「review loop」の検索結果

Design critique with 7 rated passes: Information Architecture, Interaction State Coverage, User Journey and Emotional Arc, AI Slop Risk (10-item blacklist), Design System Alignment, Responsive and Accessibility, Unresolved Decisions. Each rated 0-10 with gap-fill loop. Parallel cross-model design voices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarially stress-tests a legal text — a contract, statute, regulation, or judicial opinion — for interpretive ambiguity: it finds the seams where the people governed by it will later disagree about what it means and turns each into a concrete dispute scenario with both sides' arguments, the likely outcome, and a fix. Use it whenever someone wants to pressure-test, red-team, audit, or find weak spots, loopholes, gaps, ambiguities, or drafting problems in a legal document; whenever a drafter wants to tighten a contract, statute, regulation, or opinion before it issues; whenever a litigator wants to mine an opinion or contract for arguments; or whenever someone hands over a legal text and asks where it will be fought over or for issue-spotting. Trigger it for contract review, statutory-ambiguity analysis, judicial-opinion scope analysis, and drafting QA — even if the user never says "stress-test" or "ambiguity."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Close the post-launch loop — turn a live app's App Store signals (reviews, analytics, sales, crashes, listing conversion) into a metric-tagged backlog for the next version, AND verify whether last cycle's changes moved the metric they promised to move. Read-only on App Store Connect; every change is surfaced and routed to another command, never auto-applied. Use before planning the next version, on a monthly cadence, or ~1-2 weeks after shipping to check if a change worked.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One sentence that describes WHEN to invoke this skill. Write it as a trigger phrase, not a summary — include the words a user would say ("fix bug", "add feature", "review diff"). The agent routes on this field.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calibrate a reviewer persona with few-shot rubric examples so skepticism stays consistent and doesn't drift lenient over long runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a PR description a reviewer can approve fast. Use when opening any pull request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-first development — surround the implementation with an executable spec and a gauntlet of constraints (tests, types, coverage, mutation) so line-by-line review becomes optional. Use when the user explicitly asks for high-assurance or evidence-first work ("reliable", "TDD", "prove it works", "I won't read the code"), or when the change touches high-stakes domains (money, auth, data loss, concurrency, public API). For routine changes where the user just wants normal tests, write good tests directly instead of invoking this loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Step 2 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Execute the visualization plan from outline.json — render plots and conceptual diagrams from experimental_log.md and idea.md, optionally refine via VLM critique loop, and produce context-aware captions. Runs in parallel with the literature-review-agent. TRIGGER when the orchestrator delegates Step 2 or when the user asks to "generate the figures for my paper" or "render the plots from this experiment log".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deliver implementation PRs across Avibe, avibe-backend, avibe-docs, avault, and vault-sandbox. Required for branch and scope discipline, Codex review, CI, circuit breaking, and user-facing close-out, regardless of agent backend.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dung khi muon bien cach team dung AI thanh mot he thong van hanh — Brand Hub lam nguon su that, chia project theo vai tro, skill chain, data loop, nhip review, va bien an toan cho automation gom phan tang hanh dong, tran chi tieu va kill switch. Kich hoat khi user nhac 'AI marketing OS', 'he thong AI marketing', 'Brand Hub', 'setup Claude Project cho team', 'SOP AI team', 'AI moi nguoi dung mot kieu', 'automation marketing co an toan khong'. Khong dung cho — chi can mot output don le thi dung skill tuong ung nhu 00-ke-hoach-mkt hoac 05-copy-quang-cao; setup do luong thi dung skill 53-tracking-setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a team wants to design, audit, or operate an AI Marketing OS — a Brand Hub source of truth, role-based AI projects for leader, content, design, performance, and knowledge, skill chains, ChatGPT plus Claude plus NotebookLM workflows, MCP connectors, a Notion or Drive second brain, ads data loops, SOPs, weekly reviews, and handoffs. Trigger on 'AI marketing OS', 'set up our marketing AI system', 'Brand Hub', 'AI workflow for the team', 'MCP for ads data', 'how do I make AI actually useful for marketing'. Not for — one campaign brief, see `02-campaign-brief-global`; the weekly report, see `07-marketing-report-global`; the brand visual rules, see `46-brand-guideline-global`; the product context file, see `product-marketing-context-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after /gsd-verify-work passes, when the work should become a PR. Pushes the branch, creates the PR with an auto-generated body, optionally triggers review, and tracks the merge, closing the plan-execute-verify-ship loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the HyperFrames CLI development loop: init, add, catalog, capture, lint, check, snapshot, compare, grade-compare, preview, play, present, beats, keyframes, single or batch render, publish, cloud, cloudrun, feedback, lambda, doctor, browser, info, upgrade, skills, compositions, docs, benchmark, telemetry, transcribe, auth, tts, and remove-background. Also use when diagnosing build or render failures. validate, inspect, and layout are deprecated aliases; use check. Covers local, HeyGen-hosted cloud, AWS Lambda, and Google Cloud Run rendering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix Elixir/Phoenix code until Codex CLI review comes back clean; Use when codex is installed and you want an external…

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verification loop for Spring Boot projects: build, static analysis, tests with coverage, security scans, and diff review before release or PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive verification system covering build, types, lint, tests, security, and diff review before a PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a high-confidence, CONCISE implementation / architecture / strategy PLAN that follows the OMC plan system end to end. It first runs OMC's real requirements interview (auto-chains the `omc-plan` skill: one question at a time, explore-first, Analyst consult) to produce an initial plan in `.omc/plans/`, then DEEPENS that plan with a 3-round ITERATIVE fusion loop — each round an Opus 4.8 panelist (Agent subagent) and a GPT-5.5 panelist (via codex) critique/improve it IN PARALLEL and BLIND, then Opus 4.8 (the orchestrator) judges and synthesizes one tighter plan that seeds the next round, stopping early on convergence. Writes the final dense plan back to the same `.omc/plans/<slug>.md`, then offers the OMC handoff (`/omc-plan --review` → `/team` or `/ralph`). Use for high-stakes planning, architecture decisions, strategy calls, and hard debugging — especially when the user runs /plan or asks how to approach a non-trivial build. Reuses the `fusion` skill's run_codex.sh + judge rubric. NOT for trivial tasks (single pass is enough).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to refactor Java code to adopt modern Java features (Java 8+) — including migrating anonymous classes to lambdas, replacing Iterator loops with Stream API, adopting Optional for null safety, switching from legacy Date/Calendar to java.time, using collection factory methods, applying text blocks, var inference, or leveraging Java 25 features like flexible constructor bodies and module import declarations. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for modern Java development; Apply best practices for modern Java development in Java code; Modernize Java code with records pattern matching or switch expressions; Replace legacy idioms with modern Java features; Adopt Java 8+ language features safely. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sets up how you and your team build and work with AI agents, and produces an Agent Workflow Charter (agent lanes, plan-mode loop, autonomy ladder with promotion criteria, rules file, review policy, security rules, rollout plan). Use when you ask 'how should we work with Claude Code / Codex / Cursor', 'how many agents should I run', 'should the agent be autonomous', 'plan mode', 'CLAUDE.md', 'AI-native team', 'roll out AI to my team', or 'my agent keeps screwing up'. Draws on 110 Lenny's Podcast guests incl. Claire Vo, Boris Cherny and Aishwarya Naresh Reganti.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

4-phase execution loop for work units - IMPLEMENT, VALIDATE, ADVERSARIAL REVIEW, COMMIT

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing delays that must survive process restarts (e.g., 24-hour cart abandonment, scheduled follow-ups), waiting for human approval or external events with timeouts (review gates, webhook callbacks, async API completion), polling external services without losing state on crashes, calling other functions and awaiting their results, memoizing expensive operations so they don't re-run on retry, or running async work in parallel inside a workflow. Covers Inngest step methods: step.run, step.sleep, step.waitForEvent, step.waitForSignal, step.sendEvent, step.invoke, step.ai, plus patterns for loops and parallel execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a codebase for LLM calls that are really classifications in disguise, then produce a costed swap plan for a System One model. Use when asked to cut AI inference cost or latency, when scoping a performance engagement for a client, when reviewing an agent loop that feels slow, or when asked "where could we use Jev here". Produces a ranked table of candidates with measured latency and dollar deltas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove signs of AI-generated writing from prose, and keep it out of a repo. Use when drafting, editing, or reviewing text to make it sound natural and human, or when auditing a whole docs folder for AI slop. Detects 41 patterns across content, language, style, communication, filler, and rhetoric, including: significance inflation, promotional language, -ing tails, vague attributions, AI vocabulary, copula avoidance, negative parallelisms, false agency, em dash overuse, chatbot artifacts, hedging stacks, staccato drama, and aphorism formulas. Includes voice calibration, a no-fabrication rule, statistical tells, and a draft -> audit -> final rewrite loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when scanning code for security vulnerabilities. Use when user says "scan security", "kiểm tra bảo mật", "security audit", "review security", or invokes `/vbs-scan-security`. Auto-delegates to sub-agents for large scans (>20 main-language files OR >30 total OR >14 days). Outputs bilingual reports (vi/en). Optional `--auto-fix` (agentic patch + verify loop) and `--sca` (live CVE lookup via OSV.dev).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。