「mechanism」の検索結果

Use when 用户想根据论文、科研文档、研究文本、图注、开题/答辩材料或具备读图条件的参考图生成可复制的 AI 科研绘图提示词；触发场景包括论文配图、科研绘图、图形摘要、Graphical Abstract、机制图、技术路线图、实验装置图、模型架构图、多面板对比图、汇报总览图、参考图风格迁移、未知领域母版生成，或上传/引用 PDF、Word、LaTeX、Markdown、摘要、方法段、图注、课题说明、研究方案、参考图片。Also use when the user asks for scientific figure prompts, research illustration prompts, graphical abstract prompts, mechanism diagrams, technical roadmaps, experimental setup diagrams, model architecture diagrams, multi-panel scientific figures, paper/conference figures, or AI image prompts based on papers, research documents, abstracts, methods sections, figure captions, proposals, reference images, PDFs, Word docs, LaTeX files, Markdown files, or research plans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when selecting the right Salesforce CPQ pricing model for a product line — the four native Pricing Methods (List, Cost Plus Markup, Block, Percent of Total) and Range vs Slab Discount Schedule types — before any configuration begins. Trigger keywords: CPQ pricing method, SBQQ__PricingMethod__c, Cost Plus Markup, Block Pricing design, Percent of Total design, discount schedule type, Range vs Slab discount, pricing model strategy, which CPQ pricing mechanism to use. NOT for configuring Price Rule objects — use admin/cpq-pricing-rules. NOT for pricing without CPQ — use admin/products-and-pricebooks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or maintaining the role hierarchy as a record-access mechanism. Trigger keywords: role hierarchy, manager cannot see subordinate records, grant access using hierarchies, role reparenting, portal role, how deep should the role hierarchy be, design the role hierarchy. NOT for territory models - use admin/enterprise-territory-management. NOT for rule-based grants - use admin/sharing-rules. NOT for the overall model - use admin/sharing-and-visibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects missing report, block, filter, and contact information mechanisms required for all apps with user-generated content under Guideline 1.2.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adaptive Swift/iOS quiz with two modes. Classic is lighter, Mastery requires mechanism-level reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating high-quality scientific or medical infographic images or prompts, including review figures, disease maps, teaching diagrams, mechanism summaries, classification overviews, timelines, matrices, and academic visual explainers. If the user asks to generate the image, use ChatGPT image generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute comprehensive SQL injection vulnerability assessments on web applications to identify database security flaws, demonstrate exploitation techniques, and validate input sanitization mechanisms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent Skill design knowledge base — mechanisms, philosophy, patterns, pitfalls. Use when: designing new skills, reviewing skill quality, or deciding whether something should be a skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prevents premature exit and infinite loops. Three mechanisms: Completion Promises, Scratchpads, Loop Detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts an Adverse Event Reporting Policy compliant with 21 CFR 312.32 (IND safety reporting), 21 CFR 314.80 (postmarketing), and ICH E2A, with multi-jurisdictional overlays (EMA, PMDA, Health Canada). Covers seriousness/causality frameworks, expedited reporting timelines, roles, documentation standards, training mandates, and QA mechanisms. Use when drafting or updating an adverse event reporting policy, pharmacovigilance policy, AE/SAE reporting SOP, or safety reporting framework for a pharmaceutical company, CRO, biotech, or clinical research institution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent structured debate with anti-groupthink mechanisms — Devil's Advocate, minority opinion protection, 2-round hard cap. Use when divergent perspectives matter more than consensus (architecture decisions, design tradeoffs, contested specifications).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develop, challenge, and document Chisel processor microarchitecture designs before implementation. Use when discussing or writing design documents for processor pipelines, queues, issue logic, rename, ROB, LSU, caches, MSHRs, forwarding, wakeup, replay, flush, privilege, exceptions, or other cycle-accurate hardware mechanisms; when converting design conversations into stable Markdown specifications; or when reviewing a proposed Chisel CPU design for correctness, timing, area, verification cost, and cross-document consistency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolve a verified cluster of Rembric issues from causal root to evidence-gated closure. Use after systemic triage identifies a shared root, or when the user asks to attack issues at the root, create a mechanism map, plan a deletion-first fix, or close a fixed/stale issue cluster. Use `diagnose` for a single defect whose reproduction is not yet established.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive reference for inter-process communication mechanisms -- every way processes can talk on a computer. Covers sockets (TCP, UDP, Unix domain), WebSockets, SSE, pipes (named/anonymous), shared memory (mmap, shm_open), message queues, signals, D-Bus, XPC (macOS), gRPC, REST, stdin/stdout, file-based coordination, and clipboard. Performance benchmarks, platform availability, and code examples for each. Special focus on which IPC works best for AI agent coordination. Activate on: "IPC", "inter-process communication", "process communication", "how do I talk between processes", "Unix socket vs TCP", "shared memory", "named pipe", "WebSocket vs SSE", "gRPC vs REST", "agent coordination IPC", "XPC service", "message passing", "stdout pipe", "D-Bus", "mmap". NOT for: distributed systems design (use distributed-systems), network protocol design (use networking), message queue infrastructure like Kafka (use data-pipeline-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Call germline SNPs and indels with GATK HaplotypeCaller and the GVCF joint-genotyping workflow. Covers the local-reassembly + PairHMM mechanism (why HC beats pileup callers on indels), the -ERC GVCF reference-confidence model and <NON_REF> allele, BQSR-vs-DRAGSTR and --dragen-mode error modeling, allele-specific (AS_) annotations, and edge cases (ploidy, Mutect2 mitochondria mode, sex chromosomes/PAR, contamination gating). Use when deciding whether to use HaplotypeCaller vs a pileup or DRAGEN caller, whether BQSR still earns its place, whether to call per-sample GVCFs for a cohort, or how to handle non-diploid, mitochondrial, sex-chromosome, or contaminated samples. Not for post-calling filtering depth (see variant-calling/filtering-best-practices) or cohort joint-genotyping scaling (see variant-calling/joint-calling).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Corrects the gene-independent copy-number artifact in CRISPR-Cas9 screens (Aguirre 2016 / Munoz 2016 Cancer Discov) where amplified loci appear essential from DNA-damage burden of simultaneous cuts. Covers the gene-independent DNA-damage / G2-arrest mechanism, CRISPRcleanR (Iorio 2018) unsupervised pre-hoc correction, CERES (Meyers 2017) joint CN + gene-effect model, Chronos (Dempster 2021) DepMap-standard population-dynamics + CN model with lowest residual bias, the decision tree by data availability, the Spearman LFC-vs-CN diagnostic, focal-amplification examples (ERBB2 in HER2+, MYC in colorectal, FGFR1 in head and neck), and CRISPRi/a alternatives that bypass the artifact. Use when screening cancer cell lines, diagnosing essentiality at amplified loci, choosing CRISPRcleanR / CERES / Chronos, deciding whether CN correction is needed before MAGeCK / BAGEL2 / drugZ, or switching from Cas9 to CRISPRi.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level battery technology covering electrochemistry, lithium-ion battery physics, battery management systems, degradation mechanisms, and next-generation battery chemistries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level metals engineering covering crystal structure, phase diagrams, strengthening mechanisms, steel metallurgy, aluminum alloys, and failure analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level polymer chemistry knowledge. Use when working with polymerization mechanisms, polymer structure, molecular weight, mechanical properties, thermal analysis, rubber elasticity, polymer processing, or biopolymers. Also use when the user mentions 'polymerization', 'monomer', 'molecular weight', 'glass transition', 'crystallinity', 'elastomer', 'thermoplastic', 'thermoset', 'chain growth', 'step growth', 'living polymerization', or 'polymer blend'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level inorganic chemistry knowledge. Use when working with coordination chemistry, transition metals, crystal field theory, organometallics, main group chemistry, solid state chemistry, acid-base theory, or inorganic reaction mechanisms. Also use when the user mentions 'coordination complex', 'ligand', 'crystal field', 'transition metal', 'oxidation state', 'organometallic', 'Lewis acid', 'VSEPR', 'symmetry', 'point group', 'solid state', or 'catalysis'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze, design, write, revise, translate, and review empirical or technical research papers through an evidence-bounded dialectical workflow. Use when Codex must develop a research question, integrate reference papers with a user's ideas, build phenomenon-mechanism-conditions reasoning, design methods or experiments, restructure or edit a manuscript, translate Chinese academic text into restrained English, answer reviewers, or run multi-round peer-review convergence without fabricating evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Solves complex, open-ended problems using a knockout tournament mechanism. Generates an initial population of diverse candidate answers, pairs them into head-to-head matches, produces a hybrid "child" solution from each pair, and advances the best of the three through a bracket until a winner emerges. Use this skill whenever the user wants to competitively select the best answer from a field of alternatives, asks for a "tournament" or "bracket" style search, wants a faster alternative to full evolutionary search, or uses phrases like: "run a tournament on this", "bracket-style search", "let solutions compete", "knockout search", "find the best answer by elimination", or "which solution wins?". Also trigger when the problem is open-ended and the user wants a clear winner quickly rather than a deep multi-generation refinement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Solves complex, open-ended problems using an evolutionary search mechanism inspired by genetic algorithms. Generates a diverse population of candidate answers, scores them against a rubric, then iteratively applies selection, crossover, and mutation to breed progressively better solutions. Use this skill whenever the user wants to explore a solution space deeply, asks for the "best" answer to a subjective or multi-dimensional problem, wants to evaluate competing approaches and distill the strongest, or uses any of these triggers: "evolutionary search", "genetic algorithm", "evolve an answer", "breed solutions", "population-based search", or phrases like "give me multiple approaches and refine the best one". Also trigger when the problem is complex, open-ended, or has no obvious single correct answer and the user wants a high-quality, well-explored result, not just a quick response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draws an interactive HTML Architecture Viewer for any code flow the user names. Walks through seven research-driven steps (flow, name, repo research, lens colors, evidence flags, lens+mechanism per stop, build) and verifies links, claims, and generated artifacts before delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。