389 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Structured 6-phase debugging. Build feedback loop first, reproduce deterministically, hypothesize with ranked falsifiable theories, instrument one variable at a time, fix with regression test, cleanup. Use when a bug exists, tests fail unexpectedly, or behavior is wrong and cause is unknown.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sentry Unity SDK integration patterns for error tracking, performance monitoring, transactions, spans, and custom instrumentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Marketing analytics and data-driven optimization for B2B SaaS campaigns. Use this skill when analyzing marketing performance, optimizing conversion rates, running A/B tests, conducting customer research, creating marketing dashboards, building attribution models, analyzing funnel metrics, or storytelling with data. Also triggers on: marketing ops, performance analytics, CRO, A/B testing, data storytelling, customer insights, tracking plan, event taxonomy, UTM taxonomy, GA4 audit, consent mode, instrumentation contract, sample size calculation, minimum detectable effect, test duration, not enough traffic to A/B test, statistical significance, Bayesian vs frequentist, sample ratio mismatch, experiment feasibility, martech stack, marketing tech stack audit, tool consolidation, build vs buy, vendor evaluation, shadow IT tools, ESP/CRM/platform migration, switching cost, cutover plan, suppression list migration, data portability, customer interviews, survey design, sampling frame, non-response bias, how many people should I interview, thematic saturation, voice of customer, jobs-to-be-done, buyer persona research, is this finding real, data enrichment, which enrichment provider should we buy, waterfall enrichment, contact data quality, match rate, our list data is bad, email verification, catch-all domain, accept-all, bounce rate from bad data, B2B data decay, how often should we re-verify contacts, ZoomInfo vs Apollo vs Clearbit evaluation, cost per usable record, where did this list come from, GDPR Article 14 notice, purchased list compliance, suppression screening, TAM list building, demand planning, marketing plan, how many leads do we need, what pipeline target should marketing carry, funnel model, top-down vs bottom-up plan, plan of record, annual marketing planning, quarterly planning, pipeline coverage we have to create, sales cycle lag, our leads cannot close this quarter, carry-in pipeline, scenario planning, conservative moderate aggressive forecast, stretch target, reforecast, re-forecast triggers, assumption register, capacity ceiling, addressable audience ceiling, marginal cost per lead, blended CPL is wrong, we missed plan and nobody knows why, AI policy for the marketing team, AI governance, AI acceptable use policy, which AI tools are we allowed to use, can I paste customer data into ChatGPT, shadow AI, AI use register, human review of AI output, when can we stop reviewing every AI draft, can the agent send on its own, the AI made a mistake now what, pull back AI autonomy, AI evals, our AI vendor changed the model, AI output went out wrong, prompt injection, can our AI read prospect replies safely, lethal trifecta, the AI leaked internal notes, turn off auto-generated ad assets, auto-applied recommendations, AI literacy training, EU AI Act Article 4, duplicate records in the CRM, dedupe before import, which value wins in a merge, CRM cleanup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Electronics Engineer working on RF, analog, and mixed-signal hardware — closing an RF link budget for a wireless telemetry radio, sizing an op-amp or instrumentation-amplifier front end against a gain-bandwidth constraint, designing an anti-alias or IF filter to a cutoff and Q, pre-checking a design against FCC/IEC EMC radiated-emissions limits before formal compliance testing, or picking between a superheterodyne and direct-conversion receiver architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a correctional officer or jailer — scoring an inmate-classification instrument, deciding a use-of-force response level, running a cell/contraband search, preparing evidence for a disciplinary hearing, or screening an inmate for suicide/mental-health crisis risk.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Chemical Technician — running a routine or non-routine lab analysis under an SOP, reading a control chart or calibration-check trend for drift, deciding whether to release, hold, or escalate a QC result, troubleshooting an instrument or reagent problem on the bench, or handling chain-of-custody and hazardous-chemical storage/documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a climate change policy analyst — evaluating a proposed emissions rule's cost-benefit case, comparing carbon-pricing instruments (tax vs. cap-and-trade), drafting regulatory comment letters or legislative issue briefs, or assessing whether a climate proposal survives legal/political feasibility review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Art Therapist — matching art media to a client's regulation capacity via the Expressive Therapies Continuum, scoring a standardized directive (PPAT, KFD, DAP) with a validated instrument like FEATS as part of assessment, deciding between a directive and open-studio session structure, navigating informed consent and disposition for client-made artwork, or distinguishing an art-as-therapy approach from an art-psychotherapy approach for a given client.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Aerospace Engineering and Operations Technologist/Technician — verifying an installed fastener's preload against a drawing's torque callout via the T=K·D·F relationship, reducing strain-gauge data from a structural proof-load test into stress and checking it against an FEA-predicted margin, selecting and executing an NDI method against a defect type and material, reducing a wind-tunnel test point's dynamic-pressure and Reynolds-number data, or ballooning and dispositioning an AS9102 first article inspection. Distinct from an aerospace-engineer (owns the design, structural analysis, and certification basis) — this role builds, instruments, tests, and inspects the hardware the engineer specified, closing the loop with measurement rather than deriving a new analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up application observability with Prometheus, Grafana, Datadog, or CloudWatch — instrument metrics endpoints, configure Golden Signal dashboards, define alert rules with burn-rate SLOs, and add structured logging
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a rehabilitation recovery tracking system -- evaluate standardized outcome instruments (FIM, Barthel Index, SF-36, DASH, LEFS, PROMIS), functional assessment scoring accuracy, SMART goal and milestone tracking, regression detection with alert workflows, pain scale calibration (NRS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit laboratory automation systems -- LIMS architecture, instrument connectivity (SiLA 2, OPC-UA, serial drivers), sample tracking and chain of custody, protocol workflow engines, data acquisition pipelines, and regulatory compliance (21 CFR Part 11 electronic records/signatures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose Yuzu bugs and performance regressions with a disciplined reproduce-minimize-hypothesize-instrument-fix-regression-test loop. Use when the user says `/diagnose`, "debug this", reports a failure, flake, broken behavior, or performance regression.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configures best-practice alerting policies for AI agents using OpenTelemetry (OTel) metrics, generating output as Terraform (.tf) configuration files. Use when analyzing, writing, or deploying alerting policies to monitor agent latency, error rates, token usage, and quality metrics. Don't use for standard infrastructure monitoring unrelated to AI agents, or when the agent is not instrumented with OpenTelemetry (for Reliability, Cost, Safety, Security alerts). NOTE: Reliability, Cost, Safety, and Security alerts use generic OTel metrics and work across runtimes (such as Cloud Run, Vertex AI). Quality alerts rely on Vertex AI Online Monitors and are strictly bound to Vertex AI deployments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runtime profiling with multi-metric measurement, instrumentation, and performance map generation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate AI music using ACE-Step 1.5 via ACE Music's free API. Use when the user asks to create, generate, or compose music, songs, beats, instrumentals, or audio tracks. Supports lyrics, style prompts, covers, and repainting. Free API, no cost.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts a U.S. Bill of Sale for transferring personal property ownership from seller to buyer. Covers vehicles, equipment, watercraft, firearms, business assets, and general personal property. Enforces party identification, property description, consideration, condition representations, title warranty, lien disclosure, and jurisdiction-specific execution requirements. Use when drafting a bill of sale, asset transfer document, or ownership transfer instrument.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test. Use when user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality control for flow, spectral, and mass cytometry - time-based anomaly cleaning (flowAI, flowCut, PeacoQC, flowClean), margin/boundary event removal, signal-drift detection, dead-cell exclusion, CyTOF Gaussian/DNA/event-length checks, instrument calibration/standardization (MESF, CS&T, peak-2), and batch-level outlier flagging. Use when assessing acquisition quality, choosing a cleaning tool, ordering QC relative to compensation, deciding margin removal before density-based steps, or flagging problematic samples before clustering or differential analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bead-based signal normalization and cross-batch harmonization for CyTOF and high-parameter cytometry - EQ four-element bead normalization of instrument sensitivity drift (CATALYST normCytof, premessa), and reference-anchor cross-batch normalization (CytoNorm, per-cluster quantile splines). Covers the distinction between within-run drift correction and between-batch correction, the mandatory anchor/reference sample, why normalization is per-cluster with many quantiles, and the over-correction risk. Use when correcting CyTOF signal drift, harmonizing multi-batch or multi-site studies, or deciding whether to normalize data versus model batch in the design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build forest plots (HR, OR, RR, beta-coefficient summaries with CIs) and funnel plots (meta-analysis publication-bias diagnostics) using forestplot, metafor, ggforest, and MendelianRandomization with proper axis-scaling, summary-diamond placement, subgroup nesting, and Egger / trim-and-fill asymmetry tests. Use when summarizing effects across subgroups, trials, or instruments — meta-analysis, Mendelian randomization, subgroup HRs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs cis-pQTL Mendelian randomization for drug-target validation using UKB-PPP (Olink), deCODE (SomaScan), Fenland, INTERVAL, ARIC, and FinnGen-PPP proteomes plus colocalization triangulation, phenome-wide on-target adverse-effect scans, cross-platform Olink/SomaScan replication, and PAV (protein-altering variant) sensitivity. Use when nominating or de-risking a drug target from plasma-proteome GWAS, mimicking pharmacological inhibition via cis-pQTL instruments, separating shared-causal from LD-confounded signal under the Schmidt 2020 cis-MR framework, screening on-target adverse phenotypes pheWAS-style, or producing publication-grade STROBE-MR plus PP.H4 evidence for a target gene.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect and adjust for horizontal pleiotropy in two-sample Mendelian randomization by distinguishing uncorrelated (UHP) from correlated (CHP) pleiotropy and choosing among Egger, MR-PRESSO, MR-RAPS, CAUSE, LHC-MR, LCV, MR-Clust, MR-Mix, and contamination-mixture methods. Use when validating an MR causal claim, running the STROBE-MR sensitivity battery, suspecting a shared heritable confounder, working under weak-instrument or polygenic-exposure regimes, or reconciling discordant estimates across robust methods.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decides how to preprocess plasma cfDNA sequencing data so the recoverable signal survives - library-prep-aware fragment expectations (dsDNA vs ssDNA/adaptase prep), UMI/duplex consensus with fgbio (ExtractUmisFromBam, GroupReadsByUmi --strategy paired for duplex, CallMolecularConsensusReads vs CallDuplexConsensusReads, FilterConsensusReads min-reads "total s1 s2"), the align->group->consensus->RE-align ordering, and the cfDNA dedup trap where naive coordinate dedup collapses nucleosome-coincident independent molecules. Covers when single-strand consensus suffices vs when duplex is mandatory, the singleton/sensitivity tax at low input, and reading the insert-size histogram as a pre-analytical QC instrument. Use when processing plasma cfDNA reads before fragmentomics, ctDNA mutation calling, or tumor-fraction estimation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。