「loop」の検索結果

Triage open pull requests for CI status, review comments, and merge readiness. Use in PR babysitter loops. Respects project review norms and required checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan package manifests and lockfiles for outdated packages and known CVEs. Groups updates by risk (patch, minor, major). Use in dependency sweeper loops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan recent merges to main for follow-up cleanup: TODOs, deprecations, broken doc links, stale flags. Use in post-merge cleanup loops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan recent merges to main (and noteworthy direct commits) since a given window (last tag or date in state). Extract titles, labels, types, linked issues, and signals for breaking changes or security. Produces structured input for a release notes drafter. Use in changelog-drafter loops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parse CI failures, identify failing job/step, classify as flake, regression, env, or config. Use in CI sweeper loops before any fix attempt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

An advanced skill for L3 autonomous loops. When the token budget nears exhaustion, the agent analyzes its ROI and autonomously drafts a negotiation request for a budget increase rather than silently failing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Teaches agents to iteratively build websites using Stitch with an autonomous baton-passing loop pattern

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs an autonomous review-and-fix improvement loop over any code target — a skill, plugin, module, or directory — using a reviewer the user names: any installed skill or agent. Keeps a cross-round findings ledger, escalates when fixes stop converging, and guards scope mechanically. Use when asked to 'improve this code until review passes', 'run an improvement loop with <reviewer>', or to iterate review-and-fix with a specific reviewer. For skills prefer the skill-improver entry; for a branch prefer pr-improver.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply seamless infinite marquee loops using duplicated items.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply a prompt-agnostic execution and verification loop to any substantial task while preserving the original request. Use when the user asks to fan out work, use subagents or independent reviewers, loop until done, benchmark against references, apply a harsh critic, compare candidates blind, improve an existing prompt with verification, or continue until explicit quality gates pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate historical SWE-Marathon agent configurations to the shared Codex runtime.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run one unattended IMPLEMENTATION iteration of the autonomous value-creation loop — steward any in-flight PR, fix interrupts (red CI / security / human bugs), or else build ONE queued `idea` issue on a branch off auto-dev and open a PR that squash-merges on green CI. Ideation lives in the next-idea skill; this skill consumes its queue. Use when the user says "次のタスク", "next task", "続きをやって", or wants autonomous progress without specifying what to do.

Run one unattended IDEATION iteration of the quality-assurance loop — find the highest-value untested behavior in the codebase, judge it against the QA value bar, and file ONE locked `qa` issue specifying the test to write. Never writes code or tests; the next-qa skill builds from the queue this skill fills. Use when the user says "QAアイデア", "next qa idea", or wants the QA backlog refilled without implementation.

Run one unattended iteration of the QUALITY-ASSURANCE loop — steward any in-flight QA PR, then build ONE queued `qa` issue (test infrastructure, unit tests, regression tests for known bugs) on a branch off auto-qa and open a PR that squash-merges on green CI. Adds tests and tooling only; never edits product source. Use when the user says "QAタスク", "next qa", "テストを進めて", or wants autonomous progress on the quality track.

Run one unattended IDEATION iteration of the autonomous value-creation loop — invent improvements a user of cc-wf-studio would notice, judge them against the value bar, and file the winners as locked `idea` issues. Never implements anything; the next-task skill builds from the queue this skill fills. Use when the user says "アイデア出して", "next idea", or wants proposals without implementation.

Make a custom AI agent — Python or TypeScript/JavaScript, on a framework or hand-built — report what it did to Failproof AI, and run your own evaluator worker (the "eval pod") that scores those runs. Reach for it on vague phrasing too: "add observability to my agent", "why isn't my agent showing up?", "run an LLM judge on our own infra". Trigger when the user wants to: • plan an integration — which points in the agent loop to record; • instrument — add `failproofai-sdk` (Python) or `@failproofai/sdk` (Node, Bun, Deno, Next.js): turn on an adapter (LangChain/LangGraph, CrewAI, LlamaIndex, Pydantic AI, Vercel AI SDK, Mastra) or wire a hand-built loop; • verify — confirm events are written, or debug an integration that produces nothing; • evaluate — write, deploy or debug an Evaluator worker in Python or TypeScript. NOT for reading telemetry or scores that already landed (that's `fp-cloud-cli`), or deciding what is worth evaluating (that's `failproofai-eval-brainstorm`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep consistency audit of the entire repository — launches 4 parallel specialist agents to find factual errors, code bugs, broken references, count mismatches, and cross-document inconsistencies, then fixes all issues and loops until clean. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants a comprehensive repository-wide check — not a targeted review of a single file. Triggers include: "audit", "deep audit", "find inconsistencies", "check everything", "run a full audit", "are there any broken references", "check the whole repo", "something feels off", "run the audit loop", or after making broad changes across multiple files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn one approved master still into a character's whole animated sprite set - one image-to-video clip per action (idle, walk, run, attack, jump, hurt, cast and so on), all from that still, generated through generate2dmedia route_media.py (the xAI API when a key is configured, else the local Grok CLI) - then gate each take, key it with a soft matte, register it to the master, pick loops or retime actions, finish (HD by default, pixel on request) and package fixed-canvas frames, alpha WebM, packed MP4 for iPhone and a PNG fallback with engine metadata and a JS runtime. Also processes a supplied clip. Use for character and creature animation, fluid motion and any video-to-sprite work. Not for FX, icon or prop sheets (generate2dsprite), maps or plate loops (generate2dmap), code-drawn animation (codeart2d, only on request) or calling a video API by itself (generate2dmedia).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run tasks in a loop until goals are met — use for iterative refinement, polling, or convergence

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate an explicitly activated LoopX Material Lifecycle for a connected project. Use for material-store inventory, lossless migration, candidate/archive transitions, exact-read-backed ranking, ranked-entry rebuilds, bounded Explore intake, owner-gated apply, rollback, and audit. Do not use for ordinary one-off reading or research when the project has not activated Material Lifecycle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Qualify the exact final diff for a LoopX-managed goal. Use when goal policy enables change_quality_qualification, before a non-trivial delivery or merge, and when producing or repairing an exact-scope quality receipt. The workflow is language-neutral, permits at most one policy-authorized safe-fix pass, and never grants merge or repository authority.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterative diagnose-and-fix workflow that repeatedly uses the diagnose skill to find a proven problem, plan the smallest credible improvement, implement it, re-diagnose, and continue until no useful fix remains or user intervention is required. Requires the diagnose skill; selected installs must also install diagnose. Use when asked to keep debugging, fix and verify, iterate until satisfied, improve after diagnosis, or run a diagnosis/fix/verification loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run long or failure-prone Claude Code tasks as bounded, resumable loops with a durable state machine, attempt budget, and verification evidence checkpoint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user is hands-on deploying an in-bundle DOCA service container (Argus, DMS, Firefly, or UROM service) on a BlueField — kubelet standalone watching a static-pod manifests directory, YAML pod-spec drop, kubelet status / ENTRYPOINT logs / per-service liveness, smoke-before-bulk, and the layered error taxonomy (pod-spec, scheduling, image pull, runtime, mount, network, version, host). Trigger even when the user does not say "container deployment" — typical implicit phrasings include "how do I run my built service on the BlueField?", "where do I drop the pod-spec YAML?", "pod stuck in Pending / ImagePullBackOff / CrashLoopBackOff", "container Running but service isn't ready", "pod restart-loops after edit", or "DMS and Firefly together". Refuse and route elsewhere for per-service config schemas, DOCA install, library-API questions, external NVIDIA services (BlueMan, HBN, SNAP, Virtio-net), or full Kubernetes-cluster ops — those belong to other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。