「implementation」の検索結果

Reviews construction plans for architecture consistency and implementation feasibility. Use when reviewing implementation plans before approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting a new feature, product, or system design. Eliminates the spec-implementation gap by making specifications the primary artifact that drives code generation. Keywords: SDD, spec-driven, PRD, feature spec, user stories, implementation plan, specification, acceptance criteria, Given-When-Then.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Standardized output formats for research, planning, implementation, and review agents. Use when generating agent outputs or parsing agent responses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implementation guidance for creating individual agents in the Arcanea system with proper structure, capabilities, and integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 4.0 — Acceptance Criteria lock checkpoint before implementation. Consolidates all ACs from PRD, TechSpec, and Tasks, presents to user for confirmation, and saves the locked AC list to accepted-criteria.md. Implementation only starts after explicit user confirmation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a PRD into a multi-phase implementation plan using tracer-bullet vertical slices, saved as a local Markdown file in ./plans/. Use when user wants to break down a PRD, create an implementation plan, plan phases from a PRD, or mentions "tracer bullets".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fast spec-driven implementation from a committed spec. Use after /spec to implement an issue with a phase roadmap, TDD waves, map patching, review, and pre-commit validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a durable feature spec before touching code. Reads the codebase map, reads related models/migrations to ask technical questions (not generic ones), then produces a structured spec doc in docs/specs/. Designed to pipeline with /implementation --issue N. Use before any feature implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, build, scaffold, or safely extend Atlassian Forge apps using current official documentation. Use for fresh Forge apps, existing-app feature work, module and manifest changes, UI Kit or Custom UI implementation, backend functions and events, Atlassian or external APIs, storage, permissions, environment configuration, distribution-affecting implementation, validation, and explicitly authorized deployment or installation; route standalone debugging and specialist reviews to their dedicated skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 2 of the feature-pipeline suite. Use this after /fp-explore has filed issues and printed the M1 stop hook — when you need to turn a set of filed GitHub issues into an approved implementation plan and a draft PR. Triggers on: "plan the fix", "create the branch and PR", "draft the implementation plan", "ready to plan", "fp-plan", "next step after explore", "convert issues to a plan", "plan phase". Reads issueNumbers from state, writes a Problem Statement, opens a feature branch + draft PR, spawns a HEAVIER sub-agent for the numbered plan, and blocks on explicit user approval before writing plan to state. Does NOT write any code — that is /fp-implement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 3 of the feature-pipeline suite. Run this after /fp-implement has pushed all commits and printed the M2 stop hook. Spawns a sandboxed sub-agent (HEAVIER) in an isolated worktree to run RED/GREEN tests against the PR diff and post a structured review comment. Use when you need an independent agent to verify correctness of implementation changes before CI runs — especially for schema mutations, CLI surface changes, or doc-touching commits. Triggers on: "review the PR", "run sandbox review", "fp-review", "Phase 3", "check the implementation", "validate the changes", "run tests on the PR", or any instruction to verify what /fp-implement just pushed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill synchronizes plugin skills (plugins/synapse-a2a/skills/) with the current implementation, README.md, and guides folder. Use this skill when implementation changes have been made, new features added, or documentation updated, to ensure plugin skills stay up-to-date. Triggered by /sync-plugin-skills command or when significant code changes are detected.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

UI design and implementation for real product surfaces with taste-first critique, reference routing, project-specific design briefs, variation comparison, and implementation verification. Use when Codex should redesign, build, polish, or critique frontend UI by reading project context, exploring taste, routing through `references/catalog.md`, synthesizing `PROJECT_DESIGN.md` or `design.md`, using investment gates to avoid wrong taste/reference/scope, implementing in the existing stack, and evaluating whether the result is actually better. Best for app screens, dashboards, landing pages, query tools, product surfaces, and design explorations; not for backend-only work or tiny cosmetic edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract an Allium specification from an existing codebase. Use when the user has existing code and wants to distil behaviour into a spec, reverse engineer a specification from implementation, generate a spec from code, turn implementation into a behavioural specification, or document what a codebase does in Allium terms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Invoke a Rubber Duck Reviewer subagent to independently critique plans and implementations before proceeding. Use when the agent is about to implement a non-trivial plan (multi-file changes, architectural decisions, security-sensitive logic, database schema changes), after completing a self-contained unit of work (module, endpoint, feature), when stuck or facing repeated failures (same test fails 2+ times, unexpected results), or when the agent wants independent validation of assumptions and design decisions. Triggers on any non-trivial implementation task where independent critique would catch blind spots before they become costly mistakes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify implementation matches OpenSpec change artifacts. Use when the user wants to validate that implementation is complete, correct, and coherent before archiving. Also use when the user says "openspec verify" or "opsx verify".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when gathering, structuring, and documenting requirements for a Financial Services Cloud (FSC) wealth management implementation — including financial planning workflow discovery, portfolio review process mapping, client lifecycle requirements, advisor tooling needs, and FSC architecture determination (managed package vs. FSC Core). Trigger keywords: wealth management requirements, FSC requirements gathering, financial planning workflow, portfolio review process, advisor tools setup, FSC data model scoping, wealth management process mapping. NOT for implementation, configuration, or code — use financial-account-setup, fsc-action-plans, or apex/fsc-financial-calculations for those. NOT for FSC architecture decisions — use architect/wealth-management-architecture. NOT for Health Cloud or NPSP requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author the Salesforce Configuration Workbook — the structured, reviewable handoff document an admin uses to execute a feature across Objects/Fields, Page Layouts, Profiles/PSGs, Sharing, Validation, Automation, List Views, Reports, Integrations, and Data. Triggers: 'salesforce configuration workbook', 'admin handoff document', 'implementation workbook'. NOT for object design itself (use admin/custom-field-creation, admin/lookup-and-relationship-design, agents/object-designer/AGENT.md), NOT for permission set design (use admin/permission-set-architecture, agents/permission-set-architect/AGENT.md), NOT for Flow construction (use skills/flow/* and agents/flow-builder/AGENT.md), and NOT for the deployment manifest (use skills/devops/metadata-api-retrieve-deploy). More triggers: workbook row schema, recommended_agent, recommended_skills, row_id, source_req_id, RTM linkage block, not-in-scope-this-release, descope ledger, version-lock the workbook, check_workbook.py.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test UI components the way users interact with them using Testing Library — query by role, text, and label instead of implementation details. Use when someone asks to "test React components", "Testing Library", "user-centric testing", "test accessibility", "test without implementation details", or "render and query components in tests". Covers React Testing Library, queries, user events, async testing, and accessibility assertions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enter explore mode for technical work — a thinking partner for {{engine_name}} code, architecture, and implementation decisions before you write any code. Use it to investigate a technical solution, design the architecture of a feature, choose between frameworks or libraries, compare implementation approaches, analyze how existing code or a system works, or deeply root-cause a complex bug without fixing it yet. The ultra mode adds adaptive artifacts (a C4 view, ADRs, a dependency graph) to the research folder — run it on "ultra research", "ultra explore" or "ultraresearch"; otherwise run the default. Trigger on "let's explore this technical solution", "how should we architect this feature", "which framework should we use", "run an ultra research on the save system", "investigate this error deeply". Research and analysis only — it never writes code. This is the CODE / engineering explorer — for GAME-DESIGN, GDD, mechanics, or balance research (no code) use /unikit-gd-explore.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes single pattern implementation, calculates 4 scores (compliance, completeness, quality, implementation), identifies gaps. Invoked by ln-640 or standalone.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial implementation review based on Block's g3 dialectical autocoding research. Use when validating implementation completeness against requirements with fresh objectivity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bridge the gap from product specifications to implemented features. Document requirements, acceptance criteria, tech design, and track implementation progress in Notion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates detailed, sectionized implementation plans through research, stakeholder interviews, and multi-LLM review. Use when planning features that need thorough pre-implementation analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。