「hunting」の検索結果

Implement the 5-stage Funnel workflow (Notes → Leads → Primitives → Findings → Reports) for structured bug bounty hunting. Based on Critical Thinking Bug Bounty Podcast Episode 166.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and exploit Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA), historically known as Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR), in API architectures. Extremely common and critical flaw where an API fails to validate whether the currently authenticated user actually owns or retains permissions over the specifically requested database resource (ID).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and exploit flaws in the core business rules and logic of web applications. This skill focuses on manipulation of application workflows, pricing, inventory limitations, and multi-step processes. Use this skill when bug hunting or testing e-commerce, banking, or SaaS platforms where standard technical vulnerabilities (e.g., XSS/SQLi) are not present but the application's logic is flawed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and exploit Mass Assignment vulnerabilities in APIs. Use this skill when testing REST APIs or application forms that directly map user-supplied JSON or POST input to internal database objects. An attacker can inject undocumented variables (e.g., `is_admin`, `verified`) to illegally modify restricted properties.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exploit pervasive logical flaws in Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA/2FA) implementations to bypass the secondary authentication challenge entirely. Techniques include response manipulation, referal spoofing, token reuse, and predictable backup codes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and exploit flaws in API rate limiting enforcement. Use this skill when encountering HTTP 429 Too Many Requests errors during password brute-forcing, OTP validation, credential stuffing, or enumeration attacks. These bypasses leverage IP spoofing, parameter manipulation, and edge-case application logic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes and validates Suricata/Snort IDS rules for network-based malware detection, covering rule anatomy, content/pcre matching, flow and threshold options, and common mistakes that cause false positives or no matches. Activates for requests to write a Suricata rule, create Snort signatures, or build network detection rules from IOCs or C2 patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Converts hunt findings into portable Sigma detection rules: choosing the right logsource, expressing robust selection/filter logic, setting level and ATT&CK tags, and validating before converting to a SIEM query. Activates for requests to write a Sigma rule, convert a hunt to a detection, or create portable SIEM detection logic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tunes noisy detections by analyzing historical alert data to quantify false-positive sources, recommend allow-list filters and threshold adjustments, and measure precision impact. Activates for requests to tune a detection, reduce false positives, or analyze alert noise and recommend filters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates detection coverage by mapping Atomic Red Team tests to ATT&CK techniques, checking which of your detections cover each tested technique, and reporting coverage gaps. Activates for requests to validate detections with atomic tests, map Atomic Red Team to coverage, or find detection gaps against tested techniques.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tracks adversary C2 and staging infrastructure by clustering indicators on shared attributes (TLS/JARM, certificate fields, favicon hashes, ASN, registration patterns) to find related hosts. Activates for requests to track adversary infrastructure, cluster C2 servers, or pivot on infrastructure attributes to find related hosts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps hunts and detections to MITRE ATT&CK for coverage analysis: tagging hypotheses with techniques, building a coverage matrix from completed hunts, and identifying high-risk gaps to prioritize next. Activates for requests to map hunts to ATT&CK, build a coverage heatmap, or find detection gaps by technique.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Converts a successful threat hunt into a durable detection by extracting the discriminating logic, defining data sources and thresholds, and emitting a Sigma rule plus a test and tuning plan. Activates for requests to operationalize a hunt, turn a finding into a detection rule, or productionize hunt logic as a Sigma detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pivots on indicators of compromise across multiple data sources by correlating a seed set of IOCs against logs to find co-occurring indicators, hosts, and timeframes that expand the investigation. Activates for requests to pivot on IOCs, correlate indicators across data sources, or expand an investigation from a seed indicator set.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Profiles a threat actor by aggregating observed ATT&CK techniques into a TTP profile and comparing it against known-group technique sets to estimate similarity and candidate attribution. Activates for requests to profile a threat actor, compare observed TTPs to known groups, or estimate attribution from technique overlap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security Operations Center skill for alert triage, detection engineering, incident response, log analysis, threat hunting, SIEM queries, EDR investigation, timeline building, IOC handling, escalation notes, containment recommendations, and analyst-ready reporting. Use for blue-team operations, suspicious event analysis, and defensive cybersecurity workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy and operate endpoint detection and response — policy tuning, behavioral detections, threat hunting, and response actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deciding WHERE to point SEO effort, not how to write a page. Triggers: a new site or brand with no rankings and no authority ("cold start", "starting from zero", "nobody knows us"), deciding what to double down on, a page or cluster that ranks but earns nothing, hunting emerging or newly-coined keywords before competitors arrive, "should we build a cluster or one page", "what do we write next", "we get impressions but no clicks", "our traffic plateaued despite publishing", whether to chase a head term at all, or turning any of it into recurring automation. Also use when asked why an SEO effort stalled despite consistent output. NOT for writing an article, keyword expansion mechanics, or auditing a single tactic for penalty risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for security alert triage in Google SecOps. Use when investigating and triaging security alerts, determining false positives vs. true positives, assessing entity risk, adjusting alert severity or priority, and closing or escalating alerts and cases. Don't use for deep multi-hop incident investigations across host timelines (use secops-investigate), proactive threat hunting or retroactive IoC sweeps (use secops-hunt), or authoring new detection rules (use secops-detection-engineering).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for deep security incident and entity investigations in Google SecOps. Use when investigating cases, analyzing entities (hosts, IPs, domains, hashes, users), extracting and searching UDM events, performing asset and user timeline analysis, and detecting lateral movement across enterprise networks. Don't use for detection rule authoring or YARA-L tuning (use secops-detection-engineering), proactive hypothesis-driven hunting (use secops-hunt), initial alert triage (use secops-triage), or basic case status updates (use secops-cases).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automates the end-to-end detection engineering workflow in Google SecOps using MCP tools. Use when fetching threat intelligence from blogs, generating Threat Detection Opportunities (TDOs), simulating attacker behavior with synthetic UDM events, evaluating rule coverage, generating new YARA-L 2.0 rules to close coverage gaps, and with user approval, deploy them to SecOps. Don't use when asked to perform threat hunting actions, and SOC investigative actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fully autonomous bug hunting pipeline — discover bugs in a scoped area using parallel subagents, independently triage each finding, fix confirmed issues with subagents, then audit all fixes against repo constraints and target platforms. Runs end-to-end without user interaction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proactive bug-hunting workflow. Assesses codebase risk through complexity, coverage, and structural analysis, then spawns focused investigators that write reproducing tests to validate suspected bugs. Thoroughness over speed. Advisory only — produces findings and proposes tickets; does not implement fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous technical lead. Takes commander's intent and drives a project to completion through an OODA loop over implementation, refactoring, review, and bug-hunting skills. Has broad authority — creates tickets, commits, invokes any skill — and only escalates via andon cord for irreversible actions, public releases, or genuinely blocking decisions. User acts as product owner; skill acts as tech lead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。