「pta」の検索結果

Refine an existing Agiflow task into an unambiguous, testable specification without expanding its intended outcome. Use when a task is vague, lacks acceptance criteria, has unclear scope or dependencies, or is not ready for backlog grooming.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality gate: verify each acceptance criterion of a completed task/work unit, run quality checks, and create follow-up tasks for gaps. Use before merging or to audit delivered work. Invoked as /agiflow:review-work <work-unit-or-task>. Uses get_work_unit, get_task, update_task, create_task, create_task_comment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute a single Todo task through In Progress to Review, meeting every acceptance criterion with tests and vibe-lint checks. Refuses Planning-status tasks. Invoked as /agiflow:run-task <task>. Uses get_task, update_task, create_task_comment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a large, multi-session goal (e.g. shipping a whole side product) through the full V-model closed loop, one phase at a time, with cross-session state and a final north-star acceptance gate. Ultragoals never downgrade the lane: every phase runs CP-1→CP-6 with adversarial verification. Opt-in: invoke with /ultragoal or by calling something a long-running goal. Ordinary work does not run this.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run one task through the V-model verification loop: CP-2 plan → CP-3 build → CP-3v component verify → CP-4 integration verify (full lane) → CP-5 acceptance. The worker never grades its own homework; evidence rows trace back to AC-n. Opt-in: invoke with /closed-loop or by asking for the closed loop, proper verification, or an evidence trail. Ordinary work does not run this.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when packaging AISTATS code, data, proofs, simulation scripts, notebooks, random seeds, and logs as anonymous supplementary evidence or public post-acceptance artifacts, even when there is no separate artifact badge. Covers what statistically minded AISTATS reviewers inspect first and how to make Monte Carlo studies turnkey.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when packaging code, datasets, prompts, model outputs, or annotation materials for an ACL submission under ACL Rolling Review, covering anonymized supplement archives, scientific-artifact items of the Responsible NLP checklist, licensing and intended-use documentation, data statements, and post-acceptance public release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building the novel integrative framework that an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review must deliver — the theory-advancing "new way of seeing the field" that is the acceptance bar, not a catalog of papers. Designs the spine; it does not gather the literature (amann-literature-synthesis) or appraise evidence balance (amann-evidence-standards).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when drafting an AAMAS rebuttal to preliminary OpenReview reviews, covering the double-blind constraint, the no-new-results and no-revised-paper norms, how to answer game-theory, MARL, and systems reviewers at once, and how to give the area chair a clean acceptance rationale within a short response window.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when packaging AAMAS multiagent code, environments, opponent and population sets, random seeds, game definitions, and logs as anonymous supplementary evidence or a public post-acceptance release, even without a separate artifact badge, so that game-theory and MARL reviewers can inspect and re-run the interaction claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when explaining or planning around AAMAS peer review, covering OpenReview review release, the double-blind rebuttal on preliminary reviews, area-chair discussion, the mixed game-theory, MARL, and systems reviewer pool, the public posting of reviews and decisions, and how acceptance criteria weigh the interaction contribution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decides how to preprocess plasma cfDNA sequencing data so the recoverable signal survives - library-prep-aware fragment expectations (dsDNA vs ssDNA/adaptase prep), UMI/duplex consensus with fgbio (ExtractUmisFromBam, GroupReadsByUmi --strategy paired for duplex, CallMolecularConsensusReads vs CallDuplexConsensusReads, FilterConsensusReads min-reads "total s1 s2"), the align->group->consensus->RE-align ordering, and the cfDNA dedup trap where naive coordinate dedup collapses nucleosome-coincident independent molecules. Covers when single-strand consensus suffices vs when duplex is mandatory, the singleton/sensitivity tax at low input, and reading the insert-size histogram as a pre-analytical QC instrument. Use when processing plasma cfDNA reads before fragmentomics, ctDNA mutation calling, or tumor-fraction estimation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ATAC-seq library quality control -- TSS enrichment, FRiP, fragment-size periodicity, library complexity (NRF/PBC1/PBC2), mitochondrial fraction, and ENCODE 4 thresholds. Use when assessing whether an ATAC-seq library passes ENCODE acceptance criteria, diagnosing transposition artefacts, comparing Omni-ATAC vs standard prep quality, or selecting which replicates to drop before peak calling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing MATLAB functions with arguments blocks — repeating arguments (arguments (Repeating)), .?ClassName property import in constructors, name-value forwarding with namedargs2cell, or migrating from inputParser or validateattributes. Also when reviewing signatures for implicit-conversion pitfalls (size reshaping, class coercion, computed defaults), or when restricting, constraining, or validating function inputs — scalar vs vector enforcement, type rejection, size checking. Also when asked to harden inputs, make a function more robust, tighten input checking, or rewrite for safer input acceptance — even without "validation" or "arguments block" wording. Triggers on: arguments block, mustBe validators, name-value arguments, varargin, inputParser, nargin/narginchk, restrict input, type checking, scalar constraint, harden inputs, defensive programming. Not for: App Designer callbacks, Simulink mask parameters, class inheritance, or runtime validation outside function or property declarations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unified skill for all MATLAB and Simulink report generation tasks. Covers report generation, PDF report, document generation, mlreportgen, Report Generator, template, TitlePage, Chapter, multipage HTML, HTMLPage, html-multipage, custom reporter, customizeReporter, template hole, page header, page border, company style package, branded reporters, buildTemplates, Simulink report, model documentation, slreportgen, block diagram report, model report, subsystem documentation, SystemDiagramFinder, SystemIO, ExecutionOrder, LookupTable, template style, page footer, TemplateSrc, report package, table variants, multiple HTML pages, PDF report generation, Word report, DOM API, FormalTable, BaseTable, Figure, FormalImage, Section.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure iptables, nftables, and cloud firewalls. Implement network segmentation and traffic filtering. Use when securing network perimeters or implementing security zones.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when medium-to-large changes need explicit requirements, technical design, and task planning before implementation, especially for multi-module work, unclear acceptance criteria, or architecture-heavy requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

运维安全规范。当用户执行系统级命令（sysctl、iptables、systemctl、Docker 配置、数据库 DDL） 或进行服务器运维操作时触发。 包含命令风险说明模板、回滚方案要求、问题排查原则、Docker/Cloudflare/数据库场景规则等。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户执行系统级命令（sysctl、iptables、systemctl、Docker 配置、数据库 DDL）或进行服务器运维操作时触发。提供运维安全规范。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when YouTube is or could be relevant — even if not mentioned: pasted video/channel/playlist links, video IDs, @handles, creator lookups, video summaries, quotes, translations, topic research, tutorials, talks, lectures, expert discussions, product reviews, how-to guides, new product announcements, or anything where video content is fresher or richer than text search. Covers transcripts, video/channel search, channel browsing, playlists, and within-channel search. Not for uploads, account management, or written-source-only research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to optimize for mobile-first indexing or fix mobile usability. Also use when the user mentions "mobile-friendly," "mobile-first indexing," "mobile SEO," "responsive design," "mobile adaptation," "mobile viewport," "viewport meta," "touch targets," "font size mobile," "AMP," or "Accelerated Mobile Pages." For viewport meta, use page-metadata.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when structuring Unity 6.3 C# code: ScriptableObject data vs runtime state, events and services, inventory, health, save and load, Input System actions and key rebinding, async with Awaitable, assembly definitions, Enter Play Mode and domain reload, .meta files, Git, Smart Merge and LFS. Also when 'my save works in the Editor but not in the build', statics keep values on the second Play, events fire twice or never, an await runs after its object died, rebinds are lost on relaunch, a renamed class loses its data, a scene merge breaks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Scenario output must be checked and improved rather than accepted first roll: iterating a generation until it matches the brief, fixing a batch that came back off-brief, retrying failed shots methodically, wiring an automated generate, review, revise loop, or deciding whether to re-prompt, swap references, inpaint, post-process, or change model. Keywords: refine, iterate, critique, review loop, QA, self-correction, verify, acceptance criteria, retry, drift.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。