「rsa」の検索結果

Use this skill when building custom channel integrations with the Agentforce Agent API or BYOC (Bring Your Own Channel) for CCaaS — covering session lifecycle management, webhook handling, externalSessionKey design, sequenceId sequencing, BYOC Interaction API integration, and conversation state management. NOT for standing up a standard channel (Embedded Service, Slack, Experience Cloud, Messaging) — use agentforce/agent-channel-deployment. NOT for writing the Apex actions the agent invokes — use agentforce/custom-agent-actions-apex.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial project planning workflow. Explores the problem space, drafts tickets in batches, then runs sequential adversarial loops — a mandatory UX loop ("should we build this?"), zero or more discretionary specialist loops (security, performance) for projects with architectural implications in those domains, and a mandatory implementer loop ("could we build this?") — to find gaps before implementation. Creates well-specified, batch-tagged tickets upstream only after every applicable loop signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adversarially reviewing a document that makes formal or technical claims — math derivations, physics papers, statistical analyses, benchmark reports, whitepapers. Inventories every equation and quantitative claim, verifies each AS NAMED in the text (never a paraphrase or a neighboring statement), and classifies VERIFIED / REFUTED / UNVERIFIABLE / VACUOUS. Triggers on "check this paper", "verify these claims", "is this derivation right", "review this proof", "audit this benchmark", "does the math hold up". For source-code review see code-review-and-quality; for skill/agent library audits see skill-library-review; for content quality scoring see content-ops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scientific research engine for hypothesis testing, literature gap analysis, experimental validation, and data-driven discovery. Enforces adversarial review (Reviewer 2), 32 quality gates, tree search over hypotheses, confounder harness for quantitative claims, and serendipity detection. TRIGGER when: user asks to analyze scientific data, test hypotheses, validate findings, search for research gaps, design experiments, or investigate results. DO NOT TRIGGER when: pure code review, documentation writing, devops tasks, general conversation, or non-scientific data transformation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial implementation review based on Block's g3 dialectical autocoding research. Use when validating implementation completeness against requirements with fresh objectivity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies rigorous adversarial analysis to generate, critique, fix, and consolidate solutions for any problem (technical or non-technical). Use when facing complex problems requiring thorough analysis, multiple solution approaches, and validation of proposed fixes before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive QA session where user reports bugs or issues conversationally, and the agent files GitHub issues. Explores the codebase in the background for context and domain language. Use when user wants to report bugs, do QA, file issues conversationally, or mentions "QA session".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Navigate difficult conversations and deliver constructive feedback using structured frameworks. Covers the Preparation-Delivery-Follow-up model and Situation-Behavior-Impact (SBI) feedback technique. Use when preparing for difficult conversations, giving feedback, or managing conflicts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured approach to workplace conflicts, performance discussions, and challenging feedback using preparation-delivery-followup framework. Use when preparing for tough conversations, addressing conflicts, giving critical feedback, or navigating sensitive workplace discussions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Persistent memory systems for LLM conversations including short-term, long-term, and entity-based memory

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts adversary proceeding complaints for U.S. Bankruptcy Court under FRBP Rule 7001. Covers dischargeability disputes (§ 523), preference actions (§ 547), fraudulent transfers (§ 548), and stay violations (§ 362). Produces a filing-ready pleading with caption, jurisdictional basis, numbered allegations, count structure, and prayer for relief. Triggers when a trustee, creditor, or party in interest needs to initiate litigation within an existing bankruptcy case.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial code review using attacker mindset — trust boundary, attack surface, business logic, and defense evaluation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial dialectic tool inspired by GAN. Alternates between Generator (creative advocate) and Discriminator (adversarial critic). Supports forced role selection (g/d), intensity modes (hard/soft), and multi-language output. Use for stress-testing ideas, business plans, code, and spec designs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate and save a session summary before ending conversation. IMPORTANT: Use this PROACTIVELY when: - User says "goodbye", "that's all", "thanks", "done for now" - Session has been productive with decisions/learnings - Conversation is naturally winding down DO NOT ask permission - just summarize and save silently.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Data structures and algorithms for AI agent episodic memory. Covers vector stores (HNSW, IVF, PQ), temporal indexing, knowledge graphs with triple stores, hierarchical summarization, forgetting curves, working/long-term/ procedural memory, and memory consolidation. Deep analysis of MemGPT/Letta, Zep/Graphiti, Mem0, and the Stanford generative agents memory architecture. Teaches the CS fundamentals behind how agents remember, retrieve, and forget. Activate on: "agent memory", "episodic memory", "vector search algorithm", "HNSW", "memory retrieval", "forgetting curve", "knowledge graph memory", "MemGPT", "Letta", "Zep", "Mem0", "memory consolidation", "temporal retrieval", "agent long-term memory", "memory layer". NOT for: conversation protocol design (use agent-conversation-protocols), agent infrastructure selection (use agentic-infrastructure-2026), building RAG pipelines (use ai-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Meta-skill that orchestrates the discourse skill suite: routes between steel-man-argument, socratic-questioning, toulmin-argument-analysis, logical-fallacy-detector, bad-faith-rhetoric-detector, discourse-elision-analyzer, forensic-speech-structure, and productive-discourse-facilitator. Use when analyzing conversations, facilitating discourse, or operating as a dialogue copilot. Maintains mode (silent analysis, coaching overlay, active facilitator) and decides which skills to invoke based on conversation dynamics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert bot developer specializing in Discord, Telegram, Slack automation with deep knowledge of rate limiting, state machines, event sourcing, moderation systems, and conversational AI integration. Activate on 'Discord bot', 'Telegram bot', 'Slack bot', 'chat automation', 'moderation system'. NOT for web APIs (use backend-architect), general automation scripts (use python-pro), or frontend chat widgets (use frontend-developer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infers person-to-person transmission from pathogen genomes using outbreaker2, TransPhylo, phybreak, BadTrIP, SCOTTI, BEASTLIER, and SNP-distance / cluster-picker approaches (HIV-TRACE for HIV; transcluster). Defines outbreak clusters using pathogen-specific SNP thresholds (NOT a universal cutoff -- TB <=12 SNPs; MRSA <=15; C. difficile <=2; Klebsiella <=21), models within-host diversity and transmission bottlenecks, integrates contact-tracing data, distinguishes generation from serial interval, and attributes source via Bayesian source attribution (islandR). Use when investigating outbreaks for who-infected-whom, defining SNP-cluster outbreak definitions, accounting for unsampled intermediates, choosing between outbreaker2 (rich epi data) and TransPhylo (genomic-only after a dated phylogeny), running source attribution between host populations, calling HIV-TRACE thresholds appropriate to the local subtype, or distinguishing recent transmission from reactivation in TB or chronic HIV.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture what someone actually said without contaminating it with your own inference. Invoke when eliciting intent in conversation (design discussion, requirement interview, decision surfacing) and when turning a conversation into a durable record (ADR, decision node, memory entry, spec `## Decisions` row). Enforces quote-before-critique, keeps illustration separate from commitment, and holds interpretation subordinate to verbatim. Prevents the failure where unspecified space is filled by the recorder and then evaluated as if the speaker had specified it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive QA session where user reports bugs or issues conversationally, and the agent files GitHub issues. Explores the codebase in the background for context and domain language. Use when user wants to report bugs, do QA, file issues conversationally, or mentions "QA session".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Save durable decisions, findings, plans, and implementation knowledge from the visible Codex conversation into a new or existing NeatContext context. Use only when the user explicitly invokes this skill or asks to preserve the current conversation as reusable context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Save durable decisions, findings, plans, and implementation knowledge from the visible Kimi Code conversation into a new or existing NeatContext context. Use only when the user explicitly invokes this skill or asks to preserve the current conversation as reusable context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Save durable decisions, findings, plans, and implementation knowledge from the visible pi conversation into a new or existing NeatContext context. Use only when the user explicitly asks to preserve the current conversation as reusable context, or runs /neatcontext-save.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。