external plugins. Do NOT use for running build/test/lint tasks (use nx-run-tasks) or workspace configuration (use nx-workspace).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Facilitates deliberate skill development during AI-assisted coding. Offers interactive learning exercises after architectural work (new files, schema changes, refactors). Use when completing features, making design decisions, or when user asks to understand code better. Triggers on "learning exercise", "help me understand", "teach me", "why does this work", or after creating new files/modules. Do NOT use for urgent debugging, quick fixes, or when user says "just ship it".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert Mermaid diagram creation, validation, and rendering with dual-engine output (SVG/PNG/ASCII). Supports all 20+ diagram types including C4 architecture, AWS architecture-beta with service icons, flowcharts, sequence, ERD, state, class, mindmap, timeline, git graph, sankey, and more. Features code-to-diagram analysis, batch rendering, 15+ themes, and syntax validation. Use when users ask to create diagrams, visualize architecture, render mermaid files, generate ASCII diagrams, document system flows, model databases, draw AWS infrastructure, analyze code structure, or anything involving "mermaid", "diagram", "flowchart", "architecture diagram", "sequence diagram", "ERD", "C4", "ASCII diagram". Do NOT use for non-Mermaid image generation, data plotting with chart libraries, or general documentation writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Your pathfinder for navigating unknown codebases. Investigates with precision, implements surgically, and never assumes — if it doesn't know, it says so. Maintains a .notebook/ knowledge base that grows across sessions, turning every discovery into lasting intelligence. Summons available skills, MCPs, and docs when the mission demands. Use when fixing bugs, implementing features, refactoring, investigating flows, or any development task in unfamiliar territory. Triggers on "fix this", "implement this", "how does this work", "investigate this flow", "help me with this code". Do NOT use for greenfield scaffolding, CI/CD, or infrastructure provisioning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scores how completely an implementation fulfills a PRD/spec, case by case, and produces a single comparable final grade. Invoke only when explicitly named (e.g. run spec-driven-eval); do not auto-trigger. Use when benchmarking spec-driven implementations, grading acceptance criteria, evaluating whether a feature was 100% implemented, comparing multiple implementations of the same PRD, or auditing implementation and test coverage (unit and e2e) against product requirements. Do NOT use for planning or building features (use tlc-spec-driven), writing PRDs, or general code review unrelated to a spec.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use only when a developer explicitly asks to clean, prune, tidy, or organize DeepChat SDD documentation after implementation and validation. Scans docs/features, docs/issues, and docs/architecture; prefers multi-agent review when available; removes completed issue docs when a linked GitHub issue is closed or implementation and validation evidence proves the bug no longer exists, drops stale plans and legacy task files from completed feature or architecture goals, and deletes obsolete feature or architecture docs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。