「gather」の検索結果

Perform business analysis — requirements gathering, process mapping, gap analysis, and stakeholder-ready documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search academic papers and conduct literature reviews using OpenAlex API (free, no key needed). Use when the user needs to find scholarly papers by topic/author/DOI, explore citation chains, get structured paper metadata (title, authors, abstract, citations, DOI, open access URL), fetch full text of open access papers, or conduct automated literature reviews with theme identification and synthesis. Triggers on requests involving academic search, paper lookup, citation analysis, literature review, research synthesis, or scholarly reference gathering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when users need to search academic papers, download research documents, extract citations, or gather scholarly information. Triggers include: requests to "find papers on", "search research about", "download academic articles", "get citations for", or any request involving academic databases like arXiv, PubMed, Semantic Scholar, or Google Scholar. Also use for literature reviews, bibliography generation, and research discovery. Requires OpenClawCLI installation from clawhub.ai.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Uses the local pruner indexer to gather relevant code context before making changes, debugging, refactoring, or answering questions about this repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes harness trace logs to surface recurring failure patterns and suggest harness improvements. Scatter-gather across last N runs with a mandatory HITL gate before any change is applied.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a decision needs deep multi-source technical research with cited evidence — technology evaluation, ecosystem comparison, standards/spec fact-finding, "how do others solve X". Triggers on "research X", "deep dive on X", "evaluate X vs Y", "find best practices for X". NOT for library/API doc lookup (see mk:docs-finder); NOT for one-shot URL fetch (see mk:web-to-markdown); NOT for internal codebase discovery (see mk:scout); NOT for project-only Q&A (see mk:ask-me); NOT for comparing solution designs (see mk:brainstorming); NOT for root-cause debugging (see mk:investigate); NOT for wiki ingestion of sources (see mk:wiki-research).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Standard operating procedure for producing a documentation page end to end — gather source material, classify, draft against the measured corpus profile, then run the reader-level and humanizer passes and both gates. Use for any page on a documentation surface, or when rewriting a page that reads as machine-written. Orchestrates technical-writing, reader-level and humanizer in a fixed order.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow Phase 3 — Research and Solution Exploration. Surfaces 2–4 candidate solution approaches with concrete tradeoffs, grounded in current library docs (fetched through the provider named in `.claude/docs-provider.json`) — never in training-data recall. Output lives at `docs/research/<slug>.md`. Candidate ranking and the memo execute in main context; doc/source gathering MAY be delegated to read-only advisory subagents (seed.md §4.2-A).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow Phase 2 — Codebase Scouting and Constraint Discovery. Maps the relevant slice of the codebase for a given task. Produces a scout report at `docs/scout/<slug>.md` naming the files, modules, and patterns the proposed work touches or constrains. Report decisions execute in main context with full conversation visibility; gathering MAY be delegated to read-only advisory subagents (seed.md §4.2-A).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Any live-web task via the Firecrawl CLI — including ordinary web research: searching the web, reading or extracting pages, gathering sources, discovering site URLs, bulk extraction, downloading a site, change alerts, or pages needing clicks/login — web only; local files route to firecrawl-parse. For US legal or regulatory questions use gov; for papers use firecrawl-research-index; for library, API, error, or bug questions use firecrawl-developer-index.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prices research, tests, surveys, dashboards and experiments before running them, by computing how much the result would raise expected utility - which is zero whenever no outcome would change the decision. Use when someone proposes an A/B test, user survey, market study, competitor analysis, analytics build, consultant, pilot, or "let's gather more data", and when deciding how large a study needs to be.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start work on a Linear ticket by gathering context, planning, creating a branch/worktree, implementing, testing, opening a draft PR, and updating Linear. Use when invoked as `$linear-plan` or when the user asks to start a Linear ticket.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a question against high-trust primary sources and capture the findings as a Markdown file in the repo. Use when the user wants a topic researched, docs or API facts gathered, or reading legwork delegated to a background agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when consolidating session signals into curated memory — four-phase loop ORIENT → GATHER → CONSOLIDATE → PRUNE. Triggers on 'mine my sessions', 'consolidate memory', 'review intake signals'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When writing Python asyncio code — picking between gather / TaskGroup / wait, structured concurrency, timeouts, cancellation, sync-bridging — decision framework only, cookbook externalized.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Research] Use when starting a web research task — discover, gather, and triage candidate sources on a topic to feed deeper investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a question against high-trust primary sources and capture the findings as a Markdown file in the repo. Use when the user wants a topic researched, docs or API facts gathered, or reading legwork delegated to a background agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when work produces a deliverable, factual claim, dataset, code change, decision, publication, deployment, automation, or irreversible action whose failure would matter; when the user asks for a quality gate, acceptance criteria, QA, completeness, validation, audit, evidence, preflight, release readiness, or a definition of done; or before claiming completion on medium- or high-risk work. Automatically decide whether a formal gate is warranted, derive task-specific pass/fail criteria, gather evidence, and block unsupported completion. Make sure to use this skill even when the user does not say "quality gate" if consequential work needs acceptance criteria or completion evidence. Skip formal gating for trivial, reversible, low-impact requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GStack freeze method for pausing writes and limiting work to evidence gathering when a task is unsafe, ambiguous, or production-sensitive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One-time setup that gathers design context for your project and saves it to your AI config file. Run once to establish persistent design guidelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One-time setup that gathers design context for your project and saves it to your AI config file. Run once to establish persistent design guidelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MISP (Malware Information Sharing Platform) is an open-source threat intelligence platform for gathering, sharing, storing, and correlating Indicators of Compromise (IOCs) of targeted attacks, threat

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Traces ransomware cryptocurrency payment flows using blockchain analysis tools such as Chainalysis Reactor, WalletExplorer, and blockchain.com APIs. Identifies wallet clusters, tracks fund movement through mixers and exchanges, and supports law enforcement attribution. Activates for requests involving ransomware payment tracing, bitcoin wallet analysis, cryptocurrency forensics, or blockchain intelligence gathering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when creating bug/defect reports during system testing. Use this skill when you discover a bug, need to document test failures, or want to create comprehensive bug tickets with proper reproduction steps, severity assessment, and environment details. Guides users through interactive questioning to gather all necessary information and generates professional bug ticket documents in Markdown format. Supports Japanese (default) and English.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。