「formal」の検索結果

Rewrite a support response in a different tone - formal, casual, technical, empathetic, or concise.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Senior {{engine_name}}/{{engine_code_language}} developer that performs direct, ad-hoc code tasks without a formal plan — and the code-execution engine other unikit skills and agents delegate to. Use it whenever the user asks to do something in code right now, e.g. "add this method to this class", "refactor this function", "write a script that does X", "change this code", "optimize this class". Phrases like "without a plan", "no plan", "just do it", or "directly" are strong signals to use this skill rather than planning. Covers writing, refactoring, optimizing, and discussing {{engine_code_language}} code and patterns (DI, ECS, MVC, state machines, event systems). For a larger multi-step feature, plan it with /unikit-plan and build it with /unikit-implement — this skill is for direct, unplanned code work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Formal evaluation framework for Claude Code sessions implementing eval-driven development (EDD) principles

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adversarially reviewing a document that makes formal or technical claims — math derivations, physics papers, statistical analyses, benchmark reports, whitepapers. Inventories every equation and quantitative claim, verifies each AS NAMED in the text (never a paraphrase or a neighboring statement), and classifies VERIFIED / REFUTED / UNVERIFIABLE / VACUOUS. Triggers on "check this paper", "verify these claims", "is this derivation right", "review this proof", "audit this benchmark", "does the math hold up". For source-code review see code-review-and-quality; for skill/agent library audits see skill-library-review; for content quality scoring see content-ops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when recording, tallying, or triaging stochastic review findings — the append-only JSONL ledger where Tier 2 (advisory, unevidenced) reviewer output goes instead of blocking language. Triggers on "log this finding", "ledger add", "tally the findings", "triage findings", "is this finding recurring", "retire this noise", or whenever a reviewer produces an unevidenced concern that should be measured for recurrence rather than chased. For the review itself see code-review-and-quality or skill-library-review; for verifying formal claims with deterministic evidence see adversarial-claims-reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical blog post writing guide. rooftopsnow.tistory.com style — Korean formal technical prose, architecture diagrams, code blocks + design intent commentary, table comparisons, checklist wrap-up. Triggers on "blog", "포스팅", "블로그", "기술 글", "tech blog".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a Certificate of Incumbency certifying current officers, directors, and signing authority for a U.S. corporation. Covers exact legal name matching, incumbency tables with specimen signatures, board resolution certification, authority limitations, reliance language, and execution formalities. Use when banks, lenders, investors, or counterparties require verification of corporate authority for closings, financings, or transactions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a formal Bylaw Amendment Resolution for U.S. corporations, LLCs, or non-profits. Invoke when a board, shareholders, or members approve bylaw changes and need an auditable WHEREAS/RESOLVED record with amendment text, vote tallies, effective date, and secretary certification for minute books, bank submissions, or state filings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts U.S. corporate board-of-directors meeting minutes into formal, defensible records documenting valid corporate action and governance process. Triggers on board minutes, directors meeting record, board resolutions, quorum validation, motion and vote capture, corporate secretary records, governance drafting. Requires source materials such as agenda, attendance, bylaws, notices, reports, prior minutes, and resolutions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a U.S. at-will employment offer letter with unambiguous at-will language, FLSA-compliant compensation terms, benefits disclaimers, and conditions precedent. Use when extending formal job offers, issuing written employment offers, or drafting offer letters for new hires in U.S. jurisdictions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

China legal triage assistant. Input a contract, labor dispute facts, lawsuit-cost question, or draft legal document need; output risk checklist, cost estimate, evidence outline, or editable document skeleton. Boundary: preliminary legal information only, not a lawyer and not formal legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Foundational theory for process-oriented concurrency through synchronous message-passing, applicable to multi-agent coordination and parallel decomposition

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cryptographic security for agentic systems — zero-trust agent networking, signed message envelopes (JWS/JWE), capability-based security (ocaps), Merkle tree audit trails, WASM sandboxing, and formal verification. Covers CLI dev tool security, mTLS between agents, permission boundaries (least privilege for AI agents), and supply chain security for skills/plugins. Activate on: "agent security", "zero trust agents", "secure agent communication", "capability-based security", "ocap", "signed messages between agents", "agent audit trail", "sandbox agent execution", "agent permissions", "mTLS agents", "cryptographic verification", "agent supply chain", "OWASP agentic", "prove agent did X", "tamper-proof agent logs". NOT for: application-level SAST scanning (use security-auditor), network firewall rules (use infrastructure), SOC2/HIPAA compliance (organizational), or prompt injection defense (use prompt-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a Business Requirements Document (BRD) for cross-functional or stakeholder-heavy work that needs more structure than an intake. Use after `/intake` when the request spans multiple systems/teams, carries regulatory weight, or needs formal sign-off. Output lives at `docs/brd/<slug>.md`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multiple agents draft a structured document through federated co-authorship and formal voting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Um Engenheiro de Pesquisa Acadêmica inabalável. Opera com rigor científico absoluto, crítica objetiva e zero floreios. Focado em correção teórica, verificação formal e implementação otimizada em qualquer tecnologia necessária.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffold and formally review a new Agent Skill in this marketplace repo. Covers valid SKILL.md generation, directory layout, registry entries, and spec auditing. Use when adding a skill, validating frontmatter, or checking marketplace readiness before a PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a wireframe and everything already agreed into a written spec in traditional agile shape — an initiative broken into epics, epics into user stories with acceptance criteria, and themes as the labels that span them — presented as an interactive drill-down tree the user prunes, edits and annotates in the browser, with a plain-markdown spec generated from it. Use when the user wants a spec, an initiative or epic broken into user stories, acceptance criteria, to formalise what a wireframe or mockup does, or to review and edit a spec visually.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or update project test-case assets and test reports. Use when Codex is asked to generate test cases in Excel, produce a Word/DOCX test report, summarize automated test execution, turn repository tests into a formal testing artifact, or沉淀/复用 a project testing documentation workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SOP for normative specification and behavioral contracts. Trigger when: - Defining invariants, permitted transitions, and forbidden states. - Navigating steps: Identify, Formalize, Verify, Record, Connect. - Prompt contains: /spec, spec workflow, normative constraint, invariant, BCP 14.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review an author's manuscript, its argument and paragraph structure, analyze reviewer comments, draft rebuttals, and verify revisions. Use for self-review, structural edit plans, simulated reviewer objections, author responses, revision closure, and submission-readiness assessment. Formal assigned peer review is outside this skill; manuscript edits and final figures/tables use their owning skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activates a structured decorator framework that modifies how Claude reasons, responds, and formats output. Trigger this skill whenever a prompt contains one or more markers prefixed with +++, such as +++Reasoning, +++StepByStep, +++Tone(style=formal), or any other +++ marker, regardless of what follows in the prompt. Also trigger when the user asks to activate, list, or clear decorators, references the prompt decorator framework, or uses phrases like "use decorator", "apply +++", or "what decorators are available". This skill must be active for any +++ marker to take effect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove AI-generated writing patterns from Modern Standard Arabic (MSA/الفصحى) text. Use when editing or reviewing Arabic formal text to make it sound naturally human-written.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for documents, reports, memos, guides, academic papers, or formal text that needs clear structure, reliable tone, formatting, and diagrams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。