934 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Fixes web search on an agent whose model backend can't run it: a relay/reseller proxying Claude or Codex returns empty instead of failing. Use when web search returns nothing, a model insists a shipped product doesn't exist, someone wants to give an agent internet access, or the user is on a third-party base URL, relay, or 中转站. Diagnoses which built-in tools are dead, removes them, and installs a working replacement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Only for explicit prior-work/reuse/history requests, not status checks. Finds and verifies existing work before new production when reuse is plausible. Use when the user explicitly references earlier work, existing code, history, or prior decisions, or says 以前做过, 已有代码, 别重复造轮子. Not for current tests, files, bug fixes, or mechanical verification. Produces a reuse/adapt/reject receipt; zero hits never prove absence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Converts DOCX/PDF/PPTX and saved HTML/HTM to high-quality Markdown with automatic post-processing. Fixes pandoc grid tables, simple tables, image paths, CJK bold spacing, attribute noise, and code blocks; for PDFs also strips OCR garbage blocks, repeated headers/footers/watermarks, and absolute image paths from pymupdf4llm output. Benchmarked best-in-class (7.6/10) against Docling, MarkItDown, Pandoc raw, and Mammoth. Trigger on "convert document", "docx to markdown", "parse word", "doc to markdown", "解析word", "转换文档", "HTML to Markdown".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fixes broken line wrapping in Claude Code exported .txt conversation files — rebuilds tables, paragraphs, paths and tool calls hard-wrapped at a fixed width. Use for an export (YYYY-MM-DD-HHMMSS-*.txt) with broken tables, split paths, or mangled tool output, or "fix export" / "make export readable". Not for a live web conversation (use read-claude-web-conversation) or session history (use read-claude-code-history).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Switches or repairs an OpenClaw instance's model config: changes the default model, adds model definitions, and fixes 401 "Invalid token", "No available channel / model not found", "Thinking level X is not supported", or a config edit that doesn't take effect. Use for 切换模型/换模型/升级模型 or 模型配的错了. Not for plain config audits (use openclaw).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review what an LLM feature or agent actually puts in its context window — and find what's bloating, missing, or fighting itself. Use when asked to review a system prompt and context assembly, cut token usage without losing quality, debug an agent that ignores instructions, or audit how retrieval results, history, and tool definitions are packed into the window. Produces a context inventory with a keep/cut/restructure verdict per component, ordering and caching fixes, and a token budget. For wording-level prompt tuning use prompt-optimizer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Keep citations honest in business documents — every load-bearing claim sourced, links that actually contain the claim, the as-of dates that keep numbers honest, and the internal-vs-external sourcing rules for decks and memos. Use when asked check the sourcing in this deck, add citations to this doc, our slide says 'studies show' — which studies, or set citation norms for the team. Produces the claim-by-claim audit, the fixes (source found, claim softened, or cut), the citation format for the venue, and the team norm card.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a human changelog from the REAL commit history — read the actual commit range via the GitHub connector, not a template. Use when asked to write the changelog for this release, what changed since the last tag, draft release notes from my commits, or summarise this range for users in Cowork. Reads commits/PRs between two refs via the GitHub connector, groups them into user-facing changes (features / fixes / breaking), translates commit-speak into human benefit, and produces a changelog artifact ready for the release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review an LLM agent design and find where it will be unreliable, expensive, or unsafe. Use when asked to review an agent architecture, critique a multi-step/tool-using agent, debug an agent that loops or goes off-task, or harden an agent before launch. Produces a structured review — task fit, control flow, tools, memory/context, failure handling, cost, and safety — with prioritised findings and fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Behavioral guardrails for Codex coding work based on common user complaints. Use when Codex is asked to implement, modify, debug, review, test, or operate on a codebase and should avoid unsafe scope expansion, stale edits, fake completion, brittle edits, shallow debugging, superficial patch-on fixes, one-off special-case code, short-term design choices that hurt maintainability, blindly following incorrect user assumptions, poor dependency choices, generic product or UI output, over-mocked tests, noisy approvals, verbose status reports, or leaking internal reasoning into project artifacts or user-facing UI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find and remove AI slop — the generic, machine-default visual and copy tics of vibe-coded products — from a web project. Use when the user asks to "kill AI slop", "de-slop", "remove the AI look", "make this not look AI-generated", or clean up a landing page / UI / docs that feels templated. Detects and fixes the catalogue of tells: indigo→violet gradients, gradient-clip headlines, the default semantic palette, one-hue status boxes, atmospheric gradients, serif-italic emphasis, highlighted keywords, AI copywriting voice ("not just X — it's Y"), emoji everywhere, glowing status dots, wobbling spinners, colored-left-border callouts, pastel icon tiles, glassmorphism, over-rounding, oversized shadows, borders that die at corners, badge & pill spam, AI-drawn SVG icons, kickers over every heading, flat type hierarchies, invented stat rows, 01/02/03 section markers, cards nested in cards, the default Inter/Space Grotesk look, and more. Works on HTML/CSS, React/Vue/Svelte/Astro, Tailwind, PHP, and Markdown copy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when encountering a bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked for first-principles or Occam's-razor review, or when high-risk decisions involve competing constraints, fallback growth, duplicate owners, or architecture direction risk. Ordinary bug fixes stay on the fast path.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bug diagnosis and fixing specialist - analyzes errors, identifies root causes, provides fixes, and writes regression tests. Use for bug, debug, error, crash, traceback, exception, and regression work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review changes for correctness, security, accessibility, and performance. Use for scoped quality reviews or verification plans; bug fixes use oma-debug.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and prioritize performance work through bounded-work and forward-progress checks. Use when asked to find performance issues, investigate freezes/500s/OOMs, review retries or polling for no-progress loops, rank a performance backlog, or implement the next simple performance fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iteratively improves a PR (GitHub), MR (GitLab), or shelved changelist (Perforce) until Greptile gives it a 5/5 confidence score with zero unresolved comments. Triggers Greptile review, fixes all actionable comments, pushes/re-shelves, re-triggers review, and repeats. Use when the user wants to fully optimize a PR/MR/CL against Greptile's code review standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits a live website for AI-engine discoverability (AEO/GEO). Crawls the site, runs 16 deterministic checks plus a 6-dimension content evaluation, and produces a scored report (A-F) with prioritized fixes. Use to get a baseline before improve-aeo-geo, or to measure progress after changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan a feature or initiative through a computed route: the conductor derives the canon delta and assembles the document package — from a zero-document null route for small fixes to an umbrella PRD with one spec per capability for large initiatives. Modes, named as the first word: sdd (full package), sources (MRD → BRD → URD) for market research, customer discovery, and business or user requirements, iso (BRS → StRS → SyRS → SRS) for ISO 29148 and regulated work, research for a technical investigation — never market research — that the research instrument closes either by scope coverage (a research document) or by a recommendation (an rnd). Explicit form: plan research <topic>. Use for 'plan the X redesign', 'create a roadmap', 'plan a new feature', 'I need market research before we plan', 'we're regulated — start the ISO requirements cascade', 'investigate X before we plan', 'compare the alternatives for Y' — a new investigation, not a finished report already in hand. Not for recording a decision or documenting existing code — use /archcore:document. Not for checking docs against code — use /archcore:review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Checkpoint durable decisions, fixes, constraints, results, and open next steps from the current Codex task into scoped Waggle project memory.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a repo's agent context — CLAUDE.md files, codebase docs, skills, and tool/MCP designs — against Anthropic's Claude 5 context-engineering guidance ("unhobbling": Anthropic cut ~80% of Claude Code's system prompt with no eval loss). Finds overconstraint, conflicting instructions, redundancy, stale facts, and missing "unknown knowns"; produces a scored findings report with concrete rewrites, then applies approved fixes. Use when someone says "audit my CLAUDE.md", "context audit", "unhobble this repo", "review our agent docs/skills/tools", or after upgrading to Claude 5-generation models.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review generated or changed production code before it ships, using Clean Code, SOLID, DRY, KISS, YAGNI, and LLM-specific failure-mode checks in any programming language. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, refactors, or fixes code, before presenting, committing, or merging the result. Use when the user asks "review this PR", "is this safe to merge?", "make this cleaner", "audit this code", "refactor this", "fix this bug", or after a coding agent produced implementation code. Can also guide writing when explicitly invoked before a risky edit. Invoke it on your own initiative the moment you finish writing, editing, or refactoring non-trivial production code, before presenting or committing — don't wait to be asked. DO NOT USE for factual/conceptual questions, CI/tooling config, git workflow, running/debugging tests, pure architecture discussion, prose writing, data analysis, or test-code review (use test-guard).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate Xcode build optimization by benchmarking first, running the specialist analysis skills, prioritizing findings, requesting explicit approval, delegating approved fixes to xcode-build-fixer, and re-benchmarking after changes. Use when a developer wants an end-to-end build optimization workflow, asks to speed up Xcode builds, wants a full build audit, or needs a recommend-first optimization pass covering compilation, project settings, and packages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。