「matrix」の検索結果

Build OncoPrint and co-mutation matrix plots from somatic-variant cohorts using ComplexHeatmap, maftools, and comut.py with alteration-type stacking, sample ordering by mutational burden, mutual-exclusivity overlays, and clinical annotation tracks. Use when visualizing per-sample mutation patterns across recurrent driver genes, comparing alteration classes, or identifying mutually-exclusive / co-occurring driver pairs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build genome-browser-style multi-track figures with pyGenomeTracks (config-driven), Gviz (R), and IGV batch screenshotting. Covers BigWig coverage tracks, BED/peak overlays, gene-model rendering, Hi-C matrix tracks, BedPE link arcs, spike-in-aware normalization, and the bamCoverage --normalizeUsing trap. Use when producing publication figures of genomic loci with stacked aligned tracks (coverage, peaks, genes, interactions) for ChIP-seq, ATAC-seq, RNA-seq, Hi-C, or generic locus visualization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build UpSet plots to visualize set intersections beyond 4 sets (where Venn fails) using ComplexUpset (modern, ggplot2-grammar) or the unmaintained UpSetR, with explicit cardinality vs degree sorting, attribute panels, and query highlighting. Use when comparing overlap across many gene sets, peak sets, variant lists, or any set membership matrix where Venn diagrams become illegible.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query protein-protein and gene interaction databases (STRING, BioGRID, IntAct, SIGNOR, Reactome, HuRI, HuMAP, OmniPath, ConsensusPathDB, DIP). Use when building PPI networks, choosing between physical vs functional vs genetic interactions, signed/directed vs undirected, high-throughput vs curated, picking confidence thresholds, aggregating across resources, or navigating license constraints. Encodes the database decision matrix, STRING v12 channel semantics, OmniPath as meta-database, SIGNOR for signed signaling, and per-resource rate limits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Visualizes ChIP-seq data using deepTools (computeMatrix, plotHeatmap, plotProfile, bamCoverage, bamCompare), pyGenomeTracks (modern INI-driven track plots), Gviz (R browser-style), EnrichedHeatmap (ComplexHeatmap-based), ChIPseeker tag heatmaps, and IGV batch screenshots. Handles bigWig normalization choices (CPM, BPM, RPGC, spike-in scaled), bamCompare operations (log2 ratio, subtract) with SES scaling, k-means clustering of heatmaps for biological subgrouping, and spike-in-scaled tracks for global-shift experiments. Use when generating publication-quality ChIP-seq signal heatmaps, profile plots, genome-browser tracks, or comparing samples visually.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fits structural equation models to GWAS summary statistics using GenomicSEM (Grotzinger 2019), including common-factor models, confirmatory factor models, ESEM, common-factor GWAS with Q_SNP heterogeneity, multivariate Wald tests, and stratified GenomicSEM partitioned heritability. Reconciles results against MTAG multi-trait analysis. Handles sample overlap via the LDSC sampling-covariance matrix, identifies and resolves Heywood cases, and verifies model fit with CFI / RMSEA. Use when modeling latent genetic architecture across correlated traits, running multivariate GWAS on a shared factor, distinguishing factor-mediated from trait-specific SNP effects, or comparing GenomicSEM common-factor results against MTAG when both depend on accurate sampling covariance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep competitive intelligence for any market. Analyzes competitors' products, pricing, customer sentiment, GTM strategy, and growth signals using real web data. Produces battle cards, pricing landscape, and feature matrix. Use when the user wants to understand their competitive landscape, analyze competitors, compare products in a market, or research who they're competing against. Triggers for "who are my competitors", "competitive analysis", "competitor research", "battle cards", "pricing comparison", "competitor pricing", "market players", "competitive intelligence", "competitive landscape", "who else is in this space", "competitive moat", or any request to profile, compare, or map competitors in a category. Works standalone — no prior startup-design session needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Viking Search tuning for specified policy directions. Use this when the user provides specific queries, a type of query, or a business policy direction, and asks to boost, suppress, or fix a class of search results through request-parameter passthrough. You must only perform read-only baseline evaluation and request-level candidate testing; do not modify search scenes, app config, dictionaries, recommend scenes, or primary recall parameters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

E-commerce growth strategy advisor. Diagnoses current business health using unit economics (CAC, LTV, AOV, contribution margin), identifies the highest-impact growth opportunities across 5 levers (traffic, conversion, AOV, retention, expansion), and builds a prioritized 90-day growth roadmap. Uses the Ansoff Matrix adapted for e-commerce to evaluate market penetration, channel expansion, product expansion, and new market entry. Includes multichannel readiness assessment (Amazon, Walmart, TikTok Shop, Etsy, DTC/Shopify/Shopify) and product line expansion analysis. No API key required. Use when: (1) planning next phase of e-commerce growth, (2) deciding whether to expand to new channels or products, (3) diagnosing why growth has stalled, (4) prioritizing what to fix or build next.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automated content creation pipeline for business growth. Creates blog posts, landing pages, email sequences, social media content, and video scripts with a supply-demand topic gate, 5-dimensional quality diagnosis, one-core resonance check, per-sentence information density scoring, 12-signal authenticity audit, headline impact matrix, content substance scoring, and a cheap-format MVP testing ladder. Use when the user needs content marketing, blog posts, email sequences, copywriting, video scripts, or says 'write content', 'blog post', 'email sequence', 'content calendar', 'marketing copy', 'video script', or 'hook'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Walk through a live web app AS a real user to find usability + behavioural bugs that static reviews miss. REQUIRES proof of interaction (typing, clicking, sending, observing) before any verdict — a sweep that didn't interact terminates with verdict 'Incomplete'. Walks threads, exercises every element, runs the multi-pane stress matrix, visual polish sweep, component perfection checklist, automated a11y (axe-core), pragmatic performance budget (LCP/CLS/INP), scenario battery (11 scenarios), and stress recipes including the real-flavour data battery. Hard gates: console errors/warnings = 0, network 5xx = 0, layout collapse = 0, axe Critical/Serious = 0, perf budget green. Audit-the-audit meta-check rejects rushed reports. Each finding has reproduction steps, evidence path, and suspected code location. Trigger with 'ux audit', 'walkthrough', 'qa sweep', 'audit the app', 'dogfood this', 'check all pages', 'find what's broken', 'stress the UI'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SVG generation via DAX measures and extension measures with ImageUrl data category for inline visualizations in PBIR reports, including ready templates for matrix and table cells, new card images and per-button images on the new button slicer. Automatically invoke when the user mentions "SVG visual", "DAX sparkline", "SVG measure", "inline graphics with DAX", "ImageUrl data category", "extension measure", or asks to create any DAX-generated chart (progress bars, bullet charts, KPI indicators, data bars, gauges, donut charts, lollipop charts, dumbbell charts, status pills, overlapping bars, boxplots, IBCS bars, jitter plots, box-and-whisker charts).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create SEO pages at scale using templates and data—including AI-assisted, grounded copy for per-URL differentiation (vs rigid mail-merge templates). Also use when the user mentions "programmatic SEO," "programmatic SEO pages," "template pages," "scale content," "location pages," "city pages," "comparison pages at scale," "X vs Y pages," "integration pages," "pages from data," "automated landing pages," or "programmatic landing pages." Uses a playbook matrix aligned to skills under skills/pages. For user-facing template galleries or marketplaces (browse → use), use template-page-generator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building or debugging Unity gameplay systems: enemy AI that patrols, chases and attacks, NavMesh baking and agents (AI Navigation 2), feet sliding on agents, state machines or behavior trees, physics projectiles that tunnel, the physics spiral, layers and the collision matrix, CharacterController vs Rigidbody characters, object pooling, 'hundreds of enemies', DOTS, Burst or Jobs decisions, Netcode for GameObjects multiplayer, audio mixers, snapshots, volume sliders and 3D combat sounds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MATLAB-style numerical computing, matrix operations, and signal processing

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Annotated data matrix operations for single-cell genomics using AnnData

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has a RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) system and wants to evaluate its quality — separating retrieval issues from generation issues. Also use when the user mentions RAG evaluation, faithfulness checking, hallucination detection in RAG, retrieval quality, chunking optimization, or "is my RAG pipeline working." Outputs a diagnostic matrix that pinpoints whether problems are in retrieval or generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

An end-to-end method for drafting and finalising a complex, multi-pillar regulated fintech agreement — from intake to signature. Authored from a senior fintech lawyer's manual: a licensed payment-services provider engaging a counterparty across agent cash-in/cash-out, QR payments, wallet e-payments, and a marketplace, each with its own regulatory profile. Runs five phases and fourteen steps: regulatory mapping (activity-to-licence matrix, grey-zone classification gates), architecture (framework-plus-sub-agreement structure, ring-fenced marketplace), the regulatory–commercial balance (what flexes vs what cannot), core drafting (authority, float mechanics, hard-coded regulator caps, liability — all tracking control), execution-blocker triage, and a pre-signature check closing open blockers as conditions precedent. It refuses to invent licence-specific values or draft a representation as true without executed evidence. Use it to structure, draft, negotiate, or review any regulated payments contract.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses which of the Art. 50(1)-(5) transparency obligations of the EU AI Act apply to a given AI system's provider or deployer, grounded in the final Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-Generated Content (June 2026) and the Commission's draft Art. 50 Guidelines. Covers AI-chatbot disclosure, deepfake and synthetic-content marking/watermarking, emotion-recognition and biometric-categorisation notices, the machine-readable marking duty, the obviousness exceptions, and the implementation timeline. Outputs a formal mini-report plus a per-obligation compliance checklist with gap flags. For breadth-first tier triage use the EU AI Act System Classifier; for raw Art. 50 text and Q&A use the EU AI Act Knowledge Base; for the full role x tier matrix use the EU AI Act Obligations Mapper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps the full set of legal obligations for the EU AI Act based on role + risk tier, producing an actionable compliance matrix with RACI assignments and implementation priorities. This skill should be used when the user asks to "map AI Act obligations", "check what we need to do under the AI Act", "create a compliance checklist", "check deployer obligations", "assess provider duties", or mentions Art. 26, Art. 16-17, AI literacy Art. 4, DPIA, fundamental rights assessment, or "Pflichtenkatalog" under the AI Act.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes how multiple regulations interact for a specific product, service, or business model. Identifies where obligations overlap, reinforce, complement, duplicate, or conflict; builds a priority matrix; produces an integrated compliance timeline; and estimates the total compliance burden. Use when (1) scoping a new product or service against the full regulatory landscape before launch, (2) conducting M&A due diligence on a target's multi-regulation exposure, (3) building a strategic compliance roadmap where single-regulation analyses miss the interactions, (4) advising on complex situations where regulations touch the same conduct from different angles, or (5) estimating budget and resourcing for multi-regulation compliance. Primary coverage of EU digital regulation (GDPR, Data Act, AI Act, CRA, NIS2, DORA, DMA, DSA, ePrivacy) and national implementations; the framework extends to any jurisdiction where overlapping regulatory regimes apply to the same activity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Falling code glyphs — a techy backdrop. A bold, canvas-based effect from Open Design's html-ppt fx pack — for slides and launch videos. Guards prefers-reduced-motion (does not start). One per screen; on web use sparingly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares two or more band-tagged frameworks and produces a framework-neutral topic matrix showing coverage and gaps across all inputs, plus an optional reference-centric PLC crosswalk document when a reference framework is supplied.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick the right ComfyUI startup flags for VRAM, attention, caching, and speed. The full decision matrix for OOM (--novram / --cache-none / --disable-smart-memory), shared-VRAM creep on Windows (--reserve-vram N), model-switching with big text encoders (--cache-none), high-VRAM throughput (--gpu-only / --highvram), and attention-backend selection (--use-sage-attention for speed, --use-pytorch-cross-attention as the highest-quality / Z-Image-safe fallback). Also the acceleration-stack + Blackwell/RTX 5000 (sm_120) notes. Use when a graph OOMs (especially long video like LTX 2 / WAN), when the GPU spills into shared VRAM and slows to a crawl, when switching between models eats all RAM, when Z-Image produces black/garbled output under Sage, or when deciding which attention backend to launch with. Flag names verified against upstream comfy/cli_args.py; see Sources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。