「retro」の検索結果

Reconstructs the development cycle from git history, distills sequential/parallel patterns, and produces actionable insights for improving future iterations. Triggers: recall, retrospective, development analysis, what happened, dev cycle analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a monthly content calendar across channels using the Content Marketing Matrix (Dave Chaffey, Smart Insights) - Entertain/Inspire/Educate/Convince. Every post gets a quadrant label. The monthly calendar must hit 40% Educate, 40% Inspire+Convince, 20% Entertain. Produces a week-by-week posting schedule with topics, formats, channels, and asset links. Use when the user says "content calendar", "social calendar", "plan next month's content", "what should we post", "content plan", "editorial calendar", "schedule posts for the month", or wants a structured posting plan for LinkedIn, Twitter, email, or blog. Reads brand voice, ICP, and past learnings from knowledge/. For writing the individual posts, see linkedin-post, newsletter-writer or content-writer. For the campaign this sits inside, see campaign-brief. For the end-of-month review, see retro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review marketing KPIs and produce an executive summary with insights, anomalies, and recommended actions using the Storytelling with Data framework (Cole Nussbaumer Knaflic). Every review starts with a Big Idea - one sentence capturing the insight, its implication, and why it matters. Use when the user asks for a KPI review, monthly metrics review, marketing dashboard review, "review last month's numbers", quarterly review, performance review, or wants to analyze marketing data. Reads kpis.md and any uploaded data files. For planning a campaign against these numbers, see campaign-brief. For the post-campaign learning loop, see retro. For setting the baseline itself, see brand-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and document a marketing growth experiment. Use when the user says "run a growth experiment", "test this channel", "growth test", "I want to experiment with [channel]", "traction experiment", "acquisition experiment", "let's test if [channel] works for us", "bullseye framework", "which channels should we try", "run a traction test", or wants to systematically test a marketing or acquisition channel before committing budget. For page-level conversion hypotheses, see page-cro. For copy variants to test, see ab-copy-writer. For recording the result, see retro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a marketing campaign end-to-end using Allan Dib's Before/During/After framework (The 1-Page Marketing Plan). Produces a phase-specific campaign brief with goal, audience, message, channels, assets, timeline, budget, and success metrics. Use when the user asks to plan a campaign, brief a campaign, "we need a campaign for X", launch plan, GTM plan, marketing plan for <product>, demand gen plan, or any multi-channel marketing initiative. Reads ICP, services, and KPIs from knowledge/. For a full quarterly strategy rather than one campaign, see marketing-plan scope in positioning-doc and kpi-review. For the content schedule inside the campaign, see social-calendar. For the post-campaign review, see retro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help authors learn from exemplary ICLR, ICML, and NeurIPS papers through source-linked manuscript comparisons, concrete writing and experiment suggestions, and guided reflection. Use for research storytelling, contribution framing, paper comparison, figure planning, or research retrospectives. Not an acceptance predictor or a routine grammar/citation formatter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for security alert triage in Google SecOps. Use when investigating and triaging security alerts, determining false positives vs. true positives, assessing entity risk, adjusting alert severity or priority, and closing or escalating alerts and cases. Don't use for deep multi-hop incident investigations across host timelines (use secops-investigate), proactive threat hunting or retroactive IoC sweeps (use secops-hunt), or authoring new detection rules (use secops-detection-engineering).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for proactive threat hunting in Google SecOps. Use when proactively hunting for threats, retroactively analyzing indicators of compromise (IoCs), performing prevalence searches across enterprise events, hunting for MITRE ATT&CK techniques, or detecting behavioral and statistical outliers using UDM queries. Don't use for incoming alert triage (use secops-triage), active incident response and timeline deep-dives on a known breach (use secops-investigate), or detection rule authoring (use secops-detection-engineering).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, implement, or audit a Change Advisory Board (CAB) process for Salesforce deployments: change classification (standard, normal, emergency), required approvals, deployment gate sequencing, and integration with external ITSM tooling. NOT for scoring how risky one release is - use admin/deployment-risk-assessment. NOT for executing or troubleshooting the deployment itself - use admin/change-management-and-deployment. Also covers: the CAB charter (membership, quorum, decision rights), the CAB decision record artefact and its linter, the change classification matrix, the deployOptions a CAB decision pins (checkOnly, testLevel, rollbackOnError, ignoreWarnings, runTests), the 10-day quick-deploy validity window, the deploy-window vs freeze-register check, and the emergency (ECAB) path with its mandatory retrospective.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, restructure, or review documentation — tutorials, how-to guides, reference pages, concept/explanation docs, API references, READMEs, changelogs, release notes, and troubleshooting guides. Distills documentation craft from Mintlify's guides (compiled from technical writers at Stripe, GitHub, Amplitude, and Anaconda), the Diátaxis framework (including the compass and per-type voice), the Google and Microsoft style guides, Every Page Is Page One, Write the Docs, and Docs for Developers: audience analysis, content-type selection, style and word-level rules, procedure writing, structure for humans and AI agents, code-example standards, page templates (templates.md), mechanical enforcement and llms.txt (mechanics.md), maintenance, and success metrics. Use this skill when the user asks to "write docs", "document this feature", "improve this page", "review these docs", "write a tutorial / how-to / reference page", "structure the docs", "write API documentation", "write a README / changelog", or when authoring any file under a `docs/` tree. For SKMTC docs specifically, this skill governs the *craft* (what makes the page good); the content split between skills, `llms.md`, and the docs tree is governed by `docs/skills/README.md`. Distinct from `skmtc-retro` (captures observations about work) and the `skmtc-*` operational skills (guide doing the work) — this skill guides writing *about* the work for readers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deliberate session retrospective — look back over what you just did, distill the durable, reusable lessons (not session trivia), and write them to the learnings memory namespace, deduped against what is already stored. Use at the END of a meaningful chunk of work to capture high-signal lessons worth keeping long-term. The curated counterpart to moflo's passive session-continuity capture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Project plan ครบ — WBS, Gantt, sprint, retrospective, RAID log, stakeholder communication

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI Agile/Scrum Coach — sprint ceremony, velocity tracking, retrospective, team coaching รองรับทีม dev + non-dev

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrospective learning from a completed experience. Takes a project, incident, decision that played out, or time period; gathers ground truth (observations) separately from recollections; spawns reflectors applying different lenses (what-worked-vs-got-lucky, what-didn't, what-surprised, system-rewards-vs-intent, decisions-that-aged, what-to-tell-past-self, patterns-that-recur) in isolation; synthesizes into updated mental models as first-class output. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

把素材 / 提纲 / 要点做成点击驱动的 16:9 HTML 幻灯片（slides / 演示文稿），用于现场放映或投屏 —— 不是视频，没有口播稿 / 音频合成 / 录屏。流程：原始素材 → 产出 outline 开发计划（章节切分 + 每步屏幕内容 + 可选每步演讲备注 + 信息池）→ 用户**一次对齐** 4 件事（outline / 主题 / 素材 / 开发模式）→ 网页开发（逐章 / 顺序 / 并行）。每次点击推进一个逻辑节拍，每一步独占整屏；进度条平时隐藏只在悬浮时出现；**按 P 开独立的演讲者窗口（口播稿 + 实时预览 + 计时器，与主窗口联动；投屏只共享主 slide 窗口即可对观众隐藏口播稿），按 N 是排练用的备注浮层**。内置 24 套主题 token + 反 AI 味设计方法论（内容驱动动画、逐步揭示、电影感留白）。适用场景：技术分享 / keynote / 产品演示 / pitch deck / 教学课件 / **面试项目复盘（project retro）** / 把文章或笔记变成可交互讲解。本 Skill 沉淀的是设计方法论 + 协作流程，不绑定任何特定样式 / 字体 / 颜色，可复用到任意主题与美学。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when running an autonomous multi-hour build of a green-field product — orchestrates planner → contract → generator ⇄ evaluator loop with adaptive scaffolding density per model tier. Triggers on /mk:autobuild, "build me a kanban app", "build a retro game maker", "autonomous build", or any green-field product spec. NOT for scoped single-task work (see mk:cook); NOT for initial project scaffolding only (see mk:bootstrap).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick a visual direction before generating any creative. Produces 3-6 named, distinct visual directions (e.g. premium minimal, bold maximalist, lifestyle/editorial, retro, techno-brutalist) with rationale + sample prompts, then generates one reference image per direction so the user can choose. Use when the user says "explore visual direction", "what style should this be", "give me directions/looks", or before ads/scene/shot work when no style is locked. Part of the Creative Production set.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design decisions for when and what sounds to use in web apps, mobile apps, and desktop native apps — plus how to create them with AI. Covers UI sound vocabulary (confirms, alerts, transitions, errors), platform conventions (iOS, macOS, Material), creating sounds with AI tools (ElevenLabs, AudioCraft, Stable Audio), Web Audio API for procedural sounds, haptic-audio pairing, and the psychology of satisfying vs. annoying UI sounds. Activate on 'app sounds', 'UI sounds', 'notification sound', 'sound design app', 'earcons', 'sonic branding', 'interaction sounds', 'feedback sounds', 'app audio', 'satisfying sounds'. NOT for professional audio engineering (use sound-engineer), Windows 3.1 retro sounds specifically (use win31-audio-design), music composition (use sound-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns past decisions into calibrated judgment - scoring old predictions against what happened, assigning credit for delayed results, and separating a bad decision from a good decision that lost. Use during a retrospective, postmortem, quarterly or monthly review, when reviewing decisions taken 30+ days ago, when attributing a result to a cause, or when someone claims to have called something.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when constructing the finance-side forecast — top-down vs bottom-up shape, confidence bands, retro-loop. Triggers on 'build the forecast model', 'reconcile top-down with bottom-up'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when constructing the forecast call — commit / best-case / pipeline categorisation, deal-level evidence test, accuracy retro-loop. Triggers on 'build the forecast', 'why does our commit miss'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

At the end of a long working session, produce a counterfactual trace note — a backward walk through the session that identifies the small number of load-bearing moments (observations, failures, accidents, decisions) without which the final outcome would not exist. Use this whenever the user asks to "close the session", "run the butterfly", "trace back", "what actually mattered here", asks for a session retrospective, or asks how the session arrived at its result. Also use it when a session ends with a significant outcome (a fix, a design decision, a shipped artifact) and the user wants a note capturing why it happened, not just what happened. Do NOT use for simple summaries of short sessions — this skill is for causal tracing, and it only earns its cost when the session was long enough to contain real forks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent Media OS, the single skill for every media need in a HyperFrames project. Resolve BGM, SFX, image, icon, brand logo, voice, color grade, or LUT into a frozen local file or paste-ready block + ledger record (one verb, `resolve`); generate via TTS / music / image models when the catalog misses; produce voiceover, transcription, captions, and background removal through one shared audio engine; operate on media (cut / reframe / transform); and reuse assets across projects. Also use for vague feedback that real footage looks dark, flat, boring, should feel retro/camcorder/print/ASCII, needs privacy, or needs a media reveal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codex adapter for Garry Tan's full gstack methodology across CEO/product pressure, CTO architecture, design, engineering, QA, security, shipping, documentation, and retrospectives. Use when the 总控/CEO or 架构/CTO role needs gstack method routing, implementation-plan hardening, or the user says gstack should help a role.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。